RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Anti-osteoclast treatment with denosumab or zoledronate is known to effectively reduce the need for radiotherapy to bone and other skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this study, we analyze primary versus secondary initiation of bone-targeting agents (BTAs) relative to first palliative bone radiotherapy in patients dying of mCRPC. METHODS: Provincial administrative databases from Ontario, Canada identified patients with prostate cancer (2007-2018, nâ =â 98 646) who received continuous androgen deprivation therapy (nâ =â 29 453), died of prostate cancer (2013-2018, nâ =â 3864), and received life-prolonging therapy for mCRPC (nâ =â 1850). Variables were collected looking back 3 years from death. Multivariable analysis explored the relationship between clinical variables and BTAs. RESULTS: Of the 58% (1066/1850) patients with mCRPC who received BTA, only 289 (25.4%) started BTA prior to first palliative bone radiotherapy as primary prevention. Eight hundred and forty-eight (74.6%) patients either never received BTA before death (nâ =â 447) or started BTA only after first bone radiotherapy (nâ =â 401). More patients received denosumab (nâ =â 825, 77%) than zoledronic acid (nâ =â 241, 23%). 51.2% (582/1137) of palliative bone radiotherapy was initiated in the last 12 months of life. Factors associated with the use of BTA included elevated alkaline phosphatase (ORâ =â 1.0, Pâ =â .023), de novo metastases (ORâ =â 1.4, Pâ =â .005), medical oncologist involvement (ORâ =â 2.0, Pâ =â .007), diagnosis 2012-2017 versus 2007-2011 (ORâ =â 0.75, Pâ =â .034), and academic center (ORâ =â 0.061, Pâ =â .007). CONCLUSION: A majority of patients with mCRPC never receive BTAs prior to first SRE, despite universal access and availability of these agents in Ontario. These results highlight an opportunity to improve outcomes by emphasizing early introduction of BTA in patients with mCRPC being started on systemic therapy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/radioterapia , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , OntárioRESUMO
PURPOSE: While adjuvant bisphosphonate use in early breast cancer (EBC) is associated with improvements in breast cancer-specific outcomes, questions remain around optimal bisphosphonate type, dose and scheduling. We evaluated a single zoledronate infusion in a prospective randomised trial. METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with EBC were randomised to receive a single infusion of zoledronate (4 mg IV) or 6-monthly treatment for 3 years. Outcomes measured were; Quality of Life (QoL; EQ-5D-5L), bisphosphonate-related toxicities, including acute phase reactions (APRs), recurrence-free survival (RFS), bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 211 patients were randomized to either a single infusion (n = 107) or six-monthly treatment (n = 104). After 3 years of follow up there were no significant differences between the arms for QoL and most toxicity endpoints. APRs following zoledronate occurred in 81% (171/211) of patients (77.6% in single infusion arm and 84.6% in the 6-monthly group). While the frequency of APRs decreased over 3 years in the 6-monthly arm, they still remain common. Of 34/104 (32.7%) patients who discontinued zoledronate early in the 6-monthly treatment group, the most common reason was APRs (16/34, 47%). At the 3 year follow up, there were no differences between arms for RFS, BMFS or OS. CONCLUSION: A single infusion of zoledronate was associated with increased patient convenience, less toxicity, and lower rates of treatment discontinuation. Despite the common clinical impression that APRs decrease with time, this was not observed when patients were specifically questioned. While the study is not powered for non-inferiority, longer-term follow-up for confirmation of RFS and OS rates is ongoing.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Neoplasias da Mama , Qualidade de Vida , Ácido Zoledrônico , Humanos , Ácido Zoledrônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Ácido Zoledrônico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Resultado do Tratamento , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Difosfonatos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the humeral head bone volume of patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) and examine the therapeutic effect of zoledronate in a rat modified model of CTA (mCTA). DESIGN: The bone mass in patients with CTA was measured using Hounsfield units from CT images. The mCTA was induced by transecting the rotator cuff, biceps brachii tendon, and superior half of the joint capsule in adult rat shoulders. A single subcutaneous injection of zoledronate was followed by bone histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry of the humeral head, as well as the Murine Shoulder Arthritis Score (MSAS) assessment. RESULTS: The humeral head bone volume was decreased in patients with CTA. In