Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 137
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gastroenterology ; 158(6): 1822-1830, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32006545

RESUMO

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a leading etiology for chronic liver disease with an immense public health impact and affects >25% of the US and global population. Up to 1 in 4 NAFLD patients may have nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH is associated with significant morbidity and mortality due to complications of liver cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent data confirm that HCC represents the fifth most common cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and NAFLD has been identified as a rapidly emerging risk factor for this malignancy. NAFLD-associated liver complications are projected to become the leading indication for liver transplantation in the next decade. Despite evidence that NAFLD-associated HCC may arise in the absence of cirrhosis, is often diagnosed at advanced stages, and is associated with lower receipt of curative therapy and with poorer survival, current society guidelines provide limited guidance/recommendations addressing HCC surveillance in patients with NAFLD outside the context of established cirrhosis. Limited data are presently available to guide clinicians with respect to which patients with NAFLD should undergo HCC surveillance, optimal screening tools, frequency of monitoring, and the influence of coexisting host- and disease-related risk factors. Herein we present an evidence-based review addressing HCC risk in patients with NAFLD and provide Best Practice Advice statements to address key issues in clinical management.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/patologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/prevenção & controle , Progressão da Doença , Gastroenterologia/normas , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/prevenção & controle , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Conduta Expectante/normas
2.
J Urol ; 206(1): 22-28, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33617331

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the optimal cystoscopic interval for intermediate risk, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with intermediate risk, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (2010-2017) was performed and 3 hypothetical models of surveillance intensity were applied: model 1: high (3 months), model 2: moderate (6 months) and model 3: low intensity (12 months) over a 2-year period. We compared timing of actual detection of recurrence and progression to proposed cystoscopy timing between each model. We calculated number of avoidable cystoscopies and associated costs. RESULTS: Of 107 patients with median followup of 37 months, 66/107 (77.6%) developed recurrence and 12/107(14.1%) had progression. Relative to model 1, there were 33 (50%) delayed detection of recurrences in model 2 and 41 (62%) in model 3. There was a 1.7-month mean delay in detection of recurrence for model 1 vs 3.2, and a 7.6-month delay for models 2 and 3 (p <0.001 model 1 vs 2; p <0.001 model 2 vs 3). Relative to model 1, there were 8 (67%) and 9 (75%) delayed detection of progression events in model 2 and 3. There were no progression-related bladder cancer deaths or radical cystectomies due to delayed detection. Mean number of avoidable cystoscopies was higher in model 1 (2) vs model 2 (1) and 3 (0). Model 1 had the highest aggregate cost of surveillance ($46,262.52). CONCLUSIONS: High intensity (3-month) surveillance intervals provide faster detection of recurrences but with increased cost and more avoidable cystoscopies without clear oncologic benefit. Moderate intensity (6-month) intervals in intermediate risk, nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer allows timely detection without oncologic compromise and is less costly with fewer cystoscopies.


Assuntos
Cistoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Conduta Expectante/normas , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco
3.
J Urol ; 205(1): 52-59, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32856984

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Adrenal incidentalomas are being discovered with increasing frequency, and their discovery poses a challenge to clinicians. Despite the 2002 National Institutes of Health consensus statement, there are still discrepancies in the most recent guidelines from organizations representing endocrinology, endocrine surgery, urology and radiology. We review recent guidelines across the specialties involved in diagnosing and treating adrenal incidentalomas, and discuss points of agreement as well as controversy among guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed®, Scopus®, Embase™ and Web of Science™ databases were searched systematically in November 2019 in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement to identify the most recently updated committee produced clinical guidelines in each of the 4 specialties. Five articles met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: There is little debate among the reviewed guidelines as to the initial evaluation of an adrenal incidentaloma. All patients with a newly discovered adrenal incidentaloma should receive an unenhanced computerized tomogram and hormone screen. The most significant points of divergence among the guidelines regard reimaging an initially benign appearing mass, repeat hormone testing and management of an adrenal incidentaloma that is not easily characterized as benign or malignant on computerized tomography. The guidelines range from actively recommending against any repeat imaging and hormone screening to recommending a repeat scan as early as in 3 to 6 months and annual hormonal screening for several years. CONCLUSIONS: After reviewing the guidelines and the evidence used to support them we posit that best practices lie at their convergence and have presented our management recommendations on how to navigate the guidelines when they are discrepant.


