Surgical Treatment for Type A Aortic Dissection after Endovascular Aortic Repair: A 12-year, Single-Center Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the clinical manifestations, operative techniques, and outcomes of patients who undergo open repair after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: From January 2010 to June 2022, 113 consecutive type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients underwent secondary open operation after TEVAR at our institution, and the median interval from primary intervention to open surgery was 12 (1.9-48.0) months. We divided the patients into two groups (RTAD (retrograde type A dissection) group, N = 56; PNAD (proximal new aortic dissection) group, N = 57) according to their anatomical features. Survival analysis during the follow-up was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier survival curve and a log-rank test. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 6.2% (7/113), the median follow-up period was 31.7 (IQR 14.7-65.6) months, and the overall survival at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years was 88.5%, 88.5%, and 87.6%, respectively. Fourteen deaths occurred during the follow-up, but there were no late aorta-related deaths. Three patients underwent total thoracoabdominal aortic replacement 1 year after a second open operation. The RTAD group had a smaller ascending aorta size (42.5 ± 7.7 mm vs 48.4 ± 11.4 mm; P < .01) and a closer proximal landing zone (P < .01) compared to the PNAD group. However, there were no differences in survival between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: TAAD can present as an early or a late complication after TEVAR due to stent-grafting-related issues or disease progression. Open operation can be performed to treat TAAD, and this has acceptable early and mid-term outcomes. Follow-up should become mandatory for patients after TEVAR because these patients are at increased risk for TAAD.

Long-term outcomes of total arch replacement with bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion using the "arch first" approach.

OBJECTIVE: To report outcomes of total arch replacement (TAR) with hypothermic circulatory arrest and bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bACP) using an "arch first" approach for acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). The "arch first" approach involved revascularization of the aortic arch branch vessels with uninterrupted ACP, before lower body circulatory arrest, while the patient was cooling. METHODS: This was an observational study of aortic surgeries from 2010 to 2021. All patients who underwent TAR with bACP for ATAAD were included. Short-term and long-term outcomes were reported utilizing descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival estimation. RESULTS: A total of 215 patients were identified who underwent TAR + bACP for ATAAD. Age was 59.0 [49.0-67.0] years and 35.3% were female. 73 patients (34.0%) underwent a concomitant aortic root replacement, 188 (87.4%) had aortic cannulation, circulatory arrest time was 37.0 [26.0-52.0] minutes, and nadir temperature was 20.8 [19.4-22.5] degrees Celsius. 35 patients (16.3%) had operative mortality (STS definition), 17 (7.9%) had a new stroke, 79 (36.7%) had prolonged mechanical ventilation (>24 h), 35 (16.3%) had acute renal failure (by RIFLE criteria), and 128 (59.5%) had blood product transfusions. One-year survival was 77.1%, while 5-years survival was 67.1%. During follow-up, there were 23 (10.7%) reinterventions involving the descending thoracic aorta - either thoracic endovascular aortic repair or open thoracoabdominal aortic replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ATAAD, short-term postoperative outcomes after TAR + bACP using the "arch first" approach are acceptable. Moreover, this operative strategy may furnish long-term durability, with a reasonably low reintervention rate and satisfactory overall survival.

Night-time surgery for type a aortic dissection: Immediate or delaying?

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate whether surgery performed during night compared with daytime were associated with an increased risk of operative mortality of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients. METHODS: A total of 2015 TAAD patients who underwent surgical repair were collected from two cardiovascular centers from Jan 2015 to Jan 2021. According to the start time of surgery, patients were divided into daytime group (06:01 a.m. to 06:00 p.m.) and night-time group (06:01 p.m. to 06:00 a.m.), and retrospective analyses were performed between them. RESULTS: The operative mortality of night-time group (12.2%, 43/352) was dramatically higher than daytime group (6.9%, 115/1663; p = 0.001). There was significant difference between night-time and daytime groups in terms of 30-days mortality (5.8% vs 10.8%; p = 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs 6.0%; p = 0.03). The night-time group had a longer duration of intensive care unit stay (4 vs two; days; p < 0.001) and ventilation support (34 vs 19; hours; p < 0.001), compared with daytime group. The risk factors for operative mortality were night-time surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.545; p = 0.027), age (odds ratio, 1.152; p < 0.001), total arch replacement (OR, 2.265; p < 0.001) and previous aortic surgery (OR, 2.376; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Night-time surgical repair may be associated with higher operative mortality of patients with TAAD. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to offer emergency surgery at night-time for such patients who were more likely to present disastrous complications with delayed surgical intervention, as outcomes indicate acceptable operative mortality.

