Adjuvant Gemcitabine Versus Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Randomized Multicenter Phase II NEPAFOX Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although addition of adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard, the prognosis of pancreatic cancers still remains poor. The NEPAFOX trial evaluated perioperative treatment with FOLFIRINOX in resectable pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter phase II trial randomized patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer without metastases into arm (A,) upfront surgery plus adjuvant gemcitabine, or arm (B,) perioperative FOLFIRINOX. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Owing to poor accrual, recruitment was prematurely stopped after randomization of 40 of the planned 126 patients (A: 21, B: 19). Overall, approximately three-quarters were classified as primarily resectable (A: 16, B: 15), and the remaining patients were classified as borderline resectable (A: 5, B: 4). Of the 12 evaluable patients, 3 achieved partial response under neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Of the 21 patients in arm A and 19 patients in arm B, 17 and 7 underwent curative surgery, and R0-resection was achieved in 77% and 71%, respectively. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 72% in arm A and 46% in arm B, whereas non-surgical toxicity was comparable in both arms. Median RFS/PFS was almost doubled in arm B (14.1 months) compared with arm A (8.4 months) in the population with surgical resection, whereas median OS was comparable between both arms. CONCLUSIONS: Although the analysis was only descriptive owing to small patient numbers, no safety issues regarding surgical complications were observed in the perioperative FOLFIRINOX arm. Thus, considering the small number of patients, perioperative treatment approach appears feasible and potentially effective in well-selected cohorts of patients. In pancreatic cancer, patient selection before initiation of neoadjuvant therapy appears to be critical.

Comprehensive Multiomics Analyses Establish the Optimal Prognostic Model for Resectable Gastric Cancer : Prognosis Prediction for Resectable GC.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic models based on multiomics data may provide better predictive capability than those established at the single-omics level. Here we aimed to establish a prognostic model for resectable gastric cancer (GC) with multiomics information involving mutational, copy number, transcriptional, methylation, and clinicopathological alterations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The mutational, copy number, transcriptional, methylation data of 268, 265, 226, and 252 patients with stages I-III GC were downloaded from the TCGA database, respectively. Alterations from all omics were characterized, and prognostic models were established at the individual omics level and optimized at the multiomics level. All models were validated with a cohort of 99 patients with stages I-III GC. RESULTS: TTN, TP53, and MUC16 were among the genes with the highest mutational frequency, while UBR5, ZFHX4, PREX2, and ARID1A exhibited the most prominent copy number variations (CNVs). Upregulated COL10A1, CST1, and HOXC10 and downregulated GAST represented the biggest transcriptional alterations. Aberrant methylation of some well-known genes was revealed, including CLDN18, NDRG4, and SDC2. Many alterations were found to predict the patient prognosis by univariate analysis, while four mutant genes, two CNVs, five transcriptionally altered genes, and seven aberrantly methylated genes were identified as independent risk factors in multivariate analysis. Prognostic models at the single-omics level were established with these alterations, and optimized combination of selected alterations with clinicopathological factors was used to establish a final multiomics model. All single-omics models and the final multiomics model were validated by an independent cohort. The optimal area under the curve (AUC) was 0.73, 0.71, 0.71, and 0.85 for mutational, CNV, transcriptional, and methylation models, respectively. The final multiomics model significantly increased the AUC to 0.92 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Multiomics model exhibited significantly better capability in predicting the prognosis of resectable GC than single-omics models.

Preoperative Prediction of Long-Term Survival After Surgery in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although some clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), its optimal candidate has not been clarified. This study aimed to detect predictive prognostic factors for resectable PDAC patients who underwent upfront surgery and identify patient cohorts with long-term survival without neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 232 patients with resectable PDAC who underwent upfront surgery between January 2008 and December 2019 were evaluated. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) time and 5-year OS rate of resectable PDAC with upfront surgery was 31.5 months and 33.3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified tumor diameter in computed tomography (CT) ≤ 19 mm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, p < 0.001], span-1 within the normal range (HR 0.54, p = 0.023), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 44.31 (HR 0.51, p < 0.001), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) ≥ 3.79 (HR 0.51, p < 0.001) as prognostic factors that influence favorable prognoses after upfront surgery. According to the prognostic prediction model based on these four factors, patients with four favorable prognostic factors had a better prognosis with a 5-year OS rate of 82.4% compared to others (p < 0.001). These patients had a high R0 resection rate and a low frequency of tumor recurrence after upfront surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We identified patients with long-term survival after upfront surgery by prognostic prediction model consisting of tumor diameter in CT, span-1, PNI, and LMR. Evaluation of anatomical, biological, nutritional, and inflammatory factors may be valuable to introduce an optimal treatment strategy for resectable PDAC.