Assuntos
Adenoma/terapia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/terapia , Oncologia/normas , Feocromocitoma/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adenoma/sangue , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/patologia , Corticosteroides/sangue , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/sangue , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/patologia , Glândulas Suprarrenais/diagnóstico por imagem , Glândulas Suprarrenais/patologia , Adrenalectomia/normas , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Biópsia , Endocrinologia/métodos , Endocrinologia/normas , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Oncologia/métodos , Preferência do Paciente , Feocromocitoma/sangue , Feocromocitoma/diagnóstico , Feocromocitoma/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Radiologia/métodos , Radiologia/normas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Urologia/métodos , Urologia/normas , Conduta Expectante/normas
4.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 649, 2021 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058998

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend active surveillance as the preferred treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer, but only a minority of eligible men receive active surveillance, and practice variation is substantial. The aim of this study is to describe barriers to urologists' recommendation of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer and explore variation of barriers by setting. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews among 22 practicing urologists, evenly distributed between academic and community practice. We coded barriers to active surveillance according to a conceptual model of determinants of treatment quality to identify potential opportunities for intervention. RESULTS: Community and academic urologists were generally in agreement on factors influencing active surveillance. Urologists perceived patient-level factors to have the greatest influence on recommendations, particularly tumor pathology, patient age, and judgements about the patient's ability to adhere to follow-up protocols. They also noted cross-cutting clinical barriers, including concerns about the adequacy of biopsy samples, inconsistent protocols to guide active surveillance, and side effects of biopsy procedures. Urologists had differing opinions on the impact of environmental factors, such as financial disincentives and fear of litigation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite national and international recommendations, both academic and community urologists note a variety of barriers to implementing active surveillance in low risk prostate cancer. These barriers will need to be specifically addressed in efforts to help urologists offer active surveillance more consistently.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Urologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologistas/normas , Conduta Expectante/normas
5.
World J Urol ; 39(8): 2875-2882, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33452911

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate follow-up strategies for active surveillance of renal masses and to assess contemporary data. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of electronic databases (Embase, Medline, and Cochrane). A systematic review of the follow-up protocols was carried out. A total of 20 studies were included. RESULT: Our analysis highlights that most of the series used different protocols of follow-up without consistent differences in the outcomes. Most common protocol consisted in imaging and clinical evaluation at 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Median length of follow-up was 42 months (range 1-137). Mean age was 74 years (range 67-83). Of 2243 patients 223 (10%) died during the follow-up and 19 patients died of kidney cancer (0.8%). The growth rate was the most used parameter to evaluate disease progression eventually triggering delayed intervention. Maximal axial diameter was the most common method to evaluate growth rate. CT scan is the most used, probably because it is usually more precise than kidney ultrasound and more accessible than MRI. Performing chest X-ray at every check does not seem to alter the clinical outcome during AS. CONCLUSION: The minimal cancer-specific mortality does not seem to correlate with the follow-up scheme. Outside of growth rate and initial size, imaging features to predict outcome of RCC during AS are limited. Active surveillance of SRM is a well-established treatment option. However, standardized follow-up protocols are lacking. Prospective, randomized, trials to evaluate the best follow-up strategies are pending.


Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Neoplasias Renais , Conduta Expectante , Idoso , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/normas , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/tendências , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/terapia , Carga Tumoral , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Conduta Expectante/normas , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
J Surg Res ; 264: 309-315, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33845414

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to describe the workup, management, and outcomes of pediatric patients with breast masses undergoing operative intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of girls 10-21 y of age who underwent surgery for a breast mass across 11 children's hospitals from 2011 to 2016. Demographic and clinical characteristics were summarized. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-three female patients with a median age of 16 y (IQR: 3) underwent surgery for a breast mass during the study period. The most common preoperative imaging was breast ultrasound (95%); 28% reported the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. Preoperative core biopsy was performed in 12%. All patients underwent lumpectomy, most commonly due to mass size (45%) or growth (29%). The median maximum dimension of a mass on preoperative ultrasound was 2.8 cm (IQR: 1.9). Most operations were performed by pediatric surgeons (65%) and breast surgeons (25%). The most frequent pathology was fibroadenoma (75%); 3% were phyllodes. BI-RADS scoring ≥4 on breast ultrasound had a sensitivity of 0% and a negative predictive value of 93% for identifying phyllodes tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric breast masses are self-identified and benign. BI-RADS classification based on ultrasound was not consistently assigned and had little clinical utility for identifying phyllodes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Fibroadenoma/terapia , Mastectomia Segmentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Tumor Filoide/terapia , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mama/patologia , Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Criança , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Autoavaliação Diagnóstica , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Fibroadenoma/diagnóstico , Fibroadenoma/patologia , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar/normas , Tumor Filoide/diagnóstico , Tumor Filoide/patologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia Mamária , Conduta Expectante/normas , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Surg Res ; 264: 37-44, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765509

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The frequency and cost of postoperative surveillance for older adults (>65 y) with T1N0M0 low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) have not been well studied. METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare (2006-2013) database, frequency and cost of surveillance concordant with American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines (defined as an office visit, ≥1 thyroglobulin measurement, and ultrasound 6- to 24-month postoperatively) were analyzed for the overall cohort of single-surgery T1N0M0 low-risk PTC, stratified by lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy. RESULTS: Majority of 2097 patients in the study were white (86.7%) and female (77.5%). Median age and tumor size were 72 y (interquartile range 68-76) and 0.6 cm (interquartile range 0.3-1.1 cm), respectively; 72.9% of patients underwent total thyroidectomy. Approximately 77.5% of patients had a postoperative surveillance visit; however, only 15.9% of patients received ATA-concordant surveillance. Patients who underwent total thyroidectomy as compared with lobectomy were more likely to undergo surveillance testing, thyroglobulin (61.7% versus 24.8%) and ultrasound (37.5% versus 29.2%) (all P < 0.01), and receive ATA-concordant surveillance (18.5% versus 9.0%, P < 0.001). Total surveillance cost during the study period was $621,099. Diagnostic radioactive iodine, ablation, and advanced imaging (such as positron emission tomography scans) accounted for 55.5% of costs ($344,692), whereas ATA-concordant care accounted for 44.5% of costs. After multivariate adjustment, patients who underwent total thyroidectomy as compared with lobectomy were twice as likely to receive ATA-concordant surveillance (adjusted odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-2.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Majority of older adults with T1N0M0 low-risk PTC do not receive ATA-concordant surveillance; discordant care was costly. Total thyroidectomy was the strongest predictor of receiving ATA-concordant care.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/cirurgia , Tireoidectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/economia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/normas , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/normas , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Tireoglobulina/sangue , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/sangue , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/diagnóstico , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/economia , Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Glândula Tireoide/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/sangue , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/economia , Tireoidectomia/métodos , Ultrassonografia/economia , Ultrassonografia/normas , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Conduta Expectante/economia , Conduta Expectante/normas
8.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 216(4): 943-951, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32755219

RESUMO

Active surveillance for low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer is a conservative management approach that aims to avoid or delay active treatment until there is evidence of disease progression. In recent years, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has been increasingly used in active surveillance and has shown great promise in patient selection and monitoring. This has been corroborated by publication of the Prostate Cancer Radiologic Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) recommendations, which define the ideal reporting standards for mpMRI during active surveillance. The PRECISE recommendations include a system that assigns a score from 1 to 5 (the PRECISE score) for the assessment of radiologic change on serial mpMRI scans. PRECISE scores are defined as follows: a score of 3 indicates radiologic stability, a score of 1 or 2 denotes radiologic regression, and a score of 4 or 5 indicates radiologic progression. In the present study, we discuss current and future trends in the use of mpMRI during active surveillance and illustrate the natural history of prostate cancer on serial scans according to the PRECISE recommendations. We highlight how the ability to classify radiologic change on mpMRI with use of the PRECISE recommendations helps clinical decision making.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Idoso , Biópsia , Previsões , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Conduta Expectante/normas , Conduta Expectante/tendências
9.
Future Oncol ; 17(5): 517-527, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33021104

