Systematic review and meta-analysis of teneligliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There are efficacy and safety concerns related to teneligliptin treatment. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken to comprehensively profile the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Thirteen studies were chosen from a search of scientific databases for RCTs using teneligliptin as a monotherapy or as an adjunct to other glycemic agents with pre-specified inclusion criteria. We calculated weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each included trial and pooled the data using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirteen studies enrolled 2853 patients were identified. Teneligliptin treatment was associated with weight gain (vs. placebo, weighted mean difference (WMD) 0.28 kg; 95% CI - 0.20-0.77 kg; I2 = 86%; P = 0.25). Compared to monotherapy, add on therapy with teneligliptin showed significant improvement in FPG mg/dl levels (WMD - 16.75 mg/dl; 95% CI - 19.38 to - 14.13 mg/dl), HOMA-ß (WMD 7.91; 95% CI 5.38-10.45) and HOMA-IR (WMD - 0.27; 95% CI - 0.46 to - 0.07). The improvement in HbA1c was greater with monotherapy (WMD - 8.88 mmol/mol; 95% CI - 9.59 to - 8.08 mmol/mol). There was no significant risk of any hypoglycemia with teneligliptin compared to placebo (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.44-1.60; I2 = 0%; P = 0.60). However, the risk was 1.84 times high when combined with other glycemic agents. The risk of cardiovascular events was comparable, regardless of treatment duration when compared to placebo or any other active comparator (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.40-1.57; I2 = 0%; P = 0.50). [PROSPERO, CRD42022360785]. CONCLUSIONS: Teneligliptin is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with T2DM, both as monotherapy and as add-on therapy. However, additional large-scale, high-quality, long-term follow-up clinical trials with diverse ethnic populations are required to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety.

Efficacy and tolerability of DPP4 inhibitor, teneligliptin, on autonomic and peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes: an open label, pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic neuropathy increases risk of cardiovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, foot amputation and overall mortality. Not only hyperglycaemia induced nerve damage is harder to repair using currently approved medications, but also, the use of these agents is often limited by the extent of pain relief provided and side effects. METHODOLOGY: In this prospective, open-label, pilot study, 20 type-2 diabetes mellitus patients (male/female=13/7, mean age- 56.1±8.04 years), meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria, were treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, Teneligliptin, 20mg once a day for three months. Efficacy parameters: Sudomotor function (Sudoscan score); parasympathetic dysfunction assessed using Ewing's criteria i.e. heart rate response to -standing (HRS), -valsalva (HRV) and -deep breath (HRD); sympathetic dysfunction assessed as blood pressure response to -standing (BPS) and -handgrip (BPH); ankle brachial index (ABI), vibration perception threshold (VPT), C-reactive protein, glycemic profile and health related quality of life (HRQoL); and, tolerability parameters: complete blood count, liver function tests, serum creatinine, thyroid stimulating hormone, QT- interval and serum vitamin B12 levels, were measured. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in BMI, SBP, DBP, HRD, BPH and all safety parameters. After 12 weeks treatment, there was improvement in HRS (p<0.01) and HRV (p<0.01), but not in HRD (p=0.12). BPS was significantly lowered (p <0.01), but not the BPH (p =0.06). Sudoscan score was increased, while VPT was significantly decreased (both p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Teneligliptin not only improves the glycemic status but also improves sudomotor function, peripheral and autonomic neuropathy, and reduces vascular inflammation in type 2 diabetes.

Comparison of dapagliflozin and teneligliptin in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective randomized study.

There are no reports regarding the efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i) administrations in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of those drugs in such patients. NAFLD patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled in this single center double-blind randomized prospective study, and allocated to receive either dapagliflozin (SGLT2i) or teneligliptin (DPP4i) for 12 weeks. Laboratory variables and body compositions were assessed at the baseline and end of treatment. The primary endpoint was alanine aminotransferase (ALT) reduction level at the end of treatment. Twenty-two eligible patients (dapagliflozin group, n = 12; teneligliptin group, n = 10) were analyzed. In both groups, the serum concentration of ALT was significantly decreased after treatment (p<0.05). Multiple regression analysis results showed that decreased body weight of patients with dapagliflozin administration was significantly related to changes in total body water and body fat mass. Administration of dapagliflozin or teneligliptin decreased the serum concentration of ALT in NAFLD patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus. With dapagliflozin, body weight decreased, which was related to changes in total body water and body fat mass (UMIN000027304).

