One-stage combined ENT and dental surgical treatment of odontogenic sinusitis: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: The study analyses outcomes of the surgical treatment of odontogenic sinusitis that concurrently address sinusitis and its dental source. METHODS: A total of 364 adult patients were included, representing 13% of all patients we have operated on for any rhinosinusitis over the past 18 years. The diagnosis was based on both ENT and dental examinations including CT imaging. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) FESS with dental surgery without antrotomy, (2) FESS with intraoral antrotomy, and (3) intraoral surgery without FESS. The mean postoperative follow-up was 15 months. RESULTS: First group involved 64%, second group 31%, and third group 6% of the cases. The one-stage combined ENT and dental approach was used in 94% of cases (group 1 and 2) with a success rate of 97%. Concerning FESS, maxillary sinus surgery with middle meatal antrostomy only was performed in 54% of patients. Oroantral communication flap closure was performed in 56% of patients (success rate 98%). Healing was achieved within 3 months. The majority (87%) of patients were operated on unilaterally for unilateral findings. Over the past 18 years, a 6% increase of implant-related odontogenic sinusitis was observed. CONCLUSION: Odontogenic sinusitis is common, tending to be unilateral and chronic. Its dental source needs to be uncovered and treated and should not be underestimated. Close cooperation between ENT and dental specialists has a crucial role in achieving optimal outcomes. The one-stage combined surgical approach proves to be a reliable, safe, fast and effective treatment.

Bacterial diversity and community characteristics of the sinus and dental regions in adults with odontogenic sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: The microbiome plays a crucial role in odontogenic sinusitis (OS); however, the bacterial characteristics of the sinuses and connected dental regions in OS are poorly understood. In this study, nasal secretion samples were collected from 41 OS patients and 20 simple nasal septum deviation patients, and oral mucosa samples from dental regions were collected from 28 OS patients and 22 impacted tooth extraction patients. DNA was extracted, and 16S rRNA sequencing was performed to explore the characteristics and structure of the microbiome in the sinuses and dental regions of OS patients. RESULTS: The alpha diversity of the oral and nasal microbiomes in OS patients was higher than that in controls. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed that oral samples clustered separately from nasal samples, and the beta diversity of oral and nasal samples in OS patients was higher than that in controls. The dominant phylum was Bacteroidetes in OS patients and Firmicutes in controls in both the oral and nasal cavity. The dominant genera in the oral microbiome and nasal microbiome of OS patients were similar, including Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas and Prevotella. Co-occurrence network analysis showed decreased microbial connectivity in the oral mucosa and nasal secretion samples of OS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Odontogenic infection promotes structural and functional disorders of the nasal microbiome in OS. The interaction of dominant pathogens in the nasal and oral regions may promote the development of OS. Our study provides the microbiological aetiology of the nasal and connected dental regions in OS and is expected to provide novel insights into the diagnosis and therapeutic strategies for OS.

Sinus culture differences in patients with radiographic evidence of odontogenic disease.

PURPOSE: Odontogenic sinusitis is a well-known entity with a different pathogenesis than chronic rhinosinusitis. Nonspecific symptoms can make diagnosis difficult. This study aims to compare culture results between patients with and without computed tomography findings indicative of possible odontogenic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in which patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis over a three-year period at a single institution were reviewed. CT imaging was reviewed for evidence of dental disease, specifically periapical lucency, dehiscence of the floor of the maxillary sinus, oroantral fistula, or foreign body. Culture results were then assessed and compared between groups with CT evidence of a possible odontogenic source to those without. RESULTS: Overall, 231 patients were evaluated. 92 patients (39.8 %) were found to have evidence of a likely odontogenic source on CT. Cultures were available for 118 of 231 patients (51.1 %). Patients with CT signs of odontogenic disease were significantly more likely to grow Proteus mirabilis (p = 0.018) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (p = 0.037) on culture. Patients without CT signs of odontogenic sources were significantly more likely to grow Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p = 0.009). Of note, patients with CT findings concerning for an odontogenic source were also more likely to grow fungi other than Aspergillus and Mucor species on culture (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Patients with CT findings concerning for an odontogenic source of sinus disease showed differences in culture results that could be important in differentiating pathogenesis of sinus disease.

