Comparative effectiveness of tofacitinib and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world practice: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of tofacitinib vs tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The study used data from a single academic referral hospital's registries of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib and examined remission rates based on the disease activity score (DAS)28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for achieving remission with tofacitinib compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: This analysis included 665 patients (200 on tofacitinib and 455 on TNFi) who were followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 96 patients in the tofacitinib group (48.0%) and 409 patients in the TNFi group (89.9%) were treatment-naïve to bDMARDs. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in the remission rates between the two groups (18.0% vs 19.6%, p = 0.640). Multivariable analysis demonstrated comparable remission rates with tofacitinib and TNFi (OR 1.204, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.720-2.013). In the subpopulation naïve to JAKi and bDMARD, tofacitinib showed better remission rates than TNFi (OR 1.867, 95% CI 1.033-3.377). Tofacitinib had more adverse events (AEs) but similar rates of serious AEs (SAEs) to TNFi. CONCLUSION: In real-world settings, there was no significant difference in remission rates at 12 months between the tofacitinib and TNFi groups. In terms of safety, tofacitinib exhibited a higher incidence of AEs compared with TNFi, while the occurrence of SAEs was comparable between the groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02602704.

Comparative risk of incident and recurrent acute anterior uveitis across different biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the comparative risk of incident and recurrent acute anterior uveitis (AAU) across different biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: A retrospective nationwide cohort study was conducted on 34 621 patients with AS without a previous history of AAU using a national claims database. Patients were followed-up from 2010 to 2021. The comparative risk of incident and recurrent AAU across different bDMARDs was examined using multivariable time-dependent Cox models and counting process (AG) models, respectively. RESULTS: The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident AAU (bDMARDs non-exposure as reference) were: adalimumab 0.674 (0.581-0.891), etanercept 1.760 (1.540-2.012), golimumab 0.771 (0.620-0.959), infliximab 0.891 (0.741-1.071), and secukinumab 1.324 (0.794-2.209). Compared with adalimumab exposure, etanercept (aHR = 2.553 [2.114-3.083]), infliximab (aHR = 1.303 [1.039-1.634]), and secukinumab exposures (aHR = 2.173 [1.273-3.710]) showed a higher risk of incident AAU. The aHRs and 95% CIs for recurrent AAU (bDMARDs non-exposure as reference) were: adalimumab 0.798 (0.659-0.968), etanercept 1.416 (1.185-1.693), golimumab 0.874 (0.645-1.185), infliximab 0.926 (0.729-1.177), and secukinumab 1.257 (0.670-2.359). Compared with adalimumab exposure, etanercept exposure (aHR = 1.793 [1.403-2.292]) was associated with a higher risk of recurrent AAU. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest preference for bDMARDs in the following order: adalimumab/golimumab > infliximab > secukinumab > etanercept (for incident AAU prevention) and adalimumab > golimumab/infliximab/secukinumab > etanercept (for recurrent AAU prevention).

Interferon-alpha 1 expression indicates the disease activity and response of patients with ankylosing spondylitis to anti-TNF-α treatment.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether interferon-alpha 1 (IFNA1) is predictive of Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) progression and treatment response to Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). METHODS: Data of 50 AS patients receiving TNFi for 24 weeks were retrospectively analysed. AS patients who reached the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society 40 response at the W24 were classified as responders to TNFi treatment; otherwise, they were classified as nonresponders. Human fibroblast-like synoviocytes (HFLS) isolated from AS patients (AS-HFLS) were used for in vitro validation. RESULTS: When the IFNA1 expression level was used to diagnose AS patients, an area under the curve of 0.895 was yielded (P < .001). Pearson correlation analysis showed negative correlations between IFNA1 expression, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, Bath AS Disease Activity Index scores, AS Disease Activity Score with CRP, and the production of inflammatory cytokines. An increased IFNA1 expression level was found to be associated with a better treatment response to TNFi. IFNA1 overexpression could protect HFLS against inflammatory response in the setting of AS. CONCLUSIONS: Blood IFNA1 deficiency is correlated with inflammatory cytokine production and disease activity and is indicative of unsatisfied response to TNFi treatment in AS patients.

