Stasis and Inflammation in Varicose Vein Development: An Interleukin-Mediated Process from Intima to Media.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the combination of venous stasis and inflammation in varicose vein development. METHODS: The study included patients with primary varicose veins operated using high ligation and stripping of greater saphenous vein. All of them showed reflux at sapheno-femoral junction on preoperative Doppler ultrasound. Mesenteric veins from early or advanced gastric cancer specimens were used as control group. Inflammatory mediators expressed in the venous wall were measured via immunohistochemistry and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-five (59.3%) men and 24 women with a mean age of 52.8 years (range, 23-77 years) were included and 29 (49.2%) patients had edema or skin changes according to Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification and reporting standards for chronic venous disorders. The expression of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1) in intima and those of IL-6 in media of greater saphenous veins increased, with statistically significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.001). IL-6 in media and TGF-ß1 levels in intima were independent predictors of varicose veins (adjusted odds ratios 74.62 and 66.69, respectively). CONCLUSION: Elevated venous pressure represented by reflux on Doppler ultrasound and increased expression of inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 in media and TGF-ß1 in intima are associated with the development of varicose veins.

Endothelium Piezo1 deletion alleviates experimental varicose veins by attenuating perivenous inflammation.

Previous large-scale genetic studies have prioritized the causal genes piezo type mechanosensitive ion channel component 1 (PIEZO1) and castor zinc finger 1 (CASZ1) associated with varicose veins (VVs). This study aims to evaluate their roles in both clinical and experimental VVs. In this study, we investigated abundance of PIEZO1 and CASZ1 in both varicose and normal veins from the same patients. Yoda1 (a selective PIEZO1 agonist, 2.6 mg/kg/day) or vehicle was administered intraperitoneally for 3 weeks to evaluate the effect of PIEZO1 activation on experimental VVs. Subsequently, endothelial Piezo1 deletion mice (Piezo1iΔEC mice) were generated to explored the role of endothelial PIEZO1 on VVs. Laser speckle imaging, flow cytometry, cell tracing with Evans blue or rhodamine-6G, and histopathological staining were utilized to evaluate the pathophysiology of VVs. Our results showed that mRNA expression of PIEZO1, but not CASZ1, was abundant and increased in clinical VVs. The Piezo1tP1-td mice revealed endothelium-specific expression of PIEZO1 in mice veins. By establishing iliac vein ligation-induced VVs in mice, Yoda1 exacerbated experimental VVs with increased inflammatory cell infiltration. Subsequently, endothelial Piezo1 deletion (Piezo1iΔEC mice) alleviated experimental VVs and vascular remodeling by directly reducing vascular permeability and leukocyte-endothelium interactions compared to the control (Piezo1fl/fl mice). PIEZO1 is highly expressed in clinical VVs, meanwhile, activation or inhibition of PIEZO1 exerts a remarkable effect on experimental VVs. Furthermore, Piezo1 may constitute a potential therapeutic approach for the medical treatment of VVs.

Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR venography for mapping lower-extremity venous networks and evaluating varicose veins in patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: Comprehensive evaluation of lower-extremity varicose veins (VVs) in patients with diabetes is crucial for treatment strategizing. The study aims to assess the feasibility of using ferumoxytol-enhanced MR venography (FE-MRV) for lower-extremity venous mapping and the detection of VVs in patients with diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of a phase II clinical trial of a generic brand of ferumoxytol, documented patients with diabetes were enrolled and underwent FE-MRV on a 3-Τ MRI system. Two observers assessed FE-MRV images for image quality, signal intensity ratio (SIR), perforator (PV) diameter, and luminal signal uniformity in deep-to-superficial venous networks with the assessment of intra- and inter-rater reliability. FE-MRV was used to detect lower-extremity VVs. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent FE-MRV without adverse events. The average image quality, as scored by the two observers who assessed 275 venous segments, was 3.4 ± 0.6. Two observers strongly agreed on image quality (κ = 0.90) and SIR measurements (interclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.72) and had good agreement on PV diameter (ICC: 0.64). FE-MRV revealed uniform luminal signals in deep and saphenous venous networks (0.13 ± 0.05 vs 0.08 ± 0.03). Below-knee segments exhibited a significantly higher heterogeneity index than above-knee (p = 0.039) segments. Superficial VVs were observed in 55% (12/22) of legs in 64% (7/11) of patients. Calf muscle VVs were present in 64% (14/22) of legs in 9 patients. CONCLUSION: FE-MRV safely and robustly mapped entire lower-extremity venous networks, enabling the detection and pre-treatment evaluation of both superficial, and deep VVs in patients with diabetes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance venography offers a "one-stop" imaging strategy for the detection and pre-operative evaluation of both superficial and deep VVs in diabetic patients. KEY POINTS: Diabetic patients with VVs are at a higher risk of ulcer-related complications. FE-MRV allowed rapid and comprehensive visualization of the lower-limb venous networks and abdominopelvic veins in diabetic patients. This technique allowed for the detection of superficial and deep VVs in diabetic patients before the development of severe peripheral artery disease.