Total times to treatment completion and clinical outcomes in odontogenic sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary collaboration is essential for effective odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) management. One point of debate has been the optimal timing of primary dental treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), but differences in time to completion of these treatment pathways have not been studied. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on ODS patients from 2015 to 2022. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, and various durations of time were analyzed from rhinologic consultation through treatment completion. Resolution of sinusitis symptoms and purulence on endoscopy was also recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-nine ODS patients were analyzed (47.2 % male, median 59 years-old). Of the 89 ODS patients, 56 had treatable dental pathology, and 33 had no treatable dental pathology. Median time to treatment completion for all patients was 103 days. Of 56 ODS patients with treatable dental pathology, 33 had primary dental treatment, and 27 (81 %) required secondary ESS. In patients who underwent primary dental treatment followed by ESS, median time from initial evaluation to treatment completion was 236.0 days. If ESS was pursued primarily followed by dental treatment, median time from initial evaluation to treatment completion was 112.0 days, which was significantly shorter than if dental treatment was pursued primarily (p = 0.002). Overall symptomatic and endoscopic resolution was 97.8 %. CONCLUSIONS: After dental and sinus surgical treatment, ODS patients experienced 97.8 % resolution of symptoms and purulence on endoscopy. In patients with ODS due to treatable dental pathology, primary ESS followed by dental treatment resulted in a shorter overall treatment duration than primary dental treatment followed by ESS.

Do Symptoms Correlate with the Signs in Odontogenic Sinusitis with Periapical Lesions?

INTRODUCTION: Endodontic pathology is one of the most common causes of odontogenic sinusitis, and its evaluation is challenging. Omission of periapical lesions in diagnostic process leads to recurrent sinusitis after cessation of medical therapy. METHODS: Sixty-one symptomatic patients presented with odontogenic sinusitis with periapical lesions of teeth adjacent to the maxillary sinus were included in the study. Symptoms evaluated with SNOT-22 and OHIP-14 questionnaires were compared to signs during endoscopic and radiological evaluation. RESULTS: Coexistence of odontogenic sinusitis with nasal polyps significantly decreases the quality of life, especially concerning the emotional domain (p = 0.047). Patency of ostiomeatal corresponds well with the severity of sinonasal symptoms reported with SNOT-22 (p = 0.051). Extent of maxillary sinus opacifications scored with Zinreich scale correlates positively with the presence of discharge (p = 0.001) and edema (p = 0.072) in the endoscopic Lund-Kennedy scale. Among 67 teeth with periapical lesions, 73.1% had undergone previous root canal treatment, but in 47.8% of cases, it was defined as incomplete. Endodontic status did not affect the severity of patient's complaints. CONCLUSION: In case of odontogenic sinusitis of endodontic origin, endoscopic signs correlate better than radiological with the self-reported symptoms. In order to better evaluate the severity of the disease and possible need of surgical intervention, both otolaryngologists and dental specialists should focus on extent of inflammatory lesions in the maxillary sinus.

Odontogenic Sinusitis with Oroantral Communication and Fistula Management: Role of Regenerative Surgery.

Objective: The aim of this study is to show our experience with the correct management of patients suffering from odontogenic sinusitis with oroantral communication and fistula. Methods: According to the inclusion criteria, 41 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study with a diagnosis of odontogenic sinusitis with oroantral communication and fistula; 1 patient with pre-implantological complication, 14 with implantological complications, and 26 with classical complications. Results: Two patients were treated with a fractioned combined approach, 13 patients were treated with an oral approach only, and 26 patients were treated with a combination. There was a complete resolution of the symptoms and closure of the fistula in all the patients enrolled. Conclusions: In our study, in all 41 patients, there was a surgical success. The best option is to use a multidisciplinary approach for patients suffering from odontogenic sinusitis.

