RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To synthesise evidence concerning the range of filtering respirators suitable for patient care and guide the selection and use of different respirator types. DESIGN: Comparative analysis of international standards for respirators and rapid review of their performance and impact in healthcare. DATA SOURCES: Websites of international standards organisations, Medline and Embase, hand-searching of references and citations. STUDY SELECTION: Studies of healthcare workers (including students) using disposable or reusable respirators with a range of designs. We examined respirator performance, clinician adherence and performance, comfort and impact, and perceptions of use. RESULTS: We included standards from eight authorities across Europe, North and South America, Asia and Australasia and 39 research studies. There were four main findings. First, international standards for respirators apply across workplace settings and are broadly comparable across jurisdictions. Second, effective and safe respirator use depends on proper fitting and fit testing. Third, all respirator types carry a burden to the user of discomfort and interference with communication which may limit their safe use over long periods; studies suggest that they have little impact on specific clinical skills in the short term but there is limited evidence on the impact of prolonged wearing. Finally, some clinical activities, particularly chest compressions, reduce the performance of filtering facepiece respirators. CONCLUSION: A wide range of respirator types and models is available for use in patient care during respiratory pandemics. Careful consideration of performance and impact of respirators is needed to maximise protection of healthcare workers and minimise disruption to care.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Reutilização de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/normas , Reutilização de Equipamento/normas , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented a major medical management challenge to ophthalmology departments throughout Israel. OBJECTIVES: To examine the managerial challenges, actions taken, and insights of directors of ophthalmology departments in Israel during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional survey of directors of ophthalmology departments during the COVID-19 pandemic while the Israeli population was quarantined. RESULTS: All 21 directors answered the survey. The majority of the COVID-19 admissions were located in the center of Israel (53%) and Jerusalem (30%). E-communication took a central role in coping with the pandemic with 80% of the directors satisfied with this form of communication; 75% reported a reduction in clinical and surgery volume of at least 25%, and 40% reported reallocations of manpower. Most of the medical staff used gloves, a face shield, disposable robe, and a mask with no uniformity across departments. Cross satisfaction was noted regarding a hospital's ability to equip the departments. Lack of preparation for post-pandemic era was reported by all directors, but one (95%). Directors sought guidelines and uniformity regarding outpatient referral to the hospital (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines via safe digital platforms aid in management decisions and uniformity across departments. Advanced preparation is needed to prevent adverse clinical outcomes and to maintain treatment continuum. Our results can be used to guide and help improve the preparedness of ophthalmology departments during COVID-19 and for future pandemics.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Departamentos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Oftalmologia/organização & administração , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Comunicação , Estudos Transversais , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Luvas Protetoras/estatística & dados numéricos , Departamentos Hospitalares/normas , Humanos , Israel , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Quarentena , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The purpose of this study of healthcare workers who cared for COVID-19 patients was to identify factors that affected the duration of wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). The results of this study will provide initial guidance to practicing clinicians and a foundation for further research on this topic. This cross-sectional study examined 139 frontline healthcare professionals who worked at a single hospital in Wuhan, China, from March 16 to April 1, 2020. General and demographic data, physical and mental status, use of personal protective equipment, type of hospital work, and duration of wearing personal protective equipment were recorded. The mean duration of wearing personal protective equipment was 194.17 min (standard deviation: 3.71). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the duration of wearing personal protective equipment was significantly associated with the presence of a chronic disease, working hours when feeling discomfort, lack of patient cooperation and subsequent psychological pressure, prolonged continuous wearing of personal protective equipment, feeling anxious about physical strength, and the presence of fatigue when wearing personal protective equipment. These factors should be considered by practicing healthcare professionals and in future studies that examine the optimal duration of wearing personal protective equipment.
Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , China , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/efeitos adversos , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/classificação , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To date, the literature surrounding healthcare sustainability has focused largely on operating rooms, energy efficiency and biohazardous waste management. Few studies have looked at the sustainability within intensive care units (ICUs). OBJECTIVE: Our study sought to capture the array of sustainability initiatives undertaken by Canadian ICUs and gain a better understanding of current practices with regard to the management of single-use equipment waste. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide e-mail survey through the Canadian Critical Care Network. RESULTS: We received responses from a total of 81 hospital sites representing all 10 Canadian provinces and approximately 28.3% of all Canadian ICUs. The vast majority of responses came from ICU managers or nursing leadership. Our study identified variable waste management practices across the country and showcased successful initiatives undertaken by Canadian ICUs toward increased environmental sustainability.
