Segmentation of patients with small cell lung cancer into responders and non-responders using the optimal cross-validation technique.

BACKGROUND: The timing of treating cancer patients is an essential factor in the efficacy of treatment. So, patients who will not respond to current therapy should receive a different treatment as early as possible. Machine learning models can be built to classify responders and nonresponders. Such classification models predict the probability of a patient being a responder. Most methods use a probability threshold of 0.5 to convert the probabilities into binary group membership. However, the cutoff of 0.5 is not always the optimal choice. METHODS: In this study, we propose a novel data-driven approach to select a better cutoff value based on the optimal cross-validation technique. To illustrate our novel method, we applied it to three clinical trial datasets of small-cell lung cancer patients. We used two different datasets to build a scoring system to segment patients. Then the models were applied to segment patients into the test data. RESULTS: We found that, in test data, the predicted responders and non-responders had significantly different long-term survival outcomes. Our proposed novel method segments patients better than the standard approach using a cutoff of 0.5. Comparing clinical outcomes of responders versus non-responders, our novel method had a p-value of 0.009 with a hazard ratio of 0.668 for grouping patients using the Cox proportion hazard model and a p-value of 0.011 using the accelerated failure time model which approved a significant difference between responders and non-responders. In contrast, the standard approach had a p-value of 0.194 with a hazard ratio of 0.823 using the Cox proportion hazard model and a p-value of 0.240 using the accelerated failure time model indicating the responders and non-responders do not differ significantly in survival. CONCLUSION: In summary, our novel prediction method can successfully segment new patients into responders and non-responders. Clinicians can use our prediction to decide if a patient should receive a different treatment or stay with the current treatment.

Daratumumab in Indian patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicenter, phase IV study.

Aim: To assess the safety and effectiveness of daratumumab monotherapy in Indian patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, phase IV study, patients (aged ≥18 years) received intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg) in six cycles. Safety was the primary end point. Results: Of the 139 patients included, 121 (87.1%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 53 [38.1%] drug-related), 32 (23%) had ≥1 serious TEAEs (five [3.6%] drug-related) and 16 (11.5%) deaths were reported (one death [0.7%] was drug-related). Overall response rate was 26.3%; 62.7% of patients had stable disease. Median time to first response and median progression-free survival were 5.2 and 5.9 months, respectively. Functional status and well-being were improved. Conclusion: Daratumumab showed an acceptable and expected safety profile with consistent efficacy, providing a novel therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma management in India.

Daratumumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study evaluated the outcome of daratumumab single therapy in Indian patients who were not cured with other drugs used for the same disease. 139 adult patients were included in this study from 15 institutes across India. Daratumumab (16 mg/kg) was diluted with 500 or 1000 ml of saline solution and given slowly through the intravenous route 16-times within 6 months. The study examined whether the safety profile and benefits of daratumumab reported in Indian patients were similar to those reported in the RRMM populations of other countries. The study found that most of the adverse events were not severe and could be easily treated by the study physician. 16 patients died (one might have been due to daratumumab treatment). Daratumumab treatment provided life support and recovery benefits to many patients. Daratumumab single therapy provides an appropriate and acceptable safety profile with no new adverse events and consistent benefits in RRMM patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03768960 (ClinicalTrials.gov), CTRI/2019/06/019546.

The safety and efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline in post-stroke depression: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of escitalopram and sertraline in post-stroke depression (PSD) patients, to provide more reliable therapeutics for cardiovascular and psychiatric clinical practice. METHODS: We recruited 60 patients (aged 40-89 years old) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of PSD, who were then randomly assigned to two groups and treated with flexible doses of escitalopram (10 to 20 mg/day, n = 30) or sertraline (50 to 200 mg/day, n = 30) for consecutive 8 weeks, respectively. The 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24), the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14), the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MOCA), and the Activity of Daily Living scale (ADL) were used to assess patients before, during, and after treatment for depression, anxiety, adverse effects, cognitive function, and daily living activities. Repeated measures ANOVA, the Mann-Whitney U test, the chi-square test (χ2), or Fisher's exact test was employed to assess baseline demographics, response rate, adverse effects rate, and changes in other clinical variables. RESULTS: Significant reduction in HAMD-24 and HAMA-14 scores was evaluated at baseline, as well as 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of drug intervention (p < 0.01). There was a significant group difference in post-treatment HAMD-24 scores (p < 0.05), but no difference was observed in HAMA-14 scores (p > 0.05). Further analysis showed a significant variance in the HAMD-24 scores between the two groups at the end of the first week (p < 0.01). The incidence of adverse effects in both patient groups was mild, but there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). The improvement in cognitive function and the recovery of daily living abilities were comparable between both groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Escitalopram and sertraline showed comparable efficacy for anxiety symptoms, cognitive function, and daily living abilities in PSD patients. In addition, escitalopram was more appropriate for alleviating depressive symptoms. To validate the conclusion, trials with a larger sample size are in demand in the future. The registration number is ChiCTR1800017373.