Risk factors for venous ulceration in patients with varicose veins of lower extremities.

The aim of this case-control study was to explore the potential risk factors for venous ulceration in patients with varicose veins of lower extremities and to establish a simplified diagnostic score model. Seventy subjects with varicose veins of lower extremities and venous ulceration were compared with 1164 controls with varicose veins of lower extremities and no history of venous ulceration. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for venous ulceration. The steps in developing the diagnostic score model were based on the Framingham Heart study. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the diagnostic ability of the diagnostic score model. Multivariate analysis showed that men, overweight, obesity, longer duration varicose veins, deep venous valve insufficiency, low lymphocyte counts, and high fibrinogen content were independently associated with an increased risk of venous ulceration. The AUC for the diagnostic score model was 0.75, which indicated good discriminatory ability. Special attention should be paid to the high-risk group of patients with lower extremity varicose veins. The diagnostic score model might be a useful screening tool for clinicians, policy makers, and patients.

Causal relationship between varicose veins and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration based on Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Increased hemoglobin concentrations may increase the risk of varicose veins. However, the underlying relationship between them was not yet understood. METHODS: Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed to investigate causal effect between mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC, exposure factor) and varicose veins (outcome). Afterward, sensitivity analysis was used to ensure the reliability of MR analysis results. Then Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses of SNPs were performed. A search tool for recurring instances of neighbouring genes (STRING) database was used to construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. RESULTS: Therefore, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) results showed there existed a causal relationship between MCHC and varicose veins (p = 0.0026), with MCHC serving as a significant risk factor. (odd ratio [OR] = 1.2321). In addition, the validity of the results of the forward MR analysis was verified by sensitivity analysis. Further, a PPI network of 92 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which used for forward MR analysis related genes was constructed. And they were found to be closely associated with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signalling pathway and cellular response to external stimulus by enrichment analysis. In addition, we clarified that the effect of varicose veins on MCHC was minimal by reverse MR analysis, suggesting that the results of forward MR analysis were not disturbed by reverse results. CONCLUSION: This study found a causal relationship between varicose veins and MCHC, which provided strong evidence for the effect of hemoglobin on varicose veins, and a new thought for the diagnosis and prevention of varicose veins in the future.

Prediction Model for Delayed Behavior of Early Ambulation After Surgery for Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremity: A Prospective Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze influencing factors and establish a prediction model for delayed behavior of early ambulation after surgery for varicose veins of the lower extremity (VVLE). DESIGN: A prospective case-control study. SETTING: Patients with VVLE were recruited from 2 local hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 498 patients with VVLE were selected using convenience sampling and divided into a training set and a test set. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We collected information from the selected participants before surgery and followed up until the day after surgery, then divided them into a normal and delayed ambulation group. Propensity score matching was applied to all participants by type of surgery and anesthesia. All the characteristics in the 2 groups were compared using logistic regression, back propagation neural network (BPNN), and decision tree models. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values of the 3 models were compared to determine the optimal model. RESULTS: A total of 406 participants were included after propensity score matching. The AUC values for the training sets of logistic regression, BPNN, and decision tree models were 0.850, 0.932, and 0.757, respectively. The AUC values for the test sets were 0.928, 0.984, and 0.776, respectively. A BPNN was the optimal model. Social Support Rating Scale score, preoperative 30-second sit-stand test score, Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) grade, Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire score, and whether you know the need for early ambulation, in descending order of the result of a BPNN model. A probability value greater than 0.56 indicated delayed behavior of early ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should pay more attention to those with lower Social Support Rating Scale scores, poor lower limb strength, a higher CEAP grade, and poor medical coping ability, and make patients aware of the necessity and importance of early ambulation, thereby assisting decision-making regarding postoperative rehabilitation. Further research is needed to improve the method, add more variables, and transform the model into a scale to screen and intervene in the delayed behavior of early ambulation of VVLE in advance.

