S3I-201 derivative incorporating naphthoquinone unit as effective STAT3 inhibitors: Design, synthesis and anti-gastric cancer evaluation.

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is a key regulator of many human cancers and has been widely recognized as a promising target for cancer therapy. A variety of small-molecule inhibitors have been developed for targeting STAT3, and some of them are now undergoing clinical trials. S3I-201, a known STAT3 inhibitor, may block STAT3 function in cancer cells by binding to the STAT3 SH2 domain to disrupt STAT3 protein complex formation. Using S3I-201 as a starting point for drug development, we synthesized a series of new STAT3 inhibitors 9a-x in this study by introducing naphthoquinone unit, a privileged fragment in STAT3 inhibitors. Most of the compounds exhibited strong anti-proliferation activity of gastric cancer cells (MGC803, MKN28, MNK1, and AGS). The representative compound 9n (SIL-14) could effectively inhibit the colony formation and migration of gastric cancer cells MGC803, arrest the cell cycle and induce MGC803 cell apoptosis at low micromolar concentrations in vitro. In addition, SIL-14 can also inhibit the phosphorylation of STAT3 protein and significantly decrease the expression of total STAT3, suggesting that it may exert anticancer effects by blocking the STAT3 signaling pathway. These results support that SIL-14 may be a promising STAT3 inhibitor for the further development of potential anti-gastric cancer candidates.

Evaluation of pharmacotherapy recommendations in guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to systematically assess drug therapy in the guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease and to provide recommendations for the development of such guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search was conducted in databases and on websites to identify guidelines for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Qualified guidelines were assessed through the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). Evidence from the guidelines was extracted from the guidelines themselves. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (OCEBM) evidence grading system was used to regrade and assess this evidence. RESULTS: A total of 11 guidelines for the medical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) (2015-2019) were finally included, and after scoring using the AGREE II tool, the median scores in each domain were as follows: Ⅰ. scope and purpose (median score=88.9%, range: 76.4%-91.7%), Ⅱ. stakeholder involvement (median =38.9%, range: 18.1%-61.1%), Ⅲ. rigour of development (median =69.3%, range: 39.6%-77.6%), Ⅳ. clarity and presentation (median =97.2%, range: 91.7%-100%), Ⅴ. applicability (median =45.8%, range: 24%-68.8%) and Ⅵ. editorial independence (median =94.0%, range: 0-100%). Most of the guidelines scored over 60%, which is worthy of clinical recommendation, but different guidelines suggest that there is a great difference in drug therapy, mainly due to various populations, diverse focuses of attention, distinct efficacy of drugs between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and the preference of guiding developers for select evidence. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The quality of medical treatment guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease varies considerably. Over the past 5 years, medical treatment has been heterogeneous among different guidelines. Consideration of factors leading to heterogeneity of recommendations for drug treatment, especially preferences for evidence selection, will help upgrade the guidelines.

Olsalazine Sodium Increases Renal Urate Excretion by Modulating Urate Transporters in Hyperuricemic Animals.

Hyperuricemia is mainly the result of relative underexcretion of urate. Urate is mainly eliminated by kidney and several important transporters expressed on the membrane of renal tubular cells involved in urate excretion. Olsalazine sodium was screened from 3167 authorized small compounds/drugs, targeting xanthine oxidoreductase. In previous study, we reported that olsalazine sodium significantly reduced the serum urate levels, and the anti-hyperuricemic activity linked with inhibiting urate formation by reducing the activity of xanthine oxidoreductase. The current research aimed to assess olsalazine sodium renal urate excretion and likely molecular mechanism. The results showed that administration of olsalazine sodium 5.0 mg/kg decreased the levels of serum urate in hyperuricemic rats, and noticeably improved the fractional excretion of urate and urate clearance, exhibiting an uricosuric action. Moreover, olsalazine sodium (2.5, 5.0, 10.0 mg/kg) reduced the level of blood urea nitrogen in rats. Further study showed that olsalazine sodium reduced the mRNA expression of urate reabsorptive transporter glucose transporter 9 (GLUT9), increased the mRNA expression of urate secretory transporters, organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1), OAT3 and type 1 sodium-dependent phosphate transporter (NPT1) as well as the protein expression of OAT3 in the kidney in hyperuricemic mice. In conclusion, olsalazine sodium exhibited a promotion of urate excretion in kidney by increasing the expression of OAT3.