Previous radiotherapy improves treatment responses and causes a trend toward longer time to progression among patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequently encountered by patients during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment and are associated with better treatment outcomes. The sequencing of radiotherapy (RT) and ICIs is widely used in current clinical practice, but its effect on survival has remained unclear. METHODS: In a real-world multicenter study including 521 patients who received ICI treatment for metastatic or locally advanced cancer, RT schedules and timing, irAEs, time to progression, overall survival, and treatment responses were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patients who received previous RT and developed irAE (RT +/AE +) had the best overall response rate (ORR 44.0%). The ORR was 40.1% in the RT -/AE + group, 26.7% in the RT -/AE - group and 18.3% in the RT + /AE - group (p < 0.001). There was a significantly longer time to progression (TTP) in the RT + /AE + group compared to the RT -/AE - and RT + /AE - groups (log rank p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), but the trend toward longer TTP in the RT + /AE + group did not reach statistical significance in pairwise comparison to that in the RT -/AE + group. Preceding RT timing and intent had no statistically significant effect on TTP. In a multivariate model, ECOG = 0 and occurrence of irAEs remained independent positive prognostic factors for TTP (HR 0.737; 95% CI 0.582-0.935; p = 0.012, and HR 0.620; 95% CI 0.499-0.769; p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Better ORR and a trend toward longer TTP were demonstrated for patients with RT preceding ICI treatment and development of irAEs, which suggests that RT may boost the therapeutic effect of immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancers.

Real-World Experience of PD-1 Inhibitors for Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Patients in China.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the promising clinical trial data regarding programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL), there remains a paucity of studies describing the outcomes of patients in a real-world setting, especially for Asian cohort. METHODS: We present a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with R/R cHL who had failed ≥2 prior lines of therapies and received sintilimab or tislelizumab developed in China (sintilimab or tislelizumab monotherapy) at 3 medical centers from January 2019 to September 2021. Efficacy was evaluated with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response (DOR), best overall response (BOR) including objective response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR). Safety data were also recorded. RESULTS: 74 patients were reviewed. The median age was 38 years (range, 14-85 years). The ORR, CRR, and disease control rate were 78.3%, 52.7%, and 91.9%, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 22 (4-36) months. Four patients (5.4%) died of disease progression. The median PFS and DOR was 22.1 and 23.5 months. BOR as a new emergent endpoint was found to be the only independent prognostic factor for PFS in our study (HR = 6.234, p = 0.005), suggesting this endpoint carries stronger prognostic value over traditional endpoints in the immunotherapy era. 66 (89.2%) patients reported adverse event (AE) with any grade, with the majority of AEs being grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSION: We presented a unique real-life experience and conducted a relatively long follow-up of PD-1 antibodies developed in China for R/R HL patients which confirmed their promising effectiveness and manageable side effects given in real world in an Asian cohort. Even for those who would usually be excluded in most of clinical trials such as elderly or minor patients, anti-PD-1 monotherapy also showed a significant improvement of outcomes. Furthermore, the depth of response seemed to be a more powerful predictive tool in new era, which might serve as a basis for future immune risk-adapted strategies.

Overall and complete response rates as potential surrogates for overall survival in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Aim: The correlation between response and survival has not been well-studied in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Materials & methods: A systematic literature review of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases (2010-06/2020) and relevant congresses (2018-2020) was performed to identify randomized clinical trials in RRMM reporting median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival and response end points. The relationship between mOS and response end points was analyzed using Pearson's product-moment correlation. Results: A total of 81 records for 65 original studies, representing 12,827 patients were included. The correlation was moderate for mOS with overall response rate (Pearson r = 0.79), very good partial response (r = 0.73) and duration of response (r = 0.78); all were statistically significant. In linear regression models, estimated mOS gain was 0.48, 0.47 and 1.94 months per percentage point of overall response rate, very good partial response and complete response, respectively (all p < 0.001). Significance was maintained after adjustment for age, relapsed versus refractory multiple myeloma and study year. The analysis was limited by small sample sizes and inconsistent reporting of study-level covariates. Conclusion: These findings support short-term response-based end points as surrogates to survival in RRMM.

Treatments for multiple myeloma may not work for every patient and the cancer may come back. In clinical trials, it is difficult to find out how well new treatments work in allowing patients to live longer. This is especially true when patients have advanced disease that has returned or has not responded to treatment. How well a patient responds to treatment (i.e., has a decreased extent of disease) could indicate whether the drug will help the patient live longer, but the relationship between response to treatment and survival is not fully understood. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand how response rates and survival are related. A systematic review collects all the published research on a specific subject, and a meta-analysis is a statistical method that creates a single finding from several separate studies. This study found a moderate relationship between how long patients live after receiving treatment for multiple myeloma and their response to treatment. This would allow response-to-treatment data from clinical trials to be used to predict better survival and show the drug can help patients.

Prognosis and Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer From A Real-World Scenario in China: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Although metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is considered incurable, a specific subset of patients exhibits prolonged survival and even achieve a "cure". We retrospectively identified predictive prognostic factors and systemic therapy models to find this group of potentially cured patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with MBC from 1991-2016 in West China Hospital were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association of clinical factors and systemic therapy models with overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The median OS was 63.4 months. Age, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, molecular subtype, site and number of metastases and metastasis-free interval (MFI) were related to the prognosis of MBC (P < .05). Patients with T1, N0-1, luminal A, bone metastasis, OMBC (oligometastatic breast cancer) or metastasis-free interval (MFI) ≥ 3 years showed the median OS more than 10 years (P < .001). Independent prognostic factors that correlated with OS and BCSS were residence, lymph node metastasis, histologic grade, molecular subtype, and site of metastasis (P < .05). The group of sequential chemo-endocrine therapy (ST) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive MBC patients showed the highest overall response rate (ORR) (P < .05). However, patients who received endocrine therapy (ET) showed the best OS, BCSS and PFS in the first two-line treatment, followed by ST and chemotherapy (CT) (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the predictive prognostic factors and systemic therapy models to facilitate patients likely to achieve long-term survival.

A randomized, open-label, phase 2, multicenter trial of gemcitabine with pazopanib or gemcitabine with docetaxel in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) are limited. The goal of the current phase 2 study was to examine the clinical activity and safety of the combination of gemcitabine plus pazopanib, a multityrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in STS. METHODS: The current randomized, phase 2 trial enrolled patients with advanced nonadipocytic STS who had received prior anthracycline-based therapy. Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 with pazopanib at a dose of 800 mg daily (G+P) or gemcitabine at a dose of 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 8 (G+T) every 3 weeks. Crossover was allowed at the time of disease progression. The study used a noncomparative statistical design based on the precision of 95% confidence intervals for reporting the primary endpoints of median progression-free survival (PFS) and rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) for these 2 regimens based on the intent-to-treat patient population (AEs were graded using version 4.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled: 45 patients on each treatment arm. The median PFS was 4.1 months for each arm (P = .3, log-rank test). The best overall response of stable disease or better (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was the same for both treatment arms (64% for both the G+T and G+P arms). The rate of related grade ≥3 AEs was 82% for the G+T arm and 78% for the G+P arm. Related grade ≥3 AEs occurring in ≥10% of patients in the G+T and G+P arms were anemia (36% and 20%, respectively), fatigue (29% and 13%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (53% and 49%, respectively), neutropenia (20% and 49%, respectively), lymphopenia (13% and 11%, respectively), and hypertension (2% and 20%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of G+P as an alternative to G+T for patients with nonadipocytic STS.

Clinical outcomes in T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia: prognostic factors and treatment response.

T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukaemia (T-LGLL) is an incurable leukaemia characterised by clonal proliferation of abnormal cytotoxic T cells that can result in severe neutropenia, transfusion-dependent anaemia and pancytopenia requiring treatment. The most commonly used agents, methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide (Cy) and cyclosporine primarily produce partial remissions (PRs), with few complete responses (CRs). We evaluated the clinical course and treatment response of 60 consecutive patients with T-LGLL to evaluate clinical outcomes and future potential treatment directions. Impaired overall survival was noted among male patients, patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and those without rheumatoid arthritis. Cy was the most efficacious second-line agent, with a 70% overall response rate (ORR; three CR, four PR). All patients who failed frontline MTX responded to second-line Cy. In the relapsed or Cy-refractory setting, alemtuzumab (n = 4) and pentostatin (n = 3) had an ORR of 50% and 66%, respectively, while duvelisib induced a long-term response in one patient. In this large, retrospective analysis, our results suggest Cy is a highly effective therapy for second-line treatment in T-LGLL and should be considered a strong candidate for up-front therapy in select high-risk patients. Prospective studies evaluating pentostatin, alemtuzumab and novel agents, such as duvelisib, are needed for patients with relapsed/refractory T-LGLL.

Treatment patterns and effectiveness of patients with multiple myeloma initiating Daratumumab across different lines of therapy: a real-world chart review study.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and combination therapy across several indications, both among newly-diagnosed and refractory patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there is limited evidence on treatment patterns and effectiveness of daratumumab in the real-world setting, particularly in first line (1 L). This study aimed to describe real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients initiating daratumumab across different lines of therapy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of adult patients with MM initiating daratumumab between November 2015 and March 2021 was conducted at two clinical sites in the United States. De-identified patient-level data were abstracted in an electronic case report form. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were described. Clinical outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and time to next line of therapy were reported using descriptive statistics and stratified by line of therapy (1 L, second line [2 L] or third line or later [3 L+]). A sub-group analysis evaluated treatment patterns and ORR among patients re-treated with daratumumab. RESULTS: A total of 299 patients were included in the study (mean age: 68 years; 55% male). Among them, 26 were 1 L patients, 66 were 2 L patients, and 207 were 3 L+ patients; 110 patients (36.8%) received a stem cell transplant prior to daratumumab initiation. The mean duration of follow-up was 10 months among 1 L patients and 19 months among 2 L and 3 L+ patients. Patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L had a 100% ORR, while those initiating in 2 L and 3 L+ had an ORR of 78.8 and 65.2%, respectively. Among re-treated patients, ORR was 66.7% during the first treatment segment, and 52.9% during the second treatment segment. Kaplan-Meier rates of progression-free survival at 12 months were 89.9, 75.2, and 53.1% among patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L+, respectively. Kaplan-Meier rates of time to next line of therapy at 12 months were 94.1, 73.4, and 50.0% among patients who initiated daratumumab in 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L+, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that daratumumab-based regimens are an effective treatment option across all lines of therapy, with highest response rate in 1 L.

Phenotypic characterization of tumor CTLA-4 expression in melanoma tissues and its possible role in clinical response to Ipilimumab.

The expression of the immune checkpoint molecule CTLA-4 has been almost exclusively studied in the T cell lineage, but increasing evidence has shown its expression on tumors with implications for immunotherapy. To date, the degree of expression of CTLA-4 on tumor cells as a predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors has not been studied. In this report, we analyzed this issue in melanoma patients treated with CTLA-4 inhibitor Ipilimumab (IPI). We show that the level of CTLA-4 expression on melanoma cells is higher than that on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and it is associated with clinical response to IPI therapy supporting the idea of its possible role as a predictive biomarker.

Response to ipilimumab therapy in metastatic melanoma patients: potential relevance of CTLA-4+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and their in situ localization.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including ipilimumab (IPI), achieve a clinical benefit in a small proportion of melanoma patients highlighting the need to investigate predictive biomarkers. In this study, we characterized tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), focusing on the CTLA-4+ subset, and evaluated their possible predictive significance. We characterized TIL density, cell type, and localization in 40 melanoma lesions from 17 patients treated with IPI. Associations of TILs with IPI timing, tissue localization, and response to IPI were estimated using a linear mixed-effects modelling approach. We found that most of TIL subsets increased in situ upon IPI therapy, with particular reference to FoxP3+ cells. TILs and TIL subsets, such as CD3+, CD45RO+, CTLA-4+, CD4+, CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, and NKp46+ NK cells, showed significantly different spatial distributions in the tumor microenvironment being higher at the invasive margin (IM) as compared to the tumor center (TC) (P value < 0.001 for TIL score and P value < 0.05 for all subsets). Remarkably, high TIL score and density of CD3+, CD8+ T cells, and CTLA-4+ immune cells were significantly associated with a better response to IPI (P values = 0.002, 0.023, 0.007, and 0.001, respectively, for responders vs non-responders). In conclusion, we provide a detailed analysis of CTLA-4+ TIL distribution in melanoma tissues taking into account localization, relationship with CD3+/CD8+ TILs, and changes in response to IPI treatment. We identified that CTLA-4+ TILs may represent a marker of IPI response, alone or with CD3+/CD8+ subsets, although this requires confirmation in larger studies.

Combined gemcitabine, cisplatin, dexamethasone, methotrexate, and pegaspargase (GDP-ML) for patients with newly diagnosed extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type: a single arm, single center, prospective phase 2 study.

Extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKL) is a highly aggressive tumor with relatively poor prognosis. In this prospective study, we investigated the efficacy and toxicity of a novel GDP-ML regimen (combined gemcitabine, cisplatin, dexamethasone, methotrexate, and pegaspargase) as front-line treatment in newly diagnosed ENKL. Eligible newly diagnosed stage I/II ENKL patients received sandwich chemoradiation therapy. Patients with stage III/IV disease received an initial 4 cycles of GDP-ML regimen. After 4 cycles, responding patients continued to receive either autologous transplantation or additional two courses of GDP-ML. A total of 44 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 26 months. The overall response rate (ORR) were 78.6% for the whole cohort, 84.6% for stage I/II, and 66.7% for stage III/IV, and corresponding complete remission (CR) rates were 61.9%, 76.9%, and 33.3%. The 1- year and 2- year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 69.3% and 62.9%, and 1- year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 76.5% and 67.4%, respectively. Patients with stage I/II disease showed better 2-year OS rate compared with stage III/IV patients (88.1% vs. 33.2%, p < 0.001). Patients who achieved CR had significantly better 2-year OS rate compared with non-CR patients (90.8% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001). The main adverse event was hematologic toxicity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 59.1% of patients. These results indicate that GDP-ML is an effective and well-tolerated induction regimen with newly diagnosed ENKL patients. This clinical trial was registered on www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR-ONC-12002055).

Total skin electron beam therapy for primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas: clinical characteristics and outcomes in a Mexican reference center.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess treatment modalities, treatment response, toxicity profile, disease progression and outcomes in 14 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (PCTCL) treated with total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT). BACKGROUND: Primary cutaneous lymphomas (PCLs) are extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphomas originating in the skin without evidence of extracutaneous disease at diagnosis. Despite advances in systemic and local therapy options, the management of advanced stages remains mostly palliative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with PCTCL, diagnosed and treated in a reference center in Mexico City, analyzing treatment modalities, response to treatment, long-term outcome, and mortality. RESULTS: Eight males (57%) and 6 (43%) females were identified. Most patients were stage IVA (n = 5, 36%) followed by stage IB and IIB (28.5% and 21.4%, respectively). Eleven patients received the low-dose RT scheme (12 Gy), 1 patient, the intermediate-dose RT scheme (24 Gy), and 2 patients, the conventional-dose RT scheme (36 Gy). Mean follow-up time was 4.6 years. At first follow-up examination, 6-8 weeks after radiotherapy, the overall response rate (ORR) for the cohort was 85%. The median PFS for the whole cohort was 6 months. CONCLUSION: This study reinforces the role of TSEBT when compared with other treatment modalities and novel agents. Low-dose TSEBT is now widely used because of the opportunity for retreatment.

Phase 1-2 study of vorinostat (SAHA), cladribine and rituximab (SCR) in relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma.

Altered DNA methylation and histone acetylation in lymphoma provided the rationale for using vorinostat (SAHA), cladribine and rituximab (SCR) in non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) in this phase 1-2 study (NCT00764517). Treatment included cladribine 5 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) (days 1-5), rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV (weekly 4× for cycle 1 and 1×/month) and vorinostat orally once daily (days 1-14) every 28 days for up to six cycles. Phase 1 included relapsed patients (n = 10) in a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design (vorinostat: 200, 300 and 400 mg). No dose-limiting toxicities were seen. The phase 2 dose for vorinostat was 400 mg po (days 1-14). The majority of phase 2 patients had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (n = 57; 39 previously untreated, 10 relapsed). The primary objective was objective response rate [complete response (CR) + partial response] which was 39% (7/18) in relapsed patients and 97% (38/39) with 80% (31/39) attaining a CR in previously untreated MCL. At a median follow-up of 42 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for relapsed NHL were 19·5 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2·0-33·0] and 25·0 (95% CI: 12·0-45·0) months respectively. Median PFS for previously untreated MCL was 84·0 months; OS could not be estimated. Toxicities were primarily haematological.

Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (GDP) in combination with methotrexate and pegaspargase is active in newly diagnosed peripheral T cell lymphoma patients: a phase 2, single-center, open-label study in China.

Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) are less responsive to anthracycline-containing regimen such as CHOP and carry a poor prognosis. In this prospective study, we investigated gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone (GDP) combined with methotrexate (MTX) and pegaspargase (PEG-L) as front-line treatment in PTCL. Eligible newly diagnosed PTCL patients received 4 cycles of the GDP-ML chemotherapy every 28 days. After 4 cycles, responding patients continued to receive either autologous stem cell transplantation or the MTX/cytarabine (MA) regimen for consolidation. This trial is registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR-ONC-12002055). A total of 65 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 38.5 months. The overall response rate (ORR) was 55.4%, and complete remission rate (CR) was 33.8%. The median overall survival (OS) was 16 months, and the 1-year and 2-year OS were 59.1% and 38.2%, respectively. The median PFS was only 8 months. The main adverse event was hematologic toxicity: 50% patients showed grade III/IV neutropenia. GDP-ML for the first-line treatment of PTCL patients is an effective induction regimen compared with standard CHOP, and the toxicity was more significant but acceptable. However, future studies exploring new drug combinations are warranted to overcome relapse after remission. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02987244.

Multicenter phase 1/2 study of forodesine in patients with relapsed peripheral T cell lymphoma.

Peripheral T cell lymphomas are an aggressive group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with poor outcomes for most subtypes and no accepted standard of care for relapsed patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of forodesine, a novel purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed peripheral T cell lymphomas. Patients with histologically confirmed disease, progression after ≥ 1 prior treatment, and an objective response to last treatment received oral forodesine 300 mg twice-daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Forty-eight patients (median age, 69.5 years; median of 2 prior treatments) received forodesine. In phase 1 (n = 3 evaluable), no dose-limiting toxicity was observed during the first 28 days of forodesine treatment. In phase 2 (n = 41 evaluable), the ORR for the primary and final analyses was 22% (90% CI 12-35%) and 25% (90% CI 14-38%), respectively, including four complete responses (10%). Median PFS and OS were 1.9 and 15.6 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphopenia (96%), leukopenia (42%), and neutropenia (35%). Dose reduction and discontinuation due to adverse events were uncommon. Secondary B cell lymphoma developed in five patients, of whom four were positive for Epstein-Barr virus. In conclusion, forodesine has single-agent activity within the range of approved therapies in relapsed peripheral T cell lymphomas, with a manageable safety profile, and may represent a viable treatment option for this difficult-to-treat population.

Analysis of response-related endpoints in trials of first-line medical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor radiologic response after systemic chemotherapy has been used as endpoint of trials of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), which can report the best overall response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) by RECIST criteria as well as the early tumor shrinkage (ETS). The present study perform a trial-level analysis to verify whether such response-related endpoints are predictive of overall survival (OS). METHODS: After a systematic search, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were selected each time they evaluated the three response endpoints and progression-free survival (PFS). Two arms per trial were selected, and the correlation between the difference in each endpoint and the difference in OS was calculated. The analysis then evaluated the effects of treatment on ∆ORR, or ∆DCR, ∆ETS, ∆PFS, and on ∆OS, using separate linear regressions for each of them, and the proportion of variability explained (R2trial) on OS for each of the four endpoints was calculated. RESULTS: The systematic review of the literature led to the selection of 12 RCTs, 7 phase-3 and 5 phase-2. ETS reported a different performance in the entire sample compared to phase-3 trials (R2trial = 0.172 vs. 0.842), differently from DCR (R2trial = 0.541 vs. 0.816) and ORR (R2trial = 0.349 vs. 0.740). Surprisingly, PFS predicted OS with a weak correlation, which was not significant in the subgroup of phase-3 studies (R2trial = 0.455 vs. 0.466). CONCLUSION: The results of the present trial-level analysis report a good performance of two response-related endpoints, DCR and ETS, and suggest that they could be differently used depending on the setting of disease and the type of medical treatment.