RESUMO

Aim: Define changes in clinical management resulting from the use of the prognostic 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) test for cutaneous melanoma in a surgical oncology practice. Patients & methods: Management plans for 112 consecutively tested patients with stage I-III melanoma were evaluated for duration and number of clinical visits, blood work and imaging. Results: 31-GEP high-risk (class 2; n = 46) patients received increased management compared with low-risk (class 1; n = 66) patients. Test results were most closely associated with follow-up and imaging. Of class 1 patients, 65% received surveillance intensity within guidelines for stage I-IIA patients; 98% of class 2 patients received surveillance intensity equal to stage IIB-IV patients. Conclusion: We suggest clinical follow-up and metastatic screening be adjusted according to 31-GEP test results.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Oncologia Cirúrgica/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Feminino , Seguimentos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/secundário , Melanoma/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/normas , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Estados Unidos , Conduta Expectante/normas
10.
Future Oncol ; 17(25): 3397-3408, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34227399

RESUMO

Desmoid fibromatosis is a locally aggressive tumor with an unpredictable clinical course. Surgery was once the mainstay of treatment, but the treatment protocol has been constantly evolving and currently active surveillance is the front-line approach. There have been significant insights into the molecular biology with the addition of mutational analysis of CTNNB1 adding to prognostic information. We present a review of the literature with current practice guidelines, also including novel therapeutic targets and ongoing clinical trials, to unravel the next step in the management of sporadic desmoid fibromatosis.


Lay abstract Desmoid fibromatosis is an aggressive local tumor with continuously changing treatment paradigms. It requires MRI with biopsy for diagnosis and follow-up. Usually the tumor responds to a 'wait and watch' approach in most patients with either stable disease or regression on follow-up; a surgical plan is made only after multidisciplinary discussion, as surgery does not provide additional benefit in most patients. After a period of wait and watch, if there is disease progression, patients can be kept on medical management such as chemotherapy. Currently we have novel drugs for medical management like tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which result in disease stabilization in a majority of patients. In order to reduce the morbidity of treatment, it is essential for the patient to be on continuous follow-up and for clinicians to be updated with the continuously changing management of this disease.


Assuntos
Fibromatose Agressiva/terapia , Oncologia/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Administração Metronômica , Adolescente , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/normas , Biópsia/normas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Fibromatose Agressiva/diagnóstico , Fibromatose Agressiva/genética , Fibromatose Agressiva/mortalidade , Humanos , Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Joelho/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Oncologia/métodos , Oncologia/tendências , Mutação , Prognóstico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Conduta Expectante/normas , Adulto Jovem , beta Catenina/genética
11.
J Cutan Pathol ; 48(9): 1182-1184, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33964023

RESUMO

Rhabdomyomatous mesenchymal hamartoma (RMH) is a rare congenital malformation of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. Usually, RMH occurs in the midline of the face and neck region. We described a case of RMH presenting as telangiectasia in a 57-year-old man with a history of pityriasis lichenoides chronicus. Histopathological examination revealed a subepidermal haphazard proliferation of striated muscular tissue perpendicular to the epidermis. These bundles of striated muscular tissue were admixed with adnexal structures. The diagnosis was consistent with RMH. RMH is more common in the neonatal period or in young children, but we should consider it as part of a differential diagnosis in older adults as well.


Assuntos
Hamartoma/patologia , Mesoderma/patologia , Rabdomioma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia , Telangiectasia/diagnóstico , Desmina/metabolismo , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pitiríase Liquenoide/complicações , Pitiríase Liquenoide/patologia , Rabdomioma/metabolismo , Telangiectasia/patologia , Conduta Expectante/normas
12.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 49(2): 133-154, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641305

RESUMO

The current systematic review presented and discussed the most recent studies on pediatric chronic cough. In addition, the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology elaborated a comprehensive algorithm to guide the primary care approach to a pediatric patient with chronic cough.Several algorithms on chronic cough management have been adopted and validated in clinical practice; however, unlike the latter, we developed an algorithm focused on pediatric age, from birth until adulthood. Based on our findings, children and adolescents with chronic cough without cough pointers can be safely managed, initially using the watchful waiting approach and, successively, starting empirical treatment based on cough characteristics. Unlike other algorithms that suggest laboratory and instrumental investigations as a first step, this review highlighted the importance of a "wait and see" approach, consisting of parental reassurance and close clinical observation, also due to inter-professional collaboration and communication between general practitioners and specialists that guarantee better patient management, appropriate prescription behavior, and improved patient outcome. Moreover, the neonatal screening program provided by the Italian National Health System, which intercepts several diseases precociously, allowing to treat them in a very early stage, helps and supports a "wait and see" approach.Conversely, in the presence of cough pointers or persistence of cough, the patient should be tested and treated by the specialist. Further investigations and treatments will be based on cough etiology, aiming to intercept the underlying disease, prevent potentially irreversible tissue damage, and improve the general health of patients affected by chronic cough, as well as the quality of life of patients and their family.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia/normas , Tosse/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Antitussígenos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Doença Crônica/terapia , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/normas , Tosse/complicações , Tosse/diagnóstico , Tosse/imunologia , Humanos , Itália , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Conduta Expectante/normas
13.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 49(2): 155-169, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641306