Clinical efficacy of alternative TNF inhibitor and secukinumab between primary non-responder and secondary non-responder of prior TNF inhibitor in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the drug retention times and clinical efficacy of alternative tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and secukinumab in primary and secondary non-responders with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: AS patients treated with biologics and enrolled in the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics registry were examined. Patients who did not respond to previous TNFi treatment were defined as primary and secondary non-responders. Data regarding drug discontinuation and clinical efficacy were collected after 1 year. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to compare drug survival and associated factors. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare the clinical efficacy secukinumab with that of alternative TNFi. RESULTS: In total, 124 patients (83 receiving alternative TNFi and 41 receiving secukinumab) had biologic changes due to clinical inefficacy. Drug retention rates in the alternative TNFi and secukinumab groups were similar (P = 0.096). However, subgroup analyses including only secondary non-responders revealed that secukinumab users showed a higher hazard ratio (HR) for drug discontinuation (HR = 3.77, P = 0.045). In addition, secukinumab was negatively associated with achieving BASDAI50 or a major improvement in the ASDAS. CONCLUSION: Alternative TNFi showed better drug retention and clinical efficacy in AS patients experiencing previous TNFi failure, in secondary non-responders. Therefore, alternative TNFi may be a more suitable treatment for secondary non-responders.

Real-world characteristics, treatment experiences and corticosteroid utilisation of patients treated with tofacitinib for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of UC. We aimed to describe the real-world treatment experience and corticosteroid utilisation of patients treated with tofacitinib in a US claims database. METHODS: Patients with a UC diagnosis who initiated tofacitinib, vedolizumab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment between May 2018 and July 2019 were identified from the Optum Research Database. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who initiated tofacitinib, vedolizumab or TNFi were described. Oral corticosteroid use prior to and following tofacitinib initiation was evaluated. Tofacitinib adherence (proportion of days covered) and continuation was assessed for 6 months following initiation. Analyses were descriptive and stratified by prior biologic use (naïve, 1 or ≥ 2; minimum of 12 months prior to tofacitinib initiation). RESULTS: Among patients initiating tofacitinib (N = 225), mean age was 45.6 (SD 16.5) years and 50.2% were female. Of these, 43 (19.1%) patients were biologic-naïve and 182 (80.9%) had prior biologic use (92 [40.9%], 1 prior biologic; 90 [40.0%], ≥ 2 prior biologics). Among patients with 1 prior biologic, 82.6% were previously treated with a TNFi. Among patients with ≥ 2 prior biologics, 54.4% were previously treated with vedolizumab and a TNFi, 16.7% with two TNFi and 28.9% with ≥ 3 prior biologics. In the 6 months prior to tofacitinib initiation, 65.8% of patients had received oral corticosteroids (74.4%, 60.9% and 66.7% for biologic-naïve, 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologics, respectively). The proportion of patients with ongoing oral corticosteroid use 3-6 months after tofacitinib initiation decreased to 13.3% (9.3%, 18.5% and 10.0% for biologic-naïve, 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologics, respectively), and 19.6% of patients discontinued oral corticosteroid use during the 6 months after tofacitinib initiation. Overall, tofacitinib adherence, as determined by the mean proportion of days covered during the 6-month follow-up, was 0.7 (median 0.8). During the 6-month follow-up, 84.9% of patients continued tofacitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with UC initiating tofacitinib, the majority had prior biologic use. Tofacitinib adherence was high, discontinuation was low and oral corticosteroid utilisation decreased irrespective of prior biologic use. Further research with longer follow-up and a larger sample size is required.

Retention rate and effectiveness of secukinumab vs TNF inhibitor in ankylosing spondylitis patients with prior TNF inhibitor exposure.

OBJECTIVES: The choice of second-line biologics for AS patients previously treated with a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) remains unclear. Here, we compared drug retention and clinical efficacy between AS patients who switched biologics to secukinumab and those who switched to a different TNFi. METHODS: AS patients enrolled in the Korean College of Rheumatology BIOlogics registry were included, and patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis were excluded. Patients with previous TNFi exposure were divided into the secukinumab group and the TNFi switching group. Drug retention and clinical efficacy [BASDAI50, Assessment of Spondylo-Arthritis International Society (ASAS)20, ASAS40, AS disease activity score (ASDAS) <2.1, ASDAS clinically important improvement and ASDAS major improvement] were assessed at the 1 year follow-up. Propensity score (PS)-matched and covariate-adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-six had available 1 year follow-up data. Secukinumab as third- or later-line biologic was more frequent than alternative TNFi (54% vs 14%). PS-matched and multiple covariate-adjusted analyses showed that the odds ratio (OR) for drug discontinuation was comparable between the secukinumab and TNFi switching groups [OR 1.136 (95% CI 0.843, 1.531) and 1.000 (95% CI 0.433-2.308), respectively]. The proportion of patients who achieved BASDAI50 was also comparable between the two groups [OR 0.833 (95% CI 0.481, 1.441) in PS-matched analysis]. Other clinical efficacy parameters were also comparable. In the subgroup analysis of AS patients with previous TNFi discontinuation due to ineffectiveness, all clinical efficacy parameters were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In AS patients with previous exposure to a TNFi, switching biologics to secukinumab and switching to an alternative TNFi resulted in comparable drug retention and clinical efficacy.

Interferon-related gene expression in response to TNF inhibitor treatment in ankylosing spondylitis patients: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis primarily affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints. TNF inhibitor (TNFi) drugs are recommended for patients not responding to NSAIDs; however, there is a significant need for biomarkers of response. IFN-regulated genes (IRGs) and other cytokines/chemokines are linked to autoimmune diseases and have been associated with treatment response. Our objective was to explore whether IRGs and cytokines/chemokines can be associated with response to TNFiagents in AS. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained from 26 AS patients who were to receive a TNFi (I, n = 15) or placebo (P, n = 11) at week 0 and week 22. Response (R)/non-response (NR) was defined as reduction in ASDAS ≥ 1.2 points or reduction in sacroiliac/vertebral MRI lesions. The expression of 96 genes was quantified using TaqMan assays. Finally, ELISA was used to measure IL-6 in serum samples from another 38 AS patients. RESULTS: Analysis of gene expression in 26 baseline samples segregated patients into four groups defined by a signature of 15 genes (mainly IRGs). ASDAS response was associated with one group independently of treatment received. We then analysed response to the TNFi (n = 15) and identified a 12-gene signature associated with MRI response. A third IRG signature was also associated with a reduction in IRGs expression post-TNFi samples (n = 10 pairs). Finally, decreased circulating IL-6 was associated with BASDAI-R. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests an association between IRG expression and response to TNFi in AS. These findings require validation in a larger cohort in order to construct predictive algorithms for patient stratification.

Improvement from ixekizumab treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis who have had an inadequate response to one or two TNF inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE), a monoclonal antibody selectively targeting interleukin-17A, in patients with inadequate response to one or two TNF inhibitors (TNFi). METHODS: A phase 3 study (SPIRIT-P2; NCT02349295) randomized patients with PsA with inadequate response or intolerance to one or two TNFi to receive 80-mg IXE every 2 weeks (n = 123) or every 4 weeks (n = 122) after a 160-mg starting dose or placebo (PBO; n = 118) through week 24. This post hoc analysis used data from inadequate responders to one or two TNFi, measuring the percentage achieving: ≥50% improvement in ACR response criteria (ACR50) and 100% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100), ACR50, improvement in HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≥0.35, minimal disease activity (MDA), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response Criteria [improvement in Disease Activity Score 28 CRP (DAS28-CRP) >1.2], and Disease Activity in PsA (DAPSA) ≤14. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between inadequate responders to one and two TNFi. At week 24, significantly more patients irrespective of previous TNFi experience receiving IXE than PBO achieved ACR50, HAQ-DI ≥0.35 improvement, MDA, EULAR good response, and DAPSA ≤14, and significantly more patients with inadequate response to one TNFi receiving IXE than PBO achieved ACR50 and PASI 100. Improvement persisted in all measures through week 52. CONCLUSION: IXE improved the signs and symptoms of PsA in a population of difficult-to-treat patients with inadequate response to one or two TNFi.