A Network Meta-Analysis of Short and Long-Term Efficacy of Targeted Therapy With Single or Double-Drug Regimens in the Treatment of Stage III/IV Malignant Melanoma Based on 16 Randomized Controlled Trials.

For the treatment of stage III/IV malignant melanoma (MM), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the short and long-term efficacy of targeted therapy with single or double-drug regimens. All conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) searched from PubMed and Cochrane Library were included in the study for direct and indirect comparison for MM. The odds ratio (OR) and surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) value of the targeted therapy with single or double-drug regimens for treatment of stage III/IV MM were also analyzed. To group the treatments according to their similarity with regards to both outcomes, cluster analyses were performed. Ultimately, 16 RCTs were incorporated for this NMA. The NMA revealed that the overall response rate (ORR) values of single-drug regimens (Vemurafenib [Vem], Dabrafenib [Dab], and Nivolumab [Niv]) were higher than those of Dacarbazine (Dac). Also the ORR values of double-drug regimens (Dab + Trametinib [Dab + Tra], Niv + Ipilimumab [Niv + Ipi], and Vem + Cobimetinib [Vem + Cob]) were moderately higher than those of Dac. The results of the SUCRA showed that short-term efficacy of single-drug regimens (Vem and Dab) were better, while the short-term efficacy of double-drug regimens (Dab + Tra and Vem + Cob) were relatively better. It was determined that Vem, Dab, and Niv might be the best choice in evaluating the treatment of stage III/IV MM among different single-drug targeted therapy regimens, while Dab + Tra, Niv + Ipi, and Vem + Cob might have better short-term efficacy among different double-drug targeted therapy regimens. J. Cell. Biochem. 119: 640-649, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing the Efficacies of Eleven Novel Therapies with the Common Salvage Regimen for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a relapsed and refractory hematological malignancy with a lower morbidity but higher mortality. In addition to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, chemotherapy is used as the front-line treatment. However, the diversity of available agents and the inconsistency of outcomes of relevant trials render treatment decision-making tough. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is an efficient statistical framework that makes a comprehensive comparison and provides a valuable clinical reference. METHODS: All the potential trials were retrieved from the medical database and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main characteristics of each trial as well as the primary outcomes, including complete remission (CR), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS), were extracted. In addition, the network graph was plotted to illustrate the connections among the trials involved. Comparison results in the network were exhibited in a forest plot. Furthermore, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was introduced to rank the treatments for each endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials were selected from 1,625 identifications. No significant difference in the common treatment was observed for the endpoints CR and ORR. In terms of OS, CPX-351 (HR: 0.77, 95% CrI: 0.63, 0.94) and HiDAC plus MK-8776 (HR: 0.80, 95% CrI: 0.68, 0.93) showed a superiority over the common salvage regimen in the short term, while HiDAC plus MK-8776 (HR: 0.80, 95% CrI: 0.70, 0.93) and Ara-C plus vosaroxin (HR: 0.86, 95% CrI: 0.74, 0.99) outperformed the common salvage regimen for the 3-year OS. In addition, clofarabine plus Ara-C (HR: 0.61, 95% CrI: 0.53, 0.69) and CPX-351 (HR: 0.71, 95% CrI: 0.60, 0.83) were confirmed to be efficacious in enhancing the rate of EFS. CONCLUSION: Referring to the network outcome and SUCRA value, clofarabine plus Ara-C (CR: 79.05%, ORR: 80.02%) and Ara-C plus vosaroxin (CR: 75.42%, ORR: 73.43%) were potentially the top two choices for both CR and ORR. CPX-351 (1-year OS: 91.36%), HiDAC plus MK-8776 (3-year OS: 94.23%) and clofarabine plus Ara-C (1-year EFS: 97.34%) yielded the highest probabilities to be the optimal choices for 1-year OS, 3-year OS and 1-year EFS, respectively.