RESUMO

The current systematic review presented and discussed the most recent studies on acute cough in pediatric age. After that, the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology elaborated a comprehensive algorithm to guide the primary care approach to pediatric patients, such as infants, children, and adolescents, with acute cough. An acute cough is usually consequent to upper respiratory tract infections and is self-resolving within a few weeks. However, an acute cough may be bothersome, and therefore remedies are requested, mainly by the parents. An acute cough may significantly affect the quality of life of patients and their family.Several algorithms for the management of acute cough have been adopted and validated in clinical practice; however, unlike the latter, we developed an algorithm focused on pediatric age, and, also, in accordance to the Italian National Health System, which regularly follows the child from birth to all lifelong. Based on our findings, infants from 6 months, children, and adolescents with acute cough without cough pointers can be safely managed using well-known medications, preferably non-sedative agents, such as levodropropizine and/or natural compounds, including honey, glycerol, and herb-derived components.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia/normas , Antitussígenos/uso terapêutico , Tosse/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Doença Aguda/terapia , Adolescente , Apiterapia/métodos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Tosse/complicações , Tosse/diagnóstico , Tosse/imunologia , Glicerol/uso terapêutico , Mel , Humanos , Lactente , Itália , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Propilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Conduta Expectante/normas
14.
J Urol ; 204(6): 1160-1165, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32628102

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Nonmalignant pathology has been reported in 15% to 20% of surgeries for cT1 renal masses. We seek to identify opportunities for improvement in avoiding surgery for nonmalignant pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MUSIC-KIDNEY started collecting data in 2017. All patients with cT1 renal masses who had partial or radical nephrectomy for nonmalignant pathology were identified. Category for improvement (none-0, minor-1, moderate-2 or major-3) was independently assigned to each case by 5 experienced kidney surgeons. Specific strategies to decrease nonmalignant pathology were identified. RESULTS: Of 1,392 patients with cT1 renal masses 653 underwent surgery and 74 had nonmalignant pathology (11%). Of these, 23 (31%) cases were cT1b. Radical nephrectomy was performed in 17 (22.9%) patients for 5 cT1a and 12 cT1b lesions. Only 6 patients had a biopsy prior to surgery (5 oncocytoma, 1 unclassified renal cell carcinoma). Review identified 25 cases with minor (34%), 26 with moderate (35%) and 10 with major (14%) quality improvement opportunities. Overall 17% of cases had no quality improvement opportunities identified (12 partial nephrectomy, 1 radical nephrectomy). CONCLUSIONS: Review of patients with cT1 renal masses who underwent surgery for nonmalignant pathology revealed a significant number of cases in which this outcome may have been avoided. Approximately half of cases had moderate or major quality improvement opportunities, with radical nephrectomy for nonmalignant pathology being the most common reason. Our data indicate a lowest achievable and acceptable rate of nonmalignant pathology to be 1.9% and 5.4%, respectively. Avoiding interventions for nonmalignant pathology, particularly radical nephrectomy, is an important focus of quality improvement efforts. Strategies to decrease unnecessary interventions for nonmalignant pathology include greater use of repeat imaging, renal mass biopsy and surveillance.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/prevenção & controle , Nefrectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Idoso , Biópsia/normas , Humanos , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Rim/patologia , Rim/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nefrectomia/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Conduta Expectante/normas
15.
J Urol ; 203(4): 727-733, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31651227

