Impact of Adding Antithymocyte Globulin to Posttransplantation Cyclophosphamide in Haploidentical Stem-Cell Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of mortality after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT/CY) has become standard prophylaxis of GVHD in T-replete haploidentical transplantation. The question is whether adding antithymocyte globulin (ATG) to PT/CY may further reduce the incidence of GVHD compared to PT/CY only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 268 patients undergoing myeloablative haploidentical transplantation with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF) conditioning. Sixty-nine patients (26%) received ATG. RESULTS: In the ATG group, 3% died due to GVHD versus 8% in the no ATG group. The 100-day and 1-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 0% and 19%, respectively, in the whole cohort. On univariate analysis, the 1-year NRM was 8% versus 23% in patients receiving ATG and no ATG, respectively (P = .005). The no ATG group had a higher incidence of acute GVHD at 12 months compared to the ATG group (22% vs. 12%, respectively, P = .029). The ATG group had better overall survival at 12 months compared to the no ATG group (79% vs. 69%, P = .029). On multivariate analysis, adding ATG to PT/CY had no significant impact on any of the outcomes. A low disease risk index was associated with better overall survival and lower NRM, while Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) score ≥ 3 was associated with higher NRM. CONCLUSION: ATG can be safely used as part of the pretransplantation conditioning and does not increase the incidence of relapse or complications after transplantation.

Fludarabine-treosulfan compared to thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine or FLAMSA as conditioning regimen for patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

BACKGROUND: Limited data is available to guide the choice of the conditioning regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing transplant with persistent disease. METHODS: We retrospectively compared outcome of fludarabine-treosulfan (FT), thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF), and sequential fludarabine, intermediate dose Ara-C, amsacrine, total body irradiation/busulfan, cyclophosphamide (FLAMSA) conditioning in patients with refractory or relapsed AML. RESULTS: Complete remission rates at day 100 were 92%, 80%, and 88% for FT, TBF, and FLAMSA, respectively (p = 0.13). Non-relapse mortality, incidence of relapse, acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rates did not differ between the three groups. Overall survival at 2 years was 37% for FT, 24% for TBF, and 34% for FLAMSA (p = 0.10). Independent prognostic factors for survival were Karnofsky performance score and patient CMV serology (p = 0.01; p = 0.02), while survival was not affected by age at transplant. The use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was associated with reduced risk of grade III-IV aGVHD (p = 0.02) and cGVHD (p = 0.006), with no influence on relapse. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, FT, TBF, and FLAMSA regimens provided similar outcome in patients undergoing transplant with active AML. Survival was determined by patient characteristics as Karnofsky performance score and CMV serology, however was not affected by age at transplant. ATG appears able to reduce the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD without influencing relapse risk.

Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine compared to busulfan-fludarabine for sibling and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.

BACKGROUND: A preparatory regimen consisting of thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF) has been associated with reduced relapse in patients with haematological malignancies after haploidentical and cord blood transplants; however, few data exist regarding TBF conditioning in sibling (MSD) and unrelated donor (URD) transplants for AML. RESULTS: Among patients receiving a myeloablative (MAC) regimen, TBF-MAC was associated with significantly lower relapse (HR 0.47, p = 0.005) however higher non-relapse mortality (NRM, HR 2.69, p < 10-4) as compared to BF. This led to similar leukemia-free (LFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two regimens (LFS: p = 0.6; OS: p = 0.27). When we selected TBF-MAC patients receiving busulfan 9.6 mg/kg, NRM resulted still higher but no more significantly different as compared to BF-MAC with busulfan 12.8 mg/kg (HR 1.53, p = 0.12); despite the lower busulfan dose, relapse remained inferior with TBF-MAC (HR 0.45, p = 0.01), however no difference in survival could be demonstrated (LFS: p = 0.31; OS: 0.82). Among patients receiving a reduced-intensity (RIC) regimen, similar outcome was observed with TBF-RIC and BF-RIC (LFS: p = 0.77; OS: p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: TBF-MAC as conditioning regimen for transplant from MSD and URD in AML patients in first remission provided stronger anti-leukemic activity but higher NRM as compared to BF-MAC, thus leading to similar survival. TBF-MAC with busulfan 9.6 mg/kg was associated with low relapse and acceptable NRM, however again with no survival benefit. TBF-RIC and BF-RIC resulted in comparable outcome. METHODS: We conducted a registry-based study comparing outcomes of patients with AML in first remission undergoing transplant from MSD or URD prepared with either TBF (n = 212) or BF (n = 2698) conditioning.