Differences between sexes in patients who underwent total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk procedures for acute dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of sex on the short-time prognosis in two different age subgroups (≤55 years old and >55 years old). METHODS: From January 2009 to 2019, 1522 patients with DeBakey I acute aortic dissection (AAD) underwent frozen elephant trunk and total arch replacement at a Tertiary Center in China were divided into female group (n = 324) and male group (n = 1198). The demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, management, short-term outcomes were described in the different sex groups. The risk factors of 30-days mortality for females and males were identified by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Then, random Forest regression was used to analyze the association between age and 30-days mortality in the different sexes groups. The cut-off age for 30-days mortality in females was then identified as 55 years. The patients were divided into two subgroups: young patients (≤55 years old) and elderly patients (>55 years old). Clinical prognosis between different sex groups was further compared in the age subgroups. RESULTS: Approximately four-fifths of the patients were males. Males with DeBakey I AAD were younger than females (47 vs 52 years; p < 0.01). The proportion of males gradually declined with age. The cut-off age for 30-days mortality in females and males was identified as 55 years old and 63 years old, respectively. In young patients (≤55 years old), the 30-days mortality rate for females was lower than males (hazard ratio [HR, 2.02, p < 0.05). Following adjustment using the multivariable Cox regression analysis, females were identified as an independent protective factor for 30-days mortality (HR, 2.24, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that females present with DeBakey I AAD less frequently than males and they tend to present with DeBakey AAD later in life. In young patients, females had better early outcomes despite similar time for symptom onset to diagnosis and surgical technique than males.

Editor's Choice - Extending Aortic Replacement Beyond the Proximal Arch in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of Short Term Outcomes and Long Term Actuarial Survival.

OBJECTIVE: The extent of aortic replacement during surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is an important matter of debate. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the short and long term outcomes of a proximal aortic repair (PAR) vs. total arch replacement (TAR) in the treatment of ATAAD. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed. Studies comparing PAR to TAR for ATAAD were included. REVIEW METHODS: The primary outcomes were early death and long term actuarial survival at one, five, and 10 years. Random effects models in conjunction with relative risks (RRs) were used for meta-analyses. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included, comprising 5 744 patients (proximal: n = 4 208; total arch: n = 1 536). PAR was associated with reduced early mortality (10.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4 - 13.7] vs. 14.0% [95% CI 10.4 - 18.7]; RR 0.73 [95% CI 0.63 - 0.85]) and reduced post-operative renal failure (10.4% [95% CI 7.2 - 14.8] vs. 11.1% [95% CI 6.7 - 17.5]; RR 0.77 [95% CI 0.66 - 0.90]), but there was no difference in stroke (8.0% [95% CI 5.9 - 10.7] vs. 7.3% [95% CI 4.6 - 11.3]; RR 0.87 [95% CI 0.69 - 1.10]). No statistically significant difference was found for survival after one year (83.2% [95% CI 77.5 - 87.7] vs. 78.6% [95% CI 69.7 - 85.5]; RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.99 - 1.11]), which persisted after five years (75.4% [95% CI 71.2 - 79.2] vs. 74.5% [95% CI 64.7 - 82.3]; RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.91 - 1.14]). After 10 years, there was a significant survival benefit for patients who underwent TAR (64.7% [95% CI 61.1 - 68.1] vs. 72.4% [95% CI 67.5 - 76.7]; RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.84 - 0.99]). CONCLUSION: PAR appears to lead to an improved early mortality rate and a reduced complication rate. In the current meta-analysis, the suggestion of an improved 10 year survival benefit of TAR was found, which should be interpreted in the context of potential confounders such as age at presentation, comorbidities, and haemodynamic stability. In any case, PAR seems to be intuitive in older patients with limited dissections, and in those presenting in less stable conditions.