Presence of anaerobic bacteria and symptoms supports diagnosis of odontogenic sinusitis.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to investigate the diagnostic indicators of odontogenic sinusitis other than computed tomography (CT) findings and the history of dental treatment such as detected bacteria and symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 87 patients who underwent surgery for unilateral sinusitis between 2016 and 2020 (n = 87). Patients with cysts and fungal sinusitis were excluded from the study. We analyzed the relationship between the presence/absence of CT findings such as periapical lesions and oroantral fistulas; anaerobic bacteria; and symptoms in patients with unilateral sinusitis. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the detection of anaerobes and CT findings. Peptostreptococcus sp., Prevotella sp., Streptococcus anginosus group, and Fusobacterium sp. were the most commonly isolated species. Detection of these anaerobic bacteria supports the diagnosis of odontogenic sinusitis. Moreover, ODS often present with symptoms, such as a foul smell and facial pain. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that not only the presence of CT findings such as PAL and OAF, but the detection of anaerobic bacteria, and the presence of any symptoms may aid in the diagnosis of ODS.

Clinical characteristics of odontogenic sinusitis with periapical lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Although the symptoms and radiographic signs may mimic rhinogenic sinusitis, odontogenic sinusitis (OS) with periapical lesions (PALs) is fundamentally an endodontic infection. It is considered to be one of the main causes of OS, especially when presented unilaterally. Despite this routine dental examination is not performed and periapical infection frequently remains undiagnosed by otolaryngologists and radiologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational study covered a group of 61 patients with symptomatic OS with PAL. Assessment of quality of life was done using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and Oral Health-Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Temporal and etiological relationship between the dental cause and sinonasal complication was established among the otolaryngologist and dental specialist based on the clinical symptoms, nasal endoscopy described according to the modified Lund-MacKay scale, computed tomography (CT) scans measured and scored in compliance with Lund- Kennedy, Zinreich and Estrela scales. RESULTS: Out of 61 patients, 28 (46%) were women and 33 (54%) men. Group median age 49.1 years, ranged from 22.8 to 78.9 years. Total OHIP-14 score was 12.7 ± 11.3, with the highest value obtained in domains describing physical pain (mean 2.9 ± 2.4, median 3) in which the highest score was obtained in item 3 - painful aching in mouth and/or teeth - scored ≥2 by 52.5% of participants. Concerning dental symptoms 11.5% of patients were asymptomatic. Total SNOT-22 score was 40.7 ± 21.1, with the highest value in domains describing nasal symptoms. 23% of patients reported mild, 44.3% moderate and 32.7% severe symptoms. In the endoscopic evaluation 86.8% of cases presented discharge, 73.8% mucosal edema. In 11.5% of cases the polypoid tissues was observed in nasal cavities. The first molar tooth was the most frequently affected with an incidence of 42.6%, followed by the second molar (27.9%). In 33 (48.5%) of cases the inflammatory process caused the discontinuity of the sinus floor, which in 51.5% coexisted with total maxillary sinus opacification. 10 teeth (14.7%) had the periapical lesions with a diameter exceeding 8 mm. In case of the multi-rooted teeth, PALs were usually encountered at more than one root (57.4%). Maxillary and ethmoid sinus were affected in 54% of cases and additional frontal sinus involvement in 32.8%. In 69.6% patients, ostiomeatal complex was obstructed. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent sinonasal symptoms such as rhinorrhea, post-nasal drip and nose congestion along with dental pain may suggest endodontic nature of OS, especially after previous root-canal treatment. The bigger the PAL is in diameter and the closer to the maxillary sinus, the greater effect on its mucosal involvement and obstruction of ostiomeatal complex is observed. PALs around molar or premolar tooth apexes with coexistence of unilateral sinus opacifications should be noticed and mentioned by radiologists and evaluated by dental specialists in order to refer the patient to further treatment.

