Influence of kinematics of the lumbopelvic complex in hip arthroplasty dislocation: from assessment to recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: In total hip arthroplasty (THA), misplacement of the implant can provide instability. Adequate orientation of the acetabular cup is a challenge due to variations in inter-individual anatomy and kinematics of the pelvis in everyday life. The aim of this study was to characterize the kinematic factors influencing the risk of dislocation in order to give recommendations for optimal placement of the cup. We hypothesized that the lack of pelvic adaptation would influence the risk of prosthetic instability and motivate adapted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with primary unilateral THA were included in a matched case-control study. Seventy-four patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) consisting of patients with postoperative THA dislocation (37 patients) and group 2 (G2), without episodes of dislocation within two years postoperatively (37 patients). In both groups, spino-pelvic parameters and cup orientation were measured in standing and sitting positions with EOS® X-ray imaging and compared to each other between 12 and 24 months post-operatively. RESULTS: No significant difference between the two groups was found for static parameters. In a sitting position, a lack of pelvic retroversion with a significant lower variation in sacral slope was observed in group 1 (8.0° ± 9.3 for G1 versus 14.7° ± 6.2 for G2, p < 0.01). Twenty-two (59%) patients with THA instability had sacral slope variations of less than 10° versus eight (21% of patients) with stable THA (p < 0.01). Cup orientation in the Lewinnek safe zone was not significantly different (59% vs 67%, p = 0.62), and the spino-pelvic parameters and cup orientation measured did not change between the standing and sitting positions. However, only 14 (37%) cups in G1 were in the functional safe zone versus 24 (67%) in G2 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Static parameters of the sagittal spinopelvic balance have a low predictive value for prosthetic instability. Dynamic analysis is essential. Kinematic parameters must be taken into account in determining the ideal position of the cup or stem. Stiffness with locked standing or sitting pelvis must be integrated in order to determine a personalized safe zone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (matched case-control study).

Modifications of spinopelvic parameters and acetabular orientation after spinal surgery for adult deformity in patient who underwent bilateral total hip arthroplasty.

The spine and the hip are two anatomical districts that have close biomechanical relationship. The management of their degenerative disorders involves an in-depth biomechanical analysis of the patient, in order to define the proper hip-spine relation, using different biomechanical classifications that have been proposed in recent years. The changes in the spino-pelvic and acetabular parameters induced by prosthetic hip surgery and spinal surgery must be carefully evaluated, calculated and foreseen in the pre-operative phase, as they play a crucial role in defining the clinical success or failure of the operations. In this paper we present a case of a patient who underwent spinal surgery after a bilateral THA analyzing both spino-pelvic parameters and acetabular orientation and highlighting the strict relations between spine and hip.

Does total hip arthroplasty have a higher risk of failure in patients who undergo lumbar spinal fusion?

AIMS: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients undergoing or having a prior lumbar spine fusion (LSF) have an increased risk of mechanical complications. The aim of this registry-based, retrospective comparative cohort study is to assess the longer term survival of THA in patients who have undergone a LSF during a 17-year period (2000 to 2017). METHODS: A registry-based population study was conducted on 679 patients who underwent both THA and LSF surgeries. Patients were identified from the regional arthroplasty data base and cross linked to patients with LSF from the regional hospital discharge database between 2000 and 2017. Demographic data, diagnosis leading to primary THA, primary implant survival, perioperative complications, number and causes of failure, and patients requiring revision arthroplasty were collated and compared. For comparison, data from 67,919 primary THAs performed during the same time time period were also retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: Patients undergoing THA and LSF showed homogeneous demographic data compared to those undergoing THA alone, but a significantly lower eight-year THA implant survival (96.7 vs 96.0, p = 0.024) was observed. Moreover, THA plus LSF patients showed increased incidence of mechanical complications in the first two years after THA surgery compared to THA alone patients. CONCLUSION: This registry-based population study shows that approximately 679 (1%) THA patients were subjected to LSF. Patients undergoing THA and LSF have an increased risk of mechanical complications with their THA and a slightly increased risk of revision arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):486-491.

Dual mobility device reduces the risk of prosthetic hip instability for patients with degenerated spine: A case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The pelvic incidence is an anatomical and biomechanical pelvic parameter determining spine sagittal morphology and kinematics. Stiffening of the lumbo-pelvic complex, a result of degeneration, affects the functional cup positioning, putting prosthetic hip patients at risk of instability. The anti-dislocation dual mobility (DM) device may be clinically advantageous by reducing the risk of prosthetic instability for older patients with spine ageing. Our study aims to answer the following questions: (1) is there a relationship between prosthetic hip instability and the standing cup position, (2) is there a relationships between prosthetic hip instability and the pelvic incidence, (3) is there a relationships between prosthetic hip instability and the severity of the spine degeneration?, (4) is the DM cup device an effective option for reducing the risk of prosthetic instability related to spine degeneration? HYPOTHESIS: There is a relationship between prosthetic hip instability and the standing cup position and pelvic parameters. METHODS: Case-control study on prospectively collected data since 2009. From 1672 conventional total hip replacements (THR-5.4% dislocation rate) and 1056 DM-THRs (1.1% dislocation rate) performed at our institute since 2009, we created three groups: 33 patients with unstable THR (group 1-case), 41 patients with stable THR (group 2-control), and 42 patients with stable DM-THR (group 3-control). The cup orientation was measured on standing pelvic radiographs and the spino-pelvic parameters were measured on standing EOS™ biplanar images or lateral full spine radiographs. RESULTS: By comparing patients from group 1 with those of group 2 we found they had similar cup position (57% versus 51% fitting the safe zone, p=0.58), higher pelvic incidence (58° versus 51°, p=0.01), and more severe spine degeneration (smaller anterior pelvic plane Tilt (2° versus 7° [p=0.002]), a larger pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (17° versus 8° [p=0.005]), and a higher proportion of spino-sacral angle<127° (70% versus 43%, (p=0.02)). Patients from group 3 had similar cup position, pelvic incidence, and spine degeneration compared to patients from group 1. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Patients with spine-hip relation type 2C/D (high pelvic incidence and severe spine degeneration) have an increased risk of instability that is partly compensated for by the use of a DM device. Preoperative screening of patients with abnormal spine-hip relation would improve THR planning and reduce the risk of prosthetic hip instability. The use of a DM device on spine-degenerated elderly patients is probably sound. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.

Modern cup alignment techniques in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: A systematic review was conducted to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of the alternative surgical techniques that consider the dynamic aspect of the acetabular orientation when aligning a cup (pelvic tilt-, lumbo-pelvic kinematics-, and spine-hip relationship-adjusted cup alignment techniques). METHOD: Eight eligible articles reported the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed with alternative techniques. Clinical and radiological data were extracted. One study had a control group of patients who underwent conventional THAs (level III) while the seven other studies were level IV. Computer navigation system (CAS), Optimized Positioning System (OPS™), and manual instrumentation were used to align components in four, two, and two studies, respectively. A meta-analysis was not carried out because there was a lack of homogeneity between included articles regarding the method to position the cup and the nature of the reported data. RESULTS: THA performed with alternative techniques had an early dislocation rate ranging from 0 to 1.9%, no unexpected catastrophic failure, and acceptable radiographic cup orientations. One study compared kinematically and mechanically aligned THAs and found no dislocation in either groups, similar patient reported outcome measures (43 Oxford-12 Score for both groups), and similar proportions of cup in the Lewinnek zone (respectively 65% and 70%). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Alternative methods accounting for the functional acetabular orientation seem to be clinically safe and effective in the early-term, and generate acceptable cup orientation on radiographs. Their values compare to those of more conventional techniques for cup implantation remain to be determined. We developed a classification of the multiple methods for aligning an acetabular component. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Total hip arthroplasty planning.

Preoperative planning is mandatory to achieve the restoration of a correct and personalized biomechanics of the hip.The radiographic review is the first and fundamental step in the planning. Limb or pelvis malpositioning during the review results in mislead planning.Correct templating is possible using three different methods: acetate templating on digital X-ray, digital 2D templating on digital X-ray and 3D digital templating on CT scan.Time efficiency, costs, reproducibility and accuracy must be considered when comparing different templating methods. Based on these parameters, acetate templating should not be abandoned; digital templating allows a permanent record of planning and can be electronically viewed by different members of surgical team; 3D templating is intrinsically more accurate. There is no evidence in the few recently published studies that 3D templating impacts positively on clinical outcomes except in difficult cases.The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a reliable intraoperative soft tissue reference to set cup position.Spine-hip relations in osteoarthritic patients undergoing hip joint replacement must be considered. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:626-632. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180075.

