[Modern techniques and features of selective keratoplasty]. / Sovremennye tekhnologii i vozmozhnosti selektivnoi keratoplastiki.

Selective keratoplasty involves replacing the affected layers of the cornea with similar donor tissue. In case of pathological changes in the middle and posterior stroma, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is performed. Chronic corneal edema caused by endothelial dysfunction is an indication for endothelial keratoplasty - Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Compared to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), these operations are characterized by a low risk of damage to intraocular structures and a relatively short rehabilitation period. Complications of selective keratoplasty include the formation of a false chamber between the lamellar graft and the recipient's cornea, ocular hypertension during anterior chamber air tamponade. Persistent epithelial defect can be a sign of primary graft failure in DALK, DSAEK and DMEK. Selective keratoplasty is characterized by a lower incidence of immune rejection than PK. In some cases, DALK can be complicated by corneal changes related to suture fixation of the graft. Long-term postoperative use of topical glucocorticoids can cause ocular hypertension and cataracts.

Risk factors for intraocular pressure elevation following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Asian patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate risk factors for increased intraocular pressure (IOP) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in Asian patients. METHODS: Data from January 2015 to February 2021 were obtained from our prospective database. IOP elevation after DMEK was defined as IOP ≥ 22 mmHg or an increase in IOP of ≥ 10 mmHg from baseline. In addition, we examined maximum IOP. Using iCare, we measured IOP 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after DMEK, and every 6 months thereafter. Logistic regression and linear regression were performed to find factors predictive of IOP elevation and maximum IOP, respectively, based on the results of univariate analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 eyes (mean patient age, 74.9 ± 7.5 years; mean follow-up duration, 25.6 ± 9.9 months) that underwent DMEK. IOP elevation was present in 19 eyes (21%). IOP increased from 12.6 ± 3.9 mmHg preoperatively to a postoperative maximum of 17.0 ± 5.5 mmHg up to 36 months after DMEK (p < 0.0001). In univariate logistic regression analysis for IOP elevation, only one variable, pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX) and preexisting glaucoma, was significant (p < 0.05). Preexisting glaucoma without PEX (OR, 19.33; 95% CI, 4.75-93.46), PEX without glaucoma (OR, 7.25; 95% CI, 1.20-41.63), and PEX glaucoma (OR, 58.00; 95% CI, 6.78-1298.29) were associated with higher risk of IOP elevation. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the eyes of patients with PEX and preexisting glaucoma were found to be prone to IOP elevation after DMEK.

Graft failure rate and complications after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma. DESIGN: In this retrospective, observational case series we included data of 150 consecutive DMEKs in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma of 150 patients after excluding data of the second treated eye of each patient and of re-DMEKs during follow-up. Cumulative incidences of IOP elevation (IOP > 21 mmHg or ≥ 10 mmHg increase in IOP from preoperative value), post-DMEK glaucoma (need of an additional intervention due to worsening of the IOP), graft rejection, and graft failure rate were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. COX regression analysis was used to evaluate independent risk factors. RESULTS: The 36-month cumulative incidence of IOP elevation was 53.5% [95 CI 43.5-63.5%] and of post-DMEK glaucoma 36.3% [95 CI 26.3-46.3%]. Graft rejection occurred with a 36-month cumulative incidence of 9.2% [CI 95% 2.3-16.1]. None of the analyzed risk factors increased the risk for the development of graft rejection. The 36-month cumulative incidence of graft failure was 16.6% [CI 95% 8.4-24.8]. Independent risk factors for graft failure were the indication for DMEK "status after graft failure" (n = 16) compared to Fuchs' dystrophy (n = 74) (p = 0.045, HR 8.511 [CI 95% 1.054-68.756]) and pre-existing filtrating surgery via glaucoma drainage device (GDD) (n = 10) compared to no surgery/iridectomy (n = 109) (p = 0.014, HR 6.273 [CI 95% 1.456-27.031]). CONCLUSION: The risks of postoperative complications (IOP elevation, post-DMEK glaucoma, graft rejection, and graft failure) in patients with pre-existing glaucoma are high. In particular, pre-existing filtrating surgery via GDD implantation-but not trabeculectomy-and DMEK after graft failure increase the risk of graft failure.

Case Report: Role of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography for Managing Failed Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft.