Relationship between different anti-rheumatic drug therapies and complementary and alternative medicine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an interview based cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is highly prevalent. The relationship of these remedies with disease therapy are not fully studied. We aimed to explore the relationship between different anti-rheumatic drug therapy and CAM use in RA patients. METHODS: The study used an interview-based cross-sectional survey in two major referral centres in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients were adults with confirmed RA that attended rheumatology clinics. Information on the utilization of CAM, RA duration, drug therapy, and laboratory parameters were obtained. Descriptive statistics as well as adjusted odds ratio using bivariate logistic regression were used to explore the different factors related to CAM use, including drug therapy. RESULTS: A total of 438 adult patients with RA were included. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 49 (±15.0) years. The majority were women 393 (89.7%). Two hundred and ninety-two patients (66.7%) had used CAM. The CAM users who had a longer disease duration (AOR 1.041 [95% CI: 1.011, 1.073]; p = 0.008) were more likely to be female (AOR 2.068 [95% CI: 1.098, 3.896]; p = 0.024), and use methotrexate (AOR 1.918 [95% CI: 1.249, 2.946]; p = 0.003) as opposed to celecoxib (AOR 0.509 [95% CI: 0.307, 0.844]; p = 0.009) and biologic monotherapy (AOR 0.443 [95% CI: 0.224, 0.876]; p = 0.019). Other factors related to CAM were meloxicam use (AOR 2.342 [95% CI: 1.341, 4.089]; p = 0.003) and traditional therapy (AOR 2.989 [95% CI: 1.647, 5.425]; p = 0.000). The remaining factors were not significant. CONCLUSION: CAM use is prevalent in patients with RA. Understanding patients and disease related factors associated with higher use of CAM is warranted to improve RA management and provide more rational use of these remedies.

Pre-operative withholding of infliximab and the risk of infections after major surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Withholding TNF inhibitors (TNFI) before surgery has been recommended due to concern for post-operative infection. We examined the risks of post-operative infections and mortality in patients with RA in relation to the pre-operative timing of infliximab infusion. METHODS: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we used US Medicare claims data from 2007 to 2015 to identify patients with RA who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic or vascular surgery, or bowel resection, and who were treated with infliximab in the 90 days prior to surgery. We examined associations between the timing of infusion and infections and mortality in the 30 days after surgery. We adjusted for the predicted probability of post-operative infection or death, demographic characteristics, use of MTX, post-operative blood transfusion and hospital volume. RESULTS: We studied 712 patients with CABG, 244 patients with vascular surgery and 862 patients with bowel resections. Post-operative pneumonia occurred in 7.4-11.9%, urinary tract infection in 9.0-15.2%, surgical site infection in 3.2-18.9%, sepsis in 4.2-9.6% and death in 3.5-7.0% among surgery cohorts. There was no association between the time from last infliximab dose to surgery and the risk of post-operative infection or mortality in any surgical cohort. No subgroups were identified that had an increased risk of infection with more proximate use of infliximab. CONCLUSION: Among elderly patients with RA, risks of infection and mortality after major surgery were not related to the pre-operative timing of infliximab infusion.

Prescribing motivations and patients' characteristics related to the use of biologic drugs in adult-onset Still's disease: analysis of a multicentre "real-life" cohort.

A growing body of evidence suggests the usability of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in treating adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD). In a multicentre "real-life" cohort, the physicians' prescribing motivations and patients' predictive characteristics of being treated with bDMARDs were assessed. Patients with AOSD, who were included in GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale) cohort and treated with bDMARDs, were retrospectively assessed. Relevant data were collected by a review of clinical charts. Forty-four patients treated with bDMARDs were analysed, with slight male preponderance (52.3%) and a mean age of 39.3 ± 15.2 years. All patients were treated with corticosteroids (CCSs) (38.6% with low dosage) and 93.2% were treated with synthetic DMARDs (sDMARDs). Regarding the effectiveness of the first-line bDMARD, 65.6% of patients experienced a complete remission, defined as complete disappearance of both systemic and joint symptoms and normalisation of laboratory evidence of disease. The physicians' prescribing motivations for bDMARDs were inadequate response to CCSs and/or sDMARDs, CCS-sparing effect and occurrence of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Analysing patients' characteristics, chronic disease course (OR 3.09; 95%CI 1.22-7.80, p = 0.017), defined as disease with persistent symptoms, was predictive of being treated with bDMARDs, whereas age (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.93-0.99, p = 0.048) was negatively associated, suggesting younger age as a further predictive factor. Patients with AOSD were treated with bDMARDs for inadequate response to CCSs and/or sDMARDs, CCS-sparing effect and MAS occurrence. Younger age and chronic disease course were patients' predictive characteristics of being treated with bDMARDs.

The effect of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors on radiographic progression in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review.

The effect of TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi), with or without concomitant NSAIDs, on radiographic progression in axial SpA remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic literature review up to January 2019 to determine whether longer use of standard dose TNFi is superior vs lower duration or lower dose TNFi therapy, conventional synthetic DMARDs alone, or no therapy in inhibiting radiographic progression in patients with axial SpA. Our search yielded 373 titles of which 14 full text articles and five abstracts were eligible for quantitative analysis. Studies had an overall moderate to critical risk of bias. Data could not be pooled due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Individual studies showed conflicting results with mainly no significant difference in radiographic progression when comparing effect of TNFi therapy to no TNFi therapy or when comparing to less TNFi therapy until 2 years of follow-up. Results that are more significant are shown after 2 years' follow-up, mainly in subgroups with baseline syndesmophytes. Data on the additional or synergistic effect of concomitant NSAID use were inconclusive.

Potential alleviation of bone mineral density loss with Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by localized bone loss, general osteoporosis and increased fracture risks. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (non-TNFi) biologic, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) had shown the suppression effects to osteoclast activation and improvement of bone mineral density (BMD). Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) is associated with osteoclast activation and the resultant bone loss. However, few studies have compared BMD changes among patients with RA treated with targeted therapies that have different mechanisms of action. METHODS: This retrospective study recruited patients with RA who had undergone BMD testing twice. Changes in the BMD were compared using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) in treatment groups that received conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), TNFi, non-TNFi biologics, and JAKi. RESULTS: In total, 362 patients with RA were enrolled (csDMARDs, n = 153, TNFi, n = 71, non-TNFi biologics, n = 108, JAKi, n = 30). We observed greater changes in femoral BMD (left, 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.12, p = 0.016; right, 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.15, p = 0.001 by GEE) following JAKi treatment as compared with other treatments. Compared to the ACPA-negative group, patients with ACPA positivity exhibited greater improvement in the femoral BMD (left, 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.15, p = 0.008; right, 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.18, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared to other targeted therapies, JAKi might exert a more potent effect to prevent BMD loss, specifically in ACPA-positive patients with RA, and could be a potential therapeutic option to mitigate generalized bone loss. Key Points •JAKi therapy inhibits systemic bone loss in patients with RA. •ACPA-positive RA patients exhibited a greater BMD improvement than ACPA-negative RA patients. •JAKi might more potently prevent BMD decline than conventional synthetic or biological DMARDs.

Efficacy of biologic and small molecule agents as second-line therapy after exposure to TNF inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis: A propensity-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited real-world data on comparative effectiveness of different biologic or small molecule agents as second-line therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior exposure to a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a multi-institutional database to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior exposure to a TNFi. Failure of medical therapy was defined as a composite outcome of intravenous steroids or colectomy within 2 years. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for demographics, disease extent, mean haemoglobin, C-reactive protein, albumin and calprotectin, prior IBD medications and steroid use between cohorts. RESULTS: Among 2141 patients with UC and prior exposure to TNFi, 348 (16.2%), 716 (33.4%) and 1077 (50.3%) were switched to tofacitinib, ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively. After propensity-score matching, there was no difference in the composite outcome (aOR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55-1.07) but higher risk of colectomy (aOR: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.31-5.50) in the tofacitinib cohort than the vedolizumab cohort. There was no difference in the risk of composite outcome (aOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.89-1.86) but higher risk of colectomy (aOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.24-5.58) in the tofacitinib cohort than the ustekinumab cohort. The vedolizumab cohort had a higher risk of composite outcome (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.29-2.16) than the ustekinumab cohort. CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab might be the preferred second-line therapy over tofacitinib and vedolizumab in patients with UC that were previously exposed to a TNFi.