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In a large, prospective, multi-institutional active surveillance cohort we evaluated whether African American men are at higher risk for reclassification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Canary PASS (Prostate Active Surveillance Study) is a protocol driven, active surveillance cohort with a prespecified prostate specific antigen and surveillance biopsy regimen. Men included in this study had Gleason Grade Group 1 or 2 disease at diagnosis and fewer than 5 years between diagnosis and enrollment, and had undergone 1 or more surveillance biopsies. The reclassification risk, defined as an increase in the Gleason score on subsequent biopsy, was compared between African American and Caucasian American men using Cox proportional hazards models. In the subset of men who underwent delayed prostatectomy the rate of adverse pathology findings, defined as pT3a or greater disease, or Gleason Grade Group 3 or greater, was compared in African American and Caucasian American men. RESULTS: Of the 1,315 men 89 (7%) were African American and 1,226 (93%) were Caucasian American. There was no difference in the treatment rate in African American and Caucasian American men. In multivariate models African American race was not associated with the risk of reclassification (HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.78-1.72). Of the 441 men who underwent prostatectomy after a period of active surveillance the rate of adverse pathology was similar in those who were African American and Caucasian American (46% vs 47%, p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Of men on active surveillance who followed a standardized protocol of regular prostate specific antigen testing and biopsy those who were African American were not at increased risk for pathological reclassification while on active surveillance, or for adverse pathology findings at prostatectomy. Active surveillance appears to be an appropriate management strategy for African American men with favorable risk prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/normas , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Estados Unidos , Conduta Expectante/normas , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Curr Opin Urol ; 30(2): 245-250, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31834082

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Approximately 30% of clinical stage 1 (CS1) nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) and 15-20% of CS1 seminoma relapse without adjuvant treatment. Despite this, the 5-year survival for CS1 is 99%. The purpose of this review is to assess if active surveillance should be standard for all patients with CS1 testis cancer independent of risk factors. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent data from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre suggest a nonrisk-adapted surveillance approach avoids treatment in ∼70% of patients. Most relapse early at a median time of 7.4 months. The majority of relapses are confined to the retroperitoneum (66%) and only one modality of treatment is required: chemotherapy only in 61% and RPLND only in 73%. SUMMARY: Surveillance is the preferred option and a safe proven strategy for the management of CS1 disease independent of risk factors. The prognosis for CS1 disease is excellent and the decision to offer surveillance or adjuvant treatment needs to highlight the treatment-related morbidity in an otherwise fit and healthy young man.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Conduta Expectante/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Padrão de Cuidado , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologia
17.
Cancer ; 125(4): 618-625, 2019 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30423211

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the current study, the authors determined whether adhering to molecular monitoring guidelines in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is associated with major molecular response (MMR) and assessed barriers to adherent monitoring. METHODS: Newly treated patients with CML from the Quebec province-wide CML registry from 2005 to 2016 were included. Timely polymerase chain reaction (tPCR) was defined as the molecular assessment of BCR-ABL1 at the 3-month, 12-month, and 18-month time points from the initiation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. The cohort was analyzed as a nested case-control study. Cases with a first-ever MMR (BCR-ABL1 ≤0.1%, assessed at any time during follow-up) were matched to up to 5 controls by duration of TKI therapy, volume of patients with CML at the treatment center, year of cohort entry, and age. Odds ratios (ORs) for the performance of tPCR and MMR were adjusted for sex, comorbidities, type of TKI, and other important covariates. RESULTS: The cohort included 496 patients. Of 392 MMR events, 67.9% occurred before 18 months. The performance of tPCR was associated with a doubling of the MMR rate (OR, 2.23; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.56-3.21) and was similar with 1 to 3 tPCRs performed (P = .67). Furthermore, tPCRs at 3 months (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.81-4.23) and 12 months (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.64-5.49) were associated with achieving early MMR, whereas tPCRs at 18 months were not (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.80-1.89). Low-volume centers were found to have lower adherence to tPCR (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Timely molecular assessment at 3 months and 12 months appears to benefit patients with CML. Adherence to timely monitoring should be encouraged, especially in low-volume treatment centers.