Compression Therapy after Thermal Ablation of Varicose Veins: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether compression therapy after thermal ablation of varicose veins can improve the prognosis of patients. METHODS: Systematic research were applied for Chinese and English electronic databases(PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP Databases). Eligible prospective studies that comparing the efficacy of compression therapy and non-compression therapy on patients after thermal ablation of varicose veins were included. The interest outcome such as pain, quality of life (QOL), venous clinical severity score (VCSS), time to return to work and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: 10 studies were of high quality, and randomized controlled trials involving 1,545 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. At the same time, the meta-analysis showed that the application of compression therapy improved pain (SMD: -0.51, 95% CI: -0.95, -0.07) but exhibited no statistically significant effect on QOL (SMD: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.08, 0.16), VCSS (MD: -0.05, 95% CI: -1.19, 1.09), time to return to work (MD: -0.43, 95% CI: -0.90, 0.03), total complications (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.09), and thrombosis (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.31, 1.62). CONCLUSION: Compression therapy after thermal ablation of varicose veins can slightly relieve pain, but it has not been found to be associated with improvement in other outcomes.

Clinical efficacy of sodium aescinate administration following endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: Endovenous interventions and minimally invasive procedures are effective in the management of varicose veins. However, they can cause postoperative discomfort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sodium aescinate (SA) in improving edema, pain, vein-specific symptoms, and quality of life in patients following endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients were allocated into two groups: in Group A, 60 mg SA was administered twice daily for 20 days, and in Group B (control), no venoactive drug was prescribed. The Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification system for chronic venous disorders was used to assess the varicose veins. The circumferences of the calf and ankle were recorded for evaluating edema. The 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire (AVVQ) were used to measure the pain intensity, overall varicose vein severity, and patient's quality of life, respectively. RESULTS: The study included 87 patients (mean age, 59.9 ± 10.7 years; 54 men) with CEAP class C2-C5 varicose veins who underwent EVLA and phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy. The calf circumference recovered quicker in Group A than in Group B by days 10, 21, and 30 (difference from baseline was 1.04 ± 0.35 vs 2.39 ± 1.15 [p < .001], 0.48 ± 0.42 vs1.73 ± 1.00 [p < .001], and 0.18 ± 0.64 vs 0.82 ± 0.96 [p < .001], respectively). The ankle circumference recovered quicker in Group A than in Group B by days 10 and 21 (the difference from baseline was 1.37 ± 0.52 vs 2.36 ± 0.93 [p < .001] and 0.58 ± 0.60 vs 1.14 ± 0.88 [p = .002], respectively). Pain relief was achieved quicker in Group A than in Group B (0.257 ± 1.097 [p = .0863] vs 0.506 ± 1.250 [p = .0168] by day 21). There were no significant differences in the VCSS and AVVQ scores between both groups. There were no drug-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: SA, in combination with compression therapy, can relieve edema and alleviate pain in patients following EVLA for varicose veins.

Safety and efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation for treatment of varicose veins of the lower limbs in China: A prospective registered clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of a new Chinese device using microwave ablation for treating symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) varicose veins (VVs). METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, single-center, cohort study investigated the safety and efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation for the treatment of symptomatic VVs. A total of 50 patients with lower limb varicose veins were enrolled from the Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. The primary outcome was the occlusion rate of GSV immediately and at 1, 6, and 12 months after the treatment. The secondary outcomes included the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), the chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire 14 items (CIVIQ-14) score, the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) score, and the pain visual analog scale (VAS) score. This study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04645771). RESULTS: In total, 50 limbs from 50 patients (26 female; mean age: 53.45 ± 9.78 years) were treated. A technical success rate of 100% was achieved and no serious adverse events were recorded. During the follow-up period, the occlusion rate of the major/minor saphenous vein trunk remained 100% at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery except one patient fell off. The median 24-h VAS value was 2 (2,3). The VCSS score, CIVIQ-14 score, and AVVQ score (p < .05) at 1, 6, and 12 months improved significantly compared with the value preoperative (p < .05). CONCLUSION: EMA was safe and effective for treating varicose veins in the lower limbs, with a high rate of venous trunk occlusion and few complications, thus improving patients' postoperative quality of life.