SIGNIFICANCE: Some patients show poor visual outcomes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. In such cases, secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty can be performed to achieve complete visual recovery. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) is a valuable tool for the follow-up of posterior lamellar keratoplasty outcomes and complications. PURPOSE: This study aimed to report the clinical outcome of secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for managing poor visual results in a patient with graft failure after a previous Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, highlighting the importance of AS-OCT in the follow-up of endothelial keratoplasty. CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old woman with high myopia underwent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy after explantation of an angle-supported phakic intraocular lens. Two years after keratoplasty, the patient experienced poor visual acuity (counting fingers), and significant corneal edema was observed on clinical examination hindering visualization of the anterior chamber structures. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography showed a failed and thickened graft adhering well to the recipient cornea in an anterior chamber without other comorbidities. Therefore, the graft was removed and replaced with a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft without any complications. One year later, the clinical outcome was evaluated by comparing the pre-operative and post-operative best-corrected visual acuity, biomicroscopy findings, endothelial cell density, and corneal central thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior segment optical coherence tomography is an important tool when deciding on the surgical technique to be applied and for the post-surgical monitoring of endothelial corneal grafts. This case demonstrates the successful management of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty graft failure with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft, highlighting the importance of AS-OCT in detecting complications such as graft dislocation and primary graft failure. In addition, corneal thickness measured using AS-OCT serves as a critical predictor of graft failure, as observed in this case.

Graft dislocation following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a comparative cohort analysis of Optisol GS and organ culture preserved corneas.

Previous studies have suggested risk factors for graft dislocation after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). We aimed to investigate the influence of eye bank storage solution as a risk factor for graft dislocation, as this could have significant implications for eye banking practices. This retrospective analysis compared cohorts from the QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Canada (donor corneas preserved in Optisol GS) and the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (donor corneas preserved in organ culture). Patient, surgical, and post-operative data were collected for consecutive DSAEK surgeries performed between 2012 and 2020. Risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling. 654 DSAEK surgeries were performed during the study period: 271 in the Optisol GS storage cohort and 383 in the organ culture cohort. The most common indications were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, and failed previous DSAEK. The incidence of graft dislocation requiring surgical repositioning was 9.6% (n = 26) in the Optisol GS cohort and 12.0% (n = 46) in the organ culture cohort (OR, 0.50, 95% CI, 0.20-1.13). Development of graft dislocation was associated with intraoperative venting incisions (OR, 2.50, 95% CI, 1.12-5.51) and a post-operative wound leak (OR, 55.24, 95% CI, 10.20-514.85). The incidence of DSAEK dislocation was similar between study sites using Optisol GS and organ culture, suggesting changes in eye bank storage solution would not mitigate this post-operative complication. Intraoperative creation of venting incisions and post-operative wound leaks and were factors associated with graft dislocation.

Immunohistochemical Findings in Retrocorneal Membranes of Eyes with Corneal Decompensation after Complicated Intraocular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Retrocorneal membranes (RCMs) may result from epithelial ingrowth, stromal keratocytic downgrowth, fibrous metaplasia of the corneal endothelium, or a combination of these processes. In an institutional case series, the clinical history, ocular findings, and immunohistochemical staining results of RCMs were analysed in patients with unilateral corneal decompensation after complicated intraocular surgery. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Between January 2021 and September 2022, six retrocorneal membranes were excised during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) procedures and classified after screening with haematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff, elastic van Gieson staining, and immunohistochemical screening with cytokeratin 7 (CK7), anti-cytokeratin (CAM5.2 and AE1/3), cell surface glycoprotein CD34, smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and vimentin. RESULTS: On the basis of the immunohistochemical screening, the majority of excised RCMs (5 of 6) could histopathologically be classified as membranes originating from fibrous metaplasia of the corneal endothelium. All these RCMs were positive for CK7, α-SMA, and vimentin and negative for CAM5.2 and CD34. In one patient, an RCM had developed after 18 days of corneal contact to a free-floating dexamethasone implant in the anterior chamber and was classified as originating from stromal keratocyte downgrowth (α-SMA- and vimentin-positive, all others negative). All eyes in this series had a previous history of complicated cataract surgery, partially with subsequent intraocular lens exchange. No eyes after previous penetrating keratoplasty were in this series. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of eyes with previous complicated intraocular interventions (in most cases cataract surgery and revisions), the dominating RCM belonged to the type originating from fibrous metaplasia of the corneal endothelium.

