Serotonin syndrome: A pharmacovigilance comparative study of drugs affecting serotonin levels.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin syndrome is a rare and potentially fatal adverse drug reaction caused by serotonergic drugs and is due to an increase in serotonin concentration or activation of the 5-HT receptor in the central nervous system. We analysed adverse events in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data set to investigate the main drug classes related to reports of serotonin syndrome and the reporting risk in relation to age and sex. METHODS: We analysed data from the FAERS database to evaluate the main drug classes related to reports of the serotonin syndrome, and the reporting risk in relation to age and sex. RESULTS: We found 8,997 cases of serotonin syndrome; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was the class of drugs with most reports, followed by opioids and other antidepressants. The highest Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) for drug classes was for monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors (45.99, 95% confidence interval (CI): 41.21-51.33) and SSRIs (32.66, 95% CI: 31.33-34.04), while the ten active substances with the highest ROR were moclobemide, isocarboxazid, oxitriptane, tranylcypromine, melitracen, phenelzine, linezolid, amoxapine, reboxetine and tryptophan; with values of ROR ranging from 44.19 (95% CI: 25.38-76.94) of tryptophan to 388.36 (95% CI: 314.58-479.46) of moclobemide. The ROR for the most commonly involved drugs was higher in the group of older adults (65 > years old), and higher in males. CONCLUSION: Prescribers need to be vigilant about drugs that can raise serotonin concentration or influence serotonergic neurotransmission, also when using drugs with less well-known risk for serotonin syndrome, like linezolid and triptans.

Safety and tolerance of combination of monoamine oxidase inhibitors and direct dopamine agonists in adults and older adults with highly resistant depression.

INTRODUCTION: Dopamine (DA) is likely to be involved in some depressive dimensions, such as anhedonia and amotivation, which account for a part of treatment-resistant forms. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) and direct D2 and D3 receptors agonists (D2/3r-dAG) are known to help, but we lack safety data about their combined usage. We report on safety and tolerance of the MAOI+D2r-dAG combination in a clinical series. METHOD: All patients referred to our recourse center for depression between 2013 and 2021 were screened to select those who did receive the combo. Data were extracted from clinical files. RESULTS: Sixteen patients of 60±17 years of age (8 women, 7 with age>65years, all suffered from treatment resistant depression, 7 with bipolar disorder) received the combo. There were no life-threatening adverse effects (AE). However, AE were reported by 14 patients (88%) most of which were mild and consisted of insomnia, nausea, nervousness, confusion, impulse control disorder and/or "sleep attacks". One patient presented a serious AE requiring a short hospitalization for confusion. Intolerance led to failure to introduce treatment in two patients (13%). The retrospective non-interventional design, the variety of molecules, and the modest sample size limited the scope of these results. CONCLUSION: There was no life-threatening safety issue in combining MAOI and D2/3r-dAG, especially regarding cardiovascular side effects. The systematic screening of AE might account for their frequency, but these precluded the treatment in only two patients. Comparative studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this new combination.

Effectiveness and safety of monoamine oxidase inhibitor treatment for bipolar depression versus unipolar depression: An exploratory case cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with bipolar disorder spend most of their clinical lifetime in the depressive phase of their illness. However, antidepressants are discouraged in the treatment of bipolar depression due to concerns over manic induction and drug ineffectiveness. Some reports suggest that monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) may be safe and effective compared to other antidepressants in treating bipolar depression. The present study compared the safety and effectiveness of MAOI therapy in patients with bipolar versus unipolar depression. METHODS: Data were collected from approximately 2500 clinical research charts of patients treated with MAOI therapy at a university mood disorder clinic between 1983 and 2015. A mixed-effects model was created with patient entered as the random effect. The model included the primary diagnosis (i.e., either unipolar or bipolar depression) and other clinical covariates as fixed-effect predictors. RESULTS: Patients with bipolar depression demonstrated lower post-treatment clinical global impressions/severity scores versus patients with unipolar depression (p = 0.04). Neither group demonstrated a full syndromal manic or hypomanic episode. A higher proportion of patients with bipolar depression reported myoclonic tics and tremors, which may have resulted from concomitant lithium use. Amongst the covariates, only the number of prior antidepressant trials predicted poorer outcomes from MAOI therapy. CONCLUSION: MAOIs may be more effective-and as safe-for patients with bipolar depression versus unipolar depression. Future studies should explore this possible advantage using a larger sample size.