New Insights of Oral Colonic Drug Delivery Systems for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapy.

Colonic Drug Delivery Systems (CDDS) are especially advantageous for local treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Site-targeted drug release allows to obtain a high drug concentration in injured tissues and less systemic adverse effects, as consequence of less/null drug absorption in small intestine. This review focused on the reported contributions in the last four years to improve the effectiveness of treatments of inflammatory bowel diseases. The work concludes that there has been an increase in the development of CDDS in which pH, specific enzymes, reactive oxygen species (ROS), or a combination of all of these triggers the release. These delivery systems demonstrated a therapeutic improvement with fewer adverse effects. Future perspectives to the treatment of this disease include the elucidation of molecular basis of IBD diseases in order to design more specific treatments, and the performance of more in vivo assays to validate the specificity and stability of the obtained systems.

Concomitant Use of Aminosalicylates Is Not Associated With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Escalated to Vedolizumab.

Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting α4ß7 leukocyte integrins, has demonstrated efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC).1 However, it remains unclear whether oral aminosalicylates should be continued or stopped after treatment escalation to vedolizumab. Singh et al2 have demonstrated no significant difference in clinical remission, clinical response, or mucosal healing rates between patients treated with or without concomitant aminosalicylates at entry in clinical trials of infliximab or golimumab. We evaluate the impact of concomitant oral aminosalicylates on clinical outcomes for vedolizumab-treated UC patients.

Acetyl-3-Aminoethyl Salicylate Ameliorates Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Liver Graft Survival Through a High-Mobility Group Box 1/Toll-Like Receptor 4-Dependent Mechanism.

In liver transplant cases, severe hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury (HIRI) is a strong predictor of adverse liver graft and overall outcomes. During HIRI, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) promotes hepatocellular death and proinflammatory cytokine secretion by toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). Because salicylates inhibit HMGB1/TLR4 interaction, we hypothesized that salicylates may ameliorate HIRI-induced liver damage by inhibiting HMGB1/TLR4 axis activation. Using a murine model of HIRI, we found that the salicylate acetyl-3-aminoethyl salicylic acid (ac3AESA) reduced serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase as well as Suzuki scores and apoptotic cell counts after HIRI. Ac3AESA also down-regulated hepatocellular HMGB1 and TLR4 expression, phosphorylated inhibitor of κBα, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, cleaved caspase 3, and cleaved caspase 1 levels after HIRI. Ac3AESA reduced liver Kupffer cell transcription of proinflammatory mediators tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL) 6, IL1ß, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL) 1, CXCL2, and CXCL8 after HIRI. Ac3AESA also dose-dependently reduced in vitro release of Kupffer cell TNF-α. Employing a murine orthotopic liver transplantation model, we found daily ac3AESA administration up to day 10 after transplant improved liver graft survival, suppressed allograft damage, and down-regulated HMGB1/TLR4 signaling. These benefits to survival and allograft health were maintained for cold ischemia times of 12 and 18 hours. Notably, TLR4 knockout eliminated all foregoing ac3AESA-induced effects. In conclusion, ac3AESA partially rescues the negative effects of HIRI and prolongs liver graft survival in a TLR4-dependent manner.

The STAT3 inhibitor S3I-201 suppresses fibrogenesis and angiogenesis in liver fibrosis.

Liver fibrosis is a common pathological response to chronic hepatic injury. STAT3 is actively involved in the fibrogenesis and angiogenesis seen in liver fibrosis. S3I-201 (NSC 74859) is a chemical inhibitor of STAT3 activity, which blocks the dimerization of STAT3, STAT3-DNA binding and transcription activity. This study evaluated the effects of S3I-201 against liver fibrosis. S3I-201 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and actin filament formation in primary human hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), as well as the expression of α-SMA, collagen I and TIMP1 in both primary HSC and in a CCl4-induced fibrosis mouse model. S3I-201 induced both apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in the HSC cell line (LX-2). S3I-201 inhibited the expression of fibrogenesis factors TGFß1 and TGFßRII, as well as the downstream phosphorylation of Smad2, Smad3, Akt and ERK induced by TGFß1. In addition to fibrogenesis, both in vitro and in vivo assays showed that S3I-201 inhibited angiogenesis through expression suppression of VEGF and VEGFR2. Moreover, S3I-201 also had a synergistic effect with sorafenib, an FDA approved liver cancer drug, in the proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and fibrogenesis of HSC. S3I-201 suppressed liver fibrosis through multiple mechanisms, and combined with sorafenib, S3I-201 could be a potentially effective antifibrotic agent.

