What are the distinguishing features and size requirements of biomolecular condensates and their implications for RNA-containing condensates?

Exciting recent work has highlighted that numerous cellular compartments lack encapsulating lipid bilayers (often called "membraneless organelles"), and that their structure and function are central to the regulation of key biological processes, including transcription, RNA splicing, translation, and more. These structures have been described as "biomolecular condensates" to underscore that biomolecules can be significantly concentrated in them. Many condensates, including RNA granules and processing bodies, are enriched in proteins and nucleic acids. Biomolecular condensates exhibit a range of material states from liquid- to gel-like, with the physical process of liquid-liquid phase separation implicated in driving or contributing to their formation. To date, in vitro studies of phase separation have provided mechanistic insights into the formation and function of condensates. However, the link between the often micron-sized in vitro condensates with nanometer-sized cellular correlates has not been well established. Consequently, questions have arisen as to whether cellular structures below the optical resolution limit can be considered biomolecular condensates. Similarly, the distinction between condensates and discrete dynamic hub complexes is debated. Here we discuss the key features that define biomolecular condensates to help understand behaviors of structures containing and generating RNA.

Using quantitative reconstitution to investigate multicomponent condensates.

Many biomolecular condensates are thought to form via liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of multivalent macromolecules. For those that form through this mechanism, our understanding has benefitted significantly from biochemical reconstitutions of key components and activities. Reconstitutions of RNA-based condensates to date have mostly been based on relatively simple collections of molecules. However, proteomics and sequencing data indicate that natural RNA-based condensates are enriched in hundreds to thousands of different components, and genetic data suggest multiple interactions can contribute to condensate formation to varying degrees. In this Perspective, we describe recent progress in understanding RNA-based condensates through different levels of biochemical reconstitutions as a means to bridge the gap between simple in vitro reconstitution and cellular analyses. Complex reconstitutions provide insight into the formation, regulation, and functions of multicomponent condensates. We focus on two RNA-protein condensate case studies: stress granules and RNA processing bodies (P bodies), and examine the evidence for cooperative interactions among multiple components promoting LLPS. An important concept emerging from these studies is that composition and stoichiometry regulate biochemical activities within condensates. Based on the lessons learned from stress granules and P bodies, we discuss forward-looking approaches to understand the thermodynamic relationships between condensate components, with the goal of developing predictive models of composition and material properties, and their effects on biochemical activities. We anticipate that quantitative reconstitutions will facilitate understanding of the complex thermodynamics and functions of diverse RNA-protein condensates.

DDX6 modulates P-body and stress granule assembly, composition, and docking.

Stress granules and P-bodies are ribonucleoprotein (RNP) granules that accumulate during the stress response due to the condensation of untranslating mRNPs. Stress granules form in part by intermolecular RNA-RNA interactions and can be limited by components of the RNA chaperone network, which inhibits RNA-driven aggregation. Herein, we demonstrate that the DEAD-box helicase DDX6, a P-body component, can also limit the formation of stress granules, independent of the formation of P-bodies. In an ATPase, RNA-binding dependent manner, DDX6 limits the partitioning of itself and other RNPs into stress granules. When P-bodies are limited, proteins that normally partition between stress granules and P-bodies show increased accumulation within stress granules. Moreover, we show that loss of DDX6, 4E-T, and DCP1A increases P-body docking with stress granules, which depends on CNOT1 and PAT1B. Taken together, these observations identify a new role for DDX6 in limiting stress granules and demonstrate that P-body components can influence stress granule composition and docking with P-bodies.