Assuntos
Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Gerenciamento de Resíduos/métodos , Canadá , Equipamentos Descartáveis/provisão & distribuição , Hospitais , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs have led to increasing focus on cost containment and accountability from health care providers. We sought to explore surgeon awareness of supply costs for open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. METHODS: Surveys were sent in 2015 to surgeons at 8 academic hospitals in Toronto who performed distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Respondents were asked to estimate the total cost, type and number of disposable equipment pieces required to perform open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. We determined the accuracy of estimates through comparisons with procedural invoices for distal gastrectomy performed between Jan. 1, 2011, and Dec. 31, 2015. All values are in 2015 Canadian dollars. RESULTS: Of the 53 surveys sent out, 12 were completed (response rate 23%). Surgeon estimates of total supply costs ranged from $500 to $3000 and from $1500 to $5000 for open and laparoscopic cases, respectively. Estimated supply costs for requested equipment ranged from $464 to $2055 for open cases and from $1870 to $2960 for laparoscopic cases. Invoices for actual equipment yielded a mean of $821 (standard deviation $543) (range $89-$2613) for open cases and $2678 (standard deviation $958) (range $835-$4102) for laparoscopic cases. Estimates of total cost were within 25% of the median invoice total in 1 response (9%) for open cases and 3 (27%) of those for laparoscopic cases. CONCLUSION: Respondents failed to accurately estimate equipment costs. The variation in true total costs and estimates of supply costs represents an opportunity for intraoperative cost minimization, efficient equipment selection and value-based purchasing arrangements.
CONTEXTE: En raison de l'augmentation des coûts des soins de santé on attend des professionnels qu'ils mettent davantage l'accent sur les restrictions budgétaires et l'imputabilité. Nous avons voulu vérifier à quel point les chirurgiens sont conscients du coût des fournitures utilisés dans les cas de gastrectomie distale ouverte et laparoscopique. MÉTHODES: Des questionnaires ont été envoyés en 2015 aux chirurgiens de 8 hôpitaux universitaires de Toronto qui pratiquent la gastrectomie distale pour l'adénocarcinome de l'estomac. On demandait aux participants d'estimé le coût total, le type et le nombre de fournitures jetables requises pour une gastrectomie distale ouverte et laparoscopique. Nous avons déterminé l'exactitude des estimations en comparant les factures pour les interventions de gastrectomie distale effectuées entre le 1er janvier 2011 et le 31 décembre 2015. Toutes les valeurs sont présentées en dollars canadiens. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 53 questionnaires envoyés, 12 sont revenus complétés (taux de réponse 23â¯%). Les estimations des chirurgiens pour le coût total des fournitures allaient de 500â¯$ à 3000â¯$ et de 1500â¯$ à 5000â¯$ pour les interventions ouvertes et laparoscopiques, respectivement. Le coût estimé des fournitures pour l'équipement nécessaire variait de 464â¯$ à 2055â¯$ pour les interventions ouvertes et de 1870â¯$ à 2960â¯$ pour les interventions laparoscopiques. Les factures soumises pour les équipements réellement utilisés ont été en moyenne de 821â¯$ (écart-type 543â¯$) (éventail 89â¯$-2613â¯$) pour les interventions ouvertes et de 2678 $ (écart-type 958â¯$) (éventail 835â¯$-4102â¯$) pour les interventions laparoscopiques. Les estimations des coûts totaux se situaient à plus ou moins 25â¯% du montant total médian des factures dans 1 réponse (9â¯%) pour les interventions ouvertes et dans 3 réponses (27â¯%) pour les interventions laparoscopiques. CONCLUSION: Les participants n'ont pas été en mesure d'estimer avec exactitude le coût des fournitures. Cet écart entre les coûts totaux réels et estimés représente une occasion de réduire les coûts peropératoires, de sélectionner les équipements de façon efficiente et de conclure des contrats d'achat en fonction de la valeur.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Custos e Análise de Custo/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastrectomia/economia , Laparoscopia/economia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Adenocarcinoma/economia , Estudos Transversais , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Equipamentos e Suprimentos/economia , Utilização de Equipamentos e Suprimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares/economia , Gastrectomia/instrumentação , Gastrectomia/métodos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/métodos , Ontário , Neoplasias Gástricas/economia , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To reduce operative costs involved in the purchase, packing, and transport of unnecessary supplies by improving the accuracy of surgeon preference cards. STUDY DESIGN: Quality improvement study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: Gynecologic surgery suite of an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one specialized and generalist gynecologic surgeons. INTERVENTIONS: The preference cards of up to the 5 most frequently performed procedures per surgeon were selected. A total of 81 cards were distributed to 21 surgeons for review. Changes to the cards were communicated to the operating room charge nurse and finalized. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen surgeons returned a total of 48 reviewed cards, 39 of which had changes. A total of 109 disposable supplies were removed from these cards, at a total cost savings of $767.67. The cost per card was reduced by $16 on average for disposables alone. Three reusable instrument trays were also eliminated from the cards, resulting in savings of approximately $925 in processing costs over a 3-month period. Twenty-two items were requested by surgeons to be available on request but were not routinely placed in the room at the start of each case, at a total cost of $6,293.54. The rate of return of unused instruments to storage decreased after our intervention, from 10.1 to 9.6 instruments per case. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon preference cards serve as the basis for economic decision making regarding the purchase, storing, packing, and transport of operative instruments and supplies. A one-time surgeon review of cards resulted in a decrease in the number of disposable and reusable instruments that must be stocked, transported, counted in the operating room, or returned, potentially translating into cost savings. Surgeon involvement in preference card management may reduce waste and provide ongoing cost savings.
Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Papel do Médico , Melhoria de Qualidade , Cirurgiões , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/economia , Adulto , Comportamento do Consumidor/economia , Comportamento do Consumidor/estatística & dados numéricos , Redução de Custos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/provisão & distribuição , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/economia , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Alocação de Recursos/economia , Alocação de Recursos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgiões/economia , Cirurgiões/normas , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/provisão & distribuição , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Single-use plastic blades (SUPB) and single-use metal blades (SUMB) for direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation have not yet been compared with reusable metal blades (RUMB) in difficult airway scenarios. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our manikin study was to compare the effectiveness of these different laryngoscope blades in a difficult airway scenario, as well as in a difficult airway scenario with simulated severe inhalation injury. METHODS: Thirty anesthetists performed tracheal intubation (TI) with each of the three laryngoscope blades in the two scenario manikins. RESULTS: In the inhalation injury scenario, SUPB were associated with prolonged intubation times when compared with the metal blades. In the inhalation injury scenario, both metal laryngoscope blades provided a quicker, easier, and safer TI. In the difficult airway scenario, intubation times were significantly prolonged in the SUPB group in comparison to the RUMB group, but there were no significant differences between the SUPB and the SUMB. In this scenario, the RUMB demonstrated the shortest intubation times and seems to be the most effective device. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, results are in line with previous studies showing significant disadvantages of SUPB in both manikin scenarios. Therefore, metal blades might be beneficial, especially in the airway management of patients with inhalation injury.
Assuntos
Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento/normas , Laringoscópios/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Equipamentos Descartáveis/normas , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Desenho de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/estatística & dados numéricos , Laringoscópios/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Manequins , Metais/análise , Metais/economia , Simulação de Paciente , Plásticos/análise , Plásticos/economiaRESUMO
Background A key avoidable expense in the surgical setting is the wastage of disposable surgical items, which are discarded after cases even if they go unused. A major contributor to wastage of these items is the inaccuracy of surgeon preference cards, which are rarely examined or updated. The authors report the application of a novel technique called cost heatmapping to facilitate standardization of preference cards for microvascular breast reconstruction. Methods Preference card data were obtained for all surgeons performing microvascular breast reconstruction at the authors' institution. These data were visualized using the heatmap.2 function in the gplot package for R. The resulting cost heatmaps were shown to all surgeons performing microvascular breast reconstruction at our institution; each surgeon was asked to classify the items on the heatmap as "always needed," "sometimes needed," or "never needed." This feedback was used to generate a lean standardized preference card for all surgeons. This card was validated by all surgeons performing the case and by nursing leadership familiar with the supply needs of microvascular breast reconstruction before implementation. Cost savings associated with implementation were calculated. Results Implementation of the preference card changes will lead to an estimated per annum savings of $17,981.20 and a per annum reduction in individual items listed on preference cards of 1,693 items. Conclusion Cost heatmapping is a powerful tool for increasing surgeon awareness of cost and for facilitating comparison and standardization of surgeon preference cards.