Drug Safety and Risk of Adverse Outcomes for Pregnant Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The management of the pregnant patient with inflammatory bowel disease is complicated by multiple providers, misinformation, and a disease entity that, particularly when active, can adversely affect pregnancy outcomes. This article seeks to frame the debate on medication safety in pregnancy and lactation using the US Food and Drug Administration's new Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule and the most up-to-date safety information to discuss the risks and benefits of using each class of inflammatory bowel disease medication.

Old drug, new indication: Olsalazine sodium reduced serum uric acid levels in mice via inhibiting xanthine oxidoreductase activity.

Hyperuricemia, a long-term purine metabolic disorder, is a well-known risk factor for gout, hypertension and diabetes. In maintaining normal whole-body purine levels, xanthine oxidase (XOD) is a key enzyme in the purine metabolic pathway, as it catalyzes the oxidation of hypoxanthine to xanthine and finally to uric acid. Here we used the protein-ligand docking software idock to virtually screen potential XOD inhibitors from 3167 approved small compounds/drugs. The inhibitory activities of the ten compounds with the highest scores were tested on XOD in vitro. Interestingly, all the ten compounds inhibited the activity of XOD at certain degrees. Particularly, the anti-ulcerative-colitis drug olsalazine sodium demonstrated a great inhibitory activity for XOD (IC50 = 3.4 mg/L). Enzymatic kinetic studies revealed that the drug was a hybrid-type inhibitor of xanthine oxidase. Furthermore, the drug strikingly decreased serum urate levels, serum/hepatic activities of XOD at a dose-dependent manner in vivo. Thus, we demonstrated a successful hunting process of compounds/drugs for hyperuricemia through virtual screening, supporting a potential usage of olsalazine sodium in the treatment of hyperuricemia.