Management and Outcomes of Non-A Non-B Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The results of best medical treatment (BMT), endovascular based treatment (EBT), and total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk (FET) treatment in a single centre experience were reported in non-A non-B aortic dissection patients. METHODS: From January 2016 to May 2020, 215 consecutive patients with acute or subacute non-A non-B aortic dissection were enrolled. The primary endpoints were all cause death. Secondary endpoints included follow up adverse aortic event (AE), a composite of the outcomes of dissection related death, rupture, retrograde type A aortic dissection, stent graft induced new entry tear, secondary endoleak, and follow up re-intervention. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate associations between different treatments and outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 215 dissection patients, 127 (59.1%) received EBT, 42 (19.5%) received TAR + FET, and the remaining 46 (21.4%) received BMT. Thirty day mortality was higher in patients receiving TAR + FET (7.1%) than in those treated with EBT (1.6%) or BMT (2.2%) (p = .12). However, after a median follow up of 39.1 (27.0 - 50.7) months, no additional death was recorded in the TAR + FET group, while nine (7.3%) patients died in the EBT group and 14 (31.8%) died in the BMT group (p < .001). Specifically, EBT and TAR + FET showed no significant difference in midterm mortality rate, follow up AE, and re-intervention for complicated or uncomplicated dissection patients involving zone 2. For patients with uncomplicated non-A non-B aortic dissection involving zone 2, EBT could profoundly decrease the mortality rate, follow up AE and re-intervention when compared with BMT (p < .010 for all), although this difference was not statistically significant between TAR + FET and BMT. No statistical comparison was performed in patients with zone 1 involvement because of the limited number of patients. CONCLUSION: It was demonstrated that EBT or TAR + FET might be a viable strategy for non-A non-B aortic dissection patients.

Visceral protection in total arch replacement for aortic dissection: Effect of lower body hypothermia.

OBJECTIVE: Optimal hypothermia strategy for total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is unclear. A higher temperature during circulatory arrest might reduce tolerance to ischemia for visceral organs. We sought to investigate the effect of hypothermia on visceral protection. METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2019, 1138 consecutive patients underwent total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk for acute type A aortic dissection. The data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Visceral organ injury and visceral-related adverse outcomes were defined as acute renal failure or spinal cord injury or both. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate linear regression model were used. RESULTS: The mean age of patient was 46.9 ± 10.0 years, with a male preponderance (79.6%). Operative mortality was 6.1% (69 patients). Spinal cord injury occurred in 55 (4.8%) patients and 133 (11.7%) patients had acute renal failure. In the multivariate logistic regression model, neither bladder temperature (odds ratio [OR] 0.971, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.922-1.024, p = .278) nor circulatory arrest duration (OR 1.017, 95% CI 0.987-1.047, p = .267) significantly associated with visceral-related adverse outcomes. Female, lower limb malperfusion, age, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration and preoperative serum creatinine level were independent risk factors of visceral-related outcomes. There was a significant negative correlation between bladder temperature and CPB duration in multiple linear regression model (ß = -3.67, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Bladder temperature had no effect on outcomes related to visceral protection under the premise of short circulatory arrest duration, but female gender, lower limb malperfusion, age, CPB duration, and preoperative serum creatinine level were independent risk factors. Bladder temperature negatively correlated to CPB duration.