Teneligliptin inhibits IL-1ß-induced degradation of extracellular matrix in human chondrocytes.

The mechanisms driving the pathologic progression of osteoarthritis (OA) have not yet to be fully elucidated. Excessive and irreversible breakdown of the extracellular matrix is the main hallmark of OA. Inhibitors of DPP-4 have been widely used for over a decade as a treatment for type-2 diabetes, but the promising function of DPP-4 inhibitors in chronic inflammatory diseases has only begun to receive attention. Here, we treated human chondrocytes with interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) with or without teneligliptin to assess the role of DPP-4 in the enzyme-driven reduction of type II collagen. Treatment with teneligliptin significantly reduced IL-1ß-induced expression of tumor necrosis factor α, IL-6, and IL-8, generation of reactive oxygen species, increase in metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3) and MMP-13, reduction of tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) and TIMP-2, release of lactate dehydrogenase, and activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 and nuclear factor κB intracellular signaling pathways, among other things. These findings demonstrate that treatment with teneligliptin may act as a novel therapy to slow or halt disease progression in patients with OA.

Teneligliptin prevents doxorubicin-induced inflammation and apoptosis in H9c2 cells.

Doxorubicin is a common chemotherapy treatment with numerous negative ramifications of use such as nephropathy and radiation-induced cardiotoxicity. Doxorubicin has been shown to cause overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines including MCP-1 and IL-1ß via activation of the NF-κB pathway. Furthermore, apoptosis marked by dysregulation of the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and oxidative stress and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are also exacerbated by doxorubicin administration. Teneligliptin is part of the wider dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor family which has until recently been almost exclusively used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. DPP-4 inhibitors such as teneligliptin control the overexpression of glucagon-like peptidase 1 (GLP-1) which has the downstream effects of general insulin resistance and high blood sugar levels. Our findings indicate a significant protective effect of teneligliptin against the aftereffects of doxorubicin as a chemotherapy treatment. This protective effect includes but is not limited to the reduction of inflammation and the mitigation of dysregulated apoptosis, as evidenced by reduced expression of IL-1ß and MCP-1, inhibition of NF-κB activation, and improvement of the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. The aim of the present study was to establish teneligliptin as a potentially useful agent for the treatment of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity, and our findings support this notion.

Multicenter prospective observational study of teneligliptin, a selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: Focus on glycemic control, hypotensive effect, and safety Chikushi Anti-Diabetes Mellitus Trial-Teneligliptin (CHAT-T).

Objective: We purpose to confirm the effect of teneligliptin (Tenelia), a selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, on glycemic control and non-glucose risk factors for macroangiopathy, including blood pressure, lipid metabolism, and body weight.Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, open-label, observational study, teneligliptin (20 mg/day) was administered to type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 6.5% to <10%) at our hospitals. The safety of teneligliptin and its impact on blood glucose, blood pressure, and the lipid profile were assessed after administration for 3 and 6 months.Results: One hundred and sixty-two patients were enrolled between February 2014 and August 2015. HbA1c was 7.6% at baseline and showed significant reduction to 7.1% after 3 months of treatment and to 6.9% after 6 months (both p < 0.01). Patients with poorly controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥80 mmHg) at study initiation were extracted to investigate the effect of teneligliptin on blood pressure. SBP showed a significant decrease from 141.2 ± 9.8 mmHg at baseline to 131.1 ± 14.3 mmHg after 3 months and 133.9 ± 11.5 mmHg after 6 months (both p < 0.001). DBP also decreased significantly from 85.8 ± 5.7 mmHg at baseline to 78.4 ± 10.0 mmHg after 3 months and 79.7 ± 10.1 mmHg after 6 months (both p < 0.001). Adverse events were pruritus in four patients, and cerebral infarction was reported as a cerebrovascular event in one patient.Conclusions: Teneligliptin therapy was safe and improved glycemic control irrespective of baseline HbA1c. Blood pressure was also improved in patients with concomitant hypertension.

Development of a liquid chromatography/tandem-mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous determination of teneligliptin and its active metabolite teneligliptin sulfoxide in human plasma.

Teneligliptin is a recently developed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. To study simultaneous pharmacokinetics of teneligliptin and its major active metabolite, teneligliptin sulfoxide in human plasma, we developed and validated a LC-MS/MS method. The analytes were detected in the positive mode using multiple reaction monitoring (teneligliptin: m/z 427.2→243.1; teneligliptin-d8 : m/z 435.2→251.3; teneligliptin sulfoxide: m/z 443.2→68.2). The method demonstrated accuracy, precision, and linearity over the concentration range of 5 to 1000 ng/mL for teneligliptin and 2.5 to 500 ng/mL for teneligliptin sulfoxide. The developed method is the first fully validated method capable of simultaneous determination of teneligliptin and its active metabolite, teneligliptin sulfoxide in plasma. The suitability of the method was successfully demonstrated in terms of quantification of teneligliptin and teneligliptin sulfoxide pharmacokinetics in plasma samples collected from healthy volunteers. The measurement of plasma metabolite/parent ratio of teneligliptin was feasible by this method.

Combined Treatment with Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor (Canagliflozin) and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor (Teneligliptin) Alleviates NASH Progression in A Non-Diabetic Rat Model of Steatohepatitis.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the strongest independent predictor of mortality in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related cirrhosis. The effects and mechanisms of combination of sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter inhibitor and canagliflozin (CA) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and teneligliptin (TE) on non-diabetic NASH progression were examined. CA and TE suppressed choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined diet-induced hepatic fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis. CA alone or with TE significantly decreased proinflammatory cytokine expression. CA and TE significantly attenuated hepatic lipid peroxidation. In vitro studies showed that TE alone or with CA inhibited cell proliferation and TGF-ß1 and α1 (I)-procollagen mRNA expression in Ac-HSCs. CA+TE inhibited liver fibrogenesis by attenuating hepatic lipid peroxidation and inflammation and by inhibiting Ac-HSC proliferation with concomitant attenuation of hepatic lipid peroxidation. Moreover, CA+TE suppressed in vivo angiogenesis and oxidative DNA damage. CA or CA+TE inhibited HCC cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation. CA+TE suppressed vascular endothelial growth factor expression and promoted increased E-cadherin expression in HUVECs. CA+TE potentially exerts synergistic effects on hepatocarcinogenesis prevention by suppressing HCC cell proliferation and angiogenesis and concomitantly reducing oxidative stress and by inhibiting angiogenesis with attenuation of oxidative stress. CA+TE showed chemopreventive effects on NASH progression compared with single agent in non-diabetic rat model of NASH, concurrent with Ac-HSC and HCC cell proliferation, angiogenesis oxidative stress, and inflammation. Both agents are widely, safely used in clinical practice; combined treatment may represent a potential strategy against NASH.

Teneligliptin versus sitagliptin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and glimepiride: A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of add-on therapy with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor teneligliptin compared with sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin and glimepiride. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study of adult Korean subjects with T2DM (n = 201), with HbA1c ranging from 7.0% to 11.0%, on stable doses of metformin plus glimepiride. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either oral teneligliptin 20 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c. RESULTS: At baseline, mean age was 60.56 ± 9.41 years, body mass index was 25.23 ± 2.85 kg/m2 and HbA1c was 8.11% ± 0.79%. At 24 weeks, both groups achieved significant reductions from baseline in HbA1c (teneligliptin, -1.03% ± 0.10% [P < 0.0001]; sitagliptin, -1.02% ± 0.10% [P < 0.0001]). The inter-group difference was -0.01% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.28, 0.26; P = 0.9497); the upper limit of the 95% CI was within the preset limit for non-inferiority (0.4%). There were no significant differences between groups in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c targets, or changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, body weight or lipid levels at 24 weeks. Rates of adverse events (teneligliptin, n = 63 [61.76%]; sitagliptin, n = 61 [62.24%]; P = 0.9442) and hypoglycaemia (teneligliptin, n = 32 [31.37%]; sitagliptin, n = 28 [28.57%]; P = 0.6656) were similar. CONCLUSION: Teneligliptin was non-inferior to sitagliptin in the context of triple therapy for T2DM and is an important option in this setting.