Placebo response and remission rates in randomised trials of induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: It is important to minimize placebo rates in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to efficiently detect treatment differences between interventions. Historically, high placebo rates have been observed in clinical trials of ulcerative colitis (UC). A better understanding of factors influencing placebo rates may lead to more informed clinical trial design. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate placebo response and remission rates in RCTs evaluating UC treatments in adult patients. SEARCH METHODS: Electronic databases (i.e. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) were searched from inception to 1 March 2017 with no language restrictions applied. Reference lists and conference proceedings of major gastroenterology meetings were also handsearched to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Placebo-controlled RCTs of adult patients with UC treated with corticosteroids, aminosalicylates, immunosuppressives or biologics were eligible, provided enrolment and outcome assessment was conducted using the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) or the Mayo Clinic Score. The minimum trial duration was two weeks for induction trials and four months maintenance trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pairs of authors independently determined study eligibility and extracted data with any disagreements resolved through consensus. Outcomes of interest included the proportion of patients with clinical response and remission. Trial characteristics such as the design, participant demographics and disease history, interventions, and enrolment and assessment criteria were also recorded. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pooled placebo response and remission rates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using a binomial normal model for proportions. Induction of remission and maintenance studies were pooled separately. The impact of study-level characteristics on placebo response and remission rates was investigated using mixed-effects meta-regression analyses with logits of event rates as the outcome variables. An assessment of pooled placebo rates over time was conducted using a cumulative meta-analysis based on date of publication. Publication bias was examined using funnel plots. MAIN RESULTS: The screening process identified 61 included studies which encompass 58 induction phases (5111 patients randomised to placebo) and 12 maintenance phases (1579 patients randomised to placebo). For induction trials, the pooled estimate of placebo response was 33% (95% CI 30% to 36%) while the pooled estimate of placebo remission was 12% (95% CI 9% to 15%). For maintenance trials, the pooled estimate of placebo response was 23% (95% CI 19% to 28%) while the pooled estimate of placebo remission was 17% (95% CI 10% to 27%).Studies enrolling patients with more active disease confirmed objectively by endoscopy were associated with significantly lower placebo remission and response rates than trials enrolling patients with less active disease (27% versus 4%, OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.25 to 5.42, P = 0.01 for UCDAI endoscopy sub score ≥1 versus ≥ 2 for remission; and 27% versus 4%, OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.82, P = 0.02 for UCDAI endoscopy sub score greater than or equal to one versus greater than or equal to two for response). With respect to drug class, the lowest placebo response and remission rates were observed in trials evaluating corticosteroids (23%; 95% CI 19 to 29%, and 5%; 95% CI 2 to 11%, respectively). Trials of biologics had the highest placebo response rate (35%; 95% CI 30 to 41%), while trials evaluating aminosalicylates had the highest placebo remission rate (18%; 95% CI 12 to 24%). Disease duration of greater than five years prior to enrolment was associated with a significantly lower placebo response rate compared to disease duration of less than or equal to five years (29% versus 47%, respectively; OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.92, P = 0.02). The requirement of a minimum rectal bleeding score for study eligibility was associated with an increased placebo response rate compared to studies that did not use rectal bleeding for trial eligibility (37% versus 32%, respectively; OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.82, P = 0.02). Finally, the time point of primary outcome assessment was found to be significantly associated with placebo remission rates such that every one week increment in endpoint assessment was associated with a 6% increase in the placebo remission rate (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10, P = 0.01).Cumulative meta-analysis indicated a consistent increase in the placebo response rate from 1987 to 2007 (from 13% to 33%), although rates have remained constant from 2008 to 2015 (32% to 34%). Similarly, placebo remission rates increased from 1987 to 2007 (5% to 14%) but have remained constant from 2008 to 2015 (12 to 14%). On meta-regression, there were no statistically significant differences between the 1987-2007 and 2008-2015 point estimates for both response (P = 0.81) and remission (P = 0.32). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Placebo response and remission rates vary according to endoscopic disease severity and rectal bleeding score at trial entry, class of agent, disease duration, and the time point at which the primary outcome was measured. These observations have important implications for the design and conduct of future clinical trials in UC and will help researchers design trials, determine required sample sizes and also provide useful information about trial design features which should be considered when planning new trials.

[Inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy and childbirth]. / Tehotenství a porod zen s idiopatickými strevními zánety.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to give basic information about inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) during pregnancy, to highlight the importance of treatment in pregnancy and also show our own experience with the issue. DESIGN: Original work - a retrospective study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Horovice. RESULTS: We provide basic overview information about inheritance, fertility, mutual influence of IBD and pregnancy therapy in pregnancy and childbirth options for patients with IBD. We present also the results of the group of 17 patients with varying degrees of disability IBD (including patients after previous surgeries - bowel resection, hemicolectomy, ileostomy or with a pouch) that gave birth to our workplace. CONCLUSION: A crucial factor for good results is the degree of inflammation at the time of conception and during pregnancy. If the disease is inactive and nutrition of the diseased sufficient, there is no decrease in fertility, course of pregnancy is seamless, there is no greater risk of deterioration of disease in pregnancy and pregnancy do not differ from the normal population. The opposite situation occurs if there is a pregnancy at the time of disease activity. Then up to 75% pregnancy courses with big problems, fertility is declining, inflammation is also worsening and the risk of exacerbations increases during pregnancy, which aggravates the course of pregnancy and childbirth and has a negative effect on the fetus. Pregnancy is therefore necessary to plan for a longer period of disease stabilization and continue chronic medication and not discontinue drugs for fear of negative impact of medications on fetal development. On the contrary, active inflammation of the mother during pregnancy poses a greater risk to the fetus than adequate treatment. Commonly used drugs-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and biological therapy appears to be safe and well tolerated during pregnancy. Method of delivery is individual and depends on the form and location of the inflammation and the preceding operations.

Treatment of Diverticular Disease With Aminosalicylates: The Evidence.