Deep vein thrombosis after sclerotherapy and endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins - an observational study.

Background: The risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after endovenous ablation of varicose veins varies in the literature. Little is known about the characteristics of this complication and associated factors. This study aimed: 1) to study the occurrence of DVT after ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) alone or combined with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for lower-limb varicose veins; 2) to identify factors associated with DVT. Patients and methods: The study included all outpatients aged 18 years or older who underwent UGFS and EVLA or UGFS alone at the University Hospital of Zurich between 2011 and 2015. Data were extracted from the hospital electronic medical record. Patients were surveyed about their level of pain after the procedure and their level of satisfaction with the procedure. Duplex ultrasound was used to assess the deep venous system 7-10 days and 6-8 months after the procedure. Regression analysis was used to examine the association of patient and procedure characteristics with the development of DVT. Results: A total of 334 patients (561 procedures performed in 393 different sessions) were included: 73% of the patients underwent combined UGFS and EVLA and 27% underwent UGFS alone. DVT occurred in 24 (7.2%) patients, of whom 88% underwent combined procedures and 17% underwent interventions involving both the great and small saphenous veins on the same session. DVT occurred in 8.2% of patients receiving thromboprophylaxis and in 9.5% of patients not receiving thromboprophylaxis. DVT occurred in 5.2% of women and 11.9% of men. No factors associated with a diagnosis of DVT after intervention were identified. Pain and satisfaction levels did not differ between patients with and without DVT. Conclusions: This study adds to the knowledge of the risk of DVT following UGFS alone or combined with EVLA. Further studies are needed to revise thromboprophylaxis.

Differences in risk profile associated with varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency - results from the Bonn Vein Study 1.

Background: The aim of this publication is to demonstrate similarities and differences in the association of risk factors with the prevalence of different manifestations of chronic venous disease (CVD), like varicose veins (VV), venous oedema (C3) and severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in the population-based cross-sectional Bonn Vein Study 1 (BVS). Patients and methods: In the BVS 1 between 13.11.2000 and 15.3.2002, 3.072 participants, 1350 men and 1722 women, from a simple random sample of the general population of the city of Bonn and two rural townships aged 18-79 years were included. The overall response proportion was 59%. All participants answered a standardized questionnaire including information about socio-economic data, lifestyle, physical activity, medical history, and quality of life. Venous investigations were performed clinically and by a standardized duplex examination by trained investigators. The CEAP classification in the version of 1996 was used to classify the findings. Logistic regression models were performed for the association of possible risk factors with VV, venous edema (C3) and severe CVI (C4-C6). The predictive risk (PR) describes the association of the diseases and the possible influencing factors. Results: VV, venous oedema (C3) and severe CVI (C4-C6) have common risk factors like higher age, number of pregnancies, family history of VV and overweight or obesity. Female gender is significantly associated with VV and C3 but not with severe CVI (C4-C6). High blood pressure and urban living are only associated with C3 and C4-C6 disease whereas prolonged sitting is associated with C3 and lower social class with C4-C6 exclusively. Discussion: In many epidemiological studies risk factors were associated with chronic venous disorders in general. Our data show that VV, venous edema and severe CVI may have different risk profiles. Venous edema is more often associated with arterial hypertension and sedentary lifestyle whereas lower social class seems to be a risk factor for severe CVI including venous ulcers. Conclusions: The differences in the association of risk factors to VV, venous edema and severe CVI should be considered if prevention and treatment of chronic venous diseases are planned. As examples, compression stockings could be proposed in sitting profession to prevent oedema, VV patients with risk factors like obesity might benefit from early treatment for VV and obesity. More longitudinal evaluation of risk factors is necessary to evaluate the true risk profile of CVD.

Key Regulators of Angiogenesis and Inflammation Are Dysregulated in Patients with Varicose Veins.

