Impact of codeine rescheduling on prescribing of codeine and other opioids: Interrupted time series analyses using Australian general practice data.

AIMS: We aimed to determine the impact of codeine rescheduling on prescribing of codeine and other opioids, with a focus on demographic and diagnoses associated with codeine prescribing before and after rescheduling of codeine to prescription-only in February 2018. METHODS: We used interrupted time series analysis (February 2016-February 2020) and probit regression to examine prescribing of codeine and other opioids according to primary care data from 464 general practice clinics in Victoria, Australia. RESULTS: The rate of codeine prescribing increased in the month following rescheduling (additional 76 people/10000, 95% confidence interval [CI] 49-103), then declined to baseline rates (slope -2.02, 95% CI 3.79, -0.25). Prescribing of other opioids did not change. Post rescheduling, females were more likely to receive codeine prescriptions compared to males (ß = 0.094, 95% CI 0.08-0.108) and those aged 70-79 years were more likely to receive codeine compared to those aged <30 years. Those residing in the least disadvantaged areas had a greater probability of being prescribed codeine than those in more disadvantaged areas after rescheduling (ß = 0.154, 95% CI 0.129-0.179). A documented mental health diagnosis (ß = 0.067, 95% CI 0.052-0.082) or migraine diagnosis (ß = 0.057, 95% CI 0.037-0.078) was associated with increased likelihood of receiving a codeine prescription after rescheduling compared to before in contrast to those without such a diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Codeine rescheduling did not result in a sustained increase in codeine prescribing nor a change in the prescribing of other opioids. Patient factors associated with increased codeine prescribing after compared to before rescheduling included female sex, older age, migraine diagnosis and comorbid mental health conditions. REGISTRATION: EU PAS Register (EUPAS43218).

Evaluation of adherence to antipsychotics: A real-world data study using four different dosing assumptions.

AIMS: This study aimed to assess the frequency of dosing inconsistencies in prescription data and the effect of four dosing assumption strategies on adherence estimates for antipsychotic treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort, which linked prescription and dispensing data of adult patients with ≥1 antipsychotic prescription between 2015-2016 and followed up until 2019, in Catalonia (Spain). Four strategies were proposed for selecting the recommended dosing in overlapping prescription periods for the same patient and antipsychotic drug: (i) the minimum dosing prescribed; (ii) the dose corresponding to the latest prescription issued; (iii) the highest dosing prescribed; and (iv) all doses included in the overlapped period. For each strategy, one treatment episode per patient was selected, and the Continuous Medication Availability measure was used to assess adherence. Descriptive statistics were used to describe results by strategy. RESULTS: Of the 277 324 prescriptions included, 76% overlapped with other prescriptions (40% with different recommended dosing instructions). The number and characteristics of patients and treatment episodes (18 292, 18 303, 18 339 and 18 536, respectively per strategy) were similar across strategies. Mean adherence was similar between strategies, ranging from 57 to 60%. However, the proportion of patients with adherence ≥90% was lower when selecting all doses (28%) compared with the other strategies (35%). CONCLUSION: Despite the high prevalence of overlapping prescriptions, the strategies proposed did not show a major effect on the adherence estimates for antipsychotic treatment. Taking into consideration the particularities of antipsychotic prescription practices, selecting the highest dose in the overlapped period seemed to provide a more accurate adherence estimate.