Outcomes of Descemet's membrane keratoplasty in graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To analyze the outcomes and identify the risk factors of failure in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). METHODS: Medical records and surgical videos of patients who underwent DMEK for graft failure after PKP were reviewed in this retrospective study. Demographic data, the indication for PKP, number of previous PKPs, duration between the last PKP and graft failure, graft diameter at the last PKP, best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR) before and after DMEK, preoperative additional ocular diseases, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Descemet's membrane (DM) attachment was examined on the first day and the first month, postoperatively, and at the last follow-up visit. The patients were divided into two groups according to DM attachment at the last visit (group 1, patients with attached DM; group 2, patients with DM detachment). RESULTS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients were included in this study. At the last follow-up visit, DM was attached in 13 (65%) patients (Group 1) and detached in 7 (35%) cases (Group 2). The BCVA was improved significantly after DMEK in all patients (2.10 ± 0.4, preoperatively; 1.09 ± 0.8, postoperatively; p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between groups, in terms of age, the number and indication for PKP, the time between the last PKP and DMEK, or history of glaucoma. PKP was performed in all patients in group 2. CONCLUSION: DMEK is a feasible option with fast visual recovery and a low risk of complications in patients with graft failure after PKP. We found no risk factors for the DM graft detachment, so larger studies are needed to analyze intraoperative or donor-related factors as well.

[On the issue of separate designation of the pre-Descemet's layer in the structure of the cornea]. / K voprosu o vydelenii predestsemetovogo sloya v strukture rogovitsy.

Selective exchange of pathologically altered retinal layers is currently considered the most practical approach in corneal transplantation. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are often performed as pathogenetically substantiated transplantation methods. The technique and the course of surgery, possible complications, and achieved outcomes, among other things, depend largely on the pre-Descemet's layer, which was described more than 10 years ago by several ophthalmologists in varying detail. In view of this, the main issue discussed in literature is the following: is the pre-Descemet's layer (Dua's layer) a separate (new) layer of the cornea, or is it an integral part of the stroma (the Feizi stroma)? This article continues the discussion on «separate designation of the pre-Descemet's layer in the structure of the cornea¼ and presents the view of the authors on this problem based on own experience, literature data, anatomical subdisciplines, as well as specific aspects of ophthalmological terminology, and with the use of extrapolation and analogies.

Management of lenticule detachment and epithelial downgrowth after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a novel technique and brief literature review.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial downgrowth is a rare complication after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), which usually leads to poor visual outcome despite multiple available options of treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old man underwent DSAEK procedure due to pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Three months later, the patient presented with gradual visual loss; slit-lamp examination revealed detachment and folding of the DSAEK lenticule, which was confirmed by anterior segment optical coherence tomography. On confocal scanning, epithelial cell sheets were detected in the interface leading to the wrinkling of the donor tissue and donor detachment. Surgical debridement and transient fixating with straight 10-0 prolene needles were performed followed by air injection into the anterior chamber. The cornea turned clear in the one-year follow-up with uncorrected-visual acuity of 20/30 and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and treatment of epithelial downgrowth may be associated with a good prognosis and prevent from more aggressive treatments such as repeat of grafting. In this case, mechanical debridement and transient fixation of lenticule by 10-0 prolene needles was performed to manage post-DSAEK epithelial downgrowth and lenticule detachment, which was successful without requiring of additional re-grafting. It seems this is a feasible technique with acceptable long-term outcomes.

Severe Corneal Edema Increases ECL From Grafts After DSAEK-Corneal Edema and ECL After DSAEK.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between the preoperative degree of corneal edema in the recipient and the endothelial cell density in grafts after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). METHODS: This retrospective case series enrolled 111 eyes of 107 patients who underwent DSAEK. The preoperative and postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by anterior-segment optical coherence tomography. Eyes were divided into three groups according to the preoperative recipient CCT: group A (mild edema): 550 µm

Graft Failure after PKP and DMEK: What is the Best Option? / Transplantatversagen nach PKP und DMEK: Was ist die beste Option?