Assuntos
Redução de Custos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Mamoplastia/economia , Mamoplastia/instrumentação , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/economia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Análise Custo-Benefício , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Controle de Formulários e Registros , Humanos , Mamoplastia/normas , Segurança do PacienteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Nosocomial pneumonia accounts for the vast majority of healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Although numerous medical devices have been discussed as potential vehicles for microorganisms, very little is known about the role played by oxygen humidifiers as potential sources of nosocomial pathogens. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the safety of the reuse of humidifiers by analysing the rate of microbial contamination in reusable and disposable oxygen humidifiers used during therapy, and then discuss their potential role in the transmission of respiratory pathogens. METHODS: Water samples from reusable and disposable oxygen humidifiers were collected from different wards of the University Hospital of Messina, Italy, where nosocomial pneumonia has a higher incidence rate due to the "critical" clinical conditions of inpatients. In particular, we monitored the Internal Medicine and Pulmonology wards for the medical area; the General Surgery and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery wards for the surgical area and the Intensive Care Unit and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for the emergency area. The samples were always collected after a period of 5 days from initial use for both types of humidifiers. Samples were processed using standard bacteriological techniques and microbial colonies were identified using manual and automated methods. RESULTS: High rates of microbial contamination were observed in samples from reusable oxygen humidifiers employed in medical (83%), surgical (77%) and emergency (50%) areas. The most relevant pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, amongst the Gram-negative bacteria, and Staphylococcus aureus, amongst the Gram-positive bacteria. Other pathogens were detected in lower percentage. The disposable oxygen humidifier samples showed no contamination. CONCLUSIONS: This research presents evidence of the high rate and type of microbial contamination of reusable humidifiers employed for oxygen therapy. These devices may thus be involved in the transmission of potential pathogens. It could be important, for the prevention of nosocomial pneumonia, to replace them with singleuse humidifiers for which the absence of microbial contamination has been confirmed.
Assuntos
Microbiologia do Ar , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Reutilização de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Umidificadores , Oxigenoterapia/instrumentação , Microbiologia da Água , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Itália , RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the knowledge and biosafety practices adopted by professionals of the beauty segment. METHODS Descriptive study, of survey type. 238 professionals of the beauty segment were interviewed between August 2014 and 2015. The variables were expressed by means of absolute and relative frequencies, as well as average and standard deviation. RESULTS 62.6% of the interviwed professionals reported having had contact with blood from customers when they were not wearing gloves; 74.4% said they washed their hands before and after each service, and only 16.8% of the respondents reported reusing nonsterilizable materials. None of them was able to inform the correct number of sets of tools needed , and 32.8% of the respondents did not use Personal Protective Equipment during their work activities. CONCLUSIONS The most frequently reported diseases associated with the risk of infection and transmission in the work activities were viral hepatitis, HIV and fungi. Regarding the biosafety procedures adopted, autoclave is the least used method for sterilizing devices.
Assuntos
Indústria da Beleza , Modificação Corporal não Terapêutica , Contenção de Riscos Biológicos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Controle de Infecções , Saúde Ocupacional , Adulto , Indústria da Beleza/instrumentação , Indústria da Beleza/métodos , Líquidos Corporais , Brasil , Doenças Transmissíveis/transmissão , Desinfecção/métodos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Luvas Protetoras/estatística & dados numéricos , Higiene das Mãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Esterilização/instrumentação , Esterilização/métodos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosAssuntos
Basquetebol/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Basquetebol/normas , Intervalos de Confiança , Estudos Transversais , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Indiana , Masculino , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos , UniversidadesRESUMO
A number of studies in the U.S.A. and mainland Europe have described the costs of fibreoptic tracheal intubation. However, no such data from the UK appear available. We performed a cost assessment of fibreoptic intubation, using re-usable (various devices from Olympus, Acutronic and Karl Storz) and single-use (Ambu aScope) fibrescopes, at the Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, U.K., between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2014. The total annual cost of fibreoptic intubation with re-usable fibrescopes was £46,385. Based on 141 fibreoptic intubations per year, this equated to £329 per use, an average dominated by repair/maintenance costs (43%) and capital depreciation costs (42%). In comparison, the total annual cost of using single-use fibrescopes for the same work would have been around £200 per use. The analysis enabled us to develop a generic model, wherein we were able to describe the relationship between total cost of use vs number of uses for a fibrescope. An 'isopleth' was identified for this relationship: a line that joined all the points where the cost of re-usable vs single-use fibrescopes was equal. It appears cheaper to use single-use fibrescopes at up to 200 fibreoptic intubations per year (a range commensurate with normal practice) even when the repair rate for re-usable fibrescopes is low. Any centre, knowing its fibrescope use and repair rate, can plot its data similarly to help ascertain which of the re-usable or single-use fibrescope represents better value.
