Novel use of an autologous scleral button graft to close the anterior defect in evisceration surgery.

PURPOSE: To present an alternative evisceration technique with long-term follow-up data. This technique involves the insertion of an acrylic implant into a modified scleral shell which is closed using an autologous scleral graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of eviscerations performed in a district-general hospital in the UK. All patients underwent conventional ocular evisceration after total keratectomy. A full thickness scleral graft is harvested from the posterior sclera, using an internal approach, with an 8 mm dermatological punch. An 18-20 mm acrylic implant is placed into the shell, and the scleral graft is used to close the anterior defect. Demographic characteristics, implant size and type, and cosmetic results from pictures of all patients were recorded. All patients were invited for a review to measure motility, eyelid height, patient recorded satisfaction and complications. RESULTS: Of the five patients identified, one had since died. The remaining four attended a review in person. The mean time between surgery and review was 48 months. The mean implant size was 19 mm. There were no cases of implant extrusion or infection. All four had a <1 mm asymmetry in measured eyelid height and ≥5 mm horizontal gaze motility. All patients self-reported "good" cosmesis. An independent assessment identified "mild asymmetry" in two cases and "moderate" in the other two. CONCLUSION: Evisceration with this novel autologous scleral graft technique restores volume in the anterior orbit with good cosmetic results, and with no cases of implant exposure reported in this small case series. This technique should be compared prospectively to established techniques.

Outcome of eviscerations and enucleations at a Swedish tertiary referral centre between 2008 and 2019: improved surgical management leading to reduced complication rate.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the results of all eviscerations and enucleations performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, during 2008-2019 and to compare them with previously collected data from 1999 to 2007. METHODS: This was a retrospective investigation using the medical records for all patients having had an evisceration or an enucleation at the Department of Ophthalmology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, during the two defined periods of time. Main outcome measure was postoperative complications. RESULTS: During 1999-2007, 181 surgeries were performed, 100 with implants, and 28/100 exposed implants and 9/100 removed implants were recorded during follow-up. During 2008-2019, 250 operations were performed with 158 implants, and there were 3/158 exposed implants and 2/158 extruded implants. Two ruptures of the surgical wound without implant exposure were noted, and one implant was exchanged. The reduction of exposed implants between the two periods was statistically significant (p < .001, Chi-square test). In enucleations, the use of one kind of porous polyethylene implant in the recent study period replaced a multitude of implants in the earlier study period. In eviscerations, the major change between the two study periods was the introduction of the split sclera technique and smaller implant size. CONCLUSION: The change in surgical technique between the two periods led to a significant reduction in implant-related complications.

Risk factors for enucleation or evisceration in endophthalmitis.

PURPOSE: To identify clinical risk factors for enucleation or evisceration in patients with endophthalmitis at an academic institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis at Wilmer Eye Institute from 2010 to 2019 was conducted. Clinical characteristics, including demographics, cause for endophthalmitis, microbial culture results, salvaging procedures and surgical intervention were recorded. In patients who underwent enucleation or evisceration, type of surgery and placement of a primary implant were recorded. Chi-squared, Student's t-tests and multivariate analysis were used to identify clinical factors that predicted enucleation or evisceration. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty three patients treated for endophthalmitis over the study period were identified, of which 25 (9.88%) underwent enucleation or evisceration. Risk factors for enucleation or evisceration included poor presenting visual acuity (OR 7.86, CI: 2.26, 27.3), high presenting intraocular pressure (OR 1.07, CI: 1.03, 1.12), presence of relative afferent pupillary defect (OR 3.69, CI: 1.20, 11.37) and positive vitreous culture for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (OR 18.3, CI: 1.54, 219.2) on multivariate analysis. Patients undergoing enucleation or evisceration were also more likely to have trauma, corneal ulcer or combined causes for endophthalmitis and underwent fewer salvaging surgical and procedural interventions. There were no significant differences in characteristics of those receiving enucleation versus evisceration in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients with endophthalmitis who underwent enucleation or evisceration had more severe disease on presentation compared to those treated with eye sparing therapy. Presenting clinical characteristics may have a role in triage and management decisions for patients presenting with severe endophthalmitis.

Single or double? A comparison of evisceration techniques.