Corneal transplantation is the most commonly performed human tissue transplantation procedure worldwide. Due to the large number of grafts, corneal graft failure has become one of the most common indications for corneal transplantation for immunological and non-immunological reasons (e.g. recurrence of underlying disease, high intraocular pressure, grafted guttae, transmitted HSV or CMV infection). The relatively recently developed lamellar grafting techniques have introduced certain potential complications that may lead to graft failure and require approaches other than penetrating keratoplasty for re-grafting. On the other hand, these new lamellar techniques also offer new possibilities for salvaging failed penetrating grafts, with potential advantages over successive penetrating keratoplasties, such as lower intraoperative risks, faster visual rehabilitation and reduced risk of immune reaction. Today, the patient with good healing who is satisfied with his graft before endothelial decompensation, with low astigmatism and no stromal scars, represents the optimal condition for DMEK after PKP. This can also be combined with phacoemulsification (so-called triple DMEK). Otherwise, a penetrating re-keratoplasty with a larger graft (typically excimer laser repeat PKP 8.5/8.6 mm) is performed to treat edema, scars and irregular astigmatism simultaneously. The medical history carries weight in this decision! Re-DMEK in case of graft failure after DMEK and DSAEK does not require any modification of the standard technique and leads to good visual acuity results if performed quickly. If there is clear stromal scarring after multiple (external) DMEKs, PKP can also be considered to rectify the situation. Otherwise causeless recurrent graft failures must suggest herpetic or CMV endotheliitis and, after PCR analysis of the aqueous humour aspirate, be treated appropriately with medication.

Infectious Crystalline Keratopathy after Penetrating Keratoplasty with Light and Electron Microscopic Examination.

PURPOSE: To highlight the typical histological and ultrastructural features of severe infectious crystalline keratopathy (ICK) in a corneal graft, which required excimer laser-assisted repeat penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and to present the challenging treatment conditions associated with ICK. METHODS: An 85-year-old female patient underwent PKP for secondary graft failure after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy in the left eye. One year later, white branched opacities were observed in the superficial corneal stroma of the graft without surrounding inflammation in the left eye. The patient underwent excimer laser-assisted repeat PKP (8.0/8.1 mm) in the left eye after prolonged refractory topical anti-infectious treatment for 1 month. The corneal explant was further examined by light and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). RESULTS: The light microscopic examination of the corneal explant demonstrated aggregates of coccoid bacteria in the superficial and mid-stromal region that were positive for periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and Gram stain. The bacterial aggregates extended into the interlamellar spaces, showed a spindle-shaped appearance, and were not surrounded by an inflammatory cellular reaction. TEM demonstrated lamellae separation within the anterior corneal stroma with spindle-shaped aggregates of bacteria, which were embedded in an extracellular amorphous matrix with incipient calcification, being consistent with a biofilm. No inflammatory cellular reaction was evident by TEM. At discharge from hospital, the corrected visual acuity was 20/80 in the left eye. CONCLUSION: ICK is often challenging due to the difficult diagnosis and treatment conditions. The refractory courses are mainly attributed to a biofilm formation, which inhibits effective topical anti-infectious treatment. In such cases, (repeat) PKP may be necessary to completely remove the pathology, prevent recurrences, and improve vision.

[Morphological characteristics of Descemet's membrane removed during endothelial keratoplasty (case study)]. / Morfologicheskie osobennosti udalennoi pri endotelial'noi keratoplastike destsemetovoi membrany (klinicheskie nablyudeniya).

The two most used modifications of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) are Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). The leading complication of EK surgeries is graft detachment in the early postoperative period. This article reports on two cases of endothelial graft adhesion depending on morphological characteristics of the Descemet's membrane (DM) removed during EK. In the first case, complete graft attachment to the recipient's posterior stroma was observed after DMEK. Morphological analysis of the DM showed clean stromal surface. In the second case there was a false chamber between the endothelial transplant and the posterior stroma of the patient. OCT scans revealed separate stromal fibers protruding into the false chamber; morphological analysis of the removed DM showed stromal fragments fixed to the anterior surface of the DM. The revealed changes indicate damage to the posterior stroma the suffered received during descemetorhexis, which may be the cause for incomplete graft attachment. Complete attachment after repeated EK (DSAEK) in this case was due to a thin stromal layer on the graft that provided high degree of adhesion to the posterior corneal surface. DSAEK can be indicated as a repeated EK surgery in cases of persistent endothelial graft non-attachment after DMEK.

[Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after implantation of glaucoma drainage devices]. / Vozmozhnosti transplantatsii endoteliya s destsemetovoi membranoi posle implantatsii antiglaukomnogo drenazha.