Colonic diverticulosis is an increasingly common condition in Western industrialized countries. About 20% of patients develop symptoms, including abdominal pain, bloating, changes in bowel habits, and, eventually, diverticulitis or other complications. The management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) and the prevention of acute diverticulitis remains a challenge for the clinician. The rationale for the use of aminosalicylates, such as mesalazine, is based on the assumption of low-grade inflammation in SUDD and symptoms generation, whereas an overt inflammation may induce diverticulitis in patients with diverticular disease. Clinical scenarios in which the efficacy and safety of mesalazine have been studied include SUDD, prevention of diverticulitis, and of recurrent diverticulitis. Data from uncontrolled studies suggest a benefit of mesalazine on patients with SUDD, whereas data from randomized controlled trials showed some evidence of improvement of symptoms, although contrasting results are reported. The largest study so far published on the efficacy of mesalamine in the prevention of recurrence of diverticulitis showed that mesalamine was not superior to placebo. At this time, the role of mesalazine in the prevention of acute diverticulitis remains to be defined with many issues open and unresolved.

Aminosalicylates for induction of remission or response in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials investigating the efficacy of aminosalicylates for the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease have yielded conflicting results. A systematic review was conducted to critically examine current available data on the efficacy of sulfasalazine and mesalamine for inducing remission or clinical response in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of aminosalicylates compared to placebo, corticosteroids, and other aminosalicylates (alone or in combination with corticosteroids) for the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. SEARCH METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Library from inception to June 2015 to identify relevant studies. There were no language restrictions. We also searched reference lists from potentially relevant papers and review articles, as well as proceedings from annual meetings (1991-2015) of the American Gastroenterological Association and American College of Gastroenterology. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of sulfasalazine or mesalamine in the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease compared to placebo, corticosteroids, and other aminosalicylates (alone or in combination with corticosteroids) were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and assessment of methodological quality was independently performed by the investigators and any disagreement was resolved by discussion and consensus. We assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE criteria. The primary outcome measure was a well defined clinical endpoint of induction of remission or response to treatment. Secondary outcomes included mean Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) scores, adverse events, serious adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. For dichotomous outcomes we calculated the pooled risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. For continuous outcomes we calculated the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI using a random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses based on a fixed-effect model and duration of therapy were conducted where appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty studies (2367 patients) were included. Two studies were judged to be at high risk of bias due to lack of blinding. Eight studies were judged to be at high risk of bias due to incomplete outcomes data (high drop-out rates) and potential selective reporting. The other 10 studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. A non-significant trend in favour of sulfasalazine over placebo for inducing remission was observed, with benefit confined mainly to patients with Crohn's colitis. Forty-five per cent (63/141) of sulfasalazine patients entered remission at 17-18 weeks compared to 29% (43/148) of placebo patients (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.89, 2 studies). A GRADE analysis rated the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome as moderate due to sparse data (106 events). There was no difference between sulfasalazine and placebo in adverse event outcomes. Sulfasalazine was significantly less effective than corticosteroids and inferior to combination therapy with corticosteroids (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.86, 1 study, 110 patients). Forty-three per cent (55/128) of sulfasalazine patients entered remission at 17 to 18 weeks compared to 60% (79/132) of corticosteroid patients (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.91; 2 studies, 260 patients). A GRADE analysis rated the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome as moderate due to sparse data (134 events). Sulfasalazine patients experienced significantly fewer adverse events than corticosteroid patients (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.82; 1 study, 159 patients). There was no difference between sulfasalazine and corticosteroids in serious adverse events or withdrawal due to adverse events. Olsalazine was less effective than placebo in a single trial (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.71; 91 patients). Low dose mesalamine (1 to 2 g/day) was not superior to placebo for induction of remission. Twenty-three per cent (43/185) of low dose mesalamine patients entered remission at week 6 compared to 15% (18/117) of placebo patients (RR = 1.46, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.40; n = 302). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to risk of bias (incomplete outcome data) and sparse data (61 events). There was no difference between low dose mesalamine and placebo in the proportion of patients who had adverse events (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.96; 3 studies, 342 patients) or withdrew due to adverse events (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.95; 3 studies, 342 patients). High dose controlled-release mesalamine (4 g/day) was not superior to placebo, inducing a clinically non significant reduction in CDAI (MD -19.8 points, 95% CI -46.2 to 6.7; 3 studies, 615 patients), and was also inferior to budesonide (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.78; 1 study, 182 patients, GRADE = low). While high dose delayed-release mesalamine (3 to 4.5 g/day) was not superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.75 to 5.45; 1 study, 38 patients, GRADE = very low), no significant difference in efficacy was found when compared to conventional corticosteroids (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36; 3 studies, 178 patients, GRADE = moderate) or budesonide (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.05; 1 study, 307 patients, GRADE = moderate). However, these trials were limited by risk of bias (incomplete outcome data) and sparse data (small numbers of events). There was a lack of good quality clinical trials comparing sulfasalazine with other mesalamine formulations. Adverse events that were commonly reported included headache, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Sulfasalazine is only modestly effective with a trend towards benefit over placebo and is inferior to corticosteroids for the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. Olsalazine and low dose mesalamine (1 to 2 g/day) are not superior to placebo. High dose mesalamine (3.2 to 4 g/day) is not more effective than placebo for inducing response or remission. However, trials assessing the efficacy of high dose mesalamine (4 to 4.5 g/day) compared to budesonide yielded conflicting results and firm conclusions cannot be made. Future large randomized controlled trials are needed to provide definitive evidence on the efficacy of aminosalicylates in active Crohn's disease.