Varicose veins (VVs) are the most common manifestation of chronic venous disease (CVD) and appear as abnormally enlarged and tortuous superficial veins. VVs result from functional abnormalities in the venous circulation of the lower extremities, such as venous hypertension, venous valve incompetence, and venous reflux. Previous studies indicate that enhanced angiogenesis and inflammation contribute to the progression and onset of VVs; however, dysregulations in signaling pathways associated with these processes in VVs patients are poorly understood. Therefore, in our study, we aimed to identify key regulators of angiogenesis and inflammation that are dysregulated in patients with VVs. Expression levels of 18 genes were analyzed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using real-time PCR, as well as plasma levels of 6 proteins were investigated using ELISA. Higher levels of CCL5, PDGFA, VEGFC, TGF-alpha, TGF-beta 1, and VEGF-A, as well as lower levels of VEGFB and VEGF-C, were found to be statistically significant in the VV group compared to the control subjects without VVs. None of the analyzed factors was associated with the venous localization of the varicosities. The presented study identified dysregulations in key angiogenesis- and inflammation-related factors in PBMC and plasma from VVs patients, providing new insight into molecular mechanisms that could contribute to the development of VVs and point out promising candidates for circulatory biomarkers of this disease.

Exploring causal correlations between inflammatory cytokines and varicose veins: A Mendelian randomization analysis.

This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between inflammatory cytokines and the risk of varicose veins. The data were sourced from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of European individuals. Multiple Mendelian randomization (MR) methods were used to evaluate the association between inflammatory cytokines and varicose veins. The study found significant associations between elevated levels of certain inflammatory biomarkers (e.g., CASP-8, Vascular endothelial growth factor A levels (VEGF_A)) and an increased risk of varicose veins, while others (e.g., 4EBP1, MMP-10) showed a protective effect. The MR-Egger Intercept and heterogeneity tests indicated no significant pleiotropy or heterogeneity. This comprehensive MR analysis identifies several cytokines as potential contributors to the pathogenesis of varicose veins, offering insights into novel therapeutic targets. Our findings underscore the importance of inflammation in varicose veins and suggest that targeting specific cytokines could be a promising strategy for the treatment and prevention of varicose veins.

Assessing postoperative wound infection rates in ultrasound-guided microwave ablation versus conventional surgery for varicose veins.

Varicose veins are the prevalent vascular disorder that has conventionally been managed via risky postoperative wound infections and conventional surgery. While ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (UMA) has gained attention as a minimally invasive alternative, there is still a lack of research examining its comparative effectiveness. A prospective comparative investigation was undertaken in the Zhejiang region of China from January to November 2023, involving 140 patients who had received the diagnosis of primary varicose veins. An equal number of 70 patients underwent UMA and conventional surgery. Exclusion criteria for the study encompassed adult patients aged 18-65, with the exception of those who had undergone prior venous surgery, deep vein thrombosis or peripheral arterial disease. The demographical characteristics, procedural details and complication profiles of patients who developed postoperative wound infections within 30 days were analysed statistically. The outcomes demonstrated that postoperative wound infections were significantly diminished (5.7%) with UMA in comparison to conventional surgery (17.1%). In addition, the average duration of procedures and length of hospital stay for UMA patients were both reduced, although neither of these differences was found to be statistically significant (p > 0.05). Infection management, age and gender distribution of varicose veins were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). A significant inverse correlation was observed between the severity of varicose veins and postoperative outcomes, as determined by the regression analysis (p < 0.05). Using UMA to treat varicose veins showed promise as an alternative to conventional surgery, specifically in minimizing the incidence of postoperative wound infections. Additional research and clinical consideration are needed regarding the potential transition toward minimally invasive techniques in treatment of varicose veins, as suggested by these results.

[An unusual presentation of superior vena cava syndrome]. / Une présentation inhabituelle de syndrome de la veine cave supérieure.

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is a clinical picture resulting from the obstruction of superior vena cava. SVCS usually causes symptoms and signs related to the head, the neck, the upper extremities and the upper thorax. We report a case of unusual clinical presentation of SVCS in a 25-year-old male patient who suffered from lymphoblastic lymphoma in childhood. Clinicians should be aware of abdominal wall presentations of SVCS especially in patients having undergone central venous catheterization, even years before. SVCS could be an emergency situation, requiring specific treatment or contraindicating surgical procedures.

Le syndrome de la veine cave supérieure (SVCS) est une entité nosologique résultant de l'obstruction de la veine cave supérieure. Un SVCS comporte habituellement des symptômes et des signes cliniques localisés à la région cranio-cervicale, aux membres supérieurs et au niveau thoracique supérieur. Nous rapportons un cas de présentation clinique inhabituelle de SVCS chez un patient de 25 ans aux antécédents de lymphome lymphoblastique dans l'enfance. En pratique clinique, il est important de garder à l'esprit l'existence de présentations inhabituelles pariétales abdominales de SVCS, en particulier chez les patients ayant subi un cathétérisme veineux central, même plusieurs années auparavant. Un SVCS peut nécessiter un traitement spécifique, parfois en urgence et contre-indiquer certaines interventions chirurgicales.