Real-Time Use of SGLT2i Verified in Pre-dialysis: The RSVP Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in nephrology practice is increasingly becoming standard of care in patients with diabetes or those with proteinuria. OBJECTIVES: The primary outcome was to identify the proportion of pre-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G3a, G3b, or G4 prescribed an SGLT2i and describe their characteristics. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentric, cross-sectional study of patients with CKD followed at 4 pre-dialysis clinics in the province of Quebec, Canada. We collected data of multiple covariates associated with prescribing SGLT2i in patients over 18 years of age with CKD G3a, G3b, or G4. We then performed a multivariate logistic regression to assess their associations. RESULTS: Of the 874 patients included, 22.7% were prescribed an SGLT2i. Factors most strongly associated included male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 4.88, 95% CI = 2.38-10.03), being prescribed metformin (OR = 4.30, 95% CI = 2.23-8.31), having type 2 diabetes (OR = 4.00, 95% CI = 1.86-8.62), or having an albumin-to-creatinine ratio greater than 300 mg/g (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.08-3.14). The majority of patients (60.4%) had their SGLT2i initiated by the pre-dialysis clinic and the most frequent adverse event was an initial increase in serum creatinine 1 week after starting treatment (33.9%). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: An increasing number of patients with CKD are being prescribed SGLT2i. Nonetheless, significant disparities in sex, severity of disease, and comorbidities remain. We suggest that specific strategies be put in place to promote prescribing of SGLT2i in women and other at-risk populations, in particular among nephrology teams, to improve patient care.

Clinical consensus on treatments for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: double-blinded Delphi panel.

Aim: Obtain clinical consensus on factors impacting first-line prescribing for transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).Materials & methods: A double-blinded, modified Delphi panel was employed. USA-based hematologists/oncologists who treat TIE patients with NDMM were selected as expert panelists.Results: Consensus was reached that patient frailty, performance status, comorbidities, treatment efficacy, and adverse event profile affect first-line prescribing. All panelists agreed it is important to use the most efficacious treatment first; 88% of panelists considered daratumumab-containing regimens the most efficacious. Panelists agreed treatment should be continued until progression while benefits outweigh risk.Conclusion: Findings reinforce the importance of using the most efficacious regimen upfront for TIE NDMM, and nearly all panelists considered daratumumab-containing regimens the most efficacious treatment.

The purpose of this study was to determine the latest clinician preferences and opinions on factors affecting initial treatment selection for people recently diagnosed with multiple myeloma and unable to receive a bone marrow transplant, and to understand challenges with current treatments used in clinical practice. A panel of doctors with an average of two decades of experience treating blood disorders and cancers were recruited as expert panelists. Experts discussed treatment options by completing two rounds of surveys on treatment and one round of discussion. All experts agreed that the most effective treatment should be used first. Most experts considered treatment containing the drug daratumumab to be the most effective. Experts agreed that treatment should be continued until the cancer worsens if the treatment offers more benefits than side effects.

Prescribing patterns in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Retrospective, single-center study.

INTRODUCTION: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is marked by a high rate of treatment resistance. Patients are often left trialing medications within multiple drug classes with little response, causing heterogeneity to emerge in prescribing patterns. This analysis seeks to investigate the selection and dosing of the pharmacotherapy utilized, to portray an overview of prescribing trends in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective, single center, review of electronic medical records investigated the pharmacotherapy utilization of patients with a primary diagnosis of OCD. Two hundred and ninety-five patients who received OCD treatment at an urban, academic medical center were included in the study. Patients were included in the review if they were at least eighteen years of age and were assigned a diagnosis of OCD according to DSM-5 criteria. RESULTS: Psychotropic pharmacotherapy was integrated into the care of 93% of patients. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most utilized medication class at 85% followed by benzodiazepines (47%) and second-generation antipsychotics (37%). Tricyclic antidepressants and first-generation antipsychotics were the two medication classes utilized the least at 13% and 2% respectively. Additionally, mood stabilizers and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors were utilized at rates of 8% and 16%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based treatment guidelines are being followed with varying augmentation strategies widely prevalent, thus displaying the heterogeneity in treating OCD. A high rate of benzodiazepine utilization highlights a practice trend with potential ties to clinical factors, such as the latency to treatment effect of other first-line pharmacotherapies. Future prospective studies are required to determine the cultural, pharmacoeconomic and pharmacogenomic factors that contribute to the variation in prescribing practices and whether these variations influence treatment outcomes.

Differences in prescribing patterns of opioid dependence drugs among patients with primary alcohol use problems and opioid use disorders within New York State by social determinant factors, 2005-2018.