the mCTA model, M1 macrophages were increased in the synovium and were decreased by zoledronate treatment. The increased expressions of TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6 in mCTA synovium and articular cartilage were suppressed in the zoledronate-treated mCTA group. The expression of catabolic enzymes in the articular cartilage and MSAS showed similar results. The zoledronate-treated mCTA group showed a decreased subchondral bone collapse with a decreased RANKL/OPG expression ratio and a suppressed number of osteoclasts compared with the control mCTA group. The enhanced expressions of HMGB1 and S100A9 in the mCTA shoulders were eliminated in the zoledronate-treated mCTA group. CONCLUSIONS: The humeral head subchondral bone was decreased in patients with CTA. In the mCTA model, the collapse and osteoarthritic changes were prevented by zoledronate administration. Zoledronate seemed to suppress the number of M1 macrophages in the synovium and osteoclasts in the subchondral bone.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in hip geometry parameters following treatment with teriparatide (TPD), denosumab (Dmab) and zoledronate (ZOL) in real-life setting. METHODS: We studied 249 patients with osteoporosis (OP) with mean [SD] age of 71.5 [11.1] years divided into 3 treatment groups; Group A received TPD; n = 55, Group B (Dmab); n = 116 and Group C (ZOL); n = 78 attending a routine metabolic bone clinic. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN) prior to treatment and after 2 years (Group A), after a mean treatment duration of 3.3 [1.3] years (Group B) and after 1, 2 and 3 doses of ZOL (Group C) to assess treatment response. Hip structural analysis (HSA) was carried out retrospectively from DXA-acquired femur images at the narrow neck (NN), the intertrochanter (IT) and femoral shaft (FS). RESULTS: Changes in parameters of hip geometry and mechanical strength were seen in the following treatment. Percentage change in cross-sectional area (CSA): 3.56[1.6] % p = 0.01 and cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI): 4.1[1.8] % p = 0.029 increased at the NN only in Group A. Improvement in HSA parameters at the IT were seen in group B: CSA: 3.3[0.67]% p < 0.001, cortical thickness (Co Th): 2.8[0.78]% p = 0.001, CSMI: 5.9[1.3]% p < 0.001, section modulus (Z):6.2[1.1]% p < 0.001 and buckling ratio (BR): - 3.0[0.86]% p = 0.001 with small changes at the FS: CSA: 1.2[0.4]% p = 0.005, Z:1.6 [0.76]%, p = 0.04. Changes at the IT were also seen in Group C (after 2 doses): CSA: 2.5[0.77]% p = 0.017, Co Th: 2.4[0.84]% p = 0.012, CSMI: 3.9[1.3]% p = 0.017, Z:5.2[1.16]% p < 0.001 and BR: - 3.1[0.88]% p = 0.001 and at the NN (following 3 doses): outer diameter (OD): 4.0[1.4]% p = 0.0005, endocortical diameter(ED): 4.3[1.67% p = 0.009, CSA:5.2[1.8]% p = 0.003, CSMI: 9.3[3.8]% p = 0.019. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the effect of OP therapies on hip geometry is useful in understanding the mechanisms of their anti-fracture effect and may provide additional information on their efficacy.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Densidade Óssea , Denosumab , Osteoporose , Teriparatida , Ácido Zoledrônico , Humanos , Feminino , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Ácido Zoledrônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Zoledrônico/farmacologia , Teriparatida/uso terapêutico , Teriparatida/administração & dosagem , Teriparatida/farmacologia , Idoso , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , Denosumab/administração & dosagem , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Absorciometria de Fóton , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , SeguimentosRESUMO
Prior to the initiation of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis, the impact on ocular health is not routinely discussed with patients. This is due to the scarcity of data on the association between bisphosphonates and ocular side effects, resulting in lack of provider awareness to effectively counsel patients. Furthermore, there is little consensus among clinicians on the safety of re-challenging with intravenous bisphosphonate treatment following ocular complications. This is a case report of a patient who developed orbital inflammation four days after receiving a zoledronate infusion. This case was discussed amongst health care providers and osteoporosis experts during a meeting of Bone Health Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) virtual platform, which was established in 2015.