High Physical Activity Volume Is Associated With an Increase in the Calibre of the Lower Limb Veins Without Impact on Functional Discomfort: the VARISPORT Study.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between physical activity and lower limb veins is complex. If a sedentary lifestyle is considered to be negative on lower limb veins, specific information on physical activity varicose vein volume is sparse, especially the effect of high physical activity volume. The main objective of the VARISPORT study was to evaluate lower limb veins (clinically, morphologically, and haemodynamically) and chronic venous disease symptoms in subjects exposed to high physical activity volume compared with a group of non-exposed subjects. METHODS: A cross sectional study compared a group of high exercise training volume volunteers (more than eight hours of uninterrupted vigorous intensity physical activity per week for more than six months: high physical activity volume group, HPAV group) with a volunteer control group matched for age, sex, and body mass index. Clinical examination was performed to determine the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification of each subject and the Carpentier score was used to assess symptoms related to possible chronic venous disease. Duplex ultrasonography was used to assess vein diameters and reflux in the deep and superficial veins. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen subjects were included in each group. The lower limb veins (deep and superficial) were significantly more dilated in the HPAV group. More reflux was found in the great saphenous veins and non-saphenous veins in the HPAV group. High physical activity volume was associated with a higher frequency of visible varicose veins (stage C2 of the CEAP classification), odds ratio 3.37 (95% confidence interval 1.66 - 7.25) without impact on functional discomfort (44 subjects with a Carpentier score ≥ 1 in each group). CONCLUSION: The VARISPORT study reported an increase in the calibre of the lower limb veins without impact on functional discomfort. Further studies are needed to determine whether these athletic veins are truly pathological varicose veins or simply an adaptation to high physical activity volumes.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Thermal Versus Non-Thermal Endovenous Ablation in Superficial Venous Incompetence.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare technical success, complications, and quality of life after thermal vs. non-thermal endovenous ablation for the treatment of superficial venous incompetence. DATA SOURCES: Electronic bibliographic sources (Google Scholar, Pubmed, Cochrane Database, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase). REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was conducted using terms to identify relevant studies to be included. The primary outcome was vein occlusion rate at up to four weeks and one to two years from procedure. Secondary outcome measures included peri-procedural pain, nerve injury, endothermal heat induced thrombosis, and quality of life. RESULTS: Eight randomised controlled trials met the selection criteria. These comprised a total of 1 956 patients, of whom 1 042 underwent endovenous thermal ablation and 915 underwent endovenous non-thermal ablation. There was no statistically significant difference in occlusion rate at all time points. Relative risk at four weeks and one to two years was 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 - 1.02) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 - 1.01), respectively. Non-thermal ablation was tolerated better and had less risk of nerve injury. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of endothermal heat induced thrombosis (EHIT). There was improvement in quality of life scores post-procedure but there was no statistically significant difference in thermal vs. non-thermal ablation. The quality of evidence assessed using GRADE methodology showed high quality for occlusion rate at four weeks and one to two years, moderate quality for nerve injury and peri-procedural pain, and low quality for EHIT. CONCLUSION: Vein occlusion rates after thermal vs. non-thermal endovenous ablation are similar. In the early post-operative period, non-thermal endovenous ablation demonstrated the advantages of less pain and less risk of nerve injury. Improvement in quality of life after both thermal and non-thermal endovenous ablation is similar.

Six Year Extension Study of Patients From a Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Venefit, Radiofrequency Induced Thermal Therapy, and Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins.