Secondary decompensation of corneal endothelium, including transplanted, is a frequent long-term complication of glaucoma drainage surgery. According to literature data, after implantation of a glaucoma drainage device into the anterior chamber, the speed of endothelial cells density (ECD) loss increases significantly. PURPOSE: To study the possibility of performing modified Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with maximum graft diameter, and to assess its short-term effectiveness in the treatment of bullous keratopathy (BK) in the presence of a glaucoma drainage device in the anterior chamber. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Modified surgery 3/4-DMEK was performed in 9 eyes of 7 patients with BK and Ahmed glaucoma drainage using graft of maximum diameter (11±1 mm). Average follow-up time was 15.3±2.5 months (12 to 18 months). RESULTS: No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. Mean ECD after 12 months amounted to 1664±346 cells/mm2, which corresponds to ECD reduction of 34±9.6% (24 to 49%) in comparison to preoperative values. Mean best corrected visual acuity 12 months after surgery increased from 0.04±0.03 (0.01 to 0.1) to 0.3±0.2 (0.04 to 0.7). The last follow-up examination revealed all corneas to have preserved transparency and stable pachymetry measurements (from 488 to 548 µm). CONCLUSION: Performing 3/4-DMEK with a mega graft for treatment of BK after drainage surgery is technically possible. Absence of Descemet membrane (DM) donor and preservation of DM recipient in the drainage tube plane eliminates its contact with the endothelium. Maximum graft diameter should in the long term help prolong the effectiveness of the surgery.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in vitrectomized eyes: a case series of outcomes and complications.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in vitrectomized eyes. METHODS: A multi-surgeon, retrospective case series of previously vitrectomized eyes that underwent DMEK between 2013 and 2018 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Patients' demographics, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. RESULTS: In total, 14 eyes of 13 patients, aged 63 ± 14.6 years were included. Three eyes had intraoperative posterior dislocation of the DMEK graft into the vitreous cavity, two of these were aphakic and one had an unstable PCIOL. Postoperatively, one graft had a total detachment and required repeat keratoplasty for primary failure, two grafts had visually significant partial detachment and needed rebubbling. Three patients developed high intraocular pressure (IOP) and one required an urgent glaucoma drainage device 1-month post-DMEK. The mean corrected distance visual acuity was 0.81 ± 0.42 logMAR preoperatively, and postoperatively was 0.6 ± 0.51 at 3 months (p = 0.414); 0.69 ± 0.81 at 6 months (p = 0.684); and 0.7 ± 0.8 at 12 months (p = 0.658). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK in vitrectomized eyes has unique challenges that necessitate careful preoperative planning. We observed a significant proportion of dislocated grafts in vitrectomized eyes with either unstable IOL or aphakic. Moreover, vitrectomized eyes with secondary glaucoma may be particularly vulnerable to uncontrolled IOP postoperatively and close monitoring is essential to prevent worsening of visual acuity. We recommend that DMEK may not be a feasible option in eyes that are prone to collapse, in particular aphakic vitrectomized eyes, as opposed to DSAEK or penetrating keratoplasty.

[Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in initial cases: analysis and management of surgical complications].

Objective: To investigate causes and management of surgical complications of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in initial cases. Methods: A retrospective study. A total of 52 eyes of 52 patients underwent DMEK by one surgeon in Peking University Third Hospital from February 2017 to December 2019, including 17 males and 35 females, aged (66±12) years. All patients' demographic characteristics, previous surgical history, intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: Intraoperative complications included difficulties in unfolding the graft in 6 cases (11.5%), inverted grafts in 5 cases (9.6%), grafts rushing out of the anterior chamber in 2 cases (3.8%), grafts injected behind the iris in 3 cases (5.8%) and hemorrhage in 1 case. Partial graft detachment that occurred in 28 cases (53.8%) was the most frequent postoperative complication. Rebubbling was performed in 25 cases (48.1%). Pupillary block occurred in 9 cases (17.3%) and was managed by reducing air under a slit lamp. Primary graft failure occurred in 3 cases (5.8%) and viral infection occurred in 2 cases (3.8%). Conclusions: The rate of complications of DMEK in initial cases is higher than that of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Intraoperative graft inversion and postoperative graft detachment are the most common complications. It is important to select appropriate indications and discover or manage intraoperative and postoperative complications in time to reduce the incidence of complications. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2021, 57:595-600).

[Comparative assessment of functional outcomes of different endothelial keratoplasty techniques]. / Sravnitel'naya otsenka funktsional'nykh rezul'tatov razlichnykh tekhnologii endotelial'noi keratoplastiki.