Effects of Teneligliptin on the Progressive Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Open-Label, Marker-Stratified Randomized, Parallel-Group Comparison, Standard Treatment-Controlled Multicenter Trial (TOPLEVEL Study): Rationale and Study Design.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) can cause left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction, leading to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors have failed to reduce hospitalization due to HF in type 2 DM (T2D) patients in a large-scale clinical trial, despite their cardiovascular protective effects. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether DPP-IV inhibitors can improve LV diastolic dysfunction in T2D patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether teneligliptin, the strongest of the DPP-IV inhibitors, improves LV dysfunction or prevents the worsening of LV diastolic function in T2D patients. METHODS: The TOPLEVEL study is designed as an open-labeled, marker-stratified randomized, parallel-group comparison, standard treatment-controlled multicenter study. TOPLEVEL includes two marker-defined subgroups to give treatment recommendations for T2D patients with normal (E/e' < 8) or impaired LV diastolic function (E/e' ≥ 8), where E/e' is the ratio of peak velocity of early transmitral diastolic filling by echocardiography to early diastolic mitral annular velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography as LV diastolic function. Patients are randomly assigned to either teneligliptin (20 or 40 mg) or the standard treatment group. All patients are followed up for 2 years. The primary endpoint measure is the change in E/e' from baseline and 2 years after enrollment. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES: TOPLEVEL is a clinical trial of teneligliptin targeting LV diastolic dysfunction in T2D patients. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of DPP-IV inhibitors on LV diastolic dysfunction, an important surrogate endpoint to predict the cardiovascular outcomes of HFpEF (UMIN000014589).

Effect of glimepiride on the pharmacokinetics of teneligliptin in healthy Korean subjects.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Teneligliptin is a DPP-4 inhibitor used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, commonly prescribed in combination with glimepiride. Teneligliptin is metabolized by CYP3A4, and glimepiride might be partly metabolized by CYP3A4. The aim of the study was to investigate the possible effect of glimepiride on the pharmacokinetics of teneligliptin in healthy subjects. METHODS: A repeated dose, open-label, fixed-sequence study was conducted in 26 healthy subjects. All participants were administered 20 mg teneligliptin daily for 6 days. On day 7, 4 mg glimepiride was administered together with 20 mg teneligliptin. Plasma teneligliptin concentrations were measured at a steady state, and its pharmacokinetic characteristics were compared without and with glimepiride. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: No statistically significant difference was found in the effect of glimepiride on teneligliptin pharmacokinetics. The steady-state Cmax,ss values of teneligliptin without and with glimepiride were 207.01 ng/mL and 202.15 ng/mL, respectively. Its AUCτ values at steady-state without and with glimepiride were 1527.8 ng · h/mL and 1578.6 ng · h/mL, respectively. The point estimation of geometric mean ratios (GMR) and the 90% confidence interval for both Cmax,ss and AUCτ were within the equivalence range of 0.8-1.25. The results of the present study revealed that glimepiride did not cause pharmacokinetic interaction with teneligliptin in humans. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Glimepiride did not affect the pharmacokinetic characteristics of teneligliptin in healthy subjects.

Long-term safety and efficacy of canagliflozin as add-on therapy to teneligliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of canagliflozin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had inadequate glycaemic control with teneligliptin monotherapy. METHODS: This open-label 52-week study was conducted in Japan. Patients received canagliflozin 100 mg added to teneligliptin 20 mg orally once daily for 52 weeks. The safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). The efficacy endpoints included changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and body weight from baseline to week 52 (with last observation carried forward). RESULTS: Overall, 153 patients entered the treatment period and 142 completed the study. The overall incidence rates of AEs and drug-related AEs were 69.9% and 22.9%, respectively. Most AEs and drug-related AEs were mild or moderate in severity. There were no previously undescribed safety signals. The mean changes in HbA1c, FPG and body weight were -0.99% (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.12 to -0.85), -38.6 mg/dL (95% CI -43.4 to -33.9) and -3.92% (95% CI -4.53 to -3.31), respectively. These effects were maintained for 52 weeks without attenuation. HbA1c and body weight were both decreased in 82.24% of patients at the end of the treatment period. Reductions in postprandial glucose were observed at weeks 24 and 52. CONCLUSIONS: No new safety risks with this combination were identified, and sustained improvements in HbA1c, FPG and body weight were observed. The findings suggest that long-term co-administration of canagliflozin with teneligliptin is well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with T2DM who have inadequate glycaemic control on teneligliptin alone.

Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to canagliflozin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparative study.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are frequently used in combination for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We examined the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin (a DPP-4 inhibitor) added to canagliflozin (an SGLT2 inhibitor) monotherapy in Japanese patients with poorly controlled T2DM as part of the development of a fixed-dose combination of teneligliptin and canagliflozin. Japanese patients treated with canagliflozin (100 mg) for ≥12 weeks were randomized to receive add-on teneligliptin (20 mg; C + T group) or placebo (C + P group) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to Week 24. The between-group differences in reductions from baseline to Week 24 were significantly greater in the C + T group for HbA1c (-0.94%; P < .001). The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups (55.8% and 49.4% in the C + T and C + P groups, respectively). No episodes of hypoglycaemia were reported. Teneligliptin added to ongoing canagliflozin monotherapy improved glycaemic control and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled T2DM.

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin as add-on therapy to teneligliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results of a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

AIMS: To investigate efficacy and safety of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor canagliflozin administered as add-on therapy to the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor teneligliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial in Japanese patients with T2DM who had inadequate glycaemic control with teneligliptin. Patients were randomized to receive teneligliptin 20 mg plus either canagliflozin 100 mg (T + C, n = 70) or placebo (T + P, n = 68) once daily. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24. Other endpoints included changes in fasting plasma glucose, body weight, proinsulin/C-peptide ratio, homeostatic model assessment 2-%B and adverse events. Patients also underwent mixed-meal tolerance tests. RESULTS: The difference between the T + C and T + P groups for HbA1c change from baseline to week 24 was -0.88% (least-squares mean, P < .001). Fasting plasma glucose, body weight and the proinsulin/C-peptide ratio were significantly lower in the T + C group than in the T + P group. Homeostatic model assessment 2-%B improved with T + C compared with T + P. The T + C group exhibited a decrease in the 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose and plasma glucose area under the curve (AUC)0-2h in a mixed-meal tolerance test. No significant between-group differences were observed for C-peptide AUC0-2h or glucagon AUC0-2h after meals. Incidences of adverse events were 60.0% and 47.1% in the T + C and T + P groups, respectively. No hypoglycaemia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Canagliflozin administered as add-on therapy to teneligliptin was effective and well tolerated in Japanese T2DM patients.

Impact of teneligliptin on oxidative stress and endothelial function in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to elucidate the effect of teneligliptin on oxidative stress and endothelial function in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: Forty-five patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD who received sitagliptin for at least 12 months were randomized to either continue sitagliptin (n = 23) or switch to teneligliptin (n = 22) for 24 weeks. The following parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment with continued sitagliptin or teneligliptin: blood pressure, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary albumin excretion, endothelial function by reactive hyperaemia index (RHI; EndoPAT(®) system), reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs) measured by the d-ROMS test, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), and urinary 8-isoprostane. RESULTS: The two groups did not significantly differ with regard to age, male-to-female ratio, duration of diabetes, body mass index, HbA1c, eGFR, or urinary albumin excretion levels at baseline. We found no significant differences in changes of HbA1c, eGFR, or urinary albumin excretion levels between the two groups after 24 weeks of treatment. However, treatment with teneligliptin, but not sitagliptin, significantly improved RHI values and was correlated with the percent changes in RHI and d-ROMs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that teneligliptin, can improve endothelial function and reduce renal and vascular oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD, independently of reducing albuminuria or improving glucose control. Trial registration UMIN000017180.

An update on DPP-4 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: DPP-4 inhibitors are a class of compounds used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The drugs inhibit the degradation of GLP-1, thus amplifying the incretin effect. They have moderate glycemic efficacy, a low propensity of causing hypoglycaemia and are weight neutral. The drugs are often used as second line therapy after metformin. Areas covered: This review summarizes the available compounds in the market and discusses the novel compounds that are currently under development. Several large cardiovascular outcome trials with some of the compounds have been completed, and their results and implications are considered. Fixed dose combination pills are currently the main focus of research and the contribution of these to the care of patients with diabetes is further discussed. Expert opinion: The DPP-4 inhibitors have been a successful class in drug development for diabetes. Taken orally and available as fixed dose combinations with metformin or with SGLT-2 inhibitors, they have reached a large market share of over 7 billion dollars. Other than retagliptin, it does not appear that any additional compound will be launched soon. Currently, the main focus is on the development of additional fixed dose combinations with SGLT-2 inhibitors, but the success of these combinations remains to be seen.

Efficacy and risk profile of anti-diabetic therapies: Conventional vs traditional drugs-A mechanistic revisit to understand their mode of action.

