The Next Generation: Surgeon Learning Curve in a Mature Operative Rib Management Program.

INTRODUCTION: Prior work has demonstrated utility in using operative time to measure surgeon learning for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF); however, no studies have used operative time to evaluate the benefit of proctoring in subsequent generations of surgeons. We sought to evaluate whether there is a difference in learning between an original series (TOS) of self-taught surgeons versus the next generation (TNG) of proctored surgeons using cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis. We hypothesized that TNG would have a comparatively accelerated learning curve. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review of all SSRF at a level 1 trauma center was performed. Data were collected from the beginning of an operative chest injury program to include at least 2 y of TNG experience. Operative time was used to determine success and misstep based on prior methods. Learning curves using CUSUM analysis were calculated based on an anticipated success rate of 90% and compared between TOS and TNG groups. RESULTS: Over 7 y, 163 patients with a median Injury Severity Score of 24 underwent SSRF. Median operative time was 165 min with a 0.5 plate-to-fracture ratio. All three TOS surgeons experienced a positive slope indicative of early missteps for their first 15-20 cases. By contrast, all three TNG surgeons demonstrated a series of early successes resulting in negative CUSUM slopes which coincided with a period of proctoring. By the end of TNG series, the composite cumulative score was less than half of the TOS surgeon' scores. CONCLUSIONS: Operative time continues to be a useful surrogate for observing SSRF learning curves. In a mature institutional program, proctored novice surgeons appear to have an accelerated learning curve compared to novice surgeons developing a new operative rib program.

Educating Surgeons to Educate Patients About the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The spring of 2020 has been a trying time for the global medical community as it has faced the latest pandemic, COVID-19. This contagious and lethal virus has impacted patients and health care workers alike. Elective surgeries have been suspended, and the very core of our health care system is being strained. The following brief communication reviews pertinent details about the virus, delaying elective surgeries, and what patients can do during this time. The goal is to disseminate factual data that surgeons can then use to educate their patients.

How Has COVID-19 Affected Our Orthopedic Implant Industry Partners? Implications for the Surgeon-Industry Relationship in 2020 and Beyond.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had far-reaching societal and financial consequences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how COVID-19 has affected AAHKS industry partners and the surgeon-industry relationship, emphasizing education, resource allocation, and strategic direction for the second half of 2020. METHODS: AAHKS industry partners were contacted to participate in a blinded survey and optional interview with the AAHKS Industry Relations Committee. Based on the results, a group of AAHKS member surgeons with disparate practice types were asked to postulate on how the COVID-19 pandemic has and will affect their practice and relationship with Industry. RESULTS: AAHKS industry partner responses indicated decreased resource allocation for regional, "other national," and AAHKS annual meetings (67%, 55%, and 30%, respectively). Web-based educational content was expected to increase in 2020 and will likely remain a point of emphasis in 2021 (100% and 70% of responders). For Q3/Q4 2020, a significant emphasis was placed on site of service/outpatient TJA and COVID-19-related safety measures (70% and 90% of responders), as well as increased availability of instrumentation and implants (40% and 60%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the orthopedic landscape for the foreseeable future. Survey responses by AAHKS industry partners demonstrate a continued commitment to surgeon education with an increasing shift to a web-based platform. Increased resource allocation for outpatient TJA and COVID-19-related safety measures were significant. Articulating optimal mechanisms to aid industry in supporting surgeons with different practice models to meet demand during the second half of fiscal year 2020 will be critical.

Transversus abdominis plane blocks: pilot of feasibility and the learning curve.

BACKGROUND: Our goal was to evaluate the learning curve for transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block placement and identify issues that impede successful placement. METHODS: Three novices were prospectively evaluated performing ultrasound-guided TAP blocks in 10 consecutive patients. Operators were assessed on medication knowledge, setup/placement, procedural steps, and performance time. Times were compared to an expert for efficiency and competence. The main outcome measures were procedures needed for competence and variables associated with increased coaching/procedure time. RESULTS: In the 30 patient sample, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 30.9 (standard deviation [SD], 5.79). Fifteen patients were obese (BMI > 30), seven (23.3%) super obese (BMI > 35), and 15 had prior abdominal surgery. The mean setup time was 107.5 s (SD, 87), right-side placement was 131.8 s (SD, 60.3), left-side placement 114.8 s (SD, 40.5), and total time 354 s (SD, 111). By the second attempt, all operators were fluent in the medication and setup. At block 3, operators 1 and 3 reached competence in performance time; by block 4, all three operators reached time competence. After reaching competence, outliers in procedure times were only experienced for extremes in BMI (<20 and >35). Additional coaching was needed in four patients with prior abdominal surgery to decipher the correct planes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our pilot, by four attempts, novices reach appropriate speeds with progressively less coaching to safely and efficiently place TAP blocks. Extremes of BMI and prior abdominal surgery impact procedural time and may required additional coaching to facilitate placement. Given the promising results, further work on developing best practices for education and implementation is warranted.

Surgeon education through a surgical cost feedback system reduces supply cost in endoscopic skull base surgery.

OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of healthcare expense is operating room (OR) costs. As a means of cost mitigation, several institutions have implemented surgeon education programs to bring awareness about supply costs. This study evaluates the impact of a surgical cost feedback system (surgical receipt) on the supply costs of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) procedures. METHODS: The supply costs of each ESBS surgical case were prospectively collected and analyzed before and after the implementation of a nonincentivized, automated, and itemized weekly surgical receipt system between January 2017 and December 2019. Supply cost data collected 15 months prior to intervention were compared with cost data 21 months after implementation of the surgical receipt system. Demographics, surgical details, and OR time were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: Of 105 ESBS procedures analyzed, 36 preceded and 69 followed implementation of cost feedback. There were no significant differences in patient age (p = 0.064), sex (p = 0.489), surgical indication (p = 0.389), or OR anesthesia time (p = 0.51) for patients treated before and after implementation. The mean surgical supply cost decreased from $3824.41 to $3010.35 (p = 0.002) after implementation of receipt feedback. Usage of dural sealants (p = 0.043), microfibrillar collagen hemostat (p = 0.007), and oxidized regenerated cellulose hemostat (p < 0.0001) and reconstructive technique (p = 0.031) significantly affected cost. Mediation analysis confirmed that the overall cost reduction was predominantly driven by reduced use of dural sealant; this cost saving exceeded the incremental cost of greater use of packing materials such as microfibrillar collagen hemostat. CONCLUSIONS: Education of surgeons regarding surgical supply costs by a surgical receipt feedback system can reduce the supply cost per case of ESBS operations.

International needs analysis in orthopaedic trauma for practising surgeons with a 3-year review of resulting actions.

Introduction: To ensure best-quality education in orthopaedic trauma, the AOTrauma Education Commission conducted a Global Needs Analysis with practising surgeons worldwide. Material and methods: During July to November 2012, an email invitation to complete an online set of 30 questions in eight languages was sent to our members and associates in all countries through AOTrauma's regional networks. Non-members were invited to participate through collaboration with orthopaedic societies. Results: A total of 3,790 surgeons practising orthopaedic trauma (49%), orthopaedic (15%), general trauma (15%) and specialty orthopaedic (13%) surgeons responded worldwide. Seventy per cent completed all questions, and the top 10 countries accounted for half the responses. The top 3 areas of educational need were orthopaedic trauma, joint replacement and preservation, and pelvis and acetabulum. Aspects influencing likelihood to attend face-to-face courses were: expert faculty, focus on a specific topic, clear objectives, and discussion and feedback from experts. Barriers to attending courses were time away from practice, cost and lack of availability or access. Conclusion: The Global Needs Analysis helped our educational committees to identify short- and mid-term priorities over recent years. Adjustments in our planning have helped meet the needs of our audience on a global, regional and national level.

Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons play a crucial role in the cost efficiency of the operating room through total operative time, use of supplies, and patient outcomes. This study aimed to examine the effect of surgeon education on disposable supply usage during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Surgeons were educated about the cost of disposable equipments without incentives for achieved cost reductions. Surgical supply costs for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in fiscal year (FY) 2013 were compared with FY 2014. RESULTS: The average disposable supply cost per laparoscopic cholecystectomy was reduced from $589 (n = 586) in FY 2013 to $531 (n = 428) in FY 2014, representing a 10% reduction in supply costs (P < .001). Adjustments included reduction in the use of expensive fascial closure devices, clip appliers, suction irrigators, and specimen retrieval bags. CONCLUSIONS: Disposable equipment cost for laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be reduced by surgeon education. These techniques can likely be used to reduce costs in an array of specialties and procedures.

Decreasing the occurrence of intraoperative technical errors through periodic simple show, tell and learn method.

BACKGROUND: Technical errors (TE) that occur during surgery for treating fractures are considered as being preventable by good preoperative planning and surgeon education. This prospective study evaluated a new instructional method for improving surgical outcomes that involved assessing surgeons' own recent performances. METHODS: Postoperative radiographs from two groups of patients were assessed during consecutive 4-month periods. 350 operations were included in the Early Group and 411 operations in the Late Group. All the TE that occurred during the first period were reviewed and discussed among the residents and the consultant surgeons who had performed those operations. The same procedure was followed 4 months later. The TE were classified as minor, moderate and major. RESULTS: The two groups included the same 41 surgeons. The most common TE were: insufficient reduction, varus and valgus malalignment and prominent hardware. The total number of errors dropped significantly, from 52 (14.7%) during the first period to 26 (6.3%) during the second period (p = 0.0003). The TE score severity dropped from 81 to 38, respectively (p = 0.0001). The most affected regions were, the humerus (p < 000.1), midshaft femur (p = 0.007), proximal femur (p = 0.004) and radius (p = 0.008). Most of the gains were made in the moderate category (p = 0.0001). The consultants performed statistically better than the residents in the first period (12% vs. 20%, p = 0.036), but almost similar to the residents in the second period (5.3% vs. 9%, p = 0.164). A TE index was calculated by dividing the accumulated sum by the number of operations and it dropped in both groups from 0.2 and 0.3 to 0.09 and 0.09, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative TE can be significantly reduced by periodic performance evaluations in a seminar setting during which groups of surgeons can review the TE that they and their colleagues had made during recent orthopaedic surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.