PURPOSE: We compared the rates of implant exposure and extrusion after evisceration with single and double scleral closure techniques. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent evisceration with an implant insertion over the past 18 years at Tung Wah Eastern Hospital and Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital. Clinical documents and operation records were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 81 ethnic Chinese patients (44 male) who underwent evisceration with primary implant insertion were reviewed. 39 (48%) patients underwent the double scleral closure technique with an implant placed posterior to the posterior sclera, and 42 (52%) patients underwent the single scleral closure technique with an implant inserted in the intra-scleral cavity. The follow-up interval was 70 months. The surgical indications were endophthalmitis (35%), painful blind eye (23%), traumatic disfigured globe (22%) and phthisis bulbi (20%). Silicone was the most used implant material (69%). The patients who underwent double scleral closure had a larger size of the implant (19.7 vs 17.9 mm, p < 0.05). Both implant exposure (26% vs 3%, p < 0.05) and implant extrusion (26% vs 0%, p < 0.05) were more common in patients who underwent single scleral. CONCLUSIONS: Double scleral closure technique allows a larger implant, and it is associated with a lower rate of implant exposure and extrusion. The double scleral closure technique is a superior technique of choice in these patients with primary implant placement.

Silicone Sphere Implant Extrusion From Orbital Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Rare Complication in the Anophthalmic Socket.

Orbital implant extrusion is a known complication following evisceration and enucleation. In this case report, we present a 45-year-old woman who presented with a left silicone implant exposure and infection 2 years following evisceration with saddle nose on examination. CT of the maxillofacial bones without contrast showed bilateral soft tissue infiltration around the superior recti muscles, as well as a nasal septum perforation from extensive sinus disease. Left orbitotomy revealed a small fibrotic mass near the orbital roof. Biopsy and serology results were consistent with granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

The Ruptured Globe, Sympathetic Ophthalmia, and the 14-Day Rule.

PURPOSE: Prophylactic enucleation of a ruptured globe with no light perception within 14 days of injury to prevent sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) has been an established dictum in academic teaching for more than 100 years. This treatment strategy was originally based on observation, speculation, and careful thought, but there was never any scientific proof. This review summarizes and updates the current state of our knowledge about globe rupture and SO, examines the origin and validity of the 14-day rule, and emphasizes the importance of trying to save the traumatized eye whenever possible. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of SO and globe rupture was performed. RESULTS: SO is a rare disorder that may potentially occur following traumatic globe rupture as well as following a variety of other intraocular surgeries. Vitreoretinal surgery may be a more common cause than trauma according to some studies. SO may still occur despite having the eye removed within 14 days of the trauma. A variety of new medications including biologic agents are now available to treat SO with improved efficacy in suppressing the associated ocular inflammation and allowing retention of some useful vision. Removing the traumatized, blind eye may have other important psychological consequences associated with it that require consideration before eye removal is carried out. Retaining the blind, phthisical, disfigured eye avoids phantom vision and phantom pain associated with enucleation as well as providing a good platform to support and move an overlying prosthetic eye. Data on the occurrence of SO following evisceration and enucleation with and without predisposing factors confirms the exceedingly low risk. CONCLUSION: Most civilian open globe injuries can be successfully repaired with modern, advanced microsurgical techniques currently available. Because of the exceedingly low risk of SO, even with the severity of open globe trauma during military conflicts being more devastating as a result of the blast and explosive injuries, today every attempt is made to primarily close the eye rather than primarily enucleate it, providing there is enough viable tissue to repair. The 14-day rule for eye removal after severe globe ruptures is not scientifically supported and does not always protect against SO, but the safe time period for prophylactic eye removal is not definitively known. In the exceptional cases where SO does occur, several new medications are now available that may help treat SO. We advocate saving the ruptured globe whenever possible and avoiding prophylactic enucleation to prevent the rare occurrence of SO. When an eye requires removal, evisceration is an acceptable alternative to enucleation in cases that do not harbor intraocular malignancy.

Outcomes and complications of evisceration with primary implant: an electronic medical record driven analytics of 1800 cases.