Extended aortic arch repair via simple median sternotomy using a parabronchial approach: A case report.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Surgery for extensive thoracic aortic aneurysms is challenging. We aim to report our novel extended arch repair method, which we termed "parabronchial approach" for such disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient case data was extracted from hospital records. RESULTS: The patient was the case of a 31-year-old woman with Takayasu's arteritis who developed aortic dissection. She underwent extended arch repair via a simple sternotomy approach. The left pulmonary artery compression with a retractor arrowed us to obtain adequate working space. Postoperative computed tomography revealed a distal anastomosis site level was at the sixth thoracic vertebra. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This parabronchial approach could reduce the frequency of choosing a highly invasive approach and can be a potential minimally invasive approach in cases requiring extensive thoracic aortic aneurysm repair.

The long-term impact of acute renal failure after aortic arch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term impact of developing acute renal failure (ARF) on survival after open aortic arch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). METHODS: This was an observational study of consecutive aortic surgeries from 2007 to 2021. Patients with ATAAD were identified via a prospectively maintained institutional database and were stratified by the presence or absence of postoperative ARF (by RIFLE criteria). Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 601 patients undergoing open surgery for ATAAD were identified, of which 516 (85.9%) did not develop postoperative ARF, while 85 (14.1%) developed ARF, with a median follow-up time of 4.6 years (1.6, 7.9). Baseline characteristics were similar across each group, except for higher rates of branch vessel malperfusion and lower preoperative ejection fraction in the ARF group. Patients with ARF underwent more total arch replacement and elephant trunk procedures, with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest times than patients without ARF. ARF was associated with worse short-term outcomes, including increased in-hospital mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, higher rates of sepsis, more blood transfusions, and longer length of hospital stay. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were significantly lower in the ARF group, compared to the group without ARF (p < .001, log-rank test). After multivariable adjustment, the development of postoperative ARF was significantly associated with an increased hazard of death over the study's follow-up time-period (hazard ratio: 2.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.95, 3.86, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ARF is a highly morbid postoperative event that may adversely impact long-term survival after aortic surgery.

The impact of prior cardiac surgery on patients undergoing surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of reoperative versus first-time sternotomy for emergent open repair of acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). METHODS: This was an observational study of consecutive aortic surgeries from 2007 to 2021. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the impact of reoperative versus first-time sternotomy upon survival after ATAAD repair. RESULTS: A total of 601 patients with ATAAD were identified, of which 72 (12%) underwent reoperative sternotomy. The reoperative group had a higher prevalence of baseline comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease. Central cannulation of the aorta was achieved at a similar rate across each group (81.9% vs. 81.5%, p = .923), and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was similar across each group (204 ± 84.8 vs. 203 ± 72.4 min, p = .923). Postoperative outcomes were similar across both groups, including in-hospital mortality, stroke, pulmonary complications, renal failure, and reexploration for excessive bleeding. Five-year survival was 74.5% (70.5, 78.3) for the first-time group and was 71.6% (60.0, 81.9) for the reoperative group. After multivariable Cox regression, reoperative sternotomy was not significantly associated with an increased hazard of death compared to first-time sternotomy (hazards ratio: 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.56, 1.43, p = .642). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that re-sternotomy can be safely performed with similar outcomes as first-time sternotomy. Central initiation of CPB after sternal reentry limits CPB time and may therefore represent a protective strategy that enhances outcomes for patients presenting with ATAAD and prior cardiac surgery.

Short- and mid-term outcomes of the frozen elephant-trunk procedure for degenerative aortic arch aneurysm.

PURPOSE: The frozen elephant-trunk (FET) procedure is used widely in total aortic arch replacement (TAR) surgery; however, its safety, effectiveness, and long-term outcomes compared with those of the conventional elephant trunk (cET) procedure for degenerative aneurysms are unclear. METHODS: Between July, 2011 and August, 2019, 126 patients underwent elective total aortic arch replacement at our institution. We compared the short- and mid-term outcomes of 60 patients who underwent the FET procedure (FET group) with those of 66 patients who underwent cET (cET group). RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate tended to be lower in the FET group than in the cET group (p = 0.12). There were two cases of paraplegia (3.3%) in the FET group and in none in the cET group. The all-cause mortality at the 3-year follow-up did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.31). The FET group required more unexpected interventions at the surgical site in the mid-term period. CONCLUSIONS: FET was associated with a shorter operative time and lower surgical mortality than cET. Although the mid-term total aortic arch replacement outcomes of FET were acceptable, careful imaging observation is necessary because reinterventions were required more frequently.

Staged total arch replacement, followed by fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair, for patients with mega aortic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to review the clinical outcomes of a staged approach using total arch replacement (TAR) with an elephant trunk or a frozen elephant trunk, followed by fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) for patients with mega aortic syndrome. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data and outcomes of 11 consecutive patients (8 men; mean age, 71 ± 7 years) treated by staged TAR and F-BEVAR from January 2014 to December 2018. The F-BEVAR procedures were performed under a prospective, nonrandomized, physician-sponsored investigational device exemption protocol. All patients had had mega aortic syndrome, defined by an ascending aorta, arch, and extent I-II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. The endpoints were 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAE), patient survival, freedom from reintervention, and freedom from target vessel instability. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients, 6 had developed chronic postdissection aneurysms after previous Stanford A (three A11, two A10, one A9) dissection repair and 5 had had degenerative aneurysms with no suitable landing zone in the aortic arch. The thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were classified as extent I in four patients and extent II in seven. One patient had died within 30 days after TAR (9.0%). However, none of the remaining 10 patients who had undergone F-BEVAR had died. First-stage TAR resulted in MAE in three patients (27%), including one spinal cord injury. The mean length of stay was 12 ± 6 days. The mean interval between TAR and F-BEVAR was 245 ± 138 days with no aneurysm rupture during the interval. Second-stage F-BEVAR was associated with MAE in two patients (20%), including spinal cord injury in one patient from spinal hematoma due to placement of a cerebrospinal fluid drain. The mean follow-up period was 14 ± 10 months. At 2 years postoperatively, patient survival, primary patency, secondary patency, and freedom from renal-mesenteric target vessel instability was 80% ± 9%, 94% ± 6%, 100%, and 86% ± 8%, respectively. No aortic-related deaths occurred during the follow-up period. Four patients had required reintervention, all performed using an endovascular approach. CONCLUSIONS: A staged approach to treatment of mega aortic syndrome using TAR and F-BEVAR is a feasible alternative for selected high-risk patients. Larger clinical experience and longer follow-up are needed.

Factors for Acute Kidney Injury Following Total Arch Replacement and Association with Temperature Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single-center Retrospective Observational Study.

Many patients develop acute kidney injury (AKI) after vascular surgery. In this retrospective observational study, we investigated the risk factors for AKI defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria after total arch replacement (TAR). Additionally, we investigated the influence of temperature manage-ment during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on postoperative renal function by propensity score-matched anal-ysis. We retrospectively analyzed 161 consecutive patients who underwent TAR between 2016 and 2019. Postoperative AKI occurred in 48.7% of the patients. In the multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.95, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.56-8.27, p = 0.002), ACE inhibitors/ARB medication (OR 3.19, 95%CI 1.49-6.82, p = 0.003), preoperative chronic kidney disease (OR 2.47, 95%CI 1.17-5.23, p = 0.02), pro-longed CPB time (OR 2.36, 95%CI 1.05-5.34, p = 0.04), and lower body ischemic time during CPB (OR 2.20, 95%CI 1.05-4.46, p = 0.04) were identified as independent risk factors for AKI. Propensity score-matched anal-ysis showed no significant difference in the risk of AKI following TAR between mild hypothermia or normo-thermia and moderate hypothermia (37.2% vs. 41.9%, p = 0.83). In conclusion, modifiable risk factors for AKI included prolonged CPB time and lower body ischemic time. Temperature management during CPB had no clear effect on outcomes.

Paving the way for E-vita open NEO hybrid prosthesis implantation for complex aortic arch disease in Asia-Pacific.

We report first in man implantations of the newly designed Evita-open-NEO hybrid prosthesis for complex aortic arch disease from three different countries in Asia-Pacific including instructions on how to proceed with perioperative coagulation management.