OBJECTIVE: To compare long term outcomes after great saphenous vein (GSV) treatment with three radiofrequency (RF) thermal devices: Venefit (Closurefast), Radiofrequency Induced Thermal Therapy (RFITT), and Endovenous Radiofrequency (EVRF). DESIGN: A 72 month follow up of patients who were treated in the randomised 3RF study. METHODS: A total of 172 participants from the 3RF study were invited to take part in a single visit, long term, follow up study. Failure of GSV closure was assessed with duplex ultrasound (DUS) and constituted the primary outcome. Patients completed questionnaires for secondary outcomes: Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ), Euroqol 5D (EQ-5D), and patient reported varicose veins measured by counting vein occupying boxes in AVVQ question 1. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (12%) had already been re-treated. Of the remainder, 13 (7%) could not be contacted, 20 (11%) declined invitation, and one did not consent. Therefore, 116 (64%) and 95 (53%) participants completed questionnaires and DUS, respectively. Failure of GSV closure on 72 month DUS was 16%, 21%, and 37% for Venefit, RFITT, and EVRF, respectively (p = .14), whilst outcomes for all failures were 14%, 17%, and 44% (p < .001) (Venefit vs. EVRF: p < .001; RFITT vs. EVRF: p < .001; and Venefit vs. RFITT: p = .63). There were no between group differences in AVVQ or EQ-5D scores. Rates of patient reported presence of any varicose veins were high for all groups (97%, 92%, and 97% after Venefit, RFITT, and EVRF, respectively; p = .48). The EVRF treated participants reported more extensive recurrence than the Venefit and RFITT participants (p = .008). CONCLUSION: Long term technical outcomes after RF ablation for GSV varicose veins were significantly better after Venefit and RFITT compared with EVRF treatment. However, quality of life scores showed no differences after 72 months. Rates of patient reporting any varicose veins were high for all treatments. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT04720027.

FOVELASS: A Randomised Trial of Endovenous Laser Ablation Versus Polidocanol Foam for Small Saphenous Vein Incompetence.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) to treat isolated small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence in a multicentre randomised controlled study (RCT; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05468450). METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing isolated SSV treatment (reflux > 0.5 seconds) were randomised to UGFS or EVLA. Patients treated with UGFS were allowed one additional truncal treatment at six weeks. Tributary treatments (phlebectomy or sclerotherapy) were permitted after six months. Participants were assessed at eight days, six months, and one, two, and three years. The primary endpoint was the absence of SSV reflux (> 0.5 seconds). Secondary outcomes included clinical scores and quality of life (QoL) scores. All analyses were done by intention to treat. RESULTS: Of 1 522 screened patients, 161 were randomised to UGFS (n = 82) and EVLA (n = 79). Only 3% of patients who received UGFS had the second (allowed) treatment and 86% of patients completed the three year study. Forty-one and 19 tributary treatments (by sclerotherapy) were performed in 27 UGFS patients (33%) and 15 EVLA patients (19%), respectively. The complete absence of reflux at three years was significantly better after EVLA (86%) than after UGFS (56%) (odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.31 - 12.44; risk ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.26 - 2.01). Two deep vein thromboses (DVTs; one femoropopliteal and one gastrocnemius) and one endovenous heat induced thrombosis occurred in the EVLA group. Seven DVTs were seen in the UGFS group, including two partial popliteal DVTs and five gastrocnemius vein thromboses (four asymptomatic and incidental on day 8 screening). At three years, there was no difference between groups for the following: rate of visible varices (p = .87), revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (p = .28), and QoL (p = .59). Patient satisfaction scores were high in both groups (median score: EVLA 97/100 and UGFS 93/100; p = .080). Symptoms were significantly improved in both groups. (p < .001) CONCLUSION: Technical success was better for EVLA than for UGFS three years after SSV treatment. This agrees with studies that have reported on these treatments in the great saphenous vein. However, improvements in clinical outcome were similar for both groups.

Comparison of day surgery between varicose veins with and without superficial venous thrombosis below knee: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Development of endovenous treatment and sclerotherapy technology makes it feasible for clinicians to treat varicose veins (VV) through day surgery (DS). Superficial venous thrombosis (SVT) of lower extremities is a common complication of VV. This study aimed to investigate whether the existence of SVT below knee affect the safety and efficacy of DS for VV patients. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study. Clinical data of 593 VV patients was retrospectively analyzed. Raw data were matched by the using of propensity score matching model. Operation time, technical failure, postoperative DVT, skin burns, saphenous nerve injury, subcutaneous induration, and bleeding were compared between the groups. Also, we compared VV recurrence, SVT formation, DVT events and the change of VCSS score with 12 months. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients complicated with SVT below knee were matched with 118 patients had VV only. Perioperative and follow-up outcomes were similar in both groups except for the number of incisions (median = 6 [5, 7] VS median = 4 [4, 5], P < 0.001). Both groups experienced a great decrease in VCSS score. CONCLUSION: We systematically compared the clinical outcomes of DS in VV patients. Our results indicate DS is safe and effective for patients with VV, whether accompanied by SVT below the knee. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier for this trial is NCT05380895 (retrospectively registered).