[Determination of in vitro synergy by a checkerboard method when 3 core antimicrobial agents of the retreatment new scheme combined against MDR-MTB and XDR-MTB].

OBJECTIVE: In order to detect the in vitro synergistic effect of 4 drugs-pasiniazid (PA), moxifloxacin, rifabutin and rifapentini on multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis (MDR-MTB) and extensively drug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis(XDR-MTB), which were core drugs of"The program of retreatment research of tuberculosis". METHOD: The checkerboard method was used to detect the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antituberculosis drug combination schemes (moxifloxacin-PA, moxifloxacin-PA-rifabutin and moxifloxacin-PA-rifapentini) to 40 strains of clinical drug resistant MTB(20 strains of MDR-MTB and 20 XDR-MTB) and the standard strain H37Rv, by calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration index of joint action in vitro to judge the combined effect, with fractional inhibitory concentration index(FICI)≤0.5 and FICI≤0.75 as the basis of 2 drugs and 3 drugs showing synergy. RESULTS: The FICI of moxifloxacin-PA scheme for DR-MTB was 0.125 to 1.000, only 5 strains with a FICI ≤0.5, showing synergistic effect. The FICI of moxifloxacin-Pa-rifabutin scheme with 20 strains of MDR-MTB ranged from 0.310 to 1.260, 10 strains with a FICI≤0.75, showing synergistic effect. The FICI of moxifloxacin-PA-rifabutin scheme with 20 strains of XDR-MTB ranged from 0.215 to 1.250, 11 strains with a FICI≤0.75, showing synergistic effect. The FICI of moxifloxacin-PA-rifapentini scheme with 20 strains of MDR-MTB ranged from 0.150 to 0.780, 19 strains with a FICI≤0.75, showing synergistic effect. The FICI of moxifloxacin-PA-rifapentini scheme with 20 strains of XDR-MTB ranged from 0.200 to 1.280, 16 strains with a FICI≤0.75, showing synergistic effect. CONCLUSIONS: The synergistic effect of moxifloxacin-PA scheme was poor, but showing better synergy when further combined with rifabutin or rifapentini. Rifabutin showed better effect than rifapentini, but the synergistic effect of moxifloxacin-PA-rifabutin combination scheme was poor than that of moxifloxacin-PA-rifapentini combination scheme.