Modified total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique for a right-sided aortic arch and aortic diverticulum in a teenager.

BACKGROUND: A right sided aortic arch (RAA) and an aortic diverticulum (AD) are a rare congenital anomaly associated with an aortic rupture and dissection. Recently, various methods for the surgical management have been described to treat RAAs and ADs. CASE REPORT: We describe a case of an RAA with a mirror image branching (RAMI) and AD in a teenager who complained of chest pain. We planned a total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique. Further, we needed to devise a way to reconnect the cerebral vessels because of his small arch anatomy and limited space in the mediastinum. We performed a right subclavian artery debranching, creating an anastomosis using one graft and diamond anastomosis, and performed the left innominate and right carotid anastomosis in an island fashion. This surgical approach could be a treatment option for young or small patients with RAMIs and ADs, whose arch anatomy is very small.

Endovascular repair of the aortic arch: State of the art.

BACKGROUND: Open total arch replacement remains the gold standard treatment for aneurysms and dissections involving the aortic arch. However, high-risk surgical candidates may benefit from endovascular techniques to reduce the risk of perioperative mortality and morbidity, especially neurologic complications. Numerous endografts are available for investigational use in the aortic arch as part of investigational device exemption (IDE) programs. Some devices are fenestrated or scalloped, while others are branched, ranging from single branch to triple branch stent-grafts. Furthermore, chimney techniques and in situ fenestration may be utilized in bailout or emergent situations. RESULTS: Initial results describing outcomes of complete endovascular repair of the aortic arch are encouraging, with current data estimating that technical success ranges from 84.2% to 100%. Moreover, operative mortality may be as high as 13.2%, while neurologic complications also remain common, with stroke rates being as high as 20% and spinal cord ischemia being as high as 3.1%. However, more data are necessary to determine the comparative treatment effect of endovascular stent-grafting of the aortic arch, compared with conventional open and hybrid repairs. Longitudinal follow-up is also lacking, which will determine the long-term durability of endografts in the aortic arch. Nevertheless, endovascular repair represents an important opportunity for improving outcomes in patients with complex and potentially devastating pathologies of the aortic arch.

Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery: Hybrid Debranching Versus Total Arch Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: It is unclear whether the hybrid debranching or total arch replacement (TAR) technique is preferential in treatment of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (AAAD) among different age groups. The aim was to compare the clinical outcomes for the two therapeutic strategies. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: University medical center, single institutional. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred thirty-seven registered patients with AAAD who underwent aortic surgery from 2017 to 2019 were included in the analysis, and 309 met eligibility criteria for the study. Those excluded had an aortic landing zone 1 to 4, concomitant valve or coronary operations, staged thoracic endovascular aortic repair after TAR, and organ ischemia including renal and neurologic dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: Hybrid debranching or TAR surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Perioperative and mid-term (2 years) follow-up data were analyzed to evaluate outcomes between the 2 interventions. In the hybrid versus TAR groups, findings included hospital length of stay (days) of 22.3 ± 2.0 v 28.6 ± 5.0 (p < 0.001) for those ≥60 years and 18.6 ± 1.8 v 19.5 ± 2.8 (p = 0.061) for those <60 years; postoperative neurologic events in 5.2% v 16.7% (p = 0.038) of those ≥60 years and in 5.1% v 4.7% (p = 0.752) of those <60 years; renal insufficiency in 5.2% v 23.8% (p = 0.003) of those ≥60 years and 2.6% v 10.2% (p = 0.243) of those <60 years; midterm survival in 95.1% v 65.2% (p = 0.037) of those ≥60 years and 100% v 100% (p > 0.999) of those <60 years; and a reintervention rate of 5.2% v 0% (p < 0.05) in those ≥60 years and 7.7% v 0% (p < 0.05) in those <60 years. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of AAAD, patients older than 60 years undergoing hybrid debranching surgery had shorter hospital lengths of stay, lower rates of neurologic events and renal insufficiency, and a higher mid-term survival rate compared with the TAR procedure, whereas there was no statistical difference in hybrid debranching versus TAR in patients younger than age 60. Irrespective of reintervention, hybrid debranching can be a promising surgical option for patients with AAAD older than 60 years.