Assuntos
Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Reutilização de Equipamento/economia , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica/economia , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica/instrumentação , Hospitais de Ensino/economia , Intubação Intratraqueal/economia , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Custos e Análise de Custo , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Laringoscópios , Modelos Econômicos , Esterilização/economia , Reino UnidoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To document contact lens prescribing patterns in the United States between 2002 and 2014. METHODS: A survey of contact lens prescribing trends was conducted each year between 2002 and 2014, inclusive. Randomly selected contact lens practitioners were asked to provide information relating to 10 consecutive contact lens fits between January and March each year. RESULTS: Over the 13-year survey period, 1650 survey forms were received from US practitioners representing details of 7702 contact lens fits. The mean (±SD) age of lens wearers was 33.6 (±15.2) years, of whom 65.2% were female. Rigid lens new fits decreased from 13.0% in 2002 to 9.4% in 2014. Across this period, silicone hydrogels have replaced mid water contact lens hydrogels as the soft lens material of choice. Toric lenses represented about 25 to 30% of all soft lens fits. Multifocal soft lenses are generally preferred to monovision. Daily disposable lens fits have recently increased, and in 2014, they represented 27.1% of all soft lens fits. Most lenses are prescribed on 1 to 2 weekly or monthly lens replacement regimen. Extended wear remains a minority lens wearing modality. The vast majority of those wearing reusable lenses use multipurpose lens care solutions. Lenses are mostly worn 7 d/wk. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has revealed prescribing trends and preferences in the United States over the past 13 years.
Assuntos
Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Prescrições/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Optometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Ajuste de Prótese , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is wide variation in the cost of disposable operating room supplies between surgeons performing the same operation at the same institution. The general relationship between variation in disposable supply cost and patient outcomes is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between disposable supply cost and patient outcomes for sixteen common operations. METHODS: Cost data were reviewed for the most common procedures performed by five surgical divisions at a single children's hospital over a six-month period in 2021. For procedure, the median disposable OR costs were calculated. Each operation performed was categorized as low cost (below the group median) or high cost (above the group median. We compared the rates of adverse events (clinic visit within 5 days, 30-day emergency department visit, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, anesthesia complications, prolonged hospital length of stay, need for blood product transfusion, or death) between procedures with low and high disposable supply costs. RESULTS: 1139 operations performed by 48 unique surgeons from five specialties were included; 596 (52%) were low-cost and 543 (48%) high-cost. The low and high-cost groups did not differ regarding most demographic characteristics. Overall, 21.9% of children suffered any adverse outcome; this rate did not differ between the low and high-cost groups when evaluated individually or in aggregate (20.5% vs 23.6%, p = 0.23). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that across a wide range of pediatric surgical procedures, the cost of disposable operating room supplies was not associated with the risk of adverse outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Assuntos
Equipamentos Descartáveis , Salas Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Salas Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pré-Escolar , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Lactente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economiaRESUMO
Cardiac tamponade represents a medical emergency necessitating emergent pericardiocentesis. Use of two-dimensional echocardiography (ECHO) has improved the safety of pericardiocentesis, but procedural challenges may occur when performed in an emergent manner outside of the catheterization laboratory without availability of fluoroscopy and readily available pressure transducers. The most problematic situation is the initial finding of bloody fluid on aspiration where intrapericardial versus intravascular location of the needle must be determined. We report two cases of cardiac tamponade managed with the use of a novel, disposable lightweight digital pressure transducer to directly measure intrapericardial pressures during an ECHO guided pericardiocentesis. In both cases the fluid initially encountered was grossly bloody and rapid definition of whether this was pericardial fluid versus an inappropriately located needle in the vascular space was critical. This type of novel, disposable self contained manometer has the potential to further minimize complications associated with pericardiocentesis. It offers a cost effective alternative and answers questions about the shifting point of service for pericardiocentesis from the invasive cath lab to less costly locations (Drummond, et al., J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998;11:433-435).