Assuntos
Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Conduta Expectante/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/metabolismo , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/metabolismo
18.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 114(8): 1256-1264, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30865017

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend that patients with non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) undergo surveillance endoscopy every 3-5 years. Using a national registry, we assessed compliance to recommended surveillance intervals in patients with NDBE and identified factors associated with compliance. METHODS: We analyzed data from the GI Quality Improvement Consortium registry. Data abstracted include procedure indication, demographics, endoscopy/pathology results, and recommendations for future endoscopy. Patients with an indication of Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening or surveillance, or an endoscopic finding of BE, with non-dysplastic intestinal metaplasia on pathological examination, were included. Compliance was defined as a recommendation to undergo subsequent endoscopy between 3 and 5 years. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess variables associated with compliance. RESULTS: Of 786,712 endoscopies assessed, 58,709 (7.5%) endoscopies in 53,541 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 61.3 years, 60.4% men, 90.2% white, mean BE length was 2.3 cm). Most cases were performed by Gastroenterologists (92.3%) with propofol (78.7%). A total of 29,978 procedures (55.8%) resulted in pathology-confirmed BE. Among procedures with NDBE (n = 25,945), 29.9% were noncompliant with the 3-year threshold; most (26.9%) recommended surveillance at 1- to 2-year intervals. Patient factors such as extremes of age, black race, geographic region, type of sedation, and increasing BE length were associated with noncompliance. DISCUSSION: Approximately 30% of patients with NDBE are recommended to undergo surveillance endoscopy too soon. Patient factors associated with inappropriate utilization include extremes of age, black race, and increasing BE length. Compliance with appropriate endoscopic follow-up as a quality measure in BE is poor.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Conduta Expectante/normas , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
J Urol ; 201(5): 916-922, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30676475

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the effects of subsequent prostate needle biopsies after the baseline biopsy on health related quality of life with time. We compared men with and without prostate cancer, and men who did and did not undergo followup prostate needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in analysis were patients enrolled in the Center for Prostate Disease Research Multicenter National Database between 2007 and 2015 who had low or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer, were on active surveillance and underwent prostate needle biopsy for suspicion of prostate cancer. Patients completed the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) and the RAND SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) after baseline biopsy and at regular followup intervals. Mean health related quality of life was compared with time between patients who did and did not undergo subsequent prostate needle biopsies following baseline. RESULTS: Of the 637 patients included in study 129 (20.3%) with prostate cancer were on active surveillance and 508 (79.7%) were in the noncancer group. In the cancer and noncancer groups mean ± SD followup was 34.7 ± 16.9 and 31.6 ± 14.6 months, respectively. Of the patients with prostate cancer 54 (60.7%) underwent subsequent prostate needle biopsies compared with 114 (27.1%) without cancer. No significant impact on health related quality of life was observed in men who underwent subsequent prostate needle biopsies during a 5-year period. CONCLUSIONS: A subsequent prostate needle biopsy is required in most active surveillance protocols and in men with persistent suspicion of prostate cancer. Our analysis shows that subsequent prostate needle biopsies do not significantly impact health related quality of life.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha/efeitos adversos , Biópsia por Agulha/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Conduta Expectante/normas
20.
J Urol ; 202(3): 469-474, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30835631

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Current trends in renal transplantation, such as improved allograft/recipient survival and expanded organ transplantation eligibility criteria in older recipients, are concomitant with increasingly detected low risk prostate cancer in candidates for or recipients of renal transplantation. We reviewed the evidence regarding prostate cancer screening, diagnosis and management in renal transplant candidates and recipients. We focused on published reports of prostate cancer incidence and diagnosis in patients with end stage renal disease, pretransplant screening recommendations, and recommendations regarding waiting time between treatment and active wait listing after the prostate cancer diagnosis in renal transplant candidates. In addition, we examined the natural history of prostate cancer development after renal transplantation in the setting of standard immunosuppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the English language literature using search terms including prostate cancer, end stage renal disease, renal transplantation, prostate cancer screening, prostate specific antigen, prostate cancer treatment and active surveillance in various combinations. RESULTS: Prostate cancer screening is still widely done in almost all patients with end stage renal disease before and after transplantation. Active treatment of any patients with prostate cancer and a 5-year waiting period before transplantation can negatively affect the collective pool of participants and the overall survival of patients on dialysis. Several groups have proposed a shorter waiting time to kidney transplantation in patients with low risk prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: There are no standardized guidelines for screening and management of prostate cancer before and after transplantation. In the era of low risk prostate cancer end stage renal disease is a significant competing mortality risk factor. The role of active surveillance in these complex cases has yet to be well investigated. Further studies and nomograms are urged to integrate risk stratified screening and treatment protocols before and after renal transplantation.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Conduta Expectante/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim/normas , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Rim/tendências , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Medição de Risco , Conduta Expectante/normas , Conduta Expectante/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA