Maternal and foetal placental vascular malperfusion in pregnancies with anti-phospholipid antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the rates of pathological placental lesions among pregnant subjects positive for aPL antibodies. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal case-control study including 27 subjects with primary APS, 51 with non-criteria APS, 24 with aPL antibodies associated with other well-known CTDs enrolled at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy and 107 healthy controls. RESULTS: Compared with controls and after correction for multiple comparisons, primary, non-criteria APS and aPL associated to CTD, subjects had lower placental weight, volume and area. After penalized logistic regression analysis to correct for potential confounders, placental lesions suggesting severe maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) were more common among primary [odds ratio (OR) 11.7 (95% CI 1.3, 108)] and non-criteria APS [OR 8.5 (95% CI 1.6, 45.9)] compared with controls. The risk of foetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) was higher in primary APS [OR 4.5 (95% CI 1.2, 16.4)], aPL associated with CTDs [OR 3.1 (95% CI 1.5, 6.7)] and non-criteria APS [OR 5.9 (95% CI 1.7, 20.1)] compared with controls. Among clinical and laboratory criteria of APS, first trimester aCL IgG >40 UI/ml [OR 4.4 (95% CI 1.3, 14.4)], LA positivity [OR 6.5 (95% CI 1.3, 33.3)] and a history of pre-eclampsia at <34 weeks [OR 32.4 (95% CI 6.5, 161)] were the best independent first trimester predictors of severe MVM [area under the curve 0.74 (95% CI 0.6, 0.87)]. CONCLUSION: Compared with healthy controls, pregnant subjects with aPL antibodies have an increased risk of placental lesions, suggesting MVM and FVM. First-trimester variables such as aCL IgG >40 UI/ml and a history of pre-eclampsia were significant predictors of both severe MVM and FVM.

Antiphospholipid antibody-activated NETs exacerbate trophoblast and endothelial cell injury in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

Despite the widespread use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants, women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) may face pregnancy complications associated with placental dysplasia. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are involved in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases, including vascular APS; however, their role in obstetric APS is unclear. Herein, we investigated the role of NETs by quantifying cell-free DNA and NET marker levels. Live-cell imaging was used to visualize NET formation, and MAPK signalling pathway proteins were analysed. Cell migration, invasion and tube formation assays were performed to observe the effects of NETs on trophoblasts and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The concentrations of cell-free DNA and NETs in sera of pregnant patients with APS were elevated compared with that of healthy controls (HCs) matched to gestational week. APS neutrophils were predisposed to spontaneous NET release and IgG purified from the patients (APS-IgG) induced neutrophils from HCs to release NETs. Additionally, APS-IgG NET induction was abolished with inhibitors of reactive oxygen species, AKT, p38 MAPK and ERK1/2. Moreover, NETs were detrimental to trophoblasts and HUVECs. In summary, APS-IgG-induced NET formation deserves further investigation as a potential novel therapeutic target in obstetrical APS.

Management of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome, also known as 'Hughes Syndrome', is an autoimmune disease characterised by a set of clinical manifestations, almost all of which are direct or indirect sequelae of a hypercoagulable state involving the venous, and to a lesser extent the arterial vasculature. The incidence and prevalence of antiphospholipid syndrome are estimated at approximately 5 de novo cases per 100 000 per year and 40-50 cases per 100 000 individuals, respectively. The clinical spectrum of antiphospholipid syndrome involves haematological (thrombocytopaenia, venous thrombosis), obstetrical (recurrent pregnancy loss), neurological (stroke, transient ischaemic attack, migraine, seizures, cognitive dysfunction, chorea, transverse myelitis, multiple sclerosis), cardiovascular (cardiac valve disease), dermatological (livedo reticularis and racemosa, skin ulceration and necrosis), renal (glomerulonephritis, renal thrombotic microangiopathy) and orthopaedic (avascular necrosis of bones, non-traumatic fractures) manifestations, among others. In addition to the classical antiphospholipid antibodies, namely anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant, new autoantibodies and antibody complexes of different immunoglobulin subtypes (IgA, IgG, IgM) are now recognised as significant contributors to the pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome. Anticoagulation remains the cornerstone in the management of antiphospholipid syndrome; nevertheless, new drugs and therapeutic strategies are being tested, and some have been found effective for the primary and secondary thromboprophylaxis in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Update on Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Ten Topics in 2017.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on new clinical aspects of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in the last 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathogenesis of APS is related to endothelial activation by mechanisms other than autoantibody-mediated massive coagulation. These include Toll-like receptors, the m-TORC pathway, and neutrophil activation, inducing an uncontrolled inflammatory cascade. Given these new pathogenetic hypotheses, the treatment of APS could be directed towards a fine balance between anticoagulation and immunomodulation. A hot topic is how to consider asymptomatic antiphospholipid (aPL) carriers, with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), during pregnancy, or during their life in general: to treat or not to treat? New findings on long-standing APS, regarding survival, comorbidities, and evolution in other autoimmune conditions, have become available, including new insights into aPL as potential risk factors for damage accrual in SLE and potential implications on neuropsychological involvement of children exposed to maternal aPL in utero. This review summarizes recent findings on the management, treatment, and prevention of patients affected by APS or with aPL.

Pregnancy and Management in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Management of women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) during pregnancy presents unique clinical challenges. Women with both RA and SLE can have disease flares during pregnancy, leading to pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age infants, and preterm delivery. Disease should be under control prior to conception. Women with obstetric APS need to be anticoagulated during pregnancy. Many but not all antirheumatic medications can be used during pregnancy and lactation.

Long Term Follow up of Patients With Primary Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Introduction: Primary obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS) is defined by specific morbidities and/or losses of pregnancy in the presence of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). This variant of APS is usually treated during pregnancy and the post-partum period. Data on occurrence of thrombotic event during long term follow-up of OAPS patients is limited. Methods: A multi-centre retrospectively cohort of female patients with primary APS (pAPS) was assembled during 2004-2019. Patients were grouped according to disease presentation as pure OAPS or thrombotic APS (tAPS) for those presenting with thrombosis. Clinical and serological data were compared between groups. Results: Of 219 pAPS female patients 67 (30.6%) were diagnosed with OAPS and 152 (69.4%) with tAPS. During >10 years of follow-up 24/67 (35.8%) OAPS and 71/152 (50%) tAPS suffered a new thrombotic event (p = 0.06), while obstetric morbidity was more likely in the OAPS group (31.3 vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001) respectively. Among patients with OAPS at presentation heart valve disease and the presence of ANA were related to thrombosis following diagnosis (25 vs. 4.7%, p = 0.02; and 45.8 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.04 respectively). Conclusion: Thrombotic event following diagnosis were common among female patients with pAPS regardless of disease presentation. Heart valve disease and ANA positivity may be risk factors for thrombosis during follow-up of patients presenting with pure OAPS.

Pregnancy and Management in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Management of women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) during pregnancy presents unique clinical challenges. Women with both RA and SLE can have disease flares during pregnancy, leading to pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age infants, and preterm delivery. Disease should be under control prior to conception. Women with obstetric APS need to be anticoagulated during pregnancy. Many but not all antirheumatic medications can be used during pregnancy and lactation.

The impact of hydroxychloroquine on obstetric outcomes in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The use of low-dose aspirin (LDA) and heparin has improved pregnancy outcomes in women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, 20-30% still have adverse outcomes despite treatment. Recent retrospective studies showed a beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in APS due to its anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and antithrombotic properties. Data in refractory obstetric APS (OAPS) remain scarce and include heterogeneous populations with various concomitant treatments. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the impact on the obstetric outcomes of adding HCQ to classical treatments for women with refractory primary obstetric APS. METHODS: In a retrospective single-centre cohort study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in women with refractory primary OAPS (2004-2019) who received two different treatments in subsequent pregnancies. Group A received 400 mg HCQ + 60 mg enoxaparin + LDA, while Group B received 60 mg enoxaparin + LDA. The main outcome was live birth rates, while pregnancy complications (early and late pregnancy losses and placental-mediated complications) were the secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 101 pregnancies in 87 refractory primary OAPS patients were included. The rate of live-born babies in Group A (HCQ) was 97.1% (67/69) vs. 62.5% (20/32) in Group B (RR: 1.55 [95% CI, 1.19-2.1]; p < 0.001). Pregnancy complications in Group A were 8.7% (6/69) vs. 37.5% (12/32) in Group B (RR 0.22 [95% CI, 0.15-0.30]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Hydroxychloroquine was associated with a higher rate of live births and a lower prevalence of pregnancy complications in refractory primary obstetric APS. The addition of HCQ to classical treatment may present a promising approach that needs to be confirmed with prospective studies.

Recommendations of the Spanish Rheumatology Society for Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Part I: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment. / Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología sobre síndrome antifosfolípido primario. Parte I: Diagnóstico, evaluación y tratamiento.

OBJECTIVE: The difficulty in diagnosis and the spectrum of clinical manifestations that can determine the choice of treatment for primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has fostered the development of recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER), based on the best possible evidence. These recommendations can serve as a reference for rheumatologists and other specialists involved in the management of APS. METHODS: A panel of four rheumatologists, a gynaecologist and a haematologist with expertise in APS was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call or based on professional merits. The stages of the work were: identification of the key areas for drafting the document, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN] levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and formal assessment or reasoned judgement techniques (consensus techniques). RESULTS: 46 recommendations were drawn up, addressing five main areas: diagnosis and evaluation, measurement of primary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for APS or secondary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for obstetric APS and special situations. These recommendations also include the role of novel oral anticoagulants, the problem of recurrences or the key risk factors identified in these subjects. This document reflects the first 21, referring to the areas of: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of primary APS. The document provides a table of recommendations and treatment algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: An update of the SER recommendations on APS is presented. This document corresponds to partI, related to diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. These recommendations are considered tools for decision-making for clinicians, taking into consideration both the decision of the physician experienced in APS and the patient. A partII has also been prepared, which addresses aspects related to obstetric SAF and special situations.

Recommendations of the Spanish Rheumatology Society for Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Part II: Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Special Situations. / Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología sobre síndrome antifosfolípido primario. Parte II: síndrome antifosfolípido obstétrico y situaciones especiales.

OBJECTIVE: The difficulty in diagnosis and the spectrum of clinical manifestations that can determine the choice of treatment for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has fostered the development of recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER), based on the best possible evidence. These recommendations can serve as a reference for rheumatologists and other specialists involved in the management of APS. METHODS: A panel of 4rheumatologists, a gynaecologist and a haematologist with expertise in APS was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call or based on professional merits. The stages of the work were: identification of the key areas for the document elaboration, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, SIGN levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and formal assessment or reasoned judgement techniques (consensus techniques). RESULTS: Forty-six recommendations were drawn up, addressing 5main areas: diagnosis and evaluation, measurement of primary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for APS or secondary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for obstetric APS and special situations. These recommendations also include the role of novel oral anticoagulants, the problem of recurrences or the key risk factors identified in these subjects. This document reflects the last 25, referring to the areas of: obstetric APS and special situations. The document provides a table of recommendations and treatment algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: Update of SER recommendations on APS is presented. This document corresponds to part II, related to obstetric SAF and special situations. These recommendations are considered tools for decision-making for clinicians, taking into consideration both the decision of the physician experienced in APS and the patient. A part I has also been prepared, which addresses aspects related to diagnosis, evaluation and treatment.

Study of clinical utility of antibodies to phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex in Asian-Indian patients with suspected APS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the most common acquired pro-thrombotic disorder, also associated with obstetric complications. Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin complex antibody (aPSPT) though associated with various APS manifestations, is not included in the revised Sapporo Criteria. To study the prevalence of aPSPT in Asian-Indian patients with suspected APS and compare its performance with the criteria anti-phospholipid antibodies (APLs). Electronic charts of 372 individuals whose sera was tested for aPSPT in suspected APS between June 2014 and May 2016 were retrieved and analyzed. aPSPT was assayed by ELISA. aPSPT tested individuals were categorized into cases-seropositive and seronegative APS (SNAPS) and controls. aPSPT was positive in 24/58 (41.3%) cases and 17/314 (5.4%) controls (p < 0.001). aPSPT positivity was seen in 44.5%, 38.7%, and 58.4% in primary, secondary and SNAPS patients respectively. aPSPT had the best performance among all APLs, in obstetric APS with 31% sensitivity, 97.7% specificity, and an odds ratio of 18.8. It showed 41.4% sensitivity, 94.6% specificity for the classification/diagnosis of primary APS and 38.7% sensitivity, 91.5% specificity for secondary APS. Addition of aPSPT to current APS criteria to SNAPS patients led to reclassification of additional 12.1% patients as APS overall and 42.8% in obstetric APS category. In Asian-Indian patients with suspected APS, aPSPT outperformed all classical APLs in diagnosis/classification of obstetric APS and both isotypes of beta 2-glycoprotein-I antibodies in diagnosis/classification of APS. aPSPT could reclassify additional 12.1 and 42.8% patients as APS overall and obstetric APS respectively, over and above the cases satisfying revised Sapporo criteria.

Insights into the diagnosis and pathogenesis of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

The Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), formerly known as Anticardiolipin or Hughes syndrome, is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by obstetrical complications and thrombotic events affecting almost every organ-system in patients persistently testing positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The contribution of the extra-criteria aPL to the pathogenesis of APS have exceeded the expectations of a simple, direct pathologic 'hit' leading to thrombogenesis or obstetrical complications, and more pathologic pathways are being linked directly or indirectly to aPL. The value of extra-criteria aPL is on the rise, and these antibodies are nowadays evaluated as markers for risk assessment in the diagnostic approach to APS. A diagnosis of APS should be considered in pediatric patients with suggestive clinical and laboratory picture. Management of APS remains mostly based on anticoagulation, while other drugs are being tested for efficacy and side effects. Low-dose aspirin may have a role in the management of thrombotic and obstetric APS. Due to the high variability in disease severity and complication recurrence outcomes, new tools are being developed and validated to assess the damage index and quality of life of APS patients.

Diagnosis and management of non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

Accurate diagnosis of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a prerequisite for optimal clinical management. The international consensus (revised Sapporo) criteria for obstetric APS do not include low positive anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti ß2 glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies (< 99th centile) and/or certain clinical criteria such as two unexplained miscarriages, three non-consecutive miscarriages, late pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, late premature birth, or two or more unexplained in vitro fertilisation failures. In this review we examine the available evidence to address the question of whether patients who exhibit non-criteria clinical and/or laboratory manifestations should be included within the spectrum of obstetric APS. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies of women with pregnancy morbidity, particularly recurrent pregnancy loss, suggest that elimination of aCL and/or IgM aß2GPI, or low positive positive aCL or aß2GPI from APS laboratory diagnostic criteria may result in missing the diagnosis in a sizeable number of women who could be regarded to have obstetric APS. Such prospective and retrospective studies also suggest that women with non-criteria obstetric APS may benefit from standard treatment for obstetric APS with low-molecular-weight heparin plus low-dose aspirin, with good pregnancy outcomes. Thus, non-criteria manifestations of obstetric APS may be clinically relevant, and merit investigation of therapeutic approaches. Women with obstetric APS appear to be at a higher risk than other women of pre-eclampsia, placenta-mediated complications and neonatal mortality, and also at increased long-term risk of thrombotic events. The applicability of these observations to outcomes in women with non-criteria obstetric APS remains to be determined.