Site-specific assessment of spinal radiographic progression improves detection of TNF blocker-associated disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis: longitudinal observational data from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse whether time-varying treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) has a differential impact on structural damage progression on different spinal segments (cervical versus lumbar spine). METHODS: Patients with r-axSpA in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort were included if cervical and lumbar radiographs were available at intervals of 2 years for a maximum of 10 years. Paired radiographs were scored by two calibrated readers according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The relationship between TNFi use and progression in the cervical and the lumbar spine was analysed using generalised estimating equation models and adjustment for potential confounding. Radiographic progression per spinal segment was defined as an increase of ≥ 1 mSASSS unit or by the formation of ≥ 1 new syndesmophyte over 2 years. RESULTS: Mean ± SD symptom duration was 13.8 ± 9.8 years. Mean ± SD mSASSS progression per radiographic interval was 0.41 ± 1.69 units in the cervical spine and 0.45 ± 1.45 units in the lumbar spine (p = 0.66). Prior use of TNFi significantly reduced the odds of progression in the cervical spine by 68% (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.72), but not in the lumbar spine (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.52-1.88). A more restricted inhibition of progression in the lumbar spine was confirmed after multiple imputation of missing covariate data (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.77 and 0.85, 95% CI 0.51-1.41, for the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively). It was also confirmed with progression defined as formation of ≥ 1 syndesmophyte (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.80 versus OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.26-1.24 for the cervical and lumbar spine, respectively). CONCLUSION: Disease modification by treatment with TNFi seems to more profoundly affect the cervical spine in this r-axSpA population with longstanding disease. Site-specific analysis of spinal progression might, therefore, improve detection of disease modification in clinical trials in axSpA.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with Janus kinase inhibitors: A nationwide population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: There was a safety concern about an increased risk of thromboembolic events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis). This study aimed to determine the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Korean patients with RA treated with JAKis compared with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. METHODS: Using the National Health Insurance Service database between 2015 and 2019, patients with prevalent RA who started JAKi or TNF inhibitor were selected as the study population. All participants were naïve to targeted therapy. Patients that had experienced any VTE event or used anticoagulant agents within 30 days were excluded. Demographic and clinical characteristics were all balanced by stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) using propensity score. The Cox proportional hazard model considering death as a competing risk was used to evaluate the risk of VTE in JAKi users compared with TNF inhibitor users. RESULTS: A total of 4,178 patients were included: 871 JAKi users and 3,307 TNF inhibitor users were followed up for 1,029.2 person-years (PYs) and 5,940.3 PYs, respectively. With a balanced sample after sIPTW, the incidence rates (IR) of VTE were 0.06 per 100 PYs (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-1.23) in JAKi users and 0.38 per 100 PYs (95% CI 0.25-0.58) in TNF inhibitor users. The hazard ratio was 0.18 (95% CI 0.01-3.47) after adjusting for unbalanced variables after performing sIPTW. CONCLUSION: There is no increased risk of VTE in RA patients treated with JAKis compared with TNF inhibitors in Korea.