PURPOSE: Comparative analysis of the higher-order aberrations (HOA) of the cornea after endothelial keratoplasty (EK) using DSAEK and DMEK techniques; evaluation of the correlation between higher-order corneal aberrations and functional outcomes of the treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 47 patients (59 eyes). The main group consisted of 35 patients (35 eyes) with bullous keratopathy and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy; among them, 19 patients underwent endothelial keratoplasty using the DSAEK technique and 16 - DMEK technique. The control group included 12 patients (24 eyes) of corresponding age without corneal pathology. Standard and special examination tests were performed before, as well as 6 and 12 months after the operation, including computed tomography and aberrometry of the cornea using the Pentacam HR system. Same tests were performed in the control group. RESULTS: The values of the main HOA of the anterior corneal surface: RMS coma (Z3±1, Z5±1), RMS spherical aberration (SA; Z40, Z60) and RMS HOA (Z3-6) 6 months after different EK techniques were statistically significantly higher than in the control group. A statistically significantly lower induction of aberrations of the posterior corneal surface after DMEK technique was revealed. Analysis of the final aberration pattern 6 months after surgery did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the values of the main (RMS coma, RMS SA, RMS HOA) total corneal aberrations after DSAEK and DMEK. A negative correlation was revealed between the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and HOA; however, it was statistically significant only for individual aberration values: RMS HOA (Z3-6) of the posterior corneal aberrations after DMEK (r= -0.634, p=0.049), and RMS coma (Z3±1, Z5±1) of the cornea after DSAEK (r= -0.57, p=0.042). CONCLUSION: Comparative analysis of total corneal HOA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in the main parameters: RMS coma, RMS SA, RMS HOA in patients after DSAEK and DMEK surgeries. Correlation analysis did not reveal any statistically significant effects of most aberrations on the functional outcomes of the treatment.

An endothelial rejection line following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

BACKGROUND: The endothelial rejection line is rarely seen after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasties (DSAEKs). Here, we present a case of endothelial graft rejection with an endothelial rejection line occurring 1 year after the procedure. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old female presented with graft rejection 1 year following a DSAEK procedure. The episode started when she tapered down her loteprednol to once a day. Slit-lamp examination showed a mildly injected conjunctiva with 1+ corneal oedema. On the posterior surface of the cornea, there was an endothelial rejection line (Khodadoust line) with keratic precipitates and multiple areas of anterior synechia. CONCLUSION: The classic endothelial rejection line should be kept in mind as a rare sign of DSAEK graft rejection.

Systematic review of potential causes of intraocular lens opacification.

Intraocular lens (IOL) opacification is an infrequent complication of cataract surgery. Surface analysis has demonstrated that the opacification of IOLs is related to calcium or phosphate precipitation on or within the lenses, but the associated mechanisms are unknown, and the scientific literature is heterogeneous and limited to case series and retrospective studies. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyse the most frequent conditions associated with opacification of IOLs reported by studies. A search was carried out using the PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus databases. The quality of the studies selected was evaluated using the Pierson tool. The search provided a total of 811 articles, of which 39 were selected following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common opacified lenses were hydrophilic IOLs according to our analysis. The mean time of appearance of lens opacification was 14.93 ± 17.82 months. The most frequent conditions associated with opacification of the IOLs were Descemet Stripping with Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK/DSEK) and diabetes mellitus (DM), followed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), blood hypertension (HT), and glaucoma. Concerning the quality analysis, the mean score was 7.00 ± 1.43 (scoring range from 0 to 10), indicating an acceptable quality of the case reports and retrospective studies. In conclusion, DSAEK/DSEK, DM, PPV, glaucoma and hypertension are conditions with potential risk of IOL opacification after cataract surgery, especially when implanting hydrophilic acrylic IOLs.

Iris Posterior Synechiae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Eyes: Prevention and Management of Posterior Synechiae.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a mydriatic agent for posterior synechiae after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (staged DMEK). METHODS: In this prospective study, the outcomes of DMEK with or without mydriasis (0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride [Mydrin-P; Santen, Osaka, Japan]) after the DMEK procedure were analyzed. Patients underwent IOL implantation approximately 4 weeks before DMEK. Six months after DMEK, the iris posterior synechiae severity score was evaluated based on the extent of posterior synechiae affecting the eight areas (45° each) of the pupillary rim (posterior synechiae score; grades 0-8). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, axial length, and the amount of air at the end of the surgery were also evaluated. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients (mydriatic: n=8, control: n=7) were eligible for inclusion. Iris posterior synechiae were detected in all seven eyes (100.0%) in the control group, whereas they were noted in two eyes in the mydriatic group (25%). The mean iris posterior synechiae score was 0.69±1.20 in the mydriatic group and was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.57±0.90; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in other clinical factors. Although the incidence and scores of posterior synechiae in the control group were higher, the incidence was significantly reduced with the use of a mydriatic agent (in the mydriatic group). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a mydriatic agent is an effective measure to prevent postoperative synechiae after DMEK.