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical outcomes and implant complications in 1,800 patients undergoing evisceration with primary implant. METHODS: An Electronic Medical Record-driven analysis of 1,800 patients undergoing evisceration with primary implant between 2013 and 2019. Implant sizing was performed intra-operatively to place the largest implant without tension on the wound closure. Outcome measures included implant complications, prosthesis measurements, and incidence of a good aesthetic outcome. Good outcome was defined as <2 mm enophthalmos and grade 1 or less superior sulcus deformity with a custom ocular prosthesis. RESULTS: Eighteen hundred eyes of 1800 patients were included. The mean age at surgery was 36 ± 21 years (median 32 years). Implants used were poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) in 1737 (97%) and porous polyethylene in 63 (3%) patients. Two-petal sclerotomy was performed in 1512 (88%) and four-petal sclerotomy in 165 (10%) patients. The mean diameter of the implant used was 19.35 ± 1.18 mm (median 20, range 10-22 mm). The implant extrusion rate was 3% (56) and implant displacement was seen in none. The mean prosthesis volume and thickness were 2.22 ± 0.67 ml (median 2, range 1-6.5 ml) and 6 ± 1 mm (median 6, range 2-9 mm). The mean difference in prosthesis projection on Hertel's exophthalmometer was 0.28 ± 1 mm (median 0, range 0-1 mm). Good outcome was observed in 93%. The mean follow-up period was 351 ± 386 days (median 194). CONCLUSION: Evisceration with empirically selected primary orbital implant placement is associated with minimal implant complications and gives a good aesthetic outcome in 93% of the patients.

Trends in Eye Removal Surgeries at a Tertiary Care Hospital Over Three Decades.

PURPOSE: To determine the trends in eye removal surgeries at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria over 26 years. METHODS: A retrospective comparative review of clinical records of all patients who had eye removal surgery at a tertiary hospital in Ile-Ife, Nigeria, between 2014 and 2019 was done. Patients' demographic and clinical data, including indication for eye removal and type of surgery were analysed and compared with two earlier studies at the same hospital between 1994 and 2013. RESULTS: There was an average of 14.3 surgeries per year between 2014 and 2019. Patients' ages ranged from 2 to 102 years, M:F was 1.5:1, the commonest indication for eye removal was infection (n=30, 34.9%), and the most common surgery was evisceration (n=70, 81.4%). Studies from 1994 to 2003 and 2005 to 2013, reported an average of 9.2 and 10 surgeries per year; ages ranging from 4 days to 88 years and 3 months to 88 years; with a M:F of 2.1:1 and 3.4:1 respectively. In both studies, the commonest indication for eye removal was trauma (43.4% and 43.8% respectively) and the most common surgery was enucleation (57.6% and 55% respectively). Trend data showed a progressive increase in eye infections (12% vs 15% vs 34.9%) and eviscerations (19.6% vs 31.2% vs 81.4%) over time. CONCLUSION: There was a change in trend towards an increase in eviscerations and infective indications for eye removal at the hospital over three decades. Prompt and optimal treatment of orbito-ocular infections is recommended to reduce the incidence of eye removal surgeries.

BUT: Déterminer les tendances des chirurgies d'ablation de l'oeil dans un hôpital tertiaire du Nigeria sur une période de 26 ans. MÉTHODES: Un examen comparatif rétrospectif des dossiers cliniques de tous les patients ayant subi une chirurgie d'ablation de l'œil dans un hôpital tertiaire d'Ile-Ife, au Nigeria, entre 2014 et 2019, a été effectué. Les données démographiques et cliniques des patients, y compris l'indication de l'ablation de l'œil et le type de chirurgie, ont été analysées et comparées à deux études antérieures menées dans le même hôpital entre 1994 et 2013. RÉSULTATS: Il y avait une moyenne de 14,3 chirurgies par an entre 2014 et 2019. L'âge des patients allait de 2 à 102 ans, le rapport M:F était de 1,5:1, l'indication la plus courante pour l'ablation de l'œil était l'infection (n=30, 34,9%), et la chirurgie la plus fréquente était l'éviscération (n=70, 81,4%). Les études menées de 1994 à 2003 et de 2005 à 2013 ont fait état d'une moyenne de 9,2 et 10 interventions chirurgicales par an, d'âges allant de 4 jours à 88 ans et de 3 mois à 88 ans, et d'un rapport M:F de 2,1:1 et 3,4:1 respectivement. Dans les deux études, l'indication la plus courante pour l'ablation de l'œil était le traumatisme (43,4 % et 43,8 % respectivement) et la chirurgie la plus courante était l'énucléation (57,6 % et 55 % respectivement). Les données sur les tendances ont montré une augmentation progressive des infections oculaires (12 % vs 15 % vs 34,9 %) et des éviscérations (19,6 % vs 31,2 % vs 81,4 %) au fil du temps. CONCLUSION: On constate un changement de tendance vers une augmentation des éviscérations et des indications infectieuses pour l'ablation des yeux à l'hôpital sur trois décennies. Un traitement rapide et optimal des infections orbitooculaires est recommandé pour réduire l'incidence des chirurgies d'ablation des yeux. Mots clés: Anesthésie, énucléation, éviscération, exentération, implant orbitaire, tendances.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Moderate to Severe Postoperative Pain Following the Placement of Primary and Secondary Orbital Implants: A Prospective Observational Study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively explore the incidence and risk factors of moderate to severe pain after primary and secondary orbital implantation following evisceration or enucleation surgery. METHODS: One hundred eighteen patients under general anesthesia for orbital implantation were enrolled in this study. In 91 patients, primary orbital implantation followed evisceration, and in 27 patients, the implantation was secondary after previous evisceration or enucleation surgery. Medical interventions for all participants were followed by standardized surgical, anesthetic, and analgesic protocols. Postoperative pain (POP) intensity was quantified by an 11-point numerical rating scale within 72 hours after the surgery, numerical rating scale ≥4 was considered moderate to severe POP. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify the risk factors related to the development of POP. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (29.7%) displayed moderate to severe POP, particularly within 6 to 24 hours after surgery, which peaked at 24 hours. Of these patients, 26 patients who were unable to tolerate the pain received additional doses of analgesics during in-hospital stay. Logistic regression model revealed that preoperative anxiety (odds ratios = 4.890; p = 0.002), congenital microphthalmia (odds ratios = 14.602; p = 0.038), and surgical time longer than 60 minutes (odds ratios = 5.586; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with moderate to severe POP after orbital implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Orbital implantation after evisceration or enucleation surgery is likely to cause moderate to severe pain intensity in the early postoperative period. Preoperative anxiety, prolonged surgical time, and congenital microphthalmia were the risk factors.

Two 11-Years Periods Statistics and Trends of Enucleation and Evisceration.

PURPOSE: The indications for evisceration and enucleation are still evolving and controversial. The study aims to describe trends of enucleation versus evisceration in one center. METHODS: In period 1998-2019 were 353 patients were included in the study. Statistical results and Chi-square test for pair-wise comparisons for the statistical significance in comparing two subgroups (years periods 1998-2008 and 2009-2019) per category have been evaluated. RESULTS: The enucleation was performed in 306 patients, and the evisceration was performed in 47 patients. In 221 patients with the tumor exclusively enucleation was indicated. For the operation technique, the authors got a chi-square value of 0.027, and the associated P value is at 0.8695, then the number of evisceration and enucleation in subgroups have not confirmed independency. For the tumor presence, the authors got a chi-square value of 5.4, and the associated P value is at 0.02, then the number of validated/nonvalidated tumor presence in subgroups confirmed independency. CONCLUSIONS: The performed enucleations had 98% cases uveal melanoma, 1% of cases of another type of malignancy (lymphoma non-Hodgkin type), and 1% cases with benign tumor. Enucleation is also today most frequently due to malignant intraocular tumors, whereas evisceration if most frequently for the phthisis eye after a trauma or a previous intraocular surgery. In our study in 22 years interval also in the second period, there was an increased trend of enucleation due to intraocular malignancy. It can have many reasons, especially, that patients are sent to oncology centers late in the advanced stage of tumor.

Comparing the Management of Eye Injuries by Coalition Military Surgeons during the Iraq and Afghanistan Conflicts.

PURPOSE: To compare incidences, ocular injury types, and treatment performed on United States and United Kingdom military service members and host nation civilians within the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts to inform future military surgical training requirements and military medical planning. The United States routinely deployed ophthalmologists, whereas the United Kingdom did not. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of the United States and United Kingdom military Joint Theatre Trauma Registries. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with eye injuries treated at a deployed Military Treatment Facility between March 2003 and October 2011. METHODS: An adjusted multiple logistic regression model was performed using enucleation or evisceration and primary open-globe repair as dependent variables and casualty nationality, location, and the presence of an ophthalmic surgeon as independent variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of eye removal (enucleation or evisceration) or primary repair for open globe injury. RESULTS: Five thousand seven hundred nineteen of 67 586 (8%) survivors or those who died of wounds were recorded to have sustained eye injuries. The most common eye injuries were open-globe injury without intraocular foreign body (3201/5719 [56%]). Adnexal injuries (eyelid lacerations and damage to lacrimal apparatus) were recorded in 1265 of 5719 patients (22%). The odds of undergoing evisceration or enucleation for open-globe injury was highest in host nation civilians (odds ratio [OR], 9.23; P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of a difference between United States and United Kingdom military service member casualties (P = 0.38). The presence of an ophthalmic surgeon (OR, 16.3; P < 0.001) significantly affected the odds of eye removal. CONCLUSIONS: Eye injuries were more likely to have been treated definitively in United States Medical Treatment Facilities (MTFs), reflecting the absence of ophthalmologists in most deployed United Kingdom MTFs. The Iraq and Afghan conflicts were notable for coalition air dominance; the shape of future conflicts may mandate delays in evacuation, which may affect visual outcomes negatively, particularly if primary repair of patients with open-globe injuries is delayed. This study provides evidence to support the maintenance of specialist ophthalmic surgical competencies in deployed coalition MTFs for future conflicts.

Psychological distress and coping following eye removal surgery.

Purpose: Psychological distress is reasonably well documented in people with facial disfigurement; however, in patients following eye removal surgery this has not been studied adequately. We hypothesised that lower distress levels would be associated with age and more adaptive coping strategies and that women would be more likely to report higher levels of distress and, therefore, use maladaptive coping strategies.Methods: This exploratory, cross-sectional study measured distress and coping in a sample of 56 post enucleation or evisceration patients. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Brief COPE measured distress and coping strategies.Results: In all, 25.5% and 10.9% of the sample had high levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. Significant associations were found between levels of distress, coping strategies and demographic variables (p < .05). There were significant differences in coping strategies between those with higher and lower levels of distress (p < .05). Females reported higher levels of anxiety (U = 202.5, p < .01) and depression (U = 229, p < .05) than males. Those who experienced enucleation or evisceration aged between 20 and 39 years reported significantly higher levels of depression compared with other age groups (U = 68.5, p < .01).Conclusions: There was a relatively low level of distress across the whole sample, but we found high levels of distress in a considerable proportion (18.18%) of participants. Participants' coping strategies and levels of distress were correlated. Females and participants aged between 20 and 39 years at time of eye removal were particularly vulnerable to distress.

Poor prognoses of open globe injuries with concomitant orbital fractures.

PURPOSE: Orbital trauma, particularly with open globe injury, can have a wide range of visual outcomes, which can be difficult to predict at presentation. Clinical features on presentation may provide insight into visual prognosis. We hypothesized that patients with open globe injuries and concomitant orbital fractures have poorer visual outcomes than patients without orbital fractures. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 77 patients with isolated open globe injuries (OG) and 76 patients with open globe injuries and concomitant orbital fractures (OGOF). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the relative influence of individual presenting historical and clinical features on visual outcome. RESULTS: OGOF patients were more likely to have sustained blunt trauma than a sharp, penetrating injury compared to OG patients. Ocular wound locations were more posterior and likely to involve multiple zones in OGOF compared to OG patients. Among OGOF patients, orbital floor fractures were the most common and roof fractures were the least common, but the latter was associated with presenting NLP vision and multiple zone involvement. The presence of an orbital fracture independently increased the odds of subsequent evisceration/enucleation (OR: 4.6, 95% CI 1.3-20.1, p = .0246) and NLP vision (OR: 6.81, 95% CI 2.42-21.85, p = .0005) when controlling for zone, mechanism of injury, uveal prolapse and demographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an orbital fracture independently confers a worse visual and ocular prognosis in patients with open globe injuries. Patients with open globe injuries in this category should be appropriately counseled.

Open globe trauma in a military hospital: a review of the Ocular Trauma Score to help predict enucleation or evisceration.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to use the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) to review and analyze all the open globe injuries (OGIs) that presented to Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) from July 2011 to March 2017, and whether or not the OTS can be used to predict enucleation or evisceration. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed through the medical record systems at BAMC for all OGIs from July 2011 to March 2017. This study was not performed on wartime patients. The primary outcome measures were the variables in the OTS and need for enucleation or evisceration. RESULTS: A total of 126 OGIs in 125 patients were identified from July 2011 to March of 2017. A lower calculated OTS was negatively associated with the outcome variables. A total of 25 cases resulted in enucleation or evisceration (19.8%). Of these, 17 underwent enucleation and 8 underwent evisceration. The average OTS for all eyes was 37.15, and the average OTS for eyes resulting in enucleation or evisceration was 22. Retinal detachment (RD), afferent pupillary defect (APD), globe rupture, globe perforation, and presenting visual acuity (VA) were all found to be statistically significant risk factors in patients who underwent enucleation or evisceration. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the OTS and the OTS pre-operative variables can help predict the likelihood that an OGI will ultimately result in enucleation or evisceration. Our study shows that the OTS is a valuable tool to use when evaluating OGI and can help in evidence-based counseling.

ENDOGENOUS KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE ENDOPHTHALMITIS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features, treatment modalities, and visual outcomes in 12 eyes with endogenous Klebsiella pneumoniae endophthalmitis (EKPE). METHODS: The medical records of all patients diagnosed with EKPE at Stanford Hospital (Palo Alto, CA) and Santa Clara Valley County Hospital (Santa Clara, CA) from January 2000 to March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients (12 eyes) were diagnosed with EKPE. The median age at presentation was 56, 80% were male, and 30% were non-Asian. Presenting visual acuities ranged from 20/20 to no light perception. Of the 12 eyes 10 received a tap and injection (range, 1-33 injections per eye), 2 eyes underwent primary enucleation or evisceration, and 1 patient underwent pars plana vitrectomy after tap and injection. Final visual acuities ranged from no light perception (six eyes) to 20/300 or better (five eyes). Five patients eventually underwent evisceration or enucleation. All cases were associated with positive blood and/or vitreous cultures and had concurrent systemic infection. CONCLUSION: Endogenous Klebsiella pneumoniae endophthalmitis is a rare, but devastating, ocular infection. Most cases in this series resulted in light perception vision or worse, and almost half required enucleation or evisceration. In light of the virulence of EKPE, early diagnosis and treatment should be initiated in all suspected cases.

Enucleations and Eviscerations for Combat Ocular Trauma Performed During Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom: 2001 to 2011.

PURPOSE: To describe the demographics and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent posttraumatic enucleation or evisceration during Operations Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Enduring Freedom (OEF) from 2001 to 2011. METHODS: The Walter Reed Ocular Trauma Database is a retrospective case series of US Servicemembers and Department of Defense civilians who had combat ocular injuries in OIF and OEF. Data regarding posttraumatic enucleations and eviscerations performed during OIF and OEF were extracted. The main outcomes analyzed were the number of enucleations and eviscerations performed, location of the surgery, laterality, and graft type. The secondary outcome measures included: mechanism of injury and Ocular Trauma Score classification. RESULTS: One hundred nine enucleations and eviscerations were performed on the 890 eyes (12.24%). Sixty-three (57.80%) primary enucleations, 36 (33.03%) secondary enucleations, 5 (4.59%) postretinal detachment repair enucleations, and 5 (4.59%) primary eviscerations were completed. The surgeries were completed at a combat support hospital (57; 52.3%), or Walter Reed Army Medical Center (49; 45.0%). All surgeries were unilateral except in 2 patients. The most common graft type used was silicone (n = 56; 51.38%). Improvised explosive devices caused 76 (69.72%) eye injuries. Ocular Trauma Score were recorded as 56 (51.38%) between 0 and 44, 44 (40.37%) between 45 and 65, and unknown in 9 (8.26%). CONCLUSION: Posttraumatic enucleation or evisceration due to devastating ocular trauma is required in about 15% of ophthalmic patients in modern combat trauma. The psychosocial impact on veterans who have required an enucleation or evisceration from combat trauma has been poorly studied and requires further review.