Prognostic Impact of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Resected Non-Pancreatic Periampullary Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains debatable in para-aortic lymph node (PALN, station 16b1) metastasis in non-pancreatic periampullary cancer (NPPAC). This study examined the impact of PALN metastasis on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in NPPAC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with NPPAC who were explored for PD with PALN dissection was performed. Based on the extent of nodal involvement on final histopathology, they were stratified as node-negative (N0), regional node involved (N+) and metastatic PALN (N16+) and their outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2022, 153/887 PD patients underwent a PALN dissection, revealing N16+ in 42 patients (27.4%), of whom 32 patients underwent resection. The 3-years overall survival (OS) for patients with N16+ was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-60%), notably lower than the 67% (95% CI 53-83.5%; p = 0.007) for those without PALN metastasis. Stratified by nodal involvement, the median OS for N+ and N16+ patients was similar (28.4 months and 26.2 months, respectively). The N0 subgroup had a significantly longer 3-years OS of 87.5% (95% CI 79-96.7%; p = 0.0051). Interestingly, 10 patients not offered resection following N16+ identified on frozen section had a median survival of only 9 months. The perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing PD with PALN dissection were similar to standard resections. CONCLUSION: In a select group of patients with NPPAC, PD in isolated PALN metastasis was associated with improved OS. The survival in this group of patients was comparable with regional node-positive patients and significantly better than palliative treatment alone.

Survival Analysis of Conversion Surgery in Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Addressing Selection and Immortal Time Bias: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to provide a detailed evaluation of the oncological advantages of surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with borderline resectable (BR) or unresectable (UR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a focus on minimizing biases. Recently, NAC has become the standard care for BR or UR locally advanced (UR-LA) PDAC, however, many studies have assessed survival benefits and favorable variables without consideration for biases, particularly immortal time bias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients diagnosed with BR or UR-LA PDAC at Juntendo University Hospital from 2019 to 2022. To mitigate bias, we applied methods such as propensity score matching (PSM), time-dependent covariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (TDC), landmark analysis, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: The study analyzed 124 patients, dividing them into a surgery group (n = 57) and a chemotherapy-only group (n = 67). After PSM, there were 21 matched pairs. Survival analysis using TDC analysis showed that the surgery group had significantly better overall survival compared with the chemotherapy-only group in both the entire cohort and the matched pairs. Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort also revealed a similar superiority of surgery, while the landmark analysis showed varying results depending on the landmark setting. CONCLUSIONS: After careful adjustment for selection and immortal time biases, surgery following NAC appears to significantly extend survival in patients with BR or UR PDAC.

Molecular alterations and clinical prognostic factors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: EGFR inhibitor and immunotherapy have been approved for adjuvant treatment in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Limited reports of molecular and clinical characteristics as prognostic factors in NSCLC have been published. METHODS: Medical records of patients with resectable NSCLC stage I-III diagnosed during 2015-2020 were reviewed. Real time-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed for EGFR mutations (EGFRm). Immunohistochemistry staining was conducted for ALK and PD-L1 expression. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis was done by cox-regression method. RESULTS: Total 441 patients were included. The prevalence of EGFRm, ALK fusion, and PD-L1 expression were 57.8%, 1.9%, and 20.5% (SP263), respectively. The most common EGFRm were Del19 (43%) and L858R (41%). There was no significant difference of recurrence free survival (RFS) by EGFRm status whereas patients with PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 positive patients) had lower RFS compared to without PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 negative patients) (HR = 1.75, P = 0.036). Patients with both EGFRm and PD-L1 expression had worse RFS compared with EGFRm and PD-L1 negative patients (HR = 3.38, P = 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed higher CEA at cut-off 3.8 ng/ml, pT4, pN2, pStage II, and margin were significant poor prognostic factors for RFS in the overall population, which was similar to EGFRm population (exception of pT and pStage). Only pStage was a significant poor prognostic factor for PD-L1 positive patients. The predictive score for predicting of recurrence were 6 for all population (63% sensitivity and 86% specificity) and 5 for EGFRm population (62% sensitivity and 93% specificity). CONCLUSION: The prevalence and types of EGFRm were similar between early stage and advanced stage NSCLC. While lower prevalence of PD-L1 expression was found in early stage disease. Patients with both EGFRm and PD-L1 expression had poorer outcome. Thus PD-L1 expression would be one of the prognostic factor in EGFRm patients. Validation of the predictive score should be performed in a larger cohort.

