A comparison of hemodynamic measurement methods during orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluating agreement and trending ability of PiCCO versus pulmonary artery catheter techniques.

BACKGROUND: Significant hemodynamic changes occur during liver transplantation, emphasizing the importance of precious and continuous monitoring of cardiac output, cardiac index, and other parameters. Although the monitoring of cardiac output by pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) was statistically homogeneous compared to the clinical gold standard pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in previous studies of liver transplantation, there are fewer statistical methods for the assessment of its conclusions, and a lack of comparisons of other hemodynamic parameters (e.g., SVRI, systemic vascular resistance index). Some studies have also concluded that the agreement between PiCCO and PAC is not good enough. Overall, there are no uniform conclusions regarding the agreement between PiCCO and PAC in previous studies. This study evaluates the agreement and trending ability of relevant hemodynamic parameters obtained with PiCCO compared to the clinical gold standard PAC from multiple perspectives, employing various statistical methods. METHODS: Fifty-two liver transplantation patients were included. Cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), SVRI and stroke volume index (SVI) values were monitored at eight time points using both PiCCO and PAC. The results were analyzed by Bland-Altman analysis, Passing-bablok regression, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), 4-quadrant plot, polar plot, and trend interchangeability method (TIM). RESULTS: The Bland-Altman analysis revealed high percentage errors for PiCCO: 54.06% for CO, 52.70% for CI, 62.18% for SVRI, and 51.97% for SVI, indicating poor accuracy. While Passing-Bablok plots showed favorable agreement for SVRI overall and during various phases, the agreement for other parameters was less satisfactory. The ICC results confirmed good overall agreement between the two devices across most parameters, except for SVRI during the new liver phase, which showed poor agreement. Additionally, four-quadrant and polar plot analyses indicated that all agreement rate values fell below the clinically acceptable threshold of over 90%, and all angular deviation values exceeded ± 5°, demonstrating that PiCCO is unable to meet the acceptable trends. Using the TIM, the interchangeability rates were found to be quite low: 20% for CO and CI, 16% for SVRI, and 13% for SVI. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed notable disparities in absolute values of CO, CI, SVRI and SVI between PiCCO and PAC in intraoperative liver transplant settings, notably during the neohepatic phase where errors were particularly pronounced. Consequently, these findings highlight the need for careful consideration of PiCCO's advantages and disadvantages in liver transplantation scenarios, including its multiple parameters (such as the encompassing extravascular lung water index), against its limited correlation with PAC.

Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance in living-donor liver transplantation: a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Based on the controversy surrounding pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in surgical patients, we investigated the interchangeability of cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) measurements between ClearSight™ and PAC during living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: This prospective study included consecutively selected LDLT patients. ClearSight™-based CI and SVR measurements were compared with those from PAC at seven LDLT-stage time points. ClearSight™-based systolic (SAP), mean (MAP), and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures were also compared with those from femoral arterial catheterization (FAC). For the comparison and analysis of ClearSight™ and the reference method, Bland-Altman analysis was used to analyze accuracy while polar and four-quadrant plots were used to analyze the trending ability. RESULTS: From 27 patients, 189 pairs of ClearSight™ and reference values were analyzed. The CI and SVR performance errors (PEs) exhibited poor accuracy between the two methods (51.52 and 51.73%, respectively) in the Bland-Altman analysis. CI and SVR also exhibited unacceptable trending abilities in both the polar and four-quadrant plot analyses. SAP, MAP, and DAP PEs between the two methods displayed favorable accuracy (24.28, 21.18, and 26.26%, respectively). SAP and MAP exhibited acceptable trending ability in the four-quadrant plot between the two methods, but not in the polar plot analyses. CONCLUSIONS: During LDLT, CI and SVR demonstrated poor interchangeability, while SAP and MAP exhibited acceptable interchangeability between ClearSight™ and FAC.

Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: It is still uncertain what effects pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-guided resuscitation has on outcomes for patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of PAC on hospital mortality in patients with SAP. METHODS: We collected the data of patients with a diagnosis of SAP from January 10, 2017, to July 30, 2019. Patients were divided into a PAC group and a control group. The primary outcome measured was the day-28 mortality. Secondary outcomes included day-90 mortality, duration of ICU and hospital stay, ventilation days, usage of renal support and vasoactive agents, incidences of acute abdominal compartment syndrome, infusion volumes, and fluid balance and hemodynamic characteristics measured by the PAC. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to estimate survival outcomes. Complications related to PAC were also analyzed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the PAC group and the control group for day-28 mortality (22.7% vs. 30%, odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI 0.31-1.52; P = 0.35). The duration of ICU stay in the PAC group was shorter (P = 0.00), and the rate of dependence on renal support treatment was lower in the PAC group than in the control group (P = 0.03). There was no difference in other secondary outcomes and no significant difference in the survival curve between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.72, X2 = 0.13). However, SAP patients inserted PAC within 24 h ICU admission showed that duration of renal support therapy in PAC patients within 24 h ICU admission (mean days, 1.60; standard deviation, 0.14) was shorter than those with 24-72 h ICU admission (mean days, 2.94; standard deviation, 0.73; P = 0.03). The organ failure rates (1 organ, 2 organs and 3 organs) were all lower in PAC patients within 24 h ICU admission than with 24-72 h ICU admission (P = 0.02, P = 0.02, P = 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with severe acute pancreatitis, PAC-guided fluid resuscitation shortened the duration of ICU stay, and patients in the PAC group had a lower rate of dependence on renal support, while no benefit in terms of mortality was observed. However, SAP patients inserted PAC within 24 h ICU admission showed shorter duration of renal support therapy and lower organ failure rates than those with 24-72 h ICU admission, indicating that early use of PAC, especially within 24 h, might be better for SAP patients.

Hemodynamic assessment and risk classification for successful weaning of Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: Clinical predictors for successful weaning of patients from Impella heart pump have not been clarified. We aimed to elucidate the relationship between pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) parameters at the time of Impella weaning and subsequent outcomes. METHODS: We enrolled consecutive patients who had received Impella for cardiogenic shock. PAC data were collected immediately before Impella weaning. Patients were classified as non-survivors if they died or required any mechanical circulatory support reintroduction within 30 days of weaning. RESULTS: Of 81 patients enrolled, 61 underwent Impella weaning. Of these, 16 were non-survivors. Predictive indicators of non-survival were high pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP; hazard ratio [HR] per 5 mm Hg 1.97, 95% CI 1.35-2.80; p < 0.001), high mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP; HR per 5 mm Hg 1.90, 1.38-2.58; p < 0.001), and low cardiac power output (CPO; HR per 0.1 Watts 0.71, 0.52-0.92; p = 0.006). Cutoff values of PAWP 20 mm Hg, MPAP 22 mm Hg, and CPO 0.59 Watts showed strong associations with 30-day non-survival risk (low risk 8% in patients with low PAWP and high CPO or 4% in patients with low MPAP and high CPO; high risk 100% in patients with high PAWP and low CPO or 82% in patients with high MPAP and low CPO). CONCLUSIONS: PAWP or MPAP higher than the cutoff with CPO below the cutoff at Impella weaning were associated with worse outcomes. We proposed a risk classification model for successful Impella weaning using PAC.

Agreement between continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution for cardiac output measurement in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary artery thermodilution is the clinical reference method for cardiac output monitoring. Because both continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution are used in clinical practice it is important to know whether cardiac output measurements by the two methods are clinically interchangeable. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing cardiac output measurements assessed using continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in adult surgical and critically ill patients. 54 studies with 1522 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The heterogeneity across the studies was high. The overall random effects model-derived pooled estimate of the mean of the differences was 0.08 (95%-confidence interval 0.01 to 0.16) L/min with pooled 95%-limits of agreement of - 1.68 to 1.85 L/min and a pooled percentage error of 29.7 (95%-confidence interval 20.5 to 38.9)%. CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity across clinical studies comparing continuous and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in adult surgical and critically ill patients is high. The overall trueness/accuracy of continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution is good (indicated by a pooled mean of the differences < 0.1 L/min). Pooled 95%-limits of agreement of - 1.68 to 1.85 L/min and a pooled percentage error of 29.7% suggest that continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution barely passes interchangeability criteria with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020159730.

Pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Cardiogenic shock carries high morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review was to determine the safety and efficacy of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in adult patients hospitalized with cardiogenic shock. SOURCE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing PAC vs no PAC in cardiogenic shock. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and grey literature. We screened articles, abstracted data, and evaluated risk of bias in duplicate. We pooled data using a random-effects model and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE framework. Outcomes of interest were mortality, length of stay, and procedural complications. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We identified 19 eligible observational studies (≥ 2,716,287 patients) and no randomized controlled trials; 14 studies were at high risk of bias (lack of adjustment for prognostic variables and/or co-interventions). When pooling adjusted results, PAC was associated with improved survival to hospital discharge (relative risk [RR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.91, I2 = 98%; very low-quality evidence) and at longest available follow-up (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87; I2 = 99%; very low-quality evidence). Unadjusted length of stay was 3.5 days longer (95% CI, 1.49 to 5.54; I2 = 100%; very low-quality evidence) with PAC. Procedural complications were inconsistently reported. CONCLUSIONS: Very low-quality observational evidence suggests PAC use in patients with cardiogenic shock is associated with lower mortality. Overall, these results support consideration of PAC for hemodynamic assessment in cardiogenic shock. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to further characterize the role of PAC in this population.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le choc cardiogénique entraîne une morbidité et une mortalité élevées. Le but de cette revue était de déterminer la sécurité et l'efficacité de l'utilisation d'un cathétérisme de l'artère pulmonaire (CAP) chez des patients adultes hospitalisés en choc cardiogénique. SOURCES: Nous avons réalisé une revue systématique et une méta-analyse d'études observationnelles et d'études randomisées contrôlées comparant l'utilisation vs la non-utilisation de CAP pour le traitement d'un choc cardiogénique. Nous avons effectué des recherches dans les bases de données MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL et dans la littérature grise. Nous avons examiné les articles, résumé les données et évalué le risque de biais à deux reprises. Nous avons regroupé les données à l'aide d'un modèle à effets aléatoires et évalué la qualité des données probantes en nous appuyant sur le système GRADE. Les issues d'intérêt étaient la mortalité, la durée de séjour et les complications procédurales. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Nous avons identifié 19 études observationnelles admissibles (≥ 2 716 287 patients) et aucune étude randomisée contrôlée; 14 études comportaient un risque élevé de biais (absence d'ajustement sur les variables pronostiques et/ou les interventions concomitantes). En regroupant les résultats ajustés, le CAP a été associé à une meilleure survie jusqu'au congé de l'hôpital (risque relatif [RR], 0,77; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,64 à 0,91, I2 = 98 %; données probantes de très faible qualité) et jusqu'au point de suivi disponible rapporté le plus lointain dans le temps (RR, 0,72; IC 95 %, 0,60 à 0,87; I2 = 99 %; données probantes de très faible qualité). La durée de séjour non ajustée était 3,5 jours plus longue (IC 95 %, 1,49 à 5,54; I2 = 100 %; données probantes de très faible qualité) avec un CAP. Les complications procédurales n'étaient par rapportées de manière uniforme. CONCLUSION: Des données observationnelles de très faible qualité suggèrent que l'utilisation d'un CAP chez des patients en choc cardiogénique est associée à une réduction de la mortalité. Dans l'ensemble, ces résultats suggèrent de considérer le CAP pour l'évaluation hémodynamique en cas de choc cardiogénique. Des études cliniques randomisées prospectives sont nécessaires pour mieux caractériser le rôle du CAP dans cette population.

Takotsubo syndrome: between evidence, myths, and misunderstandings.

Takotsubo syndrome (TS) is an acute cardiac condition characterized by transient wall motion abnormalities mostly of the left ventricle. First described in 1990, TS has gained substantial attention during the past 15 years. However, the disease is still underdiagnosed. Prospective studies on TS are largely lacking, and the condition remains incompletely understood. In addition, significant misconceptions and misunderstandings are evident, contributing to potentially severe underestimation. Here, we review important aspects of TS with a focus on pitfalls, misinterpretations, and knowledge gaps considered important during diagnosis and management of the disease.

Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Cardiac Surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has become a widespread topic in perioperative medicine over the past 20 years. The goals of ERAS are to improve patient outcomes and perioperative experience, reduce length of hospital stay, minimize complications, and reduce cost. Interventions and factors before, during, and after surgery all potentially play a role with the cumulative effect being superior quality of patient care. RECENT FINDINGS: Preoperatively, patient and family education, optimization of nutritional status, and antibiotic prophylaxis all improve outcomes. Recovery is also expedited by the use of multimodal analgesia, regional anesthesia, and opioid reducing approaches. Intraoperatively, the anesthesiologist can have an impact by using less-invasive monitors appropriately to guide fluid and hemodynamic management as well as maintaining normothermia. Postoperatively, early enteral feeding, mobilization, and removal of invasive lines support patient recovery. Implementation of ERAS protocol in cardiac surgery faces challenges by some unique perioperative perspectives in cardiac surgery, such as systemic anticoagulation, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, significantly more hemodynamic variations, larger volume replacement, postoperative intubation and mechanical ventilation and associated sedation, and potentially significantly more co-existing morbidities than other surgical procedures. ERAS in cardiac surgery may benefit patients more related to its high risk and high cost nature. This manuscript specifically reviews the unique aspects of enhanced recovery in cardiac surgery.