BACKGROUND: The increase in alcohol use problems and opioid use disorder (OUD) highlights the need for research on effective medication treatments for patients with dual diagnoses. OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed trends and social disparities in prescribing OUD medications for patients who initially had alcohol use problems and later received their first OUD diagnosis. METHODS: This study utilized merged data from the New York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports and the Medicaid to analyze individuals aged 18 and older who initially had primary alcohol use problems and later had OUD for the first time between 2005 and 2018. It examined the rates of new buprenorphine and naltrexone prescriptions across various demographic and socioeconomic groups. RESULTS: Among 27,029 clients, the average rate of new buprenorphine was 64.23 per 1,000 clients (95% CI [61.30, 67.15]), with upward trends. The 18-35 age group had the highest buprenorphine utilization (111.48 per 1,000 clients), and highest increase rates compared to other age groups. The White non-Hispanic group had the highest rates of buprenorphine (119.23 per 1000 clients) and showed larger increase over time compared to other race/ethnicity groups. Disabled patients showed slower increasing rates of buprenorphine compared to other groups. Upward trends were observed in naltrexone. All observed differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Trends showed increased use of OUD medications, with varying rates of buprenorphine utilization across different ages, races, and employment statuses. Despite this, the rates of receiving new buprenorphine remained low, suggesting a need for innovative methods to expand access to treatments.

Trends and prescribing patterns of antimigraine medicines in nine major cities in China from 2018 to 2022: a retrospective prescription analysis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the trends and prescribing patterns of antimigraine medicines in China. METHODS: The prescription data of outpatients diagnosed with migraine between 2018 and 2022 were extracted from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Project of China. The demographic characteristics of migraine patients, prescription trends, and corresponding expenditures on antimigraine medicines were analyzed. We also investigated prescribing patterns of combination therapy and medicine overuse. RESULTS: A total of 32,246 outpatients who were diagnosed with migraine at 103 hospitals were included in this study. There were no significant trend changes in total outpatient visits, migraine prescriptions, or corresponding expenditures during the study period. Of the patients who were prescribed therapeutic medicines, 70.23% received analgesics, and 26.41% received migraine-specific agents. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 28.03%), caffeine-containing agents (22.15%), and opioids (16.00%) were the most commonly prescribed analgesics, with corresponding cost proportions of 11.35%, 4.08%, and 19.61%, respectively. Oral triptans (26.12%) were the most commonly prescribed migraine-specific agents and accounted for 62.21% of the total therapeutic expenditures. The proportion of patients receiving analgesic prescriptions increased from 65.25% in 2018 to 75.68% in 2022, and the proportion of patients receiving concomitant triptans decreased from 29.54% in 2018 to 21.55% in 2022 (both P <  0.001). The most frequently prescribed preventive medication classes were calcium channel blockers (CCBs; 51.59%), followed by antidepressants (20.59%) and anticonvulsants (15.82%), which accounted for 21.90%, 34.18%, and 24.15%, respectively, of the total preventive expenditures. Flunarizine (51.41%) was the most commonly prescribed preventive drug. Flupentixol/melitracen (7.53%) was the most commonly prescribed antidepressant. The most commonly prescribed anticonvulsant was topiramate (9.33%), which increased from 6.26% to 12.75% (both P <  0.001). A total of 3.88% of the patients received combined therapy for acute migraine treatment, and 18.63% received combined therapy for prevention. The prescriptions for 69.21% of opioids, 38.53% of caffeine-containing agents, 26.61% of NSAIDs, 13.97% of acetaminophen, and 6.03% of triptans were considered written medicine overuse. CONCLUSIONS: Migraine treatment gradually converges toward evidence-based and guideline-recommended treatment. Attention should be given to opioid prescribing, weak evidence-based antidepressant use, and medication overuse in migraine treatment.

Analysis of Ohio Advanced Practice Registered Nurses' Rate of Prescribing Naltrexone for Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder Since Elimination of the X-Waiver.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is common and deadly. Naltrexone is a treatment for AUD. Previous research examined factors that predict Ohio Advanced Practice Registered Nurses' (APRNs) utilization of naltrexone to treat AUD. Inclusion criteria included APRNs' endorsing receipt of the X-waiver, a designation indicating providers' receipt of substance use disorder education. In 2023, the X-waiver was eliminated. The purpose of this study was to replicate the previous research design in respondents without an X-waiver and compare findings. AIMS: The aims of this study were three-fold: (1) assess whether race, age, practice setting, years in practice, or work experience with an addiction specialist physician predicted prescription of naltrexone for AUD, (2) assess whether the goal of abstinence or reduced alcohol use as desired treatment affected the likelihood of naltrexone prescription for AUD, and (3) compare differences between the answers in the current respondent group without X-waiver and the previous study's X-waivered respondents. METHOD: All Ohio APRNs were sent surveys. Eighty-eight responses were included in analysis. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and chi-square results were reported. RESULTS: Work experience with an addiction specialist physician was negatively associated with prescribing naltrexone for AUD. Respondents from the previous study of X-waivered APRNs were significantly more likely to prescribe naltrexone for reduced alcohol consumption as a treatment outcome than the respondents in this study. CONCLUSION: The recent policy change eliminating the X-waiver provides important context for research, adding to the substance use disorder literature.

Prescribing patterns of antiretroviral treatments during pregnancy for women living with HIV in Canada 2004-2020: A surveillance study.

BACKGROUND: While treatment guidelines for HIV in adults have evolved rapidly with the advent of new antiretroviral (ARV) treatment, those for the prevention of vertical HIV transmission in pregnancy have evolved more slowly due to safety and efficacy concerns. Here we describe Canadian prescribing patterns for ARV treatments during pregnancy and compare them to perinatal HIV prescribing guidelines of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), that are commonly used in Canada and include recommendations for newly commercialized therapies. METHODS: The Canadian Perinatal HIV Surveillance Program (CPHSP) captures annual medical data on mothers living with HIV and their infants from 23 sites across Canada. Women from this cohort who received an ARV treatment during pregnancy and who gave birth between 2004 and 2020 were included in the study. ARV treatments were designated as 'preferred/alternative' as per HHS HIV perinatal guidelines, or 'other than preferred/alternative'. RESULTS: We identified 3673 pregnancies from 2720 women. The proportion of women that conceived while on ARV treatment increased from 29% in 2003 to 90% in 2020. Other than preferred/alternative ARV treatments were received in 1112 (30%) of pregnancies and this was significantly associated with having initiated ARV treatment before conception. CONCLUSION: In Canada during the study period, a high number of women were prescribed an other than preferred/alternative ARV treatment during pregnancy. Further optimization of ARV treatment in women of childbearing age living with HIV is warranted.

Optimal medical management in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia is associated with improved outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Optimizing medical management and risk factor modification are underused strategies in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), despite evidence of improved outcomes. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry is a tool to improve quality of vascular care. In this study, we used the VQI to evaluate trends in medical management in patients with CLTI undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI), and the impact of changes in management on overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS), and limb salvage (LS). METHODS: Patients undergoing index PVI for CLTI between 2012 and 2016, with ≥24 months of follow-up were identified from the national VQI registry. Patient details including smoking status and medication use, OS, LS, and AFS were analyzed with linear-by-linear association, t test, and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 12,370 PVI completed in 11,466 patients. There was a significant increase in infrapopliteal interventions (from 29.8% to 39.0%; P < .001) and PVI performed for tissue loss (from 59.1% to 66.5%; P < .001). The percentage of current smokers at time of PVI decreased (from 36.2% to 30.7%; P = .036). At discharge, statins were initiated in 25%, aspirin in 45%, and P2Y12 therapy in 58% of patients not receiving these medications before PVI. Over the course of follow-up, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (from 41.1% to 48.0%; P < .001), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (from 46.2% to 51.3%; P < .001), and statin (from 70.4% to 77.5%; P < .001) use increased. Combined DAPT, ACE inhibitor and statin use increased from 33.6% to 39.6% (P ≤ .001). Significant improvement in 24-month OS and AFS was noted (OS, from 90.9% to 93.7% [P = .002]: AFS, from 81.2% to 83.1% [P = .046]), but not LS (from 89.6% to 89.0%; P = .83). Combined therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors, statins and ACE inhibitors was an independent predictor of improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.96; P = .034). DAPT was independent predictor of improved LS (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.87; P < .007). CONCLUSIONS: Antiplatelet, ACE inhibitor, and statin use increased over the study period and was associated with improved OS and AFS. LS trends did not change significantly over time, possibly owing to the inclusion of patients with a greater disease burden or inadequate medical management. Medical management, although improved, remained far from optimal and represents an area for continued development.