The facultative human oral pathogen Prevotella histicola in equine cheek tooth apical/ periapical infection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Prevotella histicola is a facultative oral pathogen that under certain conditions causes pathologies such as caries and periodontitis in humans. Prevotella spp. also colonize the oral cavity of horses and can cause disease, but P. histicola has not yet been identified. CASE PRESENTATION: A 12-year-old Tinker mare was referred to the clinic for persistent, malodorous purulent nasal discharge and quidding. Conservative antibiotic (penicillin), antiphlogistic (meloxicam), and mucolytic (dembrexine-hydrochloride) treatment prior to referral was unsuccessful and symptoms worsened. Oral examination, radiography, sino-/ rhinoscopy, and standing computed tomography revealed severe apical/ periapical infection of the upper cheek tooth 209 with accompanying unilateral sinonasal inflammation and conchal necrosis. The tooth exhibited extensive subocclusal mesial infundibular cemental hypoplasia and caries, and an occlusal fissure fracture. After mechanical debridement and thermoplastic resin filling of the spacious subocclusal carious infundibular lesion, the tooth was extracted intraorally. The sinusitis and conchal necrosis were treated transendoscopically. Selective bacteriological swab cultures of affected tooth roots and subsequent matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry showed an infection with the obligate anaerobic, Gram-negative bacterium P. histicola. Surgical intervention and adapted antibiotic therapy led to normal healing without complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first documented case of dental infection in a horse caused by P. histicola at once indicating necessity of more sufficient microbiological diagnostics and targeted antibiotic treatment in equine dental practice. This finding is also conducive to understand species-specific Prevotella diversity and cross-species distribution.

Diagnosing odontogenic sinusitis of endodontic origin: A multidisciplinary literature review.

PURPOSE: Endodontic disease is one of the most common causes of bacterial odontogenic sinusitis (ODS). Diagnosing ODS of endodontic origin involves otolaryngologists confirming sinusitis, and dental specialists confirming endodontic sources. The purpose of this study was to conduct a multidisciplinary literature review to highlight clinical and microbiological features of ODS, and the most optimal diagnostic modalities to confirm endodontic disease. METHODS: An extensive review of both medical and dental literature was performed by rhinologists, endodontists, and an infectious disease specialist. Frequencies of various clinical and microbiological features from ODS studies were collected, and averages were calculated. Different endodontic testing and imaging modalities were also evaluated on their abilities to confirm endodontic disease. RESULTS: ODS patients most often present with unilateral sinonasal symptoms for over 3 months, purulence on nasal endoscopy, and overt dental pathology on computed tomography (CT). Subjective foul smell, and maxillary sinus cultures demonstrating anaerobes and α-streptococci (viridans group) may be more specific to ODS. For endodontic evaluations, cold pulp testing and cone-beam CT imaging are most optimal for confirming pulpal and periapical disease. CONCLUSION: Diagnosing ODS requires collaboration between otolaryngologists and dental specialists. Clinicians should suspect ODS when patients present with unilateral sinonasal symptoms, especially foul smell. Patients will generally have purulent drainage on nasal endoscopy, and both sinus opacification and overt dental pathology on CT. However, some patients will have subtle or absent dental pathology on CT. For suspected endodontic disease, endodontists should be consulted for at least cold pulp testing, and ideally cone-beam CT.

Odontogenic sinusitis publication trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is underrepresented in the literature compared to other forms of rhinosinusitis, specifically in sinusitis guidelines and position statements. ODS publication characteristics could help explain why ODS has received less attention in sinusitis guidelines and position statements. The purpose of this study was to explore trends in the quantity and quality of ODS studies over 3 decades from 1990 to 2019. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify all ODS studies from 1990 to 2019. The following variables from all ODS studies were compared between and across the 3 decades: authors' specialties, journal specialties, authors' geographic origins (continents), study topics, study designs, and evidence levels. RESULTS: From 1990 to 2019, there were 254 ODS studies that met inclusion criteria. Numbers of publications increased each decade, with 161 being published from 2010 to 2019. Otolaryngologists and dental authors published over 75% of ODS studies each decade, with 60-75% of ODS articles being published in otolaryngology or dental journals. European and Asian authors published the most ODS studies each decade. Overall, 92-100% of ODS publications per decade were level 4 and 5 evidence, with no significant changes between or across decades. CONCLUSION: While numbers of ODS publications increased each decade from 1990 to 2019, evidence levels remained low without significant changes over time. Otolaryngologists and dental authors published the majority of ODS studies each decade, with a minority of these studies being multidisciplinary. More ODS studies are needed across all aspects of the condition, and future projects would benefit from improved study designs and multidisciplinary collaboration.

Association between Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Histological and Immunohistochemical Features in Periapical Lesions Correlated with Thickened Maxillary Sinus Mucosa.

