Determinants of adherence to post-stroke/transient ischemic attack secondary prevention medications: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to post-stroke secondary prevention medications mitigates recurrence risk. This study aimed to measure adherence to secondary prevention medications during 3 years post-ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, using prescription and dispensing data, and identify factors associated with suboptimal adherence. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, cohort study involved patients from the STROKE 69 cohort, which included all consecutive patients with suspected acute stroke admitted between November 2015 and December 2016 to any emergency department or stroke center in the Rhône area in France. Prescription data for antihypertensive agents, antidiabetic agents, lipid-lowering drugs, and antithrombotics were collected. Dispensing data were provided by the French regional reimbursement database. Adherence was calculated using the continuous medication acquisition index. Associations between suboptimal adherence and potential influencing factors across the World Health Organization's five dimensions were explored through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: From 1512 eligible patients, 365 were included. Optimal adherence to overall treatment (≥90%) was observed in 61%, 62%, and 65% of patients in the first, second, and third years, respectively. Education level (high school diploma or higher: OR = 3.24, 95% CI [1.49; 7.36]) and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression scores 8-10: OR = 1.90, 95% CI [1.05; 3.44]) were significantly associated with suboptimal adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Overall adherence to secondary prevention medications was fairly good. Having an initial diagnosis of transient ischemic attack, a high level of education, or depression was associated with increased odds of suboptimal adherence, while having a history of heart rhythm disorder was associated with lower odds.

Secondary prevention medications after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term survival: a population-based longitudinal study from the SWEDEHEART registry.

AIMS: To evaluate the long-term use of secondary prevention medications [statins, ß-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, and platelet inhibitors] after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and the association between medication use and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients who underwent isolated CABG in Sweden from 2006 to 2015 and survived at least 6 months after discharge were included (n = 28 812). Individual patient data from SWEDEHEART and other mandatory nationwide registries were merged. Multivariable Cox regression models using time-updated data on dispensed prescriptions were used to assess associations between medication use and long-term mortality. Statins were dispensed to 93.9% of the patients 6 months after discharge and to 77.3% 8 years later. Corresponding figures for ß-blockers were 91.0% and 76.4%, for RAAS inhibitors 72.9% and 65.9%, and for platelet inhibitors 93.0% and 79.8%. All medications were dispensed less often to patients ≥75 years. Treatment with statins [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.52-0.60], RAAS inhibitors (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.84), and platelet inhibitors (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69-0.81) were individually associated with lower mortality risk after adjustment for age, gender, comorbidities, and use of other secondary preventive drugs (all P < 0.001). There was no association between ß-blockers and mortality risk (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.06; P = 0.54). CONCLUSION: The use of secondary prevention medications after CABG was high early after surgery but decreased significantly over time. The results of this observational study, with inherent risk of selection bias, suggest that treatment with statins, RAAS inhibitors, and platelet inhibitors is essential after CABG whereas the routine use of ß-blockers may be questioned.

Statin treatment after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis is associated with better long-term outcome.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between statin use after surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and long-term risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in a large population-based, nationwide cohort. METHODS: All patients who underwent isolated surgical aortic valve replacement due to aortic stenosis in Sweden 2006-2020 and survived 6 months after discharge were included. Individual patient data from 5 nationwide registries were merged. Primary outcome is MACE (defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke). Multivariable Cox regression model adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, valve type, operation year and secondary prevention medications is used to evaluate the association between time-updated dispense of statins and long-term outcome in the entire study population and in subgroups based on age, sex and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 11 894 patients were included. Statins were dispensed to 49.8% (5918/11894) of patients at baseline, and 51.0% (874/1713) after 10 years. At baseline, 3.6% of patients were dispensed low dose, 69.4% medium dose and 27.0% high-dose statins. After adjustments, ongoing statin treatment was associated with a reduced risk for MACE [adjusted hazard ratio 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.83). P < 0.001], mainly driven by a reduction in all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70 (0.64-0.76)], P < 0.001. The results were consistent in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that statin therapy might be beneficial for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to establish causality between statin treatment and improved outcome.

Statins for secondary prevention and major adverse events after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of statin use after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and long-term adverse events in a large population-based, nationwide cohort. METHODS: All 35,193 patients who underwent first-time isolated CABG in Sweden from 2006 to 2017 and survived at least 6 months after surgery were included. Individual patient data from the Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) and 4 other nationwide registries were merged. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and time-updated treatment with other secondary preventive medications were used to evaluate the associations between statin treatment and outcomes. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Median follow-up time to MACE was 5.3 (interquartile range, 2.5-8.2) years. RESULTS: Statins were dispensed to 95.7% of the patients six months after discharge and to 78.9% after 10 years. At baseline, 1.4% of patients were prescribed low-, 57.6% intermediate-, and 36.7% high-dose statins. Ongoing statin treatment was associated with markedly reduced risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.53-0.59]), all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.50-0.56]), cardiovascular death (aHR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.50-0.59]), myocardial infarction (aHR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.55-0.69]), stroke (aHR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.59-0.73]), new revascularization (aHR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70-0.88]), new angiography (aHR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.74-0.88]), and dementia (aHR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.65-0.85]; all P < .01), irrespective of the statin dose. CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing statin use was associated with a markedly reduced incidence of adverse events and mortality after CABG. Initiating and maintaining statin medication is essential in CABG patients.

Predictors and Outcomes of Secondary Prevention Medication in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background: Evidence on factors associated with guideline-directed secondary prevention medication (GDPM) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its effect on the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is lacking in China. Aims: To ascertain predictors of GDPM in real-world clinical practice and to assess the effect of GDPM on clinical outcomes. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to Fuwai Hospital between January 2013 and December 2013 were recruited. GDPM comprised aspirin, clopidogrel, statins, ß-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blockers. The primary outcome was five-year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (cardiac death, myocardial infarction [MI] and unplanned revascularization). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of prescribing GDPM. Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the relationship between GDPM and clinical outcomes. Results: 10,067 patients were followed up for a median of 5.0 years (interquartile range: 4.3-5.2), 45.1% were prescribed with GDPM. Presenting with ST-segment elevation MI (adjusted OR = 3.252 [2.832-3.736]), prior MI (adjusted OR = 2.174 [1.948-2.425]), more stents implanted (adjusted OR = 1.063 [1.022-1.106]), overweight (adjusted OR = 1.136 [1.038-1.243]), obesity (adjusted OR = 1.274 [1.100-1.476]), diabetes (adjusted OR = 1.225 [1.115-1.344]), and hypertension (adjusted OR = 3.556 [3.196-3.956]) predicted the prescription of GDPM. Advanced age (adjusted OR = 0.556 [0.379-0.816]) was associated with lower prescription rate of GDPM. Patients with GDPM had lower rate of 5-year MACE (adjusted HR = 0.889 [0.808-0.978]) relative to those without GDPM. Conclusions: Despite the benefit of GDPM in improving the prognosis of CAD patients undergoing PCI, gaps still exist in GDPM prescription in real-world clinical practice. Our study determined target populations for physicians to strive to promote the application of GDPM.