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Ácido Zoledrônico , Humanos , Ácido Zoledrônico/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Infusões Intravenosas , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Difosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Imidazóis/efeitos adversos , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , IdosoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Periprosthetic loosening is a major complication after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential to choose the right therapeutic path and to avoid further complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 68Gallium-Zoledronate ([68Ga]Ga-DOTAZol) PET/CT in detecting periprosthetic loosening in total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: This retrospective study included 26 patients with painful prosthesis (THA n = 17; TKA n = 16) and clinical suspicion of periprosthetic loosening, but without a confirmed diagnosis. Patients underwent [68Ga]Ga-DOTAZol PET/CT at least one year post-implantation. Diagnosis was confirmed through revision surgery or long-term clinical follow-up, with an observation period of at least 6 months. The analysis included both an assessment of the prosthesis as a unit and a separate evaluation of the individual components. Statistical analysis involved calculating sensitivity, specificity and accuracy using SPSS. RESULTS: Overall, a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 95.8% and an accuracy of 90.9% were found for detecting periprosthetic loosening, when considering the prosthesis as a unit. Individual component analyses showed a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 96.2%. CONCLUSION: The use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTAZol PET/CT in periprosthetic loosening is a remarkable diagnostic tool and a promising approach. In comparison to established radionuclide tracers, 68Gallium-Zoledronate offers notable advantages due to its availability via 68Ge/68Ga-generators, improving its potential for clinical application.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates (BPs) are widely used to inhibit excessive osteoclast activity. However, the potential to compromise bone defect healing has limited their broader application. To better understand the influence of BPs on bone regeneration, we established a bone grafting model with Zoledronate administration, aiming to deepen the understanding of bone remodeling and mineralization processes. METHODS: A bone grafting model was established in the distal femurs of male Sprague-Dawley rats. The experimental group received systemic administration of Zoledronate (ZOL, 0.2 mg/kg, administered twice). Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were employed to assess osteoblastic and macrophage activity, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was used to evaluate osteoclastogenesis. Mineralization was assessed through Micro-CT analysis, Raman spectroscopy, and back-scatter scanning electron microscopy (BSE-SEM). Additionally, the in vitro effects of ZOL on osteoblast and osteoclast activity were investigated to further elucidate its impact on bone regeneration. RESULTS: In vivo, the ZOL group showed increased bone mass, as observed in histological and radiological assessments. However, Micro-CT, Raman spectroscopy, and BSE-SEM detection revealed lower mineralization levels in ZOL group's regenerated bone. Acid-etched SEM analysis showed abnormal osteocyte characteristics in ZOL-group's regenerated bone. Simultaneously, elevated osteopontin (OPN), F4/80 expression along with reduced TRAP expressing was found in the grafting region of ZOL group. In vitro, ZOL did not negatively impact osteogenetic activity (ALP, BMP4, OCN expression) at the tested concentrations (0.02-0.5 g/ml) but significantly impaired mineralization and inhibited osteoclast formation, even at the lowest concentration. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a less recognized negative effect of ZOL on bone mineralization during bone regeneration. More research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanism.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Regeneração Óssea , Calcificação Fisiológica , Difosfonatos , Osteoclastos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Microtomografia por Raio-X , Ácido Zoledrônico , Animais , Ácido Zoledrônico/farmacologia , Masculino , Regeneração Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Ratos , Calcificação Fisiológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Difosfonatos/farmacologia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/farmacologia , Osteoclastos/efeitos dos fármacos , Osteoblastos/efeitos dos fármacos , Imidazóis/farmacologia , Análise Espectral Raman , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Fêmur/efeitos dos fármacos , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Transplante Ósseo/métodos , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Imuno-HistoquímicaRESUMO