Attenuation of COX-2 enzyme by modulating H2O2-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway by monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI): a further study on the reprofiling of MAOI in acute inflammation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the anti-inflammatory mechanism of monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) in carrageenan (CARR) induced inflammation models to reprofile their use. We also aimed to explore the role of monoamine oxidase (MAO)-mediated H2O2-NF-κB-COX-2 pathway in acute inflammation. METHODS: In vitro anti-inflammatory activity and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging activity were performed according to the established procedure. Inflammation was induced using CARR in BALB/c mice at the foot paw and peritoneal cavity. Hourly measurement of paw swelling was performed. The level of nitric oxide (NO), myeloperoxidase (MPO), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Peritoneal fluid was collected to investigate total count, differential count of leukocytes, and capillary permeability. RESULTS: In vitro anti-inflammatory evaluations revealed the potential role of MAOI to inhibit heat-induced protein denaturation and human red cell membrane destabilization. H2O2 inhibition activity of MAOI also proved their powerful role as an H2O2 scavenger. Treatment with MAOI in CARR-induced mice significantly reduced paw edema, leukocyte extravasation, and total and differential leukocyte count. The result of ELISA showed MAOI effectively reduce the level of COX-2, PGE2 and NF-κB in inflamed tissue. CONCLUSIONS: In short, this study demonstrates that inhibition of H2O2 by MAOI alleviates CARR-induced paw edema possibly by inhibiting the H2O2-mediated NF-κB-COX-2 pathway. The present investigation identifies MAOI might reprofile for the treatment of acute inflammation also, the MAO enzyme may use as a novel therapeutic target to design and develop new class of anti-inflammatory agents.

Treatment History Characteristics Associated With Use of Isocarboxazid: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The monoamine oxidase inhibitor isocarboxazid (Marplan) is occasionally used in the treatment of depression, but there is only little knowledge on the nature of the use of isocarboxazid in clinical practice. We aimed to identify treatment history characteristics associated with this use. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Via the nationwide Danish registers, we identified all adult incident users of isocarboxazid in the period from 2001 to 2018, as well as up to 5 matched controls using another antidepressant (matched on date of redeemed prescription, age, sex, and region of residence). The 5-year treatment history of the isocarboxazid users and the controls was assessed via the Danish registers. The association between treatment history characteristics and isocarboxazid use was examined by multivariate conditional logistic regression. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We identified 1455 isocarboxazid users and 7045 controls using another antidepressant. The following characteristics were associated with statistically significant increased likelihood of receiving isocarboxazid treatment: Prior treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (odds ratio [OR], 1.80 with 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-2.23), a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (OR, 4.90; 95% CI, 4.08-5.89), a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.30-1.88), a tricyclic antidepressant (OR, 5.05; 95% CI, 4.19-6.08), other antidepressants (OR, 4.74; 95% CI, 3.74-6.01), lithium (OR, 6.70; 95% CI, 5.08-8.83), an antipsychotic (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.73), and each diagnosis of depression received in relation to psychiatric hospital treatment (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.23-1.39). Forty percent of those initiating isocarboxazid had received treatment with drugs from 5 or more different psychopharmacological classes in the 5 preceding years. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that isocarboxazid is typically used for treatment-resistant depression, consistent with guideline recommendations.

60 Years of Combining Tranylcypromine: A Systematic Review of Available Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Tranylcypromine is the only irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor that is approved in the United States and in Europe for the management of treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Comprehensive data in the literature regarding the efficacy and tolerability of tranylcypromine (TCP) combination strategies have not been systematically investigated yet. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of available literature based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Study types considered eligible for inclusion were studies that reported information on efficacy and/or tolerability/adverse effects of pharmacological TCP add-on or coadministration strategies among people with psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Ninety-six articles were included in qualitative analyses. A relevant body of evidence shows that TCP combined with first- and second-generation antipsychotics seems relatively safe and might have beneficial effects in some patients with depressive disorders, although caution is needed with some second-generation antipsychotics that have proserotonergic activity. Although evidence is not entirely consistent, amitriptyline as add-on agent might be efficacious and associated with a low rate of severe adverse events. Although available data from case reports are scarce, certain other agents, such as trazodone, but also lithium, seem to have a good risk-benefit profile with regard to TCP that should be further investigated in the context of high-quality studies. CONCLUSIONS: Any combination of a psychotropic with TCP should be preceded by an evaluation of drug-to-drug interaction and an informed consent process and followed by close monitoring. Before any combination strategy, doctors should reevaluate factors of pseudo-treatment resistance, such as rapid-metabolizing status, noncompliance, trauma, alternative diagnosis, or drug abuse.