Interventional Removal of Knotted Pulmonary Artery Catheter: A Case Report.

A 60-year-old female patient underwent emergency cadaveric liver transplantation. During the insertion of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) through the left innominate vein, advancement of the catheter was not successful and a knot occurred. An interventional radiologist performed antegrade rigid wire insertion into the PAC and succeeded in loosening the knot in the vessel. We report the successful removal of a knot through intervention without additional invasive procedures in a hemodynamically unstable patient with a coagulopathy.

Extent of jugular venous distension and lower extremity edema are the best tools from history and physical examination to identify heart failure exacerbation.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to identify the best tools from history and physical examination that predict severity of heart failure (HF) exacerbation among patients with an ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 30%. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the ESCAPE trial were divided into tertiles according to the combined value of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and right atrial pressure (RAP) which we used as a marker of volume loading of both pulmonary and systemic compartments. Variables of congestion from history and physical examination were examined across tertiles. RESULTS: There were significant differences across tertiles (tertile 1: PCWP + RAP < 31 mm Hg, tertile 2: PCWP + RAP 31-42 mm Hg and tertile 3: PCWP + RAP > 42 mm Hg) with respect to baseline B­type natriuretic peptide (P = 0.016), blood urea nitrogen (P = 0.022), sodium (P = 0.015), left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.005), and inferior vena cava diameter during inspiration (P < 0.001) and expiration (P < 0.001). With respect to variables of congestion from history and physical examination, we found significant differences across tertiles predominantly in signs of right sided failure, specifically, the frequency of jugular venous distension (JVD, P < 0.001) and JVD > 12 cmH2O (p < 0.001), lower extremity edema (P = 0.001) and lower extremity edema of at least grade 2 + (P = 0.029), and positive hepatojugular reflux (HJR, P = 0.022) but no differences in patients' symptoms such as degree of dyspnea, orthopnea or fatigue. With regards to post-discharge outcomes, there was a significant difference across tertiles in all-cause mortality (P = 0.029) and rehospitalization for HF (P = 0.031) at 6 months following randomization. Receiver operator characteristic curves showed that admission PCWP + RAP had an area under the curve of 0.623 (P = 0.0075) and 0.617 (P = 0.0048), respectively, in predicting 6­month all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for HF. CONCLUSION: The presence and extent of JVD and lower extremity edema, and a positive HJR are better than other signs and symptoms in identifying severity of HF exacerbation among patients with EF ≤ 30%.

Transesophageal Echocardiographic Assessment of Pulmonary Artery-to-Ascending Aorta Ratio for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate if the main pulmonary artery (mPA)-to-ascending aorta (AscAo), (mPA:AscAo) ratio could serve as a screening tool in identifying pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary care center, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four adult patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (OPCAB). INTERVENTIONS: mPA and AscAo transverse diameters were measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and the mean pulmonary arterial pressures (mPAP) were recorded simultaneously using a pulmonary artery catheter. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: mPA:AscAo ratio demonstrated significant linear correlation with mPAP measured by pulmonary artery catheterization (ie, r = 0.61, confidence interval [CI] = 0.5352-0.6736, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curves were performed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of mPA:AscAo ratio ≥1 for diagnosing PAH (mPAP ≥25 mmHg). Area under the curve for mPA:AscAo ratio was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.869-0.936, p < 0.0001), with a sensitivity of 84.27%, specificity of 83.92%, positive-predictive value of 87.6% and negative-predictive value of 81.1% for a mPAP ≥25 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: The ratio of mPA:AscAo is a simple, reliable, and reproducible method that can be obtained through TEE, which guides the clinician to screen patients with PAH.