Assuntos
Tamponamento Cardíaco/cirurgia , Derrame Pericárdico/cirurgia , Pericardiocentese/instrumentação , Idoso , Tamponamento Cardíaco/diagnóstico por imagem , Tamponamento Cardíaco/fisiopatologia , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Ecocardiografia Doppler , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança do Paciente , Derrame Pericárdico/diagnóstico por imagem , Derrame Pericárdico/fisiopatologia , Pericardiocentese/métodos , Transdutores de Pressão , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We investigated the hypothesis that the oropharyngeal leak pressure would differ between the GuardianCPV™ and the LMA Supreme™ in anaesthetised patients. We randomly assigned 120 patients to receive either the GuardianCPV or the LMA Supreme for airway management. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was measured during cuff inflation from 0 to 40 ml in 10-ml steps. In addition, intracuff pressure, fibreoptic position of the airway and drain tube, device insertion success, ventilation success, blood staining and airway morbidity were determined. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal leak pressures for clinically acceptable cuff volumes of 20-40 ml were 31 (7) cmH2O for the GuardianCPV and 27 (7) cmH2O for the LMA Supreme (p < 0.0001); mean (SD) intracuff pressures were 68 (33) cmH2O and 88 (43) cmH2O (p < 0.0001), respectively. We found no differences in device insertion success, ventilation success, fibreoptic position of the airway and drain tube, blood staining or airway morbidity. We conclude that the oropharyngeal leak pressure is better for the GuardianCPV than for the LMA Supreme in anaesthetised patients.
Assuntos
Máscaras Laríngeas/normas , Bloqueio Neuromuscular , Paralisia/cirurgia , Adulto , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes and complications of three methods of circumcision in a Chinese pediatric population. METHODS: A total of 120 children were randomly assigned to three groups. Group I was submitted to circumcision using the Shenghuan disposable device according to Yan's method; group II was submitted to circumcision using the same device, but according to Peng's methods; group III was operated on by using the conventional scalpel/suture technique. The three groups were compared mainly by the following outcomes: duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, cosmetic effect, and the rates of edema, dehiscence, scarring, adhesion and infection. RESULTS: Groups I and II had less intraoperative bleeding. In terms of the duration of surgery, group I was the quickest. Pain scores in using the Shenghuan disposable device were higher at 6 h after surgery compared with the conventional scalpel/suture technique. The percentage of patients using paracetamol in group II was higher than that in group III at 12 h after surgery. Other complications were similar, and all three groups had successful outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Circumcision using the Shenghuan disposable device represents a safer and time-saving option compared with the conventional scalpel/suture technique, with better cosmetic outcomes. Yan's method seems to be better than Peng's method when using the Shenghuan disposable device for circumcision in children.
Assuntos
Circuncisão Masculina/instrumentação , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China , Circuncisão Masculina/efeitos adversos , Circuncisão Masculina/métodos , Método Duplo-Cego , Desenho de Equipamento , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Técnicas de Sutura , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização/fisiologiaRESUMO
As the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over skin grafts has increased, traditional methods of NPWT system reimbursement and application are increasingly being challenged. A simplified method of accessing and operating NPWT in the outpatient setting is needed, particularly in cases where immediate outpatient use of NPWT is optimal. We evaluated use of a new ultra-lightweight, off-the-shelf, disposable, single-patient-use NPWT system (SP-NPWT; V.A.C.Via™ Therapy, KCI USA, Inc., San Antonio, TX) over dermal regeneration template (DRT) and/or skin grafts. SP-NPWT was initiated over a DRT and/or skin graft in 33 patients with 41 graft procedures. Endpoints were recorded and compared to a historical control group of 25 patients with 28 grafts bolstered with traditional rental NPWT (V.A.C.® Therapy, KCI USA, Inc.). Average length of inpatient hospital stay was 0·0 days for the SP-NPWT group and 6·0 days for the control group (P < 0·0001). The average duration of SP-NPWT post-DRT or skin graft was 5·6 days for the SP-NPWT group and 7·0 days for the control (P < 0·0001). Preliminary data suggest that, compared to traditional NPWT, off-the-shelf SP-NPWT may provide a quicker, seamless transition to home, resulting in decreased hospital stay and potential cost savings.