[Antidepressive agents and hypertension: A case/no-case study in French pharmacovigilance database]. / Antidépresseurs et hypertension artérielle : étude cas /non-cas dans la base nationale de pharmacovigilance.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced hypertension was described with several pharmacological classes. The association between hypertension and antidepressant drugs (AD) is controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the link between hypertension and ADs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective disproportionality analysis from observations consecutively reported to the French pharmacovigilance database between 1985 and 2020 was performed. The relationship between the suspected ADs and the occurrence of hypertension was assessed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) in a case/non-case design. A negative (paracetamol) and a positive (celecoxib) control were used to validated this disproportionality method. RESULTS: We compared 6725 cases (including 464 AD-related cases) to 789,483 non-cases (including 56,440 AD-related cases). The reporting of hypertension was significantly associated with serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) (ROR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.26-1.64) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) (ROR 6.41, 95 % CI 4.25-9.67) but not with other ADs classes. Concerning ADs analyzed independently of their AD class, a significant signal was observed with many SNRIs (duloxetin, milnacipran and venlafaxin) and with all MAOIs (moclobemide, iproniazide) (ROR between 2.04 and 17.93) but not with others ADs. The ROR value of positive (celecoxib) and negative (paracetamol) controls were ROR=1.53; IC95 %=1.04-2.26 and ROR=0.72; IC95 %=0.65-0.80, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found a significant association between development or worsening of hypertension and SNRIs and MAOIs but not with others ADs, in this study performed in real conditions of life. It is therefore advisable to remain cautious when prescribing ADs and to check systematically for hypertension.

Time to Reconsider Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder?: A Case Series Using Phenelzine.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of a range of efficacious evidence-based treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), not all patients experience sufficient benefit or are able to tolerate them in practice. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) show efficacy in the treatment of depression and certain anxiety disorders (such as social anxiety disorder). METHODS/PROCEDURES: We survey the evidence base from case reports, and clinical trials, regarding use of MAOIs in OCD. We then present new data from a case series collected in routine clinical practice in a specialist clinical service. FINDINGS/RESULTS: In 9 treatment-resistant patients whose OCD had not improved with at least 2 standard treatment trials, 3 had marked clinical improvement (>35% improvement on YBOCS) on phenelzine, 3 had some improvement (15-34.9%), and 3 showed minimal or no improvement (<15%). In the 3 patients who experienced minimal/no improvement, 2 had discontinued early because of lack of tolerability, and the other patient discontinued after 4 weeks because of perceived lack of symptom benefit. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that (1) MAOIs in treatment-resistant OCD require appropriate research scrutiny in large-scale randomized controlled trials; and (2) MAOIs merit consideration as a treatment option in individual cases of OCD, particularly in specialist settings where first-line interventions have proven inadequate to manage severe symptoms.

The trace amine theory of spontaneous hypertension as induced by classic monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

The classic monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) tranylcypromine (TCP) and phenelzine (PLZ) are powerful antidepressants that come with an equally powerful stigma, and are thus rarely prescribed-despite their well-established effectiveness. Some of these preconceptions appear to stem from unclarity, as the etiology of a rare but important side effect, 'spontaneous hypertension' (SH)-a significant increase in blood pressure absent dietary tyramine ingestion-remains improperly elucidated. This paper aims at uprooting some of the stigma surrounding MAOIs by advancing the trace amine (TA) theory as the causative underpinning of SH. This theory posits that SH results from the considerable influx of TAs observed following TCP- or PLZ-administration. TAs are known, albeit at greatly supraphysiological levels, to raise blood pressure on account of their propensity to exert potent indirect sympathomimetic effects; additionally, some research posits that TAs may induce vasoconstrictive effects partly or wholly separate therefrom, which would then constitute a second hypertensive mechanism. TAs are endogenous to the human body in low quantities. Both TCP and PLZ cause marked elevations of 2-phenylethylamine (PEA), meta- and para-tyramine (m-/p-TYR), octopamine (OA), and tryptamine (TRYP), following both acute and (sub)chronic administration. This paper holds that TYR plays a pivotal role in causing SH, due to its strong pressor effect. Cautious treatment of SH is advised, given its typically self-limiting nature. The risk of hypotensive overshoots must be taken into account. For severe cases, this paper urges reconsideration, following suitable confirmation trials, of antipsychotics (notably risperidone) as these agents may reduce striatal p-TYR levels.