Spine-hip relations in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Patients with hip osteoarthritis often have an abnormal spine-hip relation (SHR), meaning the presence of a clinically deleterious spine-hip and/or hip-spine syndrome.Definition of the individual SHR is ideally done using the EOS® imaging system or, if not available, with conventional lumbopelvic lateral radiographs.By pre-operatively screening patients with abnormal SHR, it is possible to refine total hip replacement (THR) surgical planning, which may improve outcomes.An important component of the concept of kinematically aligned total hip arthroplasty (KA THA) consists of defining the optimal acetabular cup design and orientation based on the assessment of an individual's SHR, and use of the transverse acetabular ligament to adjust the cup positioning.The Bordeaux classification might advance the understanding of SHR and hopefully help improve THR outcomes. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:39-44. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170020.

Kinematic alignment technique for total hip and knee arthroplasty: The personalized implant positioning surgery.

Conventional techniques for hip and knee arthroplasty have led to good long-term clinical outcomes, but complications remain despite better surgical precision and improvements in implant design and quality.Technological improvements and a better understanding of joint kinematics have facilitated the progression to 'personalized' implant positioning (kinematic alignment) for total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty, the true value of which remains to be determined.By achieving a true knee resurfacing, the kinematic alignment (KA) technique for TKA aims at aligning the components with the physiological kinematic axes of the knee and restoring the constitutional tibio-femoral joint line frontal and axial orientation and soft-tissue laxity.The KA technique for THA aims at restoring the native 'combined femoro-acetabular anteversion' and the hip's centre of rotation, and occasionally adjusting the cup position and design based on the assessment of the individual spine-hip relation.The key element for optimal prosthetic joint kinematics (hip or knee) is to reproduce the femoral anatomy.The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is the reference landmark to adjust the cup position. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:98-105. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170022.

The influence of spine-hip relations on total hip replacement: A systematic review.

Sagittal pelvic kinematics along with spino-pelvic angular parameters have recently been studied by numerous investigators for their effect on total hip replacement (THR) clinical outcomes, but many issue of spine-hip relations (SHR) are currently unexplored. Therefore, our review aims at clarifying the following questions: is there any evidence of a relationship between articular impingement/dislocation risk in primary THR and (1) certain sagittal pelvic kinematics patterns, (2) pelvic incidence, and (3) types of SHRs? A systematic review of the existing literature utilising PubMed and Google search engines was performed in January 2017. Only clinical or computational studies published in peer-reviewed journals over the last five years in either English or French were reviewed. We identified 769 reports, of which 12 met our eligibility criteria. A review of literature shows that sagittal pelvic kinematics, but not the pelvic incidence, influences the risk of prosthetic impingement/dislocation. We found no study having assessed the relationship between this risk and the types of SHRs. Sagittal pelvic kinematics is highly variable among individuals and certain kinematic patterns substantially influences the risk of prosthetic impingement/dislocation. Recommendations for cup positioning are therefore switching from a systematic to a patient-specific approach, with the standing cup orientation Lewinneck safe zone progressively giving way to a new parameter of interest: the functional orientation of the cup. Based on a recently published classification for SHRs, We propose a new concept of "kinematically aligned THR" for the purposes of THR planning. Further studies are needed to investigate the relevance of such a classification towards the assumptions and hypothesis we have made. Level of evidence,- Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Spine-hip relations add understandings to the pathophysiology of femoro-acetabular impingement: A systematic review.

Relationship between hip pathoanatomy and symptomatic FAI has been reported to be weak. This is explained by the reciprocal interaction between proximal femur and acetabular anatomies, but potentially also by the individual spine-hip relations (SHR). The key-answer for a complete understanding of the pathophysiology of FAI might lie in the comprehension of the SHRs, which have not yet been fully addressed. Therefore we conducted a systematic review to answer the subsequent questions: Is there any evidence of a relationship between FAI and (1) sagittal pelvic kinematics, (2) pelvic incidence, and (3) types of SHRs? A systematic review of the existing literature utilizing PubMed and Google search engines was performed in December 2016. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals over the last ten years in either English or French were reviewed. We identified 90 reports, of which 9 met our eligibility criteria. Review of literature shows Caucasian FAI patients have a pelvis with higher anterior tilt, lesser sagittal mobility, and lower pelvic incidence compared to healthy patients. We found no study having assessed the relationship between SHR and FAI. In order to help further investigations at answering questions 3 and 4, we have developed a classification for SHRs. The classification according spino-pelvic parameters allows identifying patient at risk regarding FAI occurrence. Higher anterior pelvic tilt in standing, sitting and squatting positions and lower pelvic incidence have been found to correlate with symptomatic FAI. Because defining the individual SHR might increase the understanding of the pathophysiology of hip impingement, we have developed a classification for SHRs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.