Assuntos
Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/instrumentação , Transplante de Pele/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Análise Custo-Benefício , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/economia , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/métodos , Valores de Referência , Transplante de Pele/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: For most items used in operating rooms, it is unclear whether reusable items are environmentally and financially advantageous in comparison with single-use variants. We examined the life cycles of reusable and single-use central venous catheter kits used to aid the insertion of single-use, central venous catheters in operating rooms. We did not examine the actual disposable catheter sets themselves. We assessed the entire financial and environmental costs for the kits, including the influence of the energy source used for sterilization. METHODS: For the reusable central venous catheter kit, we performed a "time-in-motion" study to determine the labor costs and measured the energy and water consumption for cleaning and sterilization at Western Health, Melbourne, Australia. For the majority of the inputs for the single-use kit, we relied upon industry and inventory-sourced databases. We modeled the life cycles of the reusable and single-use central venous catheter kits with Monte Carlo analysis. RESULTS: Inclusive of labor, the reusable central venous catheter insertion kits cost $6.35 Australian ($A) (95% confidence interval [CI], $A5.89 to $A6.86), and the single-use kits cost $A8.65. For the reusable kit, CO(2) emissions were 1211 g (95% CI, 1099 to 1323 g) and for the single-use kit 407 g (95% CI, 379 to 442 g). Water use was 27.7 L (95% CI, 27.0 to 28.6 l) for the reusable kit and 2.5 L (95% CI, 2.1 to 2.9 l) for the single-use kit. For the reusable kit, sterilization had the greatest environmental cost, and for the single-use kit, the manufacture of plastic and metal components had the largest environmental costs. Different sources of electricity to make the reusable kits patient-ready again affected the CO(2) emissions: electricity from hospital gas cogeneration resulted in 436 g CO(2) (95% CI, 410 to 473 g CO(2)), from the United States electricity grid 764 g CO(2) (95% CI, 509 to 1174 g CO(2)), and from the European electricity grid 572 g (95% CI, 470 to 713 g CO(2)). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusive of labor, the reusable central venous catheter insertion kits were less expensive than were the single-use kits. For our hospital, which uses brown coal-sourced electricity, the environmental costs of the reusable kit were considerably greater than those of the single-use kit. Efforts to reduce the environmental footprint of reusable items should be directed towards decreasing the water and energy consumed in cleaning and sterilization. The source of hospital electricity significantly alters the relative environmental effects of reusable items.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Catéteres/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamentos Descartáveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Reutilização de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Dióxido de Carbono/análise , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economia , Catéteres/economia , Simulação por Computador , Conservação de Recursos Energéticos/economia , Conservação de Recursos Energéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Equipamentos Descartáveis/economia , Eletricidade , Poluição Ambiental/análise , Reutilização de Equipamento/economia , Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde , Modelos Estatísticos , Método de Monte Carlo , Aço Inoxidável , Esterilização/economia , Esterilização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vitória , Água , Poluição Química da Água/análiseRESUMO
In a randomised crossover study, 60 ambulance paramedics attempted tracheal intubation of a manikin model of a Cormack and Lehane grade 3/4 view using a Portex stylet, Portex and Frova single-use bougies, and a Portex reusable bougie. Tracheal intubation within 30 s was achieved by 34/60 (57%) using the stylet, 18/60 (30%) using a Portex single-use bougie, 16/60 (27%) using a Frova single-use bougie and 5/60 (8%) using a Portex reusable bougie. The proportion intubating within 30 s was significantly higher with the stylet compared with any bougie (p < 0.001), but significantly lower with a Portex reusable bougie than any other device (p < 0.004). Participants rated the Portex reusable bougie as significantly more difficult to use than the other devices (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of a relationship between previous experience and success rate for any device.