The long-term effects of zoledronate treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who stop denosumab therapy when they become osteopenic are not known. In a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial we previously reported that a single intravenous infusion of zoledronate 5 mg given to such patients 6 months after the last denosumab injection effectively prevents bone loss in the majority of them for up to 3 years. The study was extended for an additional 2 years and included all 19 patients from one Trial Site of the total 27 patients originally randomized in the zoledronate arm. Baseline characteristics of this cohort treated with denosumab for 2.4 ± 0.2 years were not different from those of the whole initial cohort or from the patients who did not participate in this extension. At the end of 5 years 7 patients had become again osteoporotic requiring additional treatment, 9 remained osteopenic while 3 did not complete the study extension. Thus, more than half of the osteoporotic women who became osteopenic with denosumab treatment and stopped it, maintained the BMD gains 5 years after a single zoledronate infusion with no additional treatment. Whether these results are also applicable to patients treated with denosumab for longer periods remains to be established.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Humanos , Feminino , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Denosumab , Densidade Óssea , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Together with diabetic osteoporosis (DOP), diabetes patients experience poor peri-implant osteogenesis following implantation for dentition defects. Zoledronate (ZOL) is widely used to treat osteoporosis clinically. To evaluate the mechanism of ZOL for the treatment of DOP, experiments with DOP rats and high glucose-grown MC3T3-E1 cells were used. The DOP rats treated with ZOL and/or ZOL implants underwent a 4-week implant-healing interval, and then microcomputed tomography, biomechanical testing, and immunohistochemical staining were performed to elucidate the mechanism. In addition, MC3T3-E1 cells were maintained in an osteogenic medium with or without ZOL to confirm the mechanism. The cell migration, cellular actin content, and osteogenic differentiation were evaluated by a cell activity assay, a cell migration assay, as well as alkaline phosphatase, alizarin red S, and immunofluorescence staining. The mRNA and protein expression of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK), osteoprotegerin (OPG), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), and collagen type I (Col-I) were detected using real-time quantitative PCRs and western blot assays, respectively. In the DOP rats, ZOL markedly improved osteogenesis, enhanced bone strength and increased the expression of AMPK, p-AMPK, and Col-I in peri-implant bones. The in vitro findings showed that ZOL reversed the high glucose-induced inhibition of osteogenesis via the AMPK signaling pathway. In conclusion, the ability of ZOL to promote osteogenesis in DOP by targeting AMPK signaling suggests that therapy with ZOL, particularly simultaneous local and systemic administration, may be a unique approach for future implant repair in diabetes patients.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Osteoporose , Ratos , Animais , Ácido Zoledrônico/farmacologia , Osteogênese , Proteínas Quinases Ativadas por AMP/metabolismo , Microtomografia por Raio-X , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/metabolismo , Diferenciação Celular , Glucose/metabolismo , Osteoblastos/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolismoRESUMO
Zoledronate (ZOL) were found to inhibit bone resorption in an animal model of diabetes, high glucose concentrations have been shown to decreased the osteogenesis-related gene expression. But the molecular mechanism by which high glucose levels affect osteoblasts and the effects of ZOL on osteoblast differentiation in a high-glucose environment remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of ZOL on osteoblast differentiation in a high-glucose environment and determine the responsible mechanism. Cell proliferation was detected by MTT assay, and cell differentiation was evaluated by immunofluorescence staining for alkaline phosphatase expression, alizarin red staining, cytoskeletal arrangement, and actin fiber formation. Real-time PCR and western blot analyses were performed to detect the mRNA and protein expression of p38MAPK, phosphorylated (p)-p38MAPK, CREB, p-CREB, collagen (COL) I, osteoprotegerin (OPG), and RANKL. The results showed that cell proliferation activity did not differ among the groups. But high glucose inhibited osteoblast differentiation; actin fiber formation; and p38MAPK, p-p38MAPK, CREB, p-CREB, COL I, and OPG expression, while promoting RANKL expression. However, we found that treatment with ZOL reversed these effects of high glucose. And further addition of a p38MAPK inhibitor led to inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and actin fiber formation, and lower p38MAPK, p-p38MAPK, CREB, p-CREB, COL I, and OPG expression than in the high glucose +ZOL group with higher RANKL expression than in the high glucose +ZOL group. Collectively, this study demonstrates that high glucose inhibits the differentiation of osteoblasts, and ZOL could partly overcome these effects by regulating p38MAPK pathway activity.