Background and Objectives: Odontogenic sinusitis is a frequently underestimated pathology with fewer symptoms in patients with periapical lesions, periodontal disease, or iatrogenic foreign bodies in the maxillary sinus. The aim of our study was to determine the correlation between maxillary sinusitis and periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging and histological and immunohistochemical investigations. Materials and Methods: A total of 1450 initial patients diagnosed with maxillary sinusitis in the Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa" Iasi, Romania, were treated with anti-inflammatory drugs. Of these, 629 still had unresolved symptomatology and were later referred to the Dental Medicine departments for further investigations. Only 50 subjects with periapical lesions in the premolar/molar maxillary area were included in the present study. All the periapical lesions were observed on CBCT and classified using the Periapical Status Index (PSI) and the mean maxillary sinus mucosa thicknesses (MSMT). The enrolled patients underwent surgical procedures with the excision of periapical lesions. The excised samples were submitted to the histological and immunohistochemical investigations. Results: The 50 patients presented periapical lesions of their maxillary teeth in 328 dental units. There was a higher prevalence of periapical lesions in men than in women (chi-square test). We observed a significant difference between the mean MSMT of individuals with periapical lesions compared to those without (p < 0.01). Mean MSMT was 1.23 mm for teeth without periapical lesions and 3.95 mm for teeth with periapical lesions. The histopathological study identified 50% cases with periapical granulomas, 10% cases with periapical granulomas with cystic potential, and 40% cases as periapical cysts. Immunohistochemical stainings showed that CD4+ helper and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes, along with CD20+ B lymphocytes and CD68+ macrophages, were diffusely distributed in all periapical cysts and in some periapical granulomas, but CD79α+ plasma cells characterized especially periapical granulomas. Conclusions: The current study observed a significant correlation between CBCT maxillary mucosa thickness and type of periapical lesion. Chronic inflammatory lympho-histiocytic infiltrate predominates in periapical lesions, supporting the idea that lesion progression is determined by a humoral-type (CD20+ and CD79α+ B lymphocytes) but also by a cellular-type (CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte population) immune mechanism.

[Characteristic of iatrogenic odontogenic sinusitis]. / Kharakteristika yatrogennykh odontogennykh gaimoritov.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to study the structure of odontogenic sinusitis and identify iatrogenic etiological factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the case histories of patients operated from 2015 to 2019 with a diagnosis of «Sinusitis¼ in the Clinical City Emergency Hospital in Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan in the department of emergency maxillofacial surgery was carried out. The total number of patients was 333 people: 105 (31.5%) men and 228 (68.5%), the average age of patients was 39.4 years. RESULTS: When analyzing the reasons for the development of sinusitis, in 73% of the total number of operated patients, there was an associated lesion of the teeth. When detailing the sources of odontogenic infection, it was determined that periapical foci of inflammation (granulomatous, granulating periodontitis, cystogranulomas) accounted for 26%, foreign bodies (teeth, roots of teeth, filling materials removed into the maxillary sinus during endodontic treatment) 31%, fistulous passages after removal teeth and attempts to eliminate perforation by surgery 43%. Other etiological factors were found: chronic polypous rhinosinusitis 14%, benign tumors 8%, allergic fungal sinusitis 5%. CONCLUSION: Clinical analysis showed that the development of most cases of odontogenic sinusitis is associated with the mistakes of dentists and is of iatrogenic origin. To prevent the development of odontogenic iatrogenic sinusitis, prior to dental interventions on the teeth of the upper jaw, it is necessary to carry out a topical diagnosis of their ratio with the maxillary sinus.

Epidemiology of odontogenic sinusitis: an old, underestimated disease, even today. A narrative literature review.

Odontogenic sinusitis is an inflammatory condition of the paranasal sinuses resulting from dental pathology. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current literature on the dimensions of the phenomenon, quality of life, economic considerations, and approaches to odontogenic sinusitis. A narrative review was conducted following the methodology proposed by Green et al. (2006). There appears to have been an increase in the incidence over the last decade. Nowadays, evidence in the literature reports that 10-12% up to 40% of all sinusitis cases are associated with odontogenic infections. The iatrogenia was by far the leading cause of odontogenic sinusitis (55.97%) while the first and second molars were the most affected teeth with an incidence of 35.6% and 22%. If not properly diagnosed and treated, these infections may lead to a rapid spread, giving rise to potentially life-threatening complications with a significant general health-related Quality of Life detriment. The proper management of patients in a pre-implant logical setting leads to substantial savings, ranging from €38 million to €152 million, for the Italian National Health Service. Odontogenic sinusitis management should involve shared decisionmaking between the otolaryngologist, dental provider, and patient, where the benefits and risks of dental treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery are discussed.

Recognizing odontogenic sinusitis: A national survey of otolaryngology chief residents.

PURPOSE: Odontogenic sinusitis is underrepresented in sinusitis literature as well as in the otolaryngology teaching curriculum sponsored by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngologists and residents in training may therefore have a decreased awareness of the condition. The objective of this study was to survey otolaryngology chief residents toward the ends of their training to determine how often they considered odontogenic sinusitis as a cause of unilateral sinus disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online REDCap survey was conducted from December 2018 to January 2019. Online surveys were emailed to 119 Otolaryngology residency program directors in the United States of America, which were then forwarded to their chief residents. Surveys included 3 demographic and 4 clinical questions. Clinical questions included 3 computed tomography-based questions requiring either differential diagnoses or most likely diagnosis, and 1 question on residents' perceived prevalence of odontogenic sinusitis as a cause of unilateral sinus opacification. Answer choices were tabulated and compared based on geographic region and post-residency career plans. RESULTS: Of 293 chief residents emailed, 94 completed the survey (32.1%). While answer choices on imaging-based questions varied, odontogenic sinusitis was generally underrecognized. Approximately 70% of residents felt odontogenic sinusitis represented 0%-40% of unilateral sinus opacification. There were no statistically significant differences in answers based on geographic distribution or post-residency career plans. CONCLUSIONS: Otolaryngology chief residents recognized odontogenic sinusitis with variable accuracy on imaging, and generally underestimated its prevalence as a cause of unilateral sinus opacification. Efforts should be made to teach otolaryngology residents about odontogenic sinusitis.

Odontogenic sinusitis involving the frontal sinus: is middle meatal antrostomy enough?

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Inflammatory conditions of the posterior maxillary teeth may cause odontogenic sinusitis (OS), which most commonly involves the maxillary sinus due to its proximity to those teeth. The infective process frequently spreads outside the maxillary sinus, involving the anterior ethmoid and the frontal sinuses. The underlying odontogenic condition must be addressed before or during the surgical procedure. The role of frontal sinusotomy in this setting has not been studied. The aim of this study is to present the surgical outcome of patients who presented with OS involving the frontal sinus and were managed by middle meatal antrostomy alone. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: All patients operated in our department due to OS involving the frontal sinus from November 2015 to December 2017 were recruited. Their demographics, complaints, imaging and endoscopic findings, surgical features and outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (male-to-female ratio 9:16) with a median age of 49 years (IQR = 43-53) were enrolled. The maxillary, frontal and anterior ethmoid sinuses were involved in each case, and each patient underwent maxillary middle meatal antrostomy alone. The median follow-up was 10 months, and no signs of active frontal disease were detected by postoperative endoscopy in any patient. CONCLUSION: Frontal sinusotomy is apparently not necessary to resolve OS involving the frontal sinus. The frontal sinusitis may reflect a reactive process that regresses spontaneously once the underlying odontogenic condition is addressed and a middle meatal antrostomy had been performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2B.

Impact of odontogenic chronic rhinosinusitis on general health-related quality of life.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may arise due to odontogenic etiologies. However, it is unknown whether odontogenic CRS has a differential impact on patients' quality of life (QOL) compared to standard, inflammatory (but non-odontogenic) CRS. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the impact of sinonasal symptomatology on general health-related QOL in odontogenic CRS compared to non-odontogenic CRS. This was a retrospective review of 21 odontogenic CRS patients who visited our tertiary care center. The severity of sinonasal symptomatology and CRS-specific QOL detriment was measured using the 22-item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) and general health-related QOL was measured using the health utility index from the 5-item EuroQol survey (EQ-5D HUV). Compared to non-odontogenic CRS, odontogenic CRS was not associated with a difference in SNOT-22 score [linear regression coefficient (ß) = - 1.57, 95% CI - 12.47 to 9.32, p = 0.777] but was significantly associated with decreased EQ-5D HUV (ß = - 0.10, 95% CI - 0.17 to - 0.03, p = 0.008). We also found that the magnitude of association (ß) between SNOT-22 and EQ5D-HUV was greater for odontogenic CRS patients compared to non-odontogenic CRS patients (p = 0.045). Our findings suggest sinonasal symptoms may have a greater impact on general QOL in odontogenic CRS compared to non-odontogenic CRS. The reason for this remains unknown, but deserves further study.