Improvement in patient-reported outcomes and work productivity following 3-year ustekinumab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from the PsABio real-world study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the real-world effect of the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab or of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and their association with effectiveness endpoints in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients over 3 years. METHODS: In PsABio (NCT02627768), a prospective, observational study, patients with PsA that were prescribed first- to third-line ustekinumab or a TNFi, and remained on that drug for 3 years, were analysed for change in baseline in PROs (EuroQol-5 dimensions health state VAS [EQ-5D VAS], 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease questionnaire [PsAID-12; range 0-10], Work Productivity and Activity Impairment for Psoriatic Arthritis questionnaire [WPAI; results expressed as a percentage for each domain]), and the association between PROs and WPAI with effectiveness endpoints, clinical disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (cDAPSA), low disease activity (LDA)/remission, minimal disease activity (MDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA). RESULTS: In 437 patients (mean age 49.1 years, 47.8% female), at 3 years, ustekinumab and TNFi treatment led to comparable improvements in EQ-5D VAS; mean change from baseline (95% confidence intervals [CI]) was 11.0 (6.5; 15.4) and 18.9 (14.0; 23.9), respectively. Both groups improved PsAID-12 after 3 years; mean change from baseline (95% CI) was -2.9 (-3.2; -2.5) and -3.5 (-3.9; -3.2), respectively. At baseline, due to their PsA, TNFi-treated patients had lower work productivity compared to ustekinumab-treated patients; mean productivity reduction (95% CI) was 58.8 [52.4; 65.2] and 43.3 [35.6; 51.1]. Over 3 years, TNFi-treated patients had a greater improvement in work productivity compared to ustekinumab-treated patients, ultimately leaving work productivity to be comparable between groups; mean improvement (95% CI) was 44.5% (38.4; 50.6) and 24.9% (15.8; 34.0), respectively. A similar trend was observed in activity impairment. Patients in both treatment groups who achieved effectiveness endpoints, cDAPSA LDA/remission, MDA, and VLDA had greater improvement in PROs and WPAI than patients who did not achieve these endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years, improvements in PROs following ustekinumab or TNFi treatment were generally comparable; however, TNFi-treated patients achieved a greater improvement in work productivity, although this group started from a lower baseline. Achievement of effectiveness endpoints, independent of treatment group, also improved PROs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02627768. Registered on 11 December 2015.

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor tapering in patients with ankylosing spondylitis at low disease activity: factors associated with flare.

BACKGROUND: To investigate factors associated with flare in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who tapered tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) after achievement of low disease activity (LDA) with the standard dose of TNFis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 101 patients with AS who tapered their first TNFis after achievement of LDA. The proportion of reduced versus standard doses of TNFi throughout the follow up in each patient was quantified using the time-averaged dose quotient (DQ). Clinical characteristics were compared between patients who did and did not experience flare after TNFi tapering. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with flare. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the cut-offs of these covariates that best predicted flare. RESULTS: Of the total 101 patients, 45 (44.6%) patients experienced flare after TNFi tapering. Compared with patients who did not experience flare, those who experienced flare had a shorter disease duration (p = 0.006), shorter LDA duration before TNFi tapering (p < 0.001) and lower time-averaged DQ (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the LDA duration [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.944, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.906-0.983, p = 0.006] and time-averaged DQ (adjusted HR: 0.978, 95% CI: 0.959-0.998, p = 0.032) were inversely associated with flare. The cut-off values of the LDA duration and time-averaged DQ that best predicted flares were <5.3 months and <60.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Shorter LDA duration (cut-off value: 5.3 months) and lower time-averaged DQ (cut-off value: 60.6%) were associated with a higher risk of flare after tapering TNFi.

Rapid improvement in spinal pain in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with secukinumab: primary results from a randomized controlled phase-IIIb trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 mg compared with placebo in the management of spinal pain and disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) at Week 8 and up to Week 24. METHODS: Patients (n = 380) with active axSpA were randomized (3:1) to secukinumab 150 mg (Group A) or placebo (Group B). At Week 8, patients from Group A with an average spinal pain score <4 were defined as responders and were re-assigned to secukinumab 150 mg (Arm A1); whereas non-responders were re-randomized to secukinumab 150/300 mg (Arm A2/A3). Patients from Group B were re-randomized (1:1) to secukinumab 150/300 mg (Arm B1/B2). RESULTS: At Week 8, the odds of achieving an average spinal pain score of <4 were significantly higher for patients on secukinumab 150 mg than for patients on placebo (odds ratio (OR): 1.89; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-3.33; p = 0.0264). Further reductions in spinal pain were observed across treatment groups up to Week 24. Pronounced improvements were also observed in other disease activity measurements, such as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score. Responders from Group A showed the highest improvements for all measured parameters of spinal pain compared with the other arms. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab provided rapid and significant improvement in spinal pain at Week 8 which was sustained or increased further up to Week 24 in patients with axSpA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03136861. Registered May 2, 2017.