A validated photonumeric scale for infraorbital dark circles and its application in evaluating the efficacy of a cosmetic treatment product in a split-face randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: As a result of their complex aetiology and periodicity, dark circles are difficult to characterize and measure, with current assessment techniques relying on specialist equipment, image analysis or proprietary grading scales. There is therefore a need to develop and validate a photonumeric scale for assessing infraorbital dark circles, which can provide an objective and consumer relevant tool for evaluating this condition and the efficacy of treatment products and procedures. METHODS: A panel of expert clinical evaluators reviewed approximately three thousand facial photographs collected over a 5-year period and selected images representing a dynamic range of dark circles. A 10-point photonumeric scale was created, with corresponding descriptors and images for each grade of the scale. To rigorously validate the scale, linearity, sensitivity and precision were assessed by colorimetry and in-clinic evaluation. Reproducibility was assessed photographically with both experienced and inexperienced clinical evaluators, whereas intragrader repeatability was assessed live in-clinic. The scale was then employed in a split-face randomized clinical trial on 58 subjects to evaluate the efficacy of a cosmetic treatment product over 8 weeks. RESULTS: Colour analysis of the images showed the scale was linear, with statistically significant correlations observed when colour data (CIElab; Individual Typology Angle) were plotted against the corresponding grades (r > 0.9, P < 0.001). Colour difference (Delta E) was calculated between the infraorbital zone and the surrounding skin, and when data were plotted against the grades, a statistically significant correlation was observed (r = 0.99, P < 0.01). The magnitude of the Delta E suggested that changes in grade are visibly perceptible to the human eye, and therefore, the scale is sensitive and clinically relevant. Intergrader reproducibility showed strong correlation (0.96) and >90% agreement between experienced evaluators, whereas intragrader repeatability assessment showed >90% perfect agreement between grades. Use of this scale in a clinical trial demonstrated the efficacy of a cosmetic product, with a mean statistically significant (P < 0.001) decrease in grade of 0.74 compared to baseline, and 0.59 versus the untreated control, after 8 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our photonumeric scale for infraorbital dark circles is sensitive and robust and provides an objective and easy-to-use tool to evaluate dark circles and their treatment.

OBJECTIF: En raison de leur étiologie et de leur périodicité complexes, les cernes sont difficiles à caractériser et à mesurer, les techniques d'évaluation actuelles reposant sur des équipements spécialisés, l'analyse d'images ou des échelles de notation exclusives. Il est donc nécessaire de développer et de valider une échelle photonumérique pour évaluer les cernes infraorbitaires, laquelle peut fournir un outil objectif et pertinent pour le consommateur et tester l'efficacité des produits et des procédures de traitement. MÉTHODES: Un panel d'évaluateurs cliniques experts a examiné environ trois mille photographies du visage recueillies sur une période de 5 ans, ainsi que des images sélectionnées représentant une plage dynamique de cernes. Une échelle photonumérique à 10 points a été créée, avec des descripteurs et des images correspondants à chaque grade de l'échelle. Afin de valider rigoureusement l'échelle, la linéarité, la sensibilité et la précision ont été évaluées par colorimétrie et en clinique. La reproductibilité a été évaluée sur le plan photographique par des évaluateurs cliniques expérimentés et inexpérimentés, tandis que la répétabilité intragrade a été évaluée en direct en clinique. L'échelle a ensuite été utilisée dans un essai clinique randomisé à deux parties sur 58 sujets, afin d'évaluer l'efficacité d'un produit de traitement cosmétique sur 8 semaines. RÉSULTATS: L'analyse des couleurs des images a montré que l'échelle était linéaire, avec des corrélations statistiquement significatives observées lorsque les données de couleurs (CIElab ; angle de typologie individuel) ont été tracées par rapport aux grades correspondants (r > 0,9, P < 0,001). La différence de couleur (Delta E) a été calculée entre la zone infraorbitaire et la peau environnante, et lorsque les données ont été tracées par rapport aux grades, une corrélation statistiquement significative a été observée (r = 0,99, P < 0,01). L'ampleur du delta E a suggéré que les changements de grade sont visiblement perceptibles à l'œil humain, l'échelle étant par conséquent sensible et cliniquement pertinente. La reproductibilité intergrade a montré une forte corrélation (0,96) et une concordance > 90 % entre les évaluateurs expérimentés, tandis que l'évaluation de la répétabilité intragrade a montré une concordance parfaite > 90 % entre les grades. L'utilisation de cette échelle lors d'un essai clinique a démontré l'efficacité d'un produit cosmétique, avec une diminution moyenne statistiquement significative (P < 0,001) du grade de 0,74 par rapport à la référence, et de 0,59 par rapport au témoin non traité, après 8 semaines de traitement. CONCLUSION: Notre échelle photonumérique pour les cernes infraorbitaires est sensible et robuste, fournissant un outil objectif et facile à utiliser afin d'évaluer les cernes et leur traitement.

Perioral wrinkles are associated with female gender, aging, and smoking: Development of a gender-specific photonumeric scale.

BACKGROUND: Perioral wrinkling is commonly reported among older adults, but its objective evaluation and causes remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a photonumeric scale for perioral wrinkling and to elucidate contributory lifestyle factors. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited participants for facial photographs and a survey. A gender-specific photonumeric scale for perioral wrinkling was developed and used by 3 graders to evaluate participant photographs. Scores and survey responses were used to create a multiple regression model to predict perioral wrinkling. RESULTS: In all, 143 participants aged 21 to 91 years were enrolled. Intraclass correlation coefficient values for interrater and intrarater reliability were high (>0.8) across 2 trials and 3 graders. A multiple regression model for prediction of perioral wrinkling severity included age, gender, and years of smoking as variables. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by sample size and a predominantly Caucasian study population. CONCLUSION: We created a photonumeric scale that accounts for gender differences in perioral wrinkling and highlighted contributory variables to photoaging in this anatomical location.

A software program designed to educate patients on age-related skin changes of facial and exposed extrafacial regions: the results of a validation study.

BACKGROUND: A software program called "HOYS" has been developed to depict various aspects and degrees of aging at 35 constituent subregions of seven distinct facial or exposed extrafacial regions. This program is underpinned by five-point photonumeric Likert scales characterizing skin surface and volume changes across five decades for each of the 35 subregions, and features an interactive skin-age assessment with a treatment-prioritization tool. In this study, the reliability and reproducibility of these scales was evaluated. METHODS: Eleven physicians and 19 non-physicians participated in this study. The five images from each of the 35 Likert scales in the HOYS program were shown on a total of 43 display boards, with selected subregions presented at rest or with movement, consistent with this program. Each image was randomly labeled between "A-E," corresponding to a range of skin ages by decade from 20-69 years. Each rater was asked to rank these images from youngest to oldest (or least to most severe deficit) for each scale and to repeat this exercise 2 hours later, with the intra- and inter-rater reliability evaluated. The raters were also asked to estimate the age of a single randomly allocated image on each scale for the purposes of internal validation. RESULTS: The overall inter-rater reliability of the raters was high at the first ranking session (weighted kappa: 0.78; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 0.77-0.79) and this was confirmed when repeated 2 hours later (0.82; 95% CI: 0.81-0.83), with an intra-rater reliability of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.75-0.77). There was no significant difference in the physicians' and non-physicians' rankings. The raters also accurately estimated the actual age of the single randomly allocated image from each of the 43 stations (0.72; 95% CI: 0.70-0.74). A very similar pattern was observed when the ratings of a constituent of one of the seven regions, the perioral/lower face, were analyzed for expounding purposes. CONCLUSION: The high reliability and reproducibility of the ranking in this validation study suggests that the five-point photonumeric Likert scales used in the HOYS program are an accurate depiction of age-related changes over five decades in the seven facial and extrafacial regions represented in this program, from the ages of 20-69 years.

Patient's self-evaluation of two education programs for age-related skin changes in the face: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: An interactive software program (HOYS) has been developed utilizing a database of digital images depicting various aspects and degrees of aging of exposed skin across seven geographic regions, representing a total of 35 facial and extrafacial subregions. A five-point photonumeric rating scale, which portrays age-related skin changes across five decades for each of these subregions, underpins this patient-based interactive self-assessment program. Based on the resulting outputs from this program, an individualized treatment prioritization list is generated for each region where significant differences between the patient's chronological and esthetic ages exist. This provides guidance for the patient and the treating physician on treatment options. METHODS: To evaluate the utility of HOYS in the clinic, relative to education programs currently used in Australian private esthetic clinics, a total of 95 esthetically-orientated patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. RESULTS: Compared with a prospective cohort of patients completing a standard education program commonly utilized in Australian esthetic clinics, patients receiving the HOYS education program reported greater empowerment through improved knowledge of specific age-related skin changes. This was associated with a clearer understanding of treatment options available to them, and a perceived ability to participate in the selection of the treatments potentially administered to improve their appearance. These differences between the two education groups were highly significant. CONCLUSION: Patients completing the HOYS patient education program have an improved understanding of age-related changes to exposed skin of their face, neck, décolletage, and hands. Due to the patient-specific nature of the program, these patients perceive a greater role in the deciding which esthetic treatments should be subsequently administered to enhance their appearance, through an improved understanding of the rationale for these treatments and indeed how they should be prioritized to achieve the best outcome for them.