Subcutaneous golimumab maintains clinical response in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Subcutaneous golimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), was evaluated as maintenance therapy in TNFα antagonist-naive adults with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis, despite conventional therapy, who responded to golimumab induction therapy. METHODS: We performed a phase 3, double-blind trial of patients who completed golimumab induction trials (Program of Ulcerative Colitis Research Studies Utilizing an Investigational Treatment, eg, PURSUIT). Patients who responded to induction therapy with golimumab (n = 464) were assigned randomly to groups given placebo or injections of 50 or 100 mg golimumab every 4 weeks through week 52. Patients who responded to placebo in the induction study continued to receive placebo. Nonresponders in the induction study received 100 mg golimumab. The primary end point was clinical response maintained through week 54; secondary end points included clinical remission and mucosal healing at both weeks 30 and 54. RESULTS: Clinical response was maintained through week 54 in 47.0% of patients receiving 50 mg golimumab, 49.7% of patients receiving 100 mg golimumab, and 31.2% of patients receiving placebo (P = .010 and P < .001, respectively). At weeks 30 and 54, a higher percentage of patients who received 100 mg golimumab were in clinical remission and had mucosal healing (27.8% and 42.4%) than patients given placebo (15.6% and 26.6%; P = .004 and P = .002, respectively) or 50 mg golimumab (23.2% and 41.7%, respectively). Percentages of serious adverse events were 7.7%, 8.4%, and 14.3% among patients given placebo, 50 mg, or 100 mg golimumab, respectively; percentages of serious infections were 1.9%, 3.2%, and 3.2%, respectively. Among all patients given golimumab in the study, 3 died (from sepsis, tuberculosis, and cardiac failure, all in patients who received 100 mg golimumab) and 4 developed active tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Golimumab (50 mg or 100 mg) maintained clinical response through week 54 in patients who responded to induction therapy with golimumab and had moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis; patients who received 100 mg golimumab had clinical remission and mucosal healing at weeks 30 and 54. Safety was consistent with that reported for other TNFα antagonists and golimumab in other approved indications. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00488631.

Subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response and remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the efficacy of golimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α, for treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated subcutaneous golimumab induction therapy in TNF-α antagonist-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC despite conventional treatment. METHODS: We integrated double-blind phase 2 dose-finding and phase 3 dose-confirmation trials in a study of 1064 adults with UC (Mayo score: 6-12; endoscopic subscore ≥ 2; 774 patients in phase 3). Patients were randomly assigned to groups given golimumab doses of 100 mg and then 50 mg (phase 2 only), 200 mg and then 100 mg, or 400 mg and then 200 mg, 2 weeks apart. The phase 3 primary end point was week-6 clinical response. Secondary end points included week-6 clinical remission, mucosal healing, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score change. RESULTS: In phase 2, median changes from baseline in the Mayo score were -1.0, -3.0, -2.0, and -3.0, in the groups given placebo, 100 mg/50 mg, 200/100 mg, and 400/200 mg golimumab, respectively. In phase 3, rates of clinical response at week 6 were 51.0% and 54.9% among patients given 200 mg/100 mg and 400 mg/200 mg golimumab, respectively, vs 30.3% among those given placebo (both, P ≤ .0001). Rates of clinical remission and mucosal healing and mean changes in IBDQ scores were significantly greater in both golimumab groups vs the placebo group (P ≤ .0014, all comparisons). Rates of serious adverse events were 6.1% and 3.0%, and rates of serious infection were 1.8% and 0.5%, in the placebo and golimumab groups, respectively. One patient in the 400 mg/200 mg group died as a result of surgical complications of an ischiorectal abscess. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with subcutaneous golimumab induces clinical response, remission, and mucosal healing, and increases quality of life in larger percentages of patients with active UC than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT00487539.