Overnight switch from rasagiline to safinamide in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations: a tolerability and safety study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: When switching between monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors, a 15-day suspension period is a precautionary measure to avoid a serotonin syndrome and hypertensive crisis. However, this indication results in a major inconvenience for parkinsonian patients because of the worsening of their clinical condition. In routine clinical practice, neurologists often perform a substitution of these two drugs without solution of continuity (i.e. overnight), to avoid worsening of fluctuations and prolonged OFF periods. Therefore, a safety open label study was performed to investigate the possible risks of switching overnight from rasagiline to safinamide. METHODS: The study population included 20 advanced patients with Parkinson's disease on stable treatment with rasagiline and levodopa (alone or in combination with other anti-parkinsonian medication). The possible occurrence of serotonin syndrome and hypertension was monitored through a strict clinical observation and a 24-h Holter recording (ABPM) performed twice, whilst subjects were on rasagiline and immediately after switching to safinamide. RESULTS: No cases of serotonin syndrome or hypertensive crisis occurred during the study. Changes that were not significant occurred in the primary end-point: 24-h mean blood pressure (BP) had a mild +4.4% increase in the ABPM2 versus ABPM1 (P = 0.17), 24-h systolic and diastolic BP values were slightly higher at ABPM2 compared to ABPM1 (respectively +3.3%, P = 0.13; and 5.4%, P = 0.08) and 24-h systolic BP variability was unchanged between the two ABPM evaluations (from 8.6 ± 2.9 to 8.9 ± 1.8; P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study confirm that the overnight switch from rasagiline to safinamide is safe and well tolerated by patients.

Three -(pyridin-2-yl)-2-(pyridin-2-ylimino)thiazolidin-4-one as a novel inhibitor of cerebral MAO-B activity with antioxidant properties and low toxicity potential.

Some brain diseases are associated with oxidative stress and altered monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant and neuroprotective actions through MAO inhibition of 3-(pyridin-2-yl)-2-(pyridine-2-ylimino) thiazolidin-4-one (PPIT, a synthetic molecule containing a thiazolidinone nucleus), as well as its effects on toxicity parameters in Swiss female mice. Five in vitro assays were carried out to verify the PPIT antioxidant capacity: protein carbonylation (PC), 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazil (DPPH), ferric ion (Fe3+ ) reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)-like activity. The results showed that PPIT reduced the level of PC in the homogenate of the brain. This compound did not demonstrate SOD mimetic activity, but it acted as a free radical scavenger (ABTS and DPPH) and exhibited reducing activity in the FRAP assay. In addition, the effects of PPIT on cerebral MAO activity (MAO-A and B isoforms) were investigated in vitro. Our data revealed inhibition of the MAO-B activity by PPIT with no effects on MAO-A. Lastly, an acute oral toxicity test was conducted in mice. No changes in food intake, body weight, and biochemical markers of kidney and liver damage were detected in mice treated with a high dose of PPIT (300 mg/kg). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that PPIT exhibits antioxidant activity and selectively inhibits the MAO-B isoform without causing apparent toxicity. These findings suggest PPIT as a potential therapeutic candidate to be tested in preclinical models of brain diseases involving perturbations of MAO-B activity and redox status.

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Tranylcypromine and Tricyclic Antidepressants in the Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of the comparison of tranylcypromine (TCP) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the treatment of depression because such work is lacking in medical scientific literature. METHODS: Literature was searched for studies of TCP controlled by TCAs in multiple databases and in reviews of TCP and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. The natural logarithm of the odds ratio (logOR) and the pooled logOR according to a fixed effect model were calculated for the numbers of responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: A total of 227 studies of TCP were found including 75 controlled studies of TCP-monotherapy. Twelve of 23 studies of TCP monotherapy and TCAs were excluded for several reasons (duplicates, safety studies, retrospective, cross-over), leaving 11 prospective and parallel controlled studies of TCP monotherapy versus TCAs (6 randomized double-blind). One study was excluded from the meta-analysis because of low quality of study design according to the Food and Drug Administration guidelines of studies of antidepressant drugs and high risk of bias according to the Cochrane's tool. Two studies with equal efficacy of TCP and TCAs in continuous endpoints did not provide dichotomous response data. A pooled logOR of 0.480 (95% confidence interval, 0.105-0.857, P = 0.01) resulted for the remaining eight studies in the primary meta-analysis, which favors TCP significantly over TCAs (test for heterogeneity: Х = 8.1, df = 7, P > 0.3, not heterogenous; I = 13.6%, heterogeneity not important). The result is robust with respect to inclusion of hypothetical response data of the 2 studies with continuous data only: pooled logOR, 0.350 (95% confidence interval, 0.028-0.672, P = 0.03). Visual inspection of forest plots and subgroup analysis suggest that superiority of TCP over TCAs is determined by 2 studies in psychomotor-retarded (anergic) depression. CONCLUSIONS: Tranylcypromine and TCAs have an equal antidepressant effect in a mean sample of depressed patients with mixed psychomotor symptoms. Tranylcypromine might be superior to TCAs in depression with predominant psychomotor retardation.