Trends in Prescribing Opioids, Benzodiazepines, and Both Among Adults with Alcohol Use Disorder in New York State.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a highly prevalent public health problem that contributes to opioid- and benzodiazepine-related morbidity and mortality. Even though co-utilization of these substances is particularly harmful, data are sparse on opioid or benzodiazepine prescribing patterns among individuals with AUD. OBJECTIVE: To estimate temporal trends and disparities in opioid, benzodiazepine, and opioid/benzodiazepine co-prescribing among individuals with AUD in New York State (NYS). DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: Serial cross-sectional study analyzing merged data from the NYS Office of Addiction Services and Supports (OASAS) and the NYS Department of Health Medicaid Data Warehouse. Subjects with a first admission to an OASAS treatment program from 2005-2018 and a primary AUD were included. A total of 148,328 subjects were identified. MEASURES: Annual prescribing rates of opioids, benzodiazepines, or both between the pre- (2005-2012) and post- (2013-2018) Internet System for Tracking Over-Prescribing (I-STOP) periods. I-STOP is a prescription monitoring program implemented in NYS in August 2013. Analyses were stratified based on sociodemographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, and location). RESULTS: Opioid prescribing rates decreased between the pre- and post-I-STOP periods from 25.1% (95% CI, 24.9-25.3%) to 21.3% (95% CI, 21.2-21.4; P <.001), while benzodiazepine (pre: 9.96% [95% CI, 9.83-10.1%], post: 9.92% [95% CI, 9.83-10.0%]; P =.631) and opioid/benzodiazepine prescribing rates remained unchanged (pre: 3.01% vs. post: 3.05%; P =.403). After I-STOP implementation, there was a significant decreasing trend in opioid (change, -1.85% per year, P <.0001), benzodiazepine (-0.208% per year, P =.0184), and opioid/benzodiazepine prescribing (-0.267% per year, P <.0001). Opioid, benzodiazepine, and co-prescription rates were higher in females, White non-Hispanics, and rural regions. CONCLUSIONS: Among those with AUD, opioid prescribing decreased following NYS I-STOP program implementation. While both benzodiazepine and opioid/benzodiazepine co-prescribing rates remained high, a decreasing trend was evident after program implementation. Continuing high rates of opioid and benzodiazepine prescribing necessitate the development of innovative approaches to improve the quality of care.