Accuracy, Precision, and Trending Ability of Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis of Cardiac Output in Patients With Impaired Left Ventricular Function: A Prospective, Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: Uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis provides minimally invasive and continuous measurement of cardiac output (CO). This technique could be of great value in patients with impaired left ventricular function, but the validity in these patients is not well established. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy, precision, and trending ability of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis of cardiac output in patients with impaired left ventricular function. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, method-comparison study. SETTING: Nonuniversity teaching hospital, single center. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 22 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. INTERVENTIONS: In the period between induction of anesthesia and sternotomy, CO was measured using the FloTrac/Vigileo system (third-generation software) and intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution before and after volume loading. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Accuracy and precision as determined using Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of -0.7 L/min, limits of agreement of -2.9 to 1.5 L/min, and a mean error of 55% for pooled data. Proportional bias and spread were present, indicating that bias and limits of agreement were underestimated for high CO values. Trending ability was assessed using 4-quadrant analysis, which revealed a concordance of 86%. Concordance from a clinical perspective was 36%. Polar plot analysis showed an angular bias of 13° degrees, with radial limits of agreement of -55° to 51°. Polar concordance at±30° was 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial waveform analysis of cardiac output and pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output were not interchangeable in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

A randomized controlled trial of ivabradine in patients with acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.

Objective: . Acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is often accompanied by tachycardia, which, in turn, increases myocardial oxygen consumption and hinders the use of ventricular assist devices, such as intra-aortic balloon pump. Evidence suggests that ivabradine may reduce heart rate (HR) without affecting other hemodynamic parameters. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of ivabradine on reducing HR and changes in other hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac index (CI), in patients with AMI-CS and tachycardia. Materials and methods: . A single-center, open label, randomized clinical trial included patients diagnosed with AMI-CS and tachycardia with >100 beats per minute (BPM). Heart rate, cardiac index, and other hemodynamic parameters measured by pulmonary flotation catheter were compared at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after randomization. Results: . A total of 12 patients were randomized; 6 received standard therapy, and 6 received ivabradine in addition to standard therapy. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar at randomization. A statistically significant lower heart rate was found at 12 hours (p=0.003) and 48 hours (p=0.029) after randomization, with differences of -23.3 (-8.2 to -38.4) BPM and -12.6 (-0.5 to -25.9) BPM, respectively. No differences in cardiac index, or any other evaluated hemodynamic parameters, length of hospital stay, nor mortality rate were noted between both groups. Conclusions: . The use of ivabradine in patients with AMI-CS was associated with a significant reduction in heart rate at 12 and 48 h, without affecting other hemodynamic parameters.

Objetivo: . El choque cardiogénico relacionado con el infarto agudo de miocardio (AMI-CS, por sus siglas en inglés) suele ir acompañado de taquicardia, lo que, a su vez, aumenta el consumo de oxígeno miocárdico y dificulta el uso de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular, como la bomba de balón intraaórtico. La evidencia sugiere que la ivabradina puede reducir la frecuencia cardíaca (FC) sin afectar otros parámetros hemodinámicos. El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar el efecto de la ivabradina en la reducción de la FC y los cambios en otros parámetros hemodinámicos como el índice cardíaco (CI) en pacientes con AMI-CS y taquicardia. Materiales y métodos: Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados con AMI-CS y taquicardia con >100 latidos por minuto (LPM) en un ensayo clínico aleatorizado de un solo centro. La frecuencia cardíaca, el índice cardíaco y otros parámetros hemodinámicos medidos mediante catéter de flotación pulmonar se compararon a las 0, 6, 12, 24 y 48 h después de la aleatorización. Resultados: Se aleatorizaron un total de 12 pacientes; 6 recibieron terapia estándar y 6 recibieron ivabradina además de la terapia estándar. Las características clínicas basales fueron similares en la aleatorización. Se encontró una frecuencia cardíaca significativamente más baja a las 12 h (p=0,003) y a las 48 h (p=0,029) después de la aleatorización, con diferencias de -23,3 (-8,2 a -38,4) LPM y -12,6 (-0,5 a -25,9) LPM, respectivamente. No se observaron diferencias en el índice cardíaco, en ningún otro parámetro hemodinámico evaluado; tampoco en la duración de la estancia hospitalaria, ni en la tasa de mortalidad entre ambos grupos. Conclusiones: El uso de ivabradina en pacientes con AMI-CS se asoció con una reducción significativa en la frecuencia cardíaca a las 12 y 48 h, sin afectar otros parámetros hemodinámicos.

Effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring for patients with cardiogenic shock of various causes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Cardiogenic shock is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) can be useful in the assessment of changes in cardiac function and hemodynamic status; however, the benefits of PAC in the management of cardiogenic shock are not known well. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials, comparing in-hospital mortality between PAC and non-PAC groups of cardiogenic shock patients with various underlying causes. Articles were obtained from MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. We reviewed titles, abstracts, and full articles and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) framework. We used a random-effects model to compare studies in terms of in-hospital mortality findings. Results: We included twelve articles in our meta-analysis. Mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock was not significantly different between the PAC and the non-PAC groups [risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-1.02, I2=100%, P<0.01]. Two studies investigating cardiogenic shock caused by acute decompensated heart failure determined lower in-hospital mortality in the PAC group than in the non-PAC group (RR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.87, I2=45%, P=0.18). Six studies investigating cardiogenic shock of any cause determined lower in-hospital mortality in the PAC group than in the non-PAC group (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.97, I2=99%, P<0.01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the PAC and non-PAC groups of patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute coronary syndrome (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.81-1.25, I2=99%, P<0.01). Conclusions: Overall, our meta-analysis demonstrated no significant association between PAC monitoring and in-hospital mortality among patients managed for cardiogenic shock. The use of PAC in the management of cardiogenic shock caused by acute decompensated heart failure was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, but there was no association between PAC monitoring and in-hospital mortality among patients with cardiogenic shock caused by acute coronary syndrome.

A simplified echocardiographic formula to estimate cardiac index in the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Measurement of cardiac index (CI) is crucial in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). The most reliable trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) technique for CI estimation is the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) Doppler method that requires, among other parameters, the LVOT cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement. However, inherent and practical disadvantages, mostly related to the ICU setting, hamper LVOT-CSA assessment. In this study, we aimed to validate a simplified formula, leveraging on LVOT-velocity time integral (VTI) and heart rate (HR) only, for non-invasive estimation of CI in ICU patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 50 consecutive patients admitted to our ICU requiring pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) over a one-year period. For each patient we measured the CI by PAC (CIPAC) and TTE. The latter was obtained both with the "traditional formula" (traditional CITTE), requiring LVOT-CSA assessment, and our new "simplified formula" (simplified CITTE). The correlation between the simplified CITTE and CIPAC was strong (r = 0.81) and resulted significantly greater than the traditional CITTE and CIPAC correlation (r = 0.70; p < 0.05 for Pearson r coefficients comparison). Both TTE-based CI showed an acceptable agreement (+0.19 ± 0.48 L/min/m2 for simplified CITTE and - 0.18 ± 0.58 L/min/m2 for traditional CITTE) with the reference CIPAC. CONCLUSION: In this study, we validated a practical approach, leveraging on TTE LVOT-VTI and HR only, for non-invasive estimation of CI in ICU patients.

Improving transportability of randomized controlled trial inference using robust prediction methods.

Randomized trials have been the gold standard for assessing causal effects since their introduction by Fisher in the 1920s, since they can eliminate both observed and unobserved confounding. Estimates of causal effects at the population level from randomized controlled trials can still be biased if there are both effect modification and systematic differences between the trial sample and the ultimate population of inference with respect to these modifiers. Recent advances in the survey statistics literature to improve inference in nonprobability samples by using information from probability samples can provide an avenue for improving population causal inference in randomized controlled trials when relevant probability samples of the patient population are available. We review some recent work in "transporting" causal effect estimates from trials to populations, focusing on the setting where there is a "benchmark" or population-representative sample along with the RCT sample. We then propose estimators using either inverse probability weighting (IPWT) or prediction that can accommodate unequal probability of selection in the "benchmark" or population, and use Bayesian additive regression trees for both inverse probability of treatment weighting and prediction estimation that do not require specification of functional form or interaction. We also consider how the assumption of ignorability may be assessed from observed data and propose a sensitivity analysis under the failure of this assumption. We compare our proposed approach with existing methods in simulation and apply these alternative approaches to a study of pulmonary artery catheterization in critically ill patients. We also suggest next steps for future work.