Eosinophil fungal rhinosinusitis caused by Fusarium infection secondary to odontogenic maxillary sinus disease: when collaboration between otolaryngologist and allergologist leads to the correct diagnosis and therapy.

SUMMARY: Rhinitis and sinusitis usually coexist and are concurrent in most individuals; thus, the correct terminology is now "rhinosinusitis". On the basis of numerous causative factors, often co-existing in the same patient, the diagnosis of rhinosinusitis is also made by a wide variety of practitioners (allergologists, otolaryngologists, pulmonologists, primary care physicians, paediatricians, and many others). Approximately 5-15% of the population suffers from chronic rhinosinusitis, and in 10-12% of them, it is of dental origin. The treatment of odontogenic maxillary sinus disease is directed to the management of the rhinosinusitis and of the odontogenic source. The widespread use of dental implants and reconstructive procedures for dental implant placement has led to new types of complication, as in this case report, due to chronic eosinophilic rhinosinusitis secondary to Fusarium infection in the maxillary sinus. The patient was initially evaluated by the allergologist, and subsequently successfully treated by the otolaryngologist with Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. The advantages of endoscopic sinus surgery include more accurate visualization, no external incision, reduced soft tissue dissection, and reduced hospital stay. Chronic maxillary sinusitis of dental origin is a common disease that requires treatment of the sinusitis as well as of the odontogenic source.

Odontogenic sinusitis: a comprehensive review.

Odontogenic sinusitis (OS) is a highly prevalent, underappreciated and underdiagnosed disease that has been known for over 100 years. Apical periodontitis, periodontal disease and iatrogenic extrusion of foreign bodies into the sinus are the main causes of OS. Although the prevalence of sinus pathosis of dental origin is still controversial, otolaryngologists recognize that in the presence of recalcitrant sinusitis, a dental origin should be considered and properly treated. Currently, cone-beam computed tomography is the gold-standard imaging technique to assess the relationship between dental conditions, especially apical periodontitis and sinus diseases, and whenever this association is detected, patients should be seen by both a dentist and an otolaryngologist in order to achieve complete recovery. This article reviews the current concepts regarding the definitions, diagnosis and management of OS from a clinical point of view.

[Maxillary sinusitis as a diagnostical adverse finding of the dental cone-beam computed tomography study]. / Sinusitis maxillaris mint a fogászati cone-beam komputertomográfiás vizsgálat melléklelete.

INTRODUCTION: Cone-beam computed tomography is a frequently used diagnostical method in the head and neck region. The thickening of the maxillary sinus mucosa is often observed in these images. AIM: Determining the prevalence of teeth and roots that can be identified as cause of maxillary odontogenic sinusitis, and recording the average observed mucosa thickening on these images. METHOD: The scans that give the base of the study have been performed by the Department of Dentistry of Medical University of Pécs between 2015-2016. The size of the voxels had been varied between 0.25 and 0.4 mm and the size of the image had been set up to 15×12 cm. The acquisition time had been set up to 27 seconds. RESULTS: 170 cases of the 260 revised records fulfilled the initial criterion conditions. The average mucosa thickness was 8.8 mm. During the present study, the upper first molars palatal and the second molars mesiobuccal roots were mainly associated with maxillary odontogenic sinusitis. CONCLUSION: Whether in the case of chronic maxillary sinusitis that is not or only temporarily responsive to conventional therapy, may it be justifiable to provide dental consultation and cone-beam computed tomography to exclude the dental origin of sinusitis. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(44): 1747-1753.