Comparison of Three Different Techniques on the Movement of Implants After Evisceration.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of 3 evisceration techniques involving placement of an acrylic implant within the scleral shell without posterior sclerotomy (Group 1), posterior sclerotomy with placement of a porous implant within the intraconal space (Group 2) and posterior sclerotomy with placement of a acrylic implant within the intraconal space (Group 3) with respect to ocular mobility, implant complications and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective, interventional case series. A chart review of 72 patients undergoing evisceration between February 2013 and January 2018 was carried out. Thirty-five patients met the inclusion criteria having a normal or near normal size eye and at least 6 months follow-up. The horizontal movements of the implant and the artificial eye was measured by using a ruler. Data analyses were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test for 2 independent samples. RESULTS: Neither infection nor prolapse of the implant had occurred in any of the patients. The mean implant sizes were 18 mm in Group 1, 20 mm in Group 2 and 20 mm in Group 3. Statistically, a significant difference was assessed between Group 1 and Group 2 in both nasal and temporal movement of the socket; nasal and temporal movement of the prosthesis. Statistically, a significant difference was assessed between Group 1 and Group 3 in both nasal and temporal movement of the socket; nasal and temporal movement of the prosthesis. However, there was no statistically significant difference between Group 2 and Group 3 in neither nasal and temporal movement of the socket nor nasal and temporal movement of the artificial eye. CONCLUSION: Group 1 showed the significantly better movement of both prosthesis and socket in adduction and abduction than Group 2 and 3. The likely explanation for this may be that preserving the scleral shell integrity allows more efficient transmission of muscle contraction to the socket and prosthesis.

Philip Henry Mules (1843-1905) and his innovations in ocular surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study is to present an historical overview of the innovations in ocular surgery introduced by the very important surgeon, but mainly unknown, Philip Henry Mules (1843-1905). METHODS: Philip Henry Mules introduced the Mules' evisceration operation and the Mules' ptosis operation. He also invented surgical instruments such as Mules' scoop, Mules' repository, and Mules' enucleation scissors. He was interested also in ocular infection. RESULTS: Many of the innovations in ocular surgery introduced by Philip Henry Mules are still in use. CONCLUSIONS: Philip Henry Mules (1843-1905) was a respectable English ophthalmologist, who despite his short life, only 62-years-old, his innovations in ocular surgery were considered a breakthrough in the late nineteenth century, because in almost every textbook of ophthalmology they were cited and deserved a great merit.

Evisceration with autogenous scleral graft and bioceramic implantation within the modified scleral shell: 133 cases over 17 years.

INTRODUCTION: To present long-term follow-up data on evisceration performed with autogenous scleral grafting and ceramic implantation in a modified scleral shell. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive eviscerations performed in the Department of Ophthalmology, Montpellier University Hospital, France, between February 1998 and October 2015. For all patients, the technique used was a conventional anterior evisceration after total keratectomy, disinsertion of the medial rectus muscle, sectioning of the optic nerve and excision of sclera centered on the papilla. The scleral graft was then sutured just behind the sutured keratectomy, and the bioceramic implant was inserted by posterior way in the scleral shell. Demographic characteristics, implant size and type, cosmetic results from pictures of all patients and complications were recorded. This study was performed with Ethics Review Committee Approval, and in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. RESULTS: In total, 133 patients (36.6% women) were identified during the study period. The mean (SD) implant size was 17.32 (1.84) mm. The median follow-up after evisceration was 57.43 (24.7, 68.3) months. Two cases of implant exposure (1.5%) were recorded. For 24 patients (17.9%), additional surgeries were performed for ptosis (2.2%), conjunctival cyst (1.5%), or post-evisceration socket syndrome (6.7%). Cosmetics results were excellent for 50.1% of cases, good for 33.3% and fair for 16.6%; using a grading scale based on the superior sulcus deformity. CONCLUSION: Evisceration with autogenous scleral grafting and ceramic implantation can result in a high volume of restoration, good cosmetic results, and low risk of exposure of the implant.

Posterior auricular muscle patch graft for exposed orbital implant.

The purpose of this article is to describe a surgical technique to repair an exposed orbital implant by posterior auricular muscle autograft. A retrospective review was conducted of four patients with an exposed orbital implant that were treated with a posterior auricular muscle graft. Four patients received posterior auricular muscle patch graft to the exposed orbital implant. The donor site healed with minimal scarring and remained well hidden. The graft incorporated fully into surrounding orbital tissue with no recurrent exposure at average of 13 month follow-up. The posterior auricular muscle autograft is a viable technique for repairing an exposed orbital implant.