Characteristics of providers who prescribed only anticholinergic medications for overactive bladder in 2020.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacologic therapy for overactive bladder typically includes either an anticholinergic or a beta-3 agonist. Based on research that has demonstrated increased risks of cognitive impairment and dementia associated with anticholinergic use, current guidelines support the use of beta-3 agonists rather than anticholinergics in older patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the characteristics of providers prescribing only anticholinergics to treat overactive bladder in patients aged ≥65 years. STUDY DESIGN: The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services publishes data on medications dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. Data include the National Provider Identifier of the prescriber and the number of pills prescribed and dispensed for any given medication for beneficiaries aged ≥65 years. We obtained each provider's National Provider Identifier, gender, degree, and primary specialty. National Provider Identifiers were linked to an additional Medicare database that includes graduation year. We included providers who prescribed pharmacologic therapy for overactive bladder in 2020 for patients aged ≥65 years. We calculated the percentage of providers who prescribed only anticholinergics (and did not prescribe beta-3 agonists) for overactive bladder and stratified by provider characteristics. Data are reported as adjusted risk ratios. RESULTS: In 2020, 131,605 providers prescribed overactive bladder medications. Of those identified, 110,874 (84.2%) had complete demographic information available. Although only 7% of providers who prescribed medications for overactive bladder were urologists, prescriptions from urologists accounted for 29% of total prescriptions. Among providers prescribing medications for overactive bladder, 73% of female providers prescribed only anticholinergics, whereas 66% of male providers prescribed only anticholinergics (P<.001). The percentage of providers that prescribed only anticholinergics also varied by specialty (P<.001), with providers specialized in geriatric medicine being least likely to prescribe only anticholinergics (40%), followed by urologists (44%). Nurse practitioners (75%) and family medicine physicians (73%) were more likely to prescribe only anticholinergics. The percentage of providers who prescribed only anticholinergics was the highest for recent medical school graduates and decreased with time since graduation. Overall, 75% of providers within 10 years of graduation prescribed only anticholinergics, whereas only 64% of providers who were >40 years of age from graduation prescribed only anticholinergics (P<.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified considerable differences in prescribing practices based on provider characteristics. Female physicians, nurse practitioners, physicians trained in family medicine, and those who recently graduated from medical school were the most likely to prescribe only anticholinergic medications and not prescribe any beta-3 agonist for the treatment of overactive bladder. This study identified differences in prescribing practices based on provider demographics that may guide educational outreach programs.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Opioid Use Following Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Recent Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To provide pharmacists and other health care professionals with the knowledge required to minimize the risk of prolonged opioid use following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed and Embase was performed, and included the search terms: (opioid OR opiate OR opium) AND (risk factor OR predict*) AND (arthroplasty OR replacement) NOT shoulder. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized control trials, cohort studies (both prospective and retrospective), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included if risk ratios (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs) were reported and published within the last 5 years. DATA SYNTHESIS: ]Twenty studies met inclusion criteria, including 2 meta-analyses and 2 prospective studies. There were several risk factors that overlapped between studies and presented clinically significant risks for prolonged opioid use following THA and TKA surgery. Of these, age < 65 (RRs: 1.15-9.36), preoperative opioid use (RRs: 1.09-7.81), larger quantities of opioids prescribed at discharge (RRs: 1.26-8.81), and TKA surgery (RRs: 1.73-6.07) were the most significant. Several risk factors were recently described, including migraines (RRs: 1.14-5.11) and fibromyalgia (RRs: 1.1-2.3) that may be of interest for further research. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review presents a discussion of the factors associated with prolonged opioid use following THA and TKA surgeries, which are among the most common orthopedic surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribers should carefully consider patient-specific factors when prescribing opioids as there are several factors, including age, surgery type, and medical conditions that can predispose patients to prolonged opioid use.

Persistence and adherence to second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectable medications for schizophrenia: A comparative study in the Australian context.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient characteristics, persistence and adherence to treatment associated with use of second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectable (SGA LAI) medications in the Australian real-world setting. METHOD: Five SGA LAIs were compared using a retrospective 10% sample of prescriptions in Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data: paliperidone palmitate 1-monthly (PP1M), paliperidone palmitate 3-monthly (PP3M), aripiprazole monohydrate (ARI), risperidone (RLAI) and olanzapine pamoate (OLAI). RESULTS: Patients in the PP3M cohort were more persistent with treatment (p < 0.001). Median months of persistence: PP3M (36 months); ARI (18 months); PP1M (11 months); OLAI (8 months); RLAI (4 months). Patients in the PP3M cohort were more adherent to treatment (p < 0.001): PP3M (78%); ARI (51%); PP1M (46%); OLAI (35%); RLAI (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on PP3M treatment showed comparatively longer persistence and better adherence. Treatments for schizophrenia with longer dosing intervals may provide patients with symptomatic stability that could allow for reduced hospitalisations/relapse and increased focus on functional recovery.

Understanding Ohio X-Waivered Advanced Practice Registered Nurses' Rate of Naltrexone Prescription for Alcohol Use Disordered Patients.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is overrepresented within the United States. Naltrexone, a recommended treatment for AUD, is underutilized. However, the prescribing behaviors of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) regarding naltrexone for AUD patients have not been studied. The purpose of our study was to explore the prescriptive practices of a sample of APRNs. AIMS: To describe and analyze survey responses of a sample of Ohio APRNs with training in medication for addiction treatment (MAT) for substance use disorders (as evidenced by DEA x-waiver receipt) regarding prescribing practices of naltrexone for AUD patients. METHOD: Public information collected from the first author's Nursing Board (list of APRNs in Ohio) was checked against the public information of x-waivered providers nationally from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA) website. This generated a potential sample size of 824 APRNs, all of whom were sent email solicitations to complete a Qualtrics survey. After 3 weeks, 55 surveys were completed, and the data were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were generated as well as a logistic regression with five potential predictor variables against the outcome variable (defined as use of naltrexone for AUD patients). RESULTS: Years practicing as an APRN was found to negatively predict naltrexone prescribing behavior for AUD patients. Practice setting and work experience with an addiction specialist physician were not found to predict naltrexone prescribing behavior for AUD patients. CONCLUSION: Implications for further study were discussed, with emphasis on regulatory variance between states.

Higher-Dose Gabapentinoids and the Risk of Adverse Events in Older Adults With CKD: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Gabapentinoids are opioid substitutes whose elimination by the kidneys is reduced as kidney function declines. To inform their safe prescribing in older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD), we examined the 30-day risk of serious adverse events according to the prescribed starting dose. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 74,084 older adults (64% women; median age, 79 [interquartile range, 73-85] years) with CKD (defined for this study as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and excluding those receiving dialysis) and a newly prescribed gabapentinoid between 2008 and 2020 in Ontario, Canada. EXPOSURE: Higher-dose gabapentinoids (gabapentin >300 mg/d or pregabalin >75 mg/d) versus lower-dose gabapentinoids (gabapentin ≤300 mg/d or pregabalin ≤75 mg/d). OUTCOMES: The primary composite outcome was the 30-day risk of a hospital visit with encephalopathy, a fall, or a fracture or a hospitalization with respiratory depression. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Comparison groups were balanced on indicators of baseline health using inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score analysis that generated a pseudosample for the reference group with a distribution of measured covariates similar to the exposed group. Weighted risk ratios were estimated using modified Poisson regression, and weighted risk differences were estimated using binomial regression. Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted by estimated glomerular filtration rate category and type of gabapentinoid. RESULTS: Among 74,084 patients identified with CKD and a new prescription for gabapentin or pregabalin, 41% started at >300 or >75 mg/d, respectively. From this set of patients, a weighted study population with a size of 61,367 was generated. Patients who started at a higher dose had a higher 30-day risk of the primary outcome than patients who started at lower dose. Within the weighted population, the numbers of events for higher versus lower dose were 585 of 30,660 (1.9%) versus 462 of 30,707 (1.5%), respectively. The weighted risk ratio was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.13-1.42), and the weighted risk difference was 0.40% (95% CI, 0.21%-0.60%). In subgroup analyses, neither multiplicative nor additive interactions were statistically significant. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, starting a gabapentinoid at a higher versus a lower dose was associated with a slightly higher risk of a hospital visit with encephalopathy, a fall, or a fracture or hospitalization with respiratory depression. If verified, these risks should be balanced against the benefits of using a higher-dose gabapentinoid.

Overcoming Cough and Angioedema: Advocating for the Use of ARBs Over ACE Inhibitors.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have comparable efficacy, but ARBs have a preferential safety profile with particular regard to cough and angioedema. Although guidelines have historically advocated for ACE inhibitor use before ARBs simply because of earlier market entry, data accumulation, and generic availability, updated verbiage advises an "ACE inhibitor or ARB" recommendation, as opposed to the classic "ACE inhibitor then ARB" approach. Despite these updates, clinical inertia in favor of ACE inhibitor use before ARBs overwhelmingly remains. Prescribers and educators should consider an "ARBs only" mentality, especially in high angioedema-risk groups such as black patients.

Core concepts in pharmacoepidemiology: Measures of drug utilization based on individual-level drug dispensing data.

BACKGROUND: Drug utilization studies are essential to facilitate rational drug use in the society. AIM: In this review, we provide an overview of drug utilization measures that can be used with individual-level drug dispensing data, referencing additional reading on the individual analysis. This is intended to serve as a primer for those new to drug utilization research and a shortlist from which researchers can identify useful analytical approaches when designing their drug utilization study. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We provide an overview of: (1) basic measures of drug utilization which are used to describe changes in drug use over time or compare drug use in different populations; (2) treatment adherence measures with specific focus on persistence and implementation; (3) how to measure drug combinations which is useful when assessing drug-drug interactions, concomitant treatment, and polypharmacy; (4) prescribing quality indicators and measures to assess variations in drug use which are useful tools to assess appropriate use of drugs; (5) proxies of prescription drug misuse and skewness in drug use; and (6) considerations when describing the characteristics of drug users or prescribers.

Antipsychotic prescribing patterns in Australia: a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: To examine real-world patterns of antipsychotic use in patients with schizophrenia Australia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the Australian Commonwealth Department of Human Services Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% sample data. Included data were for patients aged 16-years or older who initiated treatment for the first time with a PBS-reimbursed antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia between July 2013 and September 2017. Patterns of treatment usage were summarised descriptively. Differences in prescribing patterns by age and prescribing year were reported. Treatment persistence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, with differences explored using log-rank tests. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: 6,740 patients, representing 8,249 non-unique patients, received prescriptions for antipsychotic medications. Patients were aged 16 years to over 85 years (54.5% were < 55 years) and two-thirds of patients were male (61%). The majority of treatment episodes (62%, n = 5,139/8,249) were prescribed an atypical oral antipsychotic. Typical long-acting antipsychotic therapies (LATs) were prescribed 19% of the treatment episodes (n = 1,608/8,249. There was a small increase in prescribing of atypical LAT and typical LAT and a small decrease in atypical oral and clozapine prescribing over the study period. Treatment persistence was greatest in patients treated with clozapine, than in those treated with atypical LATs. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of patients receive atypical antipsychotic medications, one in five continue to use older typical LAT therapies. Patient age and time on therapy may be associated with choice of therapy. Persistence to atypical LAT therapy is better than for other treatment modalities in this real-world cohort.

Prescribing Alzheimer's Disease treatments by provider type and geographic region: a comparison among physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants.

BACKGROUND: The estimated increase in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) caseload may present a logistical challenge to the US healthcare system. While nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are increasingly delivering primary care to patients with chronic diseases, the nature of their prescribing of AD medications is largely unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare the prescribing of AD medications across provider types (physician, NP, and PA) and geographic regions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using IBM MarketScan® commercial and Medicare supplemental claims to examine unique AD prescriptions prescribed between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Parallel analysis of prescriptions for another geriatric condition, osteoporosis (OP), was also conducted for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 103,067 AD prescriptions and 131,773 OP prescriptions were included in analyses. Physicians prescribed most AD prescriptions (95.65%), followed by NPs (3.37%) and PAs (0.98%). Small differences were identified among individual AD medications prescribed by physicians compared to NP/PAs. NPs/PAs prescribed a significantly higher proportion of AD prescriptions in rural as compared to urban areas (z = 0.023, 95%CI [0.018, 0.028]). CONCLUSION: Minimal variation exists in AD prescribing among physicians, NPs, and PAs, but NPs/PAs prescribe more AD prescriptions in rural areas. NPs/PAs, especially in rural areas, may play critical roles in alleviating projected workforce constraints. Further research assessing AD care, health outcomes, and costs by provider type and region is necessary to better guide healthcare workforce planning for AD care.