Reconsideration of the clinical impact of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A dual-institution collaborative clinical study.

PURPOSE: We investigated true indication of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in resectable pancreatic cancer and the optimal surgical timing in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A total of 687 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Survival analysis was performed by intention-to-treat analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. RESULTS: In resectable disease, the NAT group showed better overall survival (OS) compared with the upfront group. Multivariate analysis identified CA19-9 level (≥100 U/mL) and lymph node metastasis to be prognostic factors, and a tumor size of 25 mm was the optimal cut-off value to predict lymph node metastasis. There was no significant survival difference between patients with a tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL and those in the NAT group. In borderline resectable disease, OS in the NAT group was significantly better than that in the upfront group. CEA (≥5 ng/mL) and CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) were identified as prognostic factors; however, the OS of patients fulfilling these factors was worse than that of the NAT group. CONCLUSIONS: NAT could be unnecessary in patients with tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL in resectable disease. In borderline resectable disease, surgery should be delayed until tumor marker levels are well controlled.

Clinical outcomes of second-line therapy following disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX. METHODS: Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3-47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX-locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Is Associated With Recurrence and Survival of Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Curative lung resection remains the key therapeutic strategy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a proportion of patients still experience variable outcomes and eventually develop recurrence or die from their disease. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has been identified as a deleterious factor that inhibits tumor cells apoptosis and leads to reduction of lymphocyte infiltration. However, there has been no research on the predicted role of PCSK9 as an immunohistochemical biomarker with survival in resectable NSCLC. METHODS: One hundred sixty-three patients with resectable NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed, and PCSK9 expression of resected NSCLC was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays. RESULTS: PCSK9 was associated with recurrence (42.1% relapsed in the PCSK9lo group versus 57.9% relapsed in the PCSK9hi group, P = 0.006) and survival status (39.6% dead in PCSK9lo group versus 60.4% dead in PCSK9hi group, P = 0.004) in patients with resectable NSCLC. Moreover, resectable NSCLC patients with higher PCSK9 expression in tumor tissue experienced poorer disease-free survival (median disease-free survival: 10.5 versus 25.2 mo, hazard ratio = 1.620, 95% confidence interval: 1.124-2.334) and overall suvrival (median overall suvrival: 20.0 versus 54.1 mo, hazard ratio = 1.646, 95% confidence interval: 1.101-2.461) compared to those with lower PCSK9 expression. CONCLUSIONS: High PCSK9 expression of tumor was correlated with recurrence and worse survival status of resectable NSCLC in our retrospective study, which indicated that PCSK9 in NSCLC may be an immunohistochemical biomarker of poor prognosis for patients with resectable NSCLC. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to establish these results.

Trends and Disparities in Robotic Surgery Utilization for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery has become an increasingly utilized approach for resectable lung cancer. However, availability may be limited for certain patient populations, underscoring inequity in access to innovative surgical techniques. We hypothesize that there is an association between social determinants of health and robotic surgery utilization for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (2010-2019) for patients with clinical stage I-III NSCLC who underwent resection, stratifying the cohort based on surgical technique. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations between sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors and the robotic approach. RESULTS: Among the 226,455 clinical stage I-III NSCLC patients identified, 34,059 (15%) received robotic resections, 78,039 (34.5%) underwent thoracoscopic resections, and 114,357 (50.5%) had open resections. Robotic surgery utilization increased from 3.1% in 2010 to 34% in 2019 (P < 0.001). Despite this, after adjusting by clinical stage, extent of resection, site of tumor, and receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, multivariable analysis revealed various sociodemographic and treatment facility factors that were associated with underutilization of this approach: lack of insurance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.93), lower income brackets (aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.96), provincial settings (urban aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.82; rural aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.64), and treatment at community centers (comprehensive community cancer programs aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.75; community cancer programs aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.47-0.55). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that disparities in determinants of health influence accessibility to robotic surgery for resectable NSCLC. Identification of these gaps is crucial to target vulnerable sectors of the population in promoting equality and uniformity in surgical treatment.