Time of day does not influence outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection: Results from the IRAD.

BACKGROUND: Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) represents a surgical emergency requiring intervention regardless of time of day. Whether such a "evening effect" exists regarding outcomes for TAAAD has not been previously studied using a large registry data. METHODS: Patients with TAAAD were identified from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissections (1996-2019). Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing operative repair during the daytime (D), defined as 8 am-5 pm, versus the evening (N), defined as 5 pm-8 am. RESULTS: Four thousand one-hundrd and ninety-seven surgically treated patients with TAAAD were identified, with 1824 patients undergoing daytime surgery (43.5%) and 2373 patients undergoing evening surgery (56.5%). Daytime patients were more likely to have undergone prior cardiac surgery (13.2% vs. 9.5%; p < .001) and have had a prior aortic dissection (4.8% vs. 3.4%; p = .04). Evening patients were more likely to have been transferred from a referring hospital (70.8% vs. 75.0%; p = .003). Daytime patients were more likely to undergo aortic valve sparing root procedures (23.3% vs. 19.2%; p = .035); however, total arch replacement was performed with equal frequency (19.4% vs. 18.8%; p = .751). In-hospital mortality (D: 17.3% vs. N. 16.2%; p = .325) was similar between both groups. Subgroup analysis examining the effect of weekend presentation revealed no significant mortality difference. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of TAAAD patients underwent surgical repair at night. There were higher rates of postoperative tamponade in evening patients; however, mortality was similar. The expertise of cardiac-dedicated operative and critical care teams regardless of time of day as well as training paradigms may explain similar mortality outcomes in this high risk population.

Single-Stage Hybrid Aortic Arch Repair is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury Than Conventional Aortic Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The authors compared the renal outcomes of single-stage hybrid aortic arch repair without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest versus conventional total arch replacement in management of thoracic aortic diseases. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review from January 2013 to December 2016 in Fuwai Hospital of 757 consecutive patients who underwent aortic arch repair: conventional total arch replacement (CTAR, 651), and hybrid arch repair (HAR, 106), with propensity matching (95 pairs). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end-point was postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) defined using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome criteria. The secondary end-point was short-term outcomes such as in-hospital mortality and paraplegia determined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The patients in the HAR group were older (60.20 ± 9.95 v 46.43 ± 10.79, p < 0.0001) and exhibited a greater rate of diabetes (11.3% v 2.0%, p = 0.0004), hyperlipidemia (47.2% v 25.4%, p < 0.0001), and coronary artery disease (13.2% v 4.3%, p < 0.0001) than those in the CTAR group. Following propensity score matching of 95 matched pairs, the difference in preoperative risk diminished. The HAR group led to a shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (133.33 ± 41.47 v 179.62 ± 40.79, p < 0.0001) and avoided circulatory arrest. The incidence of postoperative AKI between HAR and CTAR groups was significantly different (before match: 75.5% v 59.45%, p = 0.0046; after match: 78.9% v 57.9%, p = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: In the management of thoracic aortic diseases, HAR is associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative AKI, and showed equivalent short-term outcomes despite the older age compared with the CTAR group.

Total arch replacement using a 4-branched vascular graft without circulatory arrest.

The technical essentials of the procedure include femoral artery cannulation, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion for brain protection, total arch replacement with a 4-branched vascular graft, implantation of the special open stented graft into the descending aorta, moderate hypothermic balloon occluding descending aorta at 25℃. This technique allows arch reconstruction to be debranched first and upper part of the body is perfused via the 4-branched vascular graft, ensuring antegrade true lumen cerebral perfusion rapidly secured, the descending aorta is arrested by balloon occluding and early rewarming and reperfusion after distal anastomosis to minimize organs ischemia.