Limited risks of major congenital anomalies in children of mothers with IBD and effects of medications.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Concerns persist about the risk of major congenital anomalies in children of women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and whether medication use affects risk. We assessed these risks, and variations in use of medications by women with IBD before, during, and after pregnancy. METHODS: We accessed data on children born to women 15-45 y old from 1990 through 2010, using a mother-child linked dataset from an electronic database of primary care records containing medical diagnoses, events, and drug prescriptions from across the United Kingdom. We identified pregnant women with IBD, and all prescriptions for 5-aminosalicylates azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, and corticosteroids were extracted from their primary care records. We calculated risks of major congenital anomaly in children of mothers with and without IBD, and in children exposed or not exposed to 5-aminosalicylates, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, or corticosteroids during their first trimester of fetal development. Logistic regression with a generalized estimating equation was used to provide risk estimates adjusted for confounders. We calculated proportions of women taking medications before, during, and after pregnancy and assessed whether cessation was associated with subsequent disease flares. RESULTS: Risks of a major congenital anomaly in 1703 children of mothers with IBD and 384,811 children of mothers without IBD were 2.7% and 2.8%, respectively. This corresponded to an adjusted odds ratio of 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.31). In children of women with IBD, the adjusted odds ratios of a major congenital anomaly associated with drug use were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.42-1.61) for 5-aminosalicylates 0.48 (95% CI, 0.15-1.50) for corticosteroids, and 1.27 (95% CI, 0.48-3.39) for azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine. No increases in heart, limb, or genital anomalies were found in children of women with IBD; 31.2% of women discontinued 5-aminosalicylates and 24.6% discontinued azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine in early pregnancy. The risk of flares later in pregnancy was not related to cessation of medication. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that IBD during pregnancy or medical therapy for IBD during pregnancy increases the risk of a major congenital anomaly in children. Patients should receive appropriate guidance on use of medication before and during pregnancy.

Postoperative Effects of Thiopurines in Patients with Intestinal Behçet's Disease.

BACKGROUND: No studies have heretofore specifically focused on the efficacy of postoperative thiopurine therapy in intestinal Behçet's disease (BD). We conducted this study to assess the clinical effects of postoperative thiopurines in patients with intestinal BD. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients with intestinal BD who had undergone bowel resection surgery in a single tertiary academic medical center between 1991 and 2013. The cumulative probabilities of clinical recurrence were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictive factors for recurrence were assessed by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients with intestinal BD received 5-ASA (n = 50, 64.9%) or thiopurine (n = 27, 35.1%) therapy after surgery at our center. The postoperative recurrence rate was lower in patients who received postoperative thiopurines (P = 0.050). The hazard ratio for recurrence was 0.636 (95% confidence interval 0.130-1.016, P = 0.053) for postoperative thiopurine use compared with postoperative 5-ASA. However, the rates of re-operation, re-admission, and death were not significantly different between the 5-ASA and thiopurine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Thiopurine therapy after surgery exhibited a modest effect in preventing recurrence in intestinal BD patients. More patients, long-term follow-up, and a randomized controlled design are necessary to validate the effectiveness of postoperative thiopurines in patients with this disease.

Anti-TNF-A Therapy about Infliximab and Adalimamab for the Effectiveness in Ulcerative Colitis Compared with Conventional Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: TNF-α has an important role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). It seems that anti-TNF-α therapy is beneficial in the treatment of UC. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of Infliximab and Adalimamab with UC compared with con- ventional therapy. METHODOLOGY: The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for studies investigating the efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab on UC. RESULTS: Infliximab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical response (RR = 1.67; 95% CI 1.12 to 2.50) of UC compared with conventional therapy, but those had not a statistically significant effects in clinical remission (RR = 1.63; 95% CI 0.84 to 3.18) and reduction of colectomy rate (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.12) of UC. And adalimumab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical remission (RR =1.82; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.67) and clinical response (RR =1.36; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.64) of UC compared with conventional therapy. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analyses suggested that Infliximab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical response of UC compared with conventional therapy and adalimumab had a statistically significant effects in induction of clinical remission and clinical response of UC compared with conventional therapy.

The use of biologic therapy in pregnancy: a gastroenterologist's perspective.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often affects women in their peak reproductive years, and therapy is often continued during pregnancy to maintain stable disease activity. Therapeutic options have expanded over the last 2 decades with the advent of new biologic options. It is, therefore, important for the gastroenterologists and other clinicians caring for patients with IBD to understand safety data regarding the treatment options, both biologic and nonbiologic, in pregnant IBD patients. RECENT FINDINGS: In general, quality of evidence in this area remains low. However, larger prospective studies are beginning to provide evidence regarding the potential safety of biologics both alone and in conjunction with nonbiologic therapy. SUMMARY: The majority of treatment options for IBD appears to be of low risk and may often be continued through pregnancy and lactation. Not treating IBD, for example, by discontinuing therapy prior to or with pregnancy, may pose a greater risk to mother and fetus in many cases.