An increasing array of anti-diabetic drugs are available today, yet Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) - remains a life threatening disease, causing high mortality and morbidity in developing and developed countries. As of now, no effective therapy is available for the complete eradication/cure of diabetes and its associated complications. Therefore, it is time to re-think and revisit molecular pathways and targets of each existing drug in order to identify multiple targets from different signaling pathways that may be manipulated simultaneously to treat or manage T2DM effectively. Bearing this goal in mind, the article reviews the mechanisms of action of available anti-diabetic drugs with in-depth mechanistic analysis of each therapy. The conventional and herbal strategies are analysed and compared for their benefits and the associated possible side effects. This critical information is necessary not only for the development of better, novel and potent anti-diabetic therapy in future but also for best possible combinational therapies and strategies with the available drugs.

Comparative review of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sulphonylureas.

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a progressive disease, and pharmacotherapy with a single agent does not generally provide durable glycaemic control over the long term. Sulphonylurea (SU) drugs have a history stretching back over 60 years, and have traditionally been the mainstay choice as second-line agents to be added to metformin once glycaemic control with metformin monotherapy deteriorates; however, they are associated with undesirable side effects, including increased hypoglycaemia risk and weight gain. Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors are, by comparison, more recent, with the first compound being launched in 2006, but the class now globally encompasses at least 11 different compounds. DPP-4 inhibitors improve glycaemic control with similar efficacy to SUs, but do not usually provoke hypoglycaemia or weight gain, are relatively free from adverse side effects, and have recently been shown not to increase cardiovascular risk in large prospective safety trials. Because of these factors, DPP-4 inhibitors have become an established therapy for T2DM and are increasingly being positioned earlier in treatment algorithms. The present article reviews these two classes of oral antidiabetic drugs (DPP-4 inhibitors and SUs), highlighting differences and similarities between members of the same class, as well as discussing the potential advantages and disadvantages of the two drug classes. While both classes have their merits, the choice of which to use depends on the characteristics of each individual patient; however, for the majority of patients, DPP-4 inhibitors are now the preferred choice.

Teneligliptin improves left ventricular diastolic function and endothelial function in patients with diabetes.

Incretin hormones have been reported to have cytoprotective actions in addition to their glucose-lowering effects. We evaluated whether teneligliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, affects left ventricular (LV) function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Twenty-nine T2DM patients not receiving any incretin-based drugs were enrolled and prescribed with teneligliptin for 3 months. Compared to baseline levels, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased (7.6 ± 1.0 % to 6.9 ± 0.7 %, p < 0.01) and 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol levels increased (9.6 ± 7.2 µg/mL to 13.5 ± 8.7 µg/mL, p < 0.01) after treatment. Clinical parameters, including body mass index and blood pressure, did not show any difference before and after treatment. Three months after treatment, there were improvements in LV systolic and diastolic function [LV ejection fraction, 62.0 ± 6.5 % to 64.5 ± 5.0 %, p = 0.01; peak early diastolic velocity/basal septal diastolic velocity (E/e') ratio, 13.3 ± 4.1 to 11.9 ± 3.3, p = 0.01]. Moreover, there was an improvement in endothelial function (reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry [RH-PAT] index; 1.58 ± 0.47 to 2.01 ± 0.72, p < 0.01). There was a significant negative correlation between changes in the E/e' ratio and RH-PAT values. Furthermore, circulating adiponectin levels increased (27.0 ± 38.5 pg/mL to 42.7 ± 33.2 pg/mL, p < 0.01) without changes in patient body weight. Teneligliptin treatment was associated with improvements in LV function and endothelial functions, and an increase in serum adiponectin levels. These results support the cardio-protective effects of teneligliptin in T2DM patients and increase in serum adiponectin levels.

Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, combined with metformin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of teneligliptin in combination with metformin in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. Patients [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0-10.0%, on stable metformin ≥1000 mg/day] were randomized 2 : 1 to receive 20 mg teneligliptin plus metformin (n = 136) or placebo plus metformin (n = 68). The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c levels from baseline to week 16. The mean baseline HbA1c was 7.9% in the teneligliptin group and 7.8% in the placebo group. The differences between the teneligliptin and placebo groups regarding changes in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels were -0.78 % and -1.24 mmol/l (22.42 mg/dl), respectively, at week 16. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. The addition of teneligliptin once daily to metformin was effective and generally well tolerated in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes.