Aurora kinase A regulates liver regeneration through macrophages polarization and Wnt/ß-catenin signalling.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver regeneration is a complex process regulated by a variety of cells, cytokines and biological pathways. Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a role in centrosome maturation and spindle formation during the cell division cycle. The purpose of this study was to further explore the mechanism of AURKA on liver regeneration and to identify new possible targets for liver regeneration. METHODS: The effect and mechanism of AURKA on liver regeneration were studied using a 70% hepatectomy model. Human liver organoids were used as an in vitro model to investigate the effect of AURKA on hepatocyte proliferation. RESULTS: AURKA inhibition significantly reduced the level of ß-catenin protein by reducing the phosphorylation level of glycogen synthase kinase-3ß (GSK-3ß), leading to the inhibition of liver regeneration. Further studies showed that AURKA co-localized and interacted with GSK-3ß in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes. When phosphorylation of GSK-3ß was enhanced, the total GSK-3ß level remained unchanged, while AURKA was not affected, and ß-catenin protein levels were increased. In addition, AURKA inhibition affected the formation and proliferation of human liver organoids. Furthermore, AURKA inhibition led to the polarization of M1 macrophages and the release of interleukin-6 and Tumour necrosis factor α, which also led to reduced liver regeneration and increased liver injury. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide more details on the mechanism of liver regeneration and suggest that AURKA is an important regulator of this mechanism.

A kinase-independent function for AURORA-A in replisome assembly during DNA replication initiation.

The catalytic activity of human AURORA-A kinase (AURKA) regulates mitotic progression, and its frequent overexpression in major forms of epithelial cancer is associated with aneuploidy and carcinogenesis. Here, we report an unexpected, kinase-independent function for AURKA in DNA replication initiation whose inhibition through a class of allosteric inhibitors opens avenues for cancer therapy. We show that genetic depletion of AURKA, or its inhibition by allosteric but not catalytic inhibitors, blocks the G1-S cell cycle transition. A catalytically inactive AURKA mutant suffices to overcome this block. We identify a multiprotein complex between AURKA and the replisome components MCM7, WDHD1 and POLD1 formed during G1, and demonstrate that allosteric but not catalytic inhibitors prevent the chromatin assembly of functional replisomes. Indeed, allosteric but not catalytic AURKA inhibitors sensitize cancer cells to inhibition of the CDC7 kinase subunit of the replication-initiating factor DDK. Thus, our findings define a mechanism essential for replisome assembly during DNA replication initiation that is vulnerable to inhibition as combination therapy in cancer.

Size matters! Aurora A controls Drosophila larval development.

In metazoans, organisms arising from a fertilized egg, the embryo will develop through multiple series of cell divisions, both symmetric and asymmetric, leading to differentiation. Aurora A is a serine threonine kinase highly involved in such divisions. While intensively studied at the cell biology level, its function in the development of a whole organism has been neglected. Here we investigated the pleiotropic effect of Aurora A loss-of-function in Drosophila larval early development. We report that Aurora A is required for proper larval development timing control through direct and indirect means. In larval tissues, Aurora A is required for proper symmetric division rate and eventually development speed as we observed in central brain, wing disc and ring gland. Moreover, Aurora A inactivation induces a reduction of ecdysteroids levels and a pupariation delay as an indirect consequence of ring gland development deceleration. Finally, although central brain development is initially restricted, we confirmed that brain lobe size eventually increases due to additive phenotypes: delayed pupariation and over-proliferation of cells with an intermediate cell-identity between neuroblast and ganglion mother cell resulting from defective asymmetric neuroblast cell division.

Aurora kinase A is required for hematopoiesis but is dispensable for murine megakaryocyte endomitosis and differentiation.

Aurora kinase A (AURKA) is a therapeutic target in acute megakaryocytic leukemia. However, its requirement in normal hematopoiesis and megakaryocyte development has not been extensively characterized. Based on its role as a cell cycle regulator, we predicted that an Aurka deficiency would lead to severe abnormalities in all hematopoietic lineages. Here we reveal that loss of Aurka in hematopoietic cells causes profound cell autonomous defects in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. Surprisingly, in contrast to the survival defects of nearly all hematopoietic lineages, deletion of Aurka was associated with increased differentiation and polyploidization of megakaryocytes both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, in contrast to other cell types examined, megakaryocytes continued DNA synthesis after loss of Aurka. Thus, like other cell cycle regulators such as Aurkb and survivin, Aurka is required for hematopoiesis, but is dispensable for megakaryocyte endomitosis. Our work supports a growing body of evidence that the megakaryocyte endomitotic cell cycle differs significantly from the proliferative cell cycle.

The potential role of the NEK6, AURKA, AURKB, and PAK1 genes in adenomatous colorectal polyps and colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Colorectal adenomatous polyp (CRAP) is a major risk factor for the development of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). Histone modifications are one of the epigenetic mechanisms that may have key roles in the carcinogenesis of CRC. The objective of the present study is to investigate the alternations in the defined histone modification gene expression profiles in patients with CRAP and CRC. Histone modification enzyme key gene expressions of the CRC, CRAP, and control groups were evaluated and compared using the reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) array method. Gene expression analysis was performed in the CRAP group after dividing the patients into subgroups according to the polyp diameter, pathological results, and morphological parameters which are risk factors for developing CRC in patients with CRAP. PAK1, NEK6, AURKA, AURKB, HDAC1, and HDAC7 were significantly more overexpressed in CRC subjects compared to the controls (p < 0.05). PAK1, NEK6, AURKA, AURKB, and HDAC1 were significantly more overexpressed in the CRAP group compared to the controls (p < 0.005). There were no significant differences between the CRAP and CRC groups with regards to PAK1, NEK6, AURKA, or AURKB gene overexpression. PAK1, NEK6, AURKA, and AURKB were significantly in correlation with the polyp diameter as they were more overexpressed in polyps with larger diameters. In conclusion, overexpressions of NEK6, AURKA, AURKB, and PAK1 genes can be used as predictive markers to decide the colonoscopic surveillance intervals after the polypectomy procedure especially in polyps with larger diameters.

Repeated Aurora-A siRNA Transfection Results in Effective Apoptosis of A549 Cells Compared to Single Transfection.

BACKGROUND: Suppression of Aurora kinase A (Aurora-A, AURKA) by Aurora-A siRNA has been proposed for lung tumor treatment. However, protocols using single administration have shown little benefit in some types of lung tumor. Given that transfection efficiency of Aurora-A siRNA is low due to tightly packed cells in the tumor, we hypothesized that repeated administration would result in efficient cell apoptosis. METHODS: We compared single vs. repeated transfection (thrice) in A549 cells by transfecting Aurora-A siRNA (siA) on the 1st or 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after cell seeding. A random sequence was used as the negative siRNA control (siC). Cells in the single transfection group received only transfection reagent without siRNAs on the 2nd and 3rd day. RESULTS: Two days after the third transfection, both single and repeated siA administration decreased mRNA expression of Aurora-A and cell viability compared to no administration and siC single administration. However, the decrease in these two indices with repeated transfection was more obvious than that following single administration: cell viability decreased to 72.8 ± 3.05% (p < 0.05) following siA single transfection and to 64.2 ± 1.99% (p < 0.05) following siA repeated transfection, compared with normal control cells, respectively. Gene expression decreased to 17 ± 16.6% (p < 0.05 vs. normal control) following siA repeated transfection and to 43.2 ± 13.0% (p < 0.05 vs. normal control) following siA single transfection. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to single transfection, repeated Aurora-A siRNA transfection decreased Aurora-A, which, in turn, resulted in effective apoptosis of A549 cells.

Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: novel morphological insights and future therapeutic perspectives.

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an aggressive variant of prostate cancer that commonly arises in later stages of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) The detection of NEPC has clinical implications as these patients are often treated with platinum chemotherapy rather than with androgen receptor targeted therapies. The poor molecular characterization of NEPC accounts in part for the lack of disease specific therapeutics. Several mechanisms are involved in NE differentiation, including inflammation and autophagy, and may actually represent future therapeutic targets for advanced NEPC patients. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests a potential role of circulating tumor cells in the early diagnosis and treatment of NEPC. Here we summarize the recent findings on NEPC pathogenesis and we discuss the ongoing clinical trials and future perspectives for the treatment of NEPC patients.

Aurora-A controls cancer cell radio- and chemoresistance via ATM/Chk2-mediated DNA repair networks.

High expression of Aurora kinase A (Aurora-A) has been found to confer cancer cell radio- and chemoresistance, however, the underlying mechanism is unclear. In this study, by using Aurora-A cDNA/shRNA or the specific inhibitor VX680, we show that Aurora-A upregulates cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and anchorage-independent growth to enhance cell resistance to cisplatin and X-ray irradiation through dysregulation of DNA damage repair networks. Mechanistic studies showed that Aurora-A promoted the expression of ATM/Chk2, but suppressed the expression of BRCA1/2, ATR/Chk1, p53, pp53 (Ser15), H2AX, γH2AX (Ser319), and RAD51. Aurora-A inhibited the focus formation of γH2AX in response to ionizing irradiation. Treatment of cells overexpressing Aurora-A and ATM/Chk2 with the ATM specific inhibitor KU-55933 increased the cell sensitivity to cisplatin and irradiation through increasing the phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 and inhibiting the expression of Chk2, γH2AX (Ser319), and RAD51. Further study revealed that BRCA1/2 counteracted the function of Aurora-A to suppress the expression of ATM/Chk2, but to activate the expression of ATR/Chk1, pp53, γH2AX, and RAD51, leading to the enhanced cell sensitivity to irradiation and cisplatin, which was also supported by the results from animal assays. Thus, our data provide strong evidences that Aurora-A and BRCA1/2 inversely control the sensitivity of cancer cells to radio- and chemotherapy through the ATM/Chk2-mediated DNA repair networks, indicating that the DNA repair molecules including ATM/Chk2 may be considered for the targeted therapy against cancers with overexpression of Aurora-A.

Aurora A overexpression in breast cancer patients induces taxane resistance and results in worse prognosis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the expression level of Aurora A in human breast cancer tissues and to test whether there is a relationship between its expression levels and clinicopathological parameters including response to taxanes, tumor grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, and overall survival (OS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 49 metastatic breast cancer patients whose clinical outcomes had been tracked after taxane treatment. The expression status of Aurora A was defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the anti-Aurora A antibody. RESULTS: Aurora A was overexpressed in 73% of the examined specimens. There was significant correlation between high Aurora A expression and decreased taxane sensitivity (p=0.02). There was no association between the clinicopathological parameters including histologic grade, ER positivity and triple negative molecular subtype and the level of Aurora A expression. However, HER2 positive tumors showed significantly higher Aurora A expression compared with HER2 negative tumors (p=0.02). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis failed to show a significant correlation between expression levels of Aurora A and OS although patients with low Aurora A levels had a marginally longer survival compared to patients with high levels. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that Aurora A may be a promising predictive and prognostic marker in patients with breast cancer.

Aurora-A contributes to cisplatin resistance and lymphatic metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer and predicts poor prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based chemotherapy improves survival among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the efficiency is limited due to resistance. In this study, we aimed to identify the expression of Aurora-A and its correlation with cisplatin resistance and prognosis in NSCLC. METHODS: We used immunohistochemical analysis to determine the expression of Aurora-A protein in 102 NSCLC patients treated by surgery and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The prognostic significances were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox models. The potential role of Aurora-A in the regulation of cisplatin resistance in NSCLC cells was examined by transfections using expression vector and small interfering RNA or using small-molecule inhibitors. RESULTS: Aurora-A expression was significantly associated with clinical stage (p = 0.018), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.038) and recurrence (p = 0.005), and was an independent prognostic parameter in multivariate analysis. High level of Aurora-A expression predicted poorer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In vitro data showed that Aurora-A expression was elevated in cisplatin-resistant lung cancer cells, and overexpression or knockdown of Aurora-A resulted in increased or decreased cellular resistance to cisplatin. Furthermore, inhibition of Aurora-A reversed the migration ability of cisplatin-resistant cells. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that high Aurora-A expression is correlated with cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic resistance and predicts poor patient survival in NSCLC. Aurora-A might serve as a predictive biomarker of drug response and therapeutic target to reverse chemotherapy resistance.

Aurora-A: a potential DNA repair modulator.

It is well-known that overexpression of Aurora-A promotes tumorigenesis, but the role of Aurora-A in the development of cancer has not been fully investigated. Recent studies indicate that Aurora-A may confer cancer cell chemo- and radioresistance through dysregulation of cell cycle progression and DNA damage response. Direct evidences from literatures suggest that Aurora-A inhibits pRb, p53, p21(waf1/cip1), and p27(cip/kip) but enhances Plk1, CDC25, CDK1, and cyclin B1 to repeal cell cycle checkpoints and to promote cell cycle progression. Other studies indicate that Aurora-A suppresses BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51, poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP), and gamma-H2AX to dysregulate DNA damage response. Aurora-A may also interact with RAS and Myc to control DNA repair indirectly. In this review, we summarized the potential role of Aurora-A in DNA repair from the current literatures and concluded that Aurora-A may function as a DNA repair modulator to control cancer cell radio- and chemosensitivity, and that Aurora-A-associated DNA repair molecules may be considered for targeted cancer therapy.

Biology of Aurora A kinase: implications in cancer manifestation and therapy.

The Aurora A kinase belongs to serine/threonine group of kinases, well known for its role in cell cycle, especially in the regulation of mitosis. Numerous substrates of Aurora A kinase have been identified, which are predominantly related to cell cycle progression while some of them are transcription factors. Aurora A-mediated phosphorylation can either directly or indirectly regulate the function of its substrates. There are overwhelming evidences which report overexpression and gene amplification of Aurora A in several human cancers, and suggest that Aurora A could be a bona fide oncogene involved in tumorigenesis. Hence, Aurora A plays wide-ranging roles in both mitosis and its deregulation manifests in cancer progression. These observations have favored the choice of Aurora kinases as a target for cancer therapy. Recently, numerous small molecules have been discovered against Aurora kinases and many have entered clinical trials. Most of these small-molecule modulators designed are specific against either Aurora A or Aurora B, but some are dual inhibitors targeting the ATP-binding site which is highly conserved among the three human homologues of Aurora kinase. In this review, we discuss the physiological functions of Aurora A, interactions between Aurora A kinase and its cellular substrates, tumorigenesis mediated by Aurora A kinase upon overexpression, and small-molecule modulators of Aurora kinase as targets for cancer therapy.

Mitochondrial Aurora kinase A induces mitophagy by interacting with MAP1LC3 and Prohibitin 2.

Epithelial and haematologic tumours often show the overexpression of the serine/threonine kinase AURKA. Recently, AURKA was shown to localise at mitochondria, where it regulates mitochondrial dynamics and ATP production. Here we define the molecular mechanisms of AURKA in regulating mitochondrial turnover by mitophagy. AURKA triggers the degradation of Inner Mitochondrial Membrane/matrix proteins by interacting with core components of the autophagy pathway. On the inner mitochondrial membrane, the kinase forms a tripartite complex with MAP1LC3 and the mitophagy receptor PHB2, which triggers mitophagy in a PARK2/Parkin-independent manner. The formation of the tripartite complex is induced by the phosphorylation of PHB2 on Ser39, which is required for MAP1LC3 to interact with PHB2. Last, treatment with the PHB2 ligand xanthohumol blocks AURKA-induced mitophagy by destabilising the tripartite complex and restores normal ATP production levels. Altogether, these data provide evidence for a role of AURKA in promoting mitophagy through the interaction with PHB2 and MAP1LC3. This work paves the way to the use of function-specific pharmacological inhibitors to counteract the effects of the overexpression of AURKA in cancer.

ISL1 promoted tumorigenesis and EMT via Aurora kinase A-induced activation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in neuroblastoma.

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid malignancy in children and its mortality rate is relatively high. However, driver genes of NB are not clearly identified. Using bioinformatics analysis, we determined the top 8 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in NB, including GFAP, PAX6, FOXG1, GAD1, PTPRC, ISL1, GRM5, and GATA3. Insulin gene enhancer binding protein 1 (ISL1) is a LIM homeodomain transcription factor which has been found to be highly expressed in a variety of malignant tumors, but the function of ISL1 in NB has not been fully elucidated. We identified ISL1 as an oncogene in NB. ISL1 is preferentially upregulated in NB tissues compared with normal tissues. High ISL1 expression is significantly associated with poor outcome of NB patients. Knockdown of ISL1 markedly represses proliferation and induces cell apoptosis in vitro, and suppresses tumorigenicity in vivo, while overexpression of ISL1 has the opposite effects. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that ISL1 promotes cell proliferation and EMT transformation through PI3K/AKT signaling pathway by upregulating Aurora kinase A (AURKA), a serine-threonine kinase that is essential for the survival of NB cells. The blockade of AURKA attenuates the function of ISL1 overexpression in the regulation of cell proliferation and migration, Conclusively, this study showed that ISL1 targeted AURKA to facilitate the development of NB, which provided new insights into the tumorigenesis of NB. Thus, ISL1 may be a promising therapeutic target in the future.

Role of primary cilium in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Review).

The primary cilium is a non­motile cellular structure extending from the apical membrane of epithelial cells that is involved in several processes due to its ability to receive and elaborate different signals. Ciliogenesis and its obliteration are essential for proliferating cells, and several signalling pathways are responsible for their regulation. In fact, the primary cilium is a central hub for numerous signalling pathways implicated in a variety of biological processes, such as the Hedgehog, mammalian target of rapamycin and Wnt pathways. Loss of primary cilia has been recently correlated with different types of tumours, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). K­Ras and HDAC2 were recently identified as possible ciliogenesis regulators in PDAC, likely acting through Aurora A kinase (AURKA) which, in turn, controls inositol polyphosphate­5­phosphatase E. However, the exact molecular mechanisms underlying this regulatory effect remain to be fully elucidated. In the present study, the regulation of the main genes involved in primary cilia assembly/resorption was reconstructed showing the links with the Hedgehog and phosphoinositide 3­kinase/AKT pathways. Finally, by analysing gene expression databases, the regulatory genes that have high probability to be associated with prognosis, histological grade and pathological stage in patients with PDAC have been highlighted. However, further experimental studies are required to reach definitive conclusions on the roles of these genes. Improving our understating of ciliogenesis and its regulators may help develop ciliotherapies using histone deacetylase and AURKA inhibitors, which may induce re­differentiation of tumour cells into normal cells by reducing tumour growth or inducing apoptosis of cancer cells.

Aurora A plays a dual role in migration and survival of human glioblastoma cells according to the CXCL12 concentration.

Primary glioblastoma is the most frequent human brain tumor in adults and is generally fatal due to tumor recurrence. We previously demonstrated that glioblastoma-initiating cells invade the subventricular zones and promote their radio-resistance in response to the local release of the CXCL12 chemokine. In this work, we show that the mitotic Aurora A kinase (AurA) is activated through the CXCL12-CXCR4 pathway in an ERK1/2-dependent manner. Moreover, the CXCL12-ERK1/2 signaling induces the expression of Ajuba, the main cofactor of AurA, which allows the auto-phosphorylation of AurA.We show that AurA contributes to glioblastoma cell survival, radio-resistance, self-renewal, and proliferation regardless of the exogenous stimulation with CXCL12. On the other hand, AurA triggers the CXCL12-mediated migration of glioblastoma cells in vitro as well as the invasion of the subventricular zone in xenograft experiments. Moreover, AurA regulates cytoskeletal proteins (i.e., Actin and Vimentin) and favors the pro-migratory activity of the Rho-GTPase CDC42 in response to CXCL12. Altogether, these results show that AurA, a well-known kinase of the mitotic machinery, may play alternative roles in human glioblastoma according to the CXCL12 concentration.

AURKA Suppresses Leukemic THP-1 Cell Differentiation through Inhibition of the KDM6B Pathway.

Aberrations in histone modifications are being studied in mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL)-AF9-driven acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, we focused on the regulation of the differentiation of the MLL-AF9 type AML cell line THP-1. We observed that, upon phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) treatment, THP-1 cells differentiated into monocytes by down-regulating Aurora kinase A (AURKA), resulting in a reduction in H3S10 phosphorylation. We revealed that the AURKA inhibitor alisertib accelerates the expression of the H3K27 demethylase KDM6B, thereby dissociating AURKA and YY1 from the KDM6B promoter region. Using Flow cytometry, we found that alisertib induces THP-1 differentiation into monocytes. Furthermore, we found that treatment with the KDM6B inhibitor GSK-J4 perturbed the PMA-mediated differentiation of THP-1 cells. Thus, we discovered the mechanism of AURKA-KDM6B signaling that controls the differentiation of THP-1 cells, which has implications for biotherapy for leukemia.

Cell cycle proteins as promising targets in cancer therapy.

Cancer is characterized by uncontrolled tumour cell proliferation resulting from aberrant activity of various cell cycle proteins. Therefore, cell cycle regulators are considered attractive targets in cancer therapy. Intriguingly, animal models demonstrate that some of these proteins are not essential for proliferation of non-transformed cells and development of most tissues. By contrast, many cancers are uniquely dependent on these proteins and hence are selectively sensitive to their inhibition. After decades of research on the physiological functions of cell cycle proteins and their relevance for cancer, this knowledge recently translated into the first approved cancer therapeutic targeting of a direct regulator of the cell cycle. In this Review, we focus on proteins that directly regulate cell cycle progression (such as cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs)), as well as checkpoint kinases, Aurora kinases and Polo-like kinases (PLKs). We discuss the role of cell cycle proteins in cancer, the rationale for targeting them in cancer treatment and results of clinical trials, as well as the future therapeutic potential of various cell cycle inhibitors.

Aurora-A recruitment and centrosomal maturation are regulated by a Golgi-activated pool of Src during G2.

The Golgi apparatus is composed of stacks of cisternae laterally connected by tubules to form a ribbon-like structure. At the onset of mitosis, the Golgi ribbon is broken down into discrete stacks, which then undergo further fragmentation. This ribbon cleavage is required for G2/M transition, which thus indicates that a 'Golgi mitotic checkpoint' couples Golgi inheritance with cell cycle transition. We previously showed that the Golgi-checkpoint regulates the centrosomal recruitment of the mitotic kinase Aurora-A; however, how the Golgi unlinking regulates this recruitment was unknown. Here we show that, in G2, Aurora-A recruitment is promoted by activated Src at the Golgi. Our data provide evidence that Src and Aurora-A interact upon Golgi ribbon fragmentation; Src phosphorylates Aurora-A at tyrosine 148 and this specific phosphorylation is required for Aurora-A localization at the centrosomes. This process, pivotal for centrosome maturation, is a fundamental prerequisite for proper spindle formation and chromosome segregation.

AurkA controls self-renewal of breast cancer-initiating cells promoting wnt3a stabilization through suppression of miR-128.

AurkA overexpression was previously found in breast cancer and associated to its ability in controlling chromosome segregation during mitosis, however whether it may affect breast cancer cells, endorsed with stem properties (BCICs), is still unclear. Surprisingly, a strong correlation between AurkA expression and ß-catenin localization in breast cancer tissues suggested a link between AurkA and Wnt signaling. In our study, AurkA knock-down reduced wnt3a mRNA and suppressed metastatic signature of MDA-MB-231 cells. As a consequence, the amount of BCICs and their migratory capability dramatically decreased. Conversely, wnt3a mRNA stabilization and increased CD44(+)/CD24(low/-) subpopulation was found in AurkA-overexpressing MCF7 cells. In vivo, AurkA-overexpressing primary breast cancer cells showed higher tumorigenic properties. Interestingly, we found that AurkA suppressed the expression of miR-128, inhibitor of wnt3a mRNA stabilization. Namely, miR-128 suppression realized after AurkA binding to Snail. Remarkably, a strong correlation between AurkA and miR-128 expression in breast cancer tissues confirmed our findings. This study provides novel insights into an undisclosed role for the kinase AurkA in self-renewal and migration of BCICs affecting response to cancer therapies, metastatic spread and recurrence. In addition, it suggests a new therapeutic strategy taking advantage of miR-128 to suppress AurkA-Wnt3a signaling.