Assuntos
Osteogênese , Proteínas Quinases p38 Ativadas por Mitógeno , Animais , Ácido Zoledrônico/metabolismo , Proteínas Quinases p38 Ativadas por Mitógeno/metabolismo , Actinas/metabolismo , Diferenciação Celular , Osteoblastos/metabolismo , Osteoprotegerina/metabolismo , Glucose/metabolismo , Ligante RANK/metabolismoRESUMO
Currently in the UK and Ireland, after a hip fracture most patients do not receive bone protection medication to reduce the risk of refracture. Yet randomised controlled trial data specifically examining patients with hip fracture have shown that intravenous zoledronate reduces refracture risk by a third. Despite this evidence, use of intravenous zoledronate is highly variable following a hip fracture; many hospitals are providing this treatment, whilst most are currently not. A range of clinical uncertainties, doubts over the evidence base and practical concerns are cited as reasons. This paper discusses these concerns and provides guidance from expert consensus, aiming to assist orthogeriatricians, pharmacists and health services managers establish local protocols to deliver this highly clinically and cost-effective treatment to patients before they leave hospital, in order to reduce costly re-fractures in this frail population.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Fraturas do Quadril , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Ácido Zoledrônico , Humanos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Consenso , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Irlanda , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Ácido Zoledrônico/administração & dosagemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonates are widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis, which could cause osteonecrosis of the jaw (also known as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw [BRONJ]). Currently, there is no effective treatment for BRONJ. Here, we investigated the role of human recombinant semaphorin 4D (Sema4D) in BRONJ in vitro. METHODS: MG-63 and RAW264.7 cells were used to determine the effects of Sema4D on BRONJ. Osteoclast and osteoblast were differentiated by treatment with 50 ng/mL RANKL for 7 days. In vitro BRONJ model was induced by treatment with ZOL (2.5 µ
Assuntos
Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos , Osteoclastos , Humanos , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/tratamento farmacológico , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/metabolismo , Difosfonatos/metabolismo , Difosfonatos/farmacologia , Osteoblastos , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate medications, including alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate administered orally and zoledronate, administered intravenously, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of osteoporosis based on evidence that, correctly taken, bisphosphonates can improve bone strength and lead to a reduction in the risk of fragility fractures. However, it is currently unclear how decisions to select between bisphosphonate regimens, including intravenous regimen, are made in practice and how clinicians support patients with different treatments. METHODS: This was an interpretivist qualitative study. 23 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of general practitioners (GPs), secondary care clinicians, specialist experts as well as those providing and leading novel treatments including participants from a community intravenous (IV) zoledronate service. Data analysis was undertaken through a process of iterative categorisation. RESULTS: The results report clinicians varying experiences of making treatment choices, as well as wider aspects of osteoporosis care. Secondary care and specialist clinicians conveyed some confidence in making treatment choices including on selecting IV treatment. This was aided by access to diagnostic testing and medication expertise. In contrast GPs reported a number of challenges in prescribing bisphosphonate medications for osteoporosis and uncertainty about treatment choice. Results also highlight how administering IV zoledronate was seen as an opportunity to engage in broader care practices. CONCLUSION: Approaches to making treatment decisions and supporting patients when prescribing bisphosphonates for osteoporosis vary in practice. This study points to the need to co-ordinate osteoporosis treatment and care across different care providers.