Catheterization of Pulmonary and Carotid Arteries for Concurrent Measurement of Mean Pulmonary and Systemic Arterial Pressure in Rat Models of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a group of pulmonary vascular disorders in which mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) becomes abnormally high because of various pathological conditions, including remodeling of the pulmonary arteries, lung and heart disorders, or congenital conditions. Various animal models, including mouse and rat models, have been used to recapitulate elevated mPAP observed in PH patients. However, the measurement and recording of mPAP and mean systemic arterial pressure (mSAP) in small animals require microsurgical procedures and a sophisticated data acquisition system. In this paper, we describe the surgical procedures for right heart catheterizations (RHC) to measure mPAP in rats. We also explain the catheterization of the carotid artery for simultaneous measurement of mPAP and mSAP using the PowerLab Data Acquisition system. We enumerate the surgical steps involved in exposing the jugular vein and the carotid artery for catheterizing these two blood vessels. We list the tools used for microsurgery in rats, describe the methods for preparing catheters, and illustrate the process for inserting the catheters in the pulmonary and carotid arteries. Finally, we delineate the steps involved in the calibration and setup of the PowerLab system for recording both mPAP and mSAP. This is the first protocol wherein we meticulously explain the surgical procedures for RHC in rats and the recording of mPAP and mSAP. We believe this protocol will be essential for PH research. Investigators with little training in animal handling can reproduce this microsurgical procedure for RHC in rats and measure mPAP and mSAP in rat models of PH. Further, this protocol is likely to help master RHC in rats that are performed for other conditions, such as heart failure, congenital heart disease, heart valve disorders, and heart transplantation.

CON: Pulmonary artery catheter use should be forgone in modern clinical practice.

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and its role in the practice of modern medicine remains to be questioned and has experienced a substantial decline in its use in the most recent decades. The complications associated to its use, the lack of consistency of the interpretation provided by the PAC among clinicians, the development of new hemodynamic methods, and the deleterious cost profile associated to the PAC are some of the reasons behind the decrease in its use. Since its introduction into clinical practice, the PAC and the data obtained from its use became paramount in the management of critically ill patients as well as for the high-risk/invasive procedures. Initially, many clinicians were under the impression that regardless the clinical setting, acquiring the information provided by the PAC justified its use, until a growing body of evidence demonstrated its lack of mortality and morbidity improvement, as well as several reports of the presence of difficulties-some of them fatal-during its insertion. The authors present an updated review discussing the futility of the PAC in current clinical practice, the complications associated to its insertion, the lack of mortality benefit in critically ill patients and cardiac surgery, as well as present alternative hemodynamic methods to the PAC.

The role of intraoperative pulmonary arterial catheterization data in determining the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate predictive factors of identification of the need of patients for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support during lung transplantation. METHODS: A total of 63 patients (49 males, 14 females, mean age: 44.9±14.4 years; range, 14 to 64 years) who underwent lung transplantation in our institution between December 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics and perioperative clinical data of patients were recorded. After induction and pulmonary artery catheterization, cardiac output, mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac index, pulmonary vascular resistance, systemic vascular resistance, and right atrial pressure were measured using the thermodilution technique. RESULTS: Thirty-three of the patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support during surgery. The right atrial pressure (p<0.001), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p<0.002), mean pulmonary artery pressure (p<0.001), and pulmonary vascular resistance (p<0.001) were statistically significantly higher in the patients who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support intraoperatively. The systemic vascular resistance (p<0.032) was statistically significantly lower in the patients who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support intraoperatively. A mean pulmonary artery pressure of >39 mmHg (p<0.02) and a right atrial pressure of >12 mmHg (p<0.047) were independent risk factors for ECMO support intraoperatively during lung transplantation. CONCLUSION: Predicting the need of intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support is of utmost importance in timing the need for mechanical support, protecting the new graft from high mechanical ventilator pressures, and adequately maintaining hemodynamic stability.

PRO: The pulmonary artery catheter has a paramount role in current clinical practice.

Ever since its clinical introduction, the utilization of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been surrounded by multiple controversies, mostly related to imprecise clinical indications and the complications derived from its placement. Currently, one of the most important criticisms of the PAC is the ambiguity in the interpretation of its hemodynamic measurements and therefore, in the translation of this data into specific therapeutic interventions. The popularity of the PAC stems from the fact that it provides hemodynamic data that cannot be obtained from clinical examination. The assumption is that this information would allow better understanding of the individual's hemodynamic profile which would trigger therapeutic interventions that improve patient outcomes. Nevertheless, even with the current diversity of hemodynamic devices available, the PAC remains a valuable tool in a wide variety of clinical settings. The authors present a review exposing the benefits of the PAC, current clinical recommendations for its use, mortality and survival profile, its role in goal-directed therapy, and other applications of the PAC beyond cardiac surgery and the intensive care unit.