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Osteoporose , Humanos , Feminino , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Ácido Ibandrônico/uso terapêutico , Alendronato/uso terapêutico , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications (AOMs) is crucial. National Health Insurance (NHI) in Taiwan has its own rules of reimbursement rule for AOMs. The midterm adherence remained inconclusive. Here we investigated the adherence according to the initially used AOMs, for three consecutive years. METHODS: The nationwide cohort study from 2008 to 2018, based on Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, included 336,229 patients. Their adherence, indicated by medication possession ratio (MPR), to the initial AOMs was investigated yearly for three consecutive years. The overall MPRs (OMPR), including the switched AOMs, were also calculated in the first year. The Sankey diagram further visualized the patient flows toward different adherence according to the initial AOMs. RESULTS: The OMPR in the first year improved if the patients used AOMs with longer dosing intervals. 100%, 68.9%, 40.7%, and 34.0% of the patients started the treatment with zoledronate, denosumab, alendronate, and raloxifene, respectively, had OMPR ≥75% in the first year. In the 3rd year, only 20.89%, 24.13%, and 12.83% of the patients continuously treated with zoledronate, denosumab, and alendronate, respectively, had MPR ≥75%. From the Sankey diagram, we also observed that patients who had poor adherence at one year were inclined to have poor adherence or discontinue antiosteoporosis treatment in the next year. CONCLUSION: The initial AOMs and the observed adherence may provide clues for optimizing patient treatment. The real-world adherence in Taiwan was far from satisfactory in our study.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose , Humanos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Alendronato/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , Ácido Zoledrônico/uso terapêutico , Taiwan , Motivação , Adesão à Medicação , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Dendritic cells (DC) are powerful cells that play critical roles in anti-tumor immunity, and their use in cancer immunotherapy unlocks hidden capabilities as an effective therapeutic. In order to maximize the full potential of DC, we developed a DC vaccine named CellgramDC-WT1 (CDW). CDW was pulsed with WT1, an antigen commonly expressed in solid tumors, and induced with zoledronate to aid DC maturation. Although our previous study focused on using Rg3 as an inducer of DC maturation, problems with quality control and access led us to choose zoledronate as a better alternative. Furthermore, CDW secreted IL-12 and IFN-γ, which induced the differentiation of naïve T cells to active CD8+ T cells and elicited cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response against cancer cells with WT1 antigens. By confirming the identity and function of CDW, we believe CDW is an improved DC vaccine and holds promising potential in the field of cancer immunotherapy.
Assuntos
Vacinas Anticâncer , Neoplasias , Vacinas , Humanos , Ácido Zoledrônico/farmacologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Imunoterapia , Linfócitos T Citotóxicos , Células Dendríticas , Proteínas WT1RESUMO
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe disease with unclear pathogenesis. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC(AT)s) serve as a special source for cell therapy. Herein, we explored whether exosomes (Exo) derived from MSC(AT)s promote primary gingival wound healing and prevent MRONJ. An MRONJ mice model was constructed using zoledronate (Zol) administration and tooth extraction. Exosomes were collected from the conditioned medium (CM) of MSC(AT)s (MSC(AT)s-Exo) and locally administered into the tooth sockets. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA)-siRNA was used to knock down the expression of IL-1RA in MSC(AT)s-Exo. Clinical observations, micro-computed tomography (microCT), and histological analysis were used to evaluate the therapeutic effects in vivo. In addition, the effect of exosomes on the biological behavior of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) was evaluated in vitro. MSC(AT)s-Exo accelerated primary gingival wound healing and bone regeneration in tooth sockets and prevented MRONJ. Moreover, MSC(AT)s-Exo increased IL-1RA expression and decreased interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) expression in the gingival tissue. The sequent rescue assay showed that the effects of preventing MRONJ in vivo and improving the migration and collagen synthesis abilities of zoledronate-affected HGFs in vitro were partially impaired in the IL-1RA-deficient exosome group. Our results indicated that MSC(AT)s-Exo might prevent the onset of MRONJ via an IL-1RA-mediated anti-inflammatory effect in the gingiva wound and improve the migration and collagen synthesis abilities of HGFs.
Assuntos
Exossomos , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Osteonecrose , Camundongos , Animais , Humanos , Ácido Zoledrônico , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/genética , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/metabolismo , Exossomos/metabolismo , Microtomografia por Raio-X , Osteonecrose/metabolismo , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/metabolismo , Colágeno/metabolismoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a serious debilitating disease caused by anti-resorption and anti-angiogenesis drugs, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Recent studies suggested that primary gingival wound healing may effectively prevent the development of MRONJ. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of low-level light therapy (LLLT) on promoting gingival wound healing in extraction sockets of MRONJ-like mice and preventing the occurrence of MRONJ. Furthermore, we explored underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Mice were randomly divided into the Ctrl, Zol, and Zol + LLLT groups. Administration of zoledronate and tooth extraction of bilateral maxillary second molars were used to build the MRONJ model, and LLLT was locally administered into the tooth sockets to examine the effect of LLLT. Next, to explore the function of IL-1RA, we performed LLLT with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) neutralizing antibody (named Zol + LLLT + IL-1RA NAb group) or negative control antibodies for tooth extraction in subsequent rescue animal experiments. Stereoscope observations, micro-computed tomography, and histological examination were conducted to evaluate gingival wound healing and bone regeneration in tooth sockets. The effects of LLLT on the migration capacities of zoledronate-treated epithelial cells were assessed in vitro. RESULTS: LLLT promoted primary gingival wound healing without exposed necrotic bone. Micro-computed tomography results showed higher bone volume and mineral density of the tooth sockets after LLLT. Histology analysis showed complete gingival coverage, obvious bone regeneration, and reduced soft tissue inflammation, with down-regulated pro-inflammation cytokines, like interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and up-regulated IL-1RA expression in the gingival tissue in the LLLT group. The rescue assay further showed that the effects of LLLT promoting gingival wound healing and preventing MRONJ might be partially abolished by IL-1RA neutralizing antibodies. In vitro studies demonstrated that LLLT accelerated zoledronate-treated epithelial cell migration. CONCLUSIONS: LLLT might promote primary gingival wound healing and contribute to subsequent bone regeneration of the tooth extractions in MRONJ-like lesions via IL-1RA-mediated pro-inflammation signaling suppression.
Assuntos
Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Doenças da Gengiva , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Animais , Camundongos , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/prevenção & controle , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Gengiva/radioterapia , Proteína Antagonista do Receptor de Interleucina 1/metabolismo , Qualidade de Vida , Extração Dentária , Cicatrização , Microtomografia por Raio-X , Ácido Zoledrônico/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Amino-bisphosphonates (N-BPs) have been commercially available for over four decades and are used for the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease, hypercalcemia of malignancy, and bone metastases derived from various cancer types. Zoledronate and alendronate, two of the most potent N-BPs, have demonstrated direct tumoricidal activity on tumor cells and immune modulatory effects on myeloid cells and T cells in vitro and in animal models of cancer. However, the rapid renal clearance and sequestration in mineral bone of these drugs in free form severely limit their systemic exposure and applications in cancer patients. Reformulation of N-BPs by encapsulation in liposomal nanoparticles addresses these pharmacokinetic barriers, and liposomal zoledronate and alendronate formulations have been found to increase the anticancer efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapies and adoptive T cell immunotherapies in murine cancer models. Herein, we review the differences in pharmacology between N-BPs versus non-N-BPs (e.g., clodronate), free versus liposomal N-BP formulations, and targeted versus non-targeted liposomal N-BPs, and the clinical and preclinical evidence supporting a role for liposomal N-BPs in the treatment of cancer. We propose that pegylated liposomal alendronate (PLA) has the most potential for clinical translation based on favorable therapeutic index, ability to passively target and accumulate in tumors, proven biocompatibility of the liposome carrier, and preclinical anticancer efficacy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Composição de Medicamentos/métodos , Descoberta de Drogas , Reposicionamento de Medicamentos/métodos , Lipossomos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Difosfonatos/química , Humanos , Lipossomos/químicaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To devise a precise and efficient tool for predicting the individualized risk of acute-phase response (APR) in bisphosphonate (BP)-naive osteoporotic (OP) patients, receiving their first intravenous dose of zoledronate (ZOL). METHODS: The baseline clinical and laboratory data of 475 consecutive BP-naive OP patients, who received their first intravenous dose of ZOL between March 2016 and March 2021 in the Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University, were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were generated to establish candidate predictors of APR fever risk, using three distinct fever thresholds, namely, 37.3 °C (model A), 38.0 °C (model B), and 38.5 °C (model C). Next, using predictor regression coefficients, three fever-threshold nomograms were developed. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of each predicting models were then assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve (CC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). The internal and external model validations were then performed. RESULTS: The stable predictors were age, serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D, serum total calcium, and peripheral blood erythrocytes count. These were negatively associated with the APR fever risk. The AUCs of models A, B, and C were 0.828 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.782 to 0.874), 0.825 (95% CI, 0.767 to 0.883), and 0.879 (95% CI, 0.824 to 0.934), respectively. Good agreement was observed between the predictions and observations in the CCs of all three nomograms. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed and validated nomogram prediction models that can predict APR fever risk in BP-naive OP patients receiving their first infusion of ZOL.
Assuntos
Reação de Fase Aguda , Difosfonatos , Reação de Fase Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Cálcio , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vitamina D , Ácido ZoledrônicoRESUMO
Zoledronate could be contributing to the development of acute kidney injury in a small number of patients. Since estimated glomerular function (eGFR) is simpler to obtain and at least as good a predictor as creatinine clearance (CrCl), it should be used in everyday practice. INTRODUCTION: Zoledronate is widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis. A potential side effect is acute kidney injury (AKI). Advice from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in 2019 stated that CrCl and not estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) should be used and that treatment should not be given if CrCl < 35 ml/min. The objective of this study was to compare our current method of assessing renal function (eGFR) with the method proposed by the MHRA (CrCl) for predicting AKI after zoledronate infusions. METHODS: The evaluation was performed at the Metabolic Bone Centre in Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, UK. Data on all the patients who had zoledronate from 1/09/2015 to 1/10/2020 were included. RESULTS: Data on 4405 patients were retrieved (total number of infusions 7660). Creatinine in the 14 days post-infusion was available for a total of 969 infusions and AKI was observed within 14 days following 45 infusions (4.6%). One patient died due to pneumonia. One patient needed continued haemodialysis. Severe AKI (threefold in creatinine and/or eGFR < 15 ml/min/173 m2) was observed within 1 year following 24 infusions. If the MHRA recommendations had been followed, 996 infusions with baseline CrCl < 35 ml/min would not have been given. Of these, follow-up data on serum creatinine within 14 days were available for 142 infusions, showing AKI in only four (2.8%). Logistic regression showed that both CrCl and eGFR were significant factors in predicting AKI within 14 days, but that the current recommended cut-off of CrCl 35 ml/min had poor sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Since eGFR is at least as good a predictor of AKI as CrCl, and permits the treatment of more patients at high fracture risk, we recommend that eGFR is used to determine renal function for zoledronate treatment. We suggest that the infusion is given over 30 min in patients with eGFR < 50 ml/min/1.73 m2.