Serotonin syndrome: a clinical review of current controversies.

Serotonin syndrome is a state of increased central and peripheral serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) activity. Unless recognized and treated early, serotonin syndrome can lead to seizures, shock and death. Both substances with direct and indirect serotonergic activity can precipitate the syndrome. Serotonin syndrome can occur not only in psychiatric but also in non-psychiatric settings. Yet, clinicians may not be familiar with the condition. We explore some of the current controversies regarding serotonin syndrome. Specifically, we tested the following assumptions: (i) Despite being rare, serotonin syndrome is still clinically relevant; (ii) The Hunter criteria are the gold standard for diagnosing serotonin syndrome; (iii) Hyperthermia is common in cases of serotonin syndrome; (iv) Serotonin syndrome usually develops fast; (v) Severe serotonin syndrome usually or almost exclusively involves monoamine oxidase inhibitors. We found that (i) despite being rare, serotonin syndrome was clinically relevant, (ii) the Hunter criteria could not be regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of serotonin syndrome since they missed more cases than the other two diagnostic criteria systems (Sternbach and Radomski criteria), (iii) Serotonin syndrome could occur in the absence of an elevated temperature, (iv) fast onset could not be regarded as a reliable clinical sign of serotonin syndrome, and (v) absence of monoamine oxidase inhibitors treatment did not exclude a diagnosis of serotonin syndrome. Clinicians should bear in mind that in the context of relevant drug history, serotonin syndrome may still be possible in these circumstances.

Efficacy and safety of MAO-B inhibitor versus donepezil in Chinese elderly stroke patients with Alzheimer disease: A potential therapeutic option.

This pilot study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MAO-B inhibitor in comparison with Donepezil (DNP) in elderly Chinese patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). In the present clinical trial, Chinese elderly patients aged ≥65 years with a confirmed diagnosis of AD were enrolled. The patients received MAO-B inhibitor (Selegiline 5 mg) or DNP 10 mg daily (reference) for 6 months. The efficacy and safety data were collected from 120 patients (60 patients in each group) every 3 weeks until 6 months. The primary endpoints were to assess the change in cognitive score from baseline in both the treatment group. The result of the present study showed that the patients treated with MAO-B inhibitor and DNP have similar efficacy and safety profile Considering the clinical benefit, mean (SD) improvement in sign and symptoms was numerically greater in DNP-treated patients as compared to MAO-B inhibitor at endpoint visit (SIB: 12.3 (3.7) vs 11.3 (4.2); AD severity: 14.2 (3.5); CIBIS+/CIBIC: 10.2 (2.7) vs 9.4 (3.2); ADCS-ADL: 14.3 (4.2) vs 13.2 (3.4); MMSE: 14.3 (3.7) vs 12.2 (3.2), P>0.05 respectively for each comparison). However, a statistical difference in terms of clinical benefit was similar between both the treatment groups (p>0.05). Overall, both the study drugs were found comparable in relieving the symptoms of AD (severity score after end of treatment: 14.2 vs 13.4 respectively; p >0.05). This indicates that MAO-B inhibitor is a potential target for the treatment of AD in China. The results of the present study may help to design a large clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MAO-B inhibitor in comparison with DNP in AD patients.

Relative Effectiveness of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor and Tricyclic Antidepressant Combination Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: We examined the relative safety and effectiveness of adding a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) to a failed tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) trial versus adding a TCA to a failed MAOI trial or adding a TCA to a failed TCA trial in treatment-resistant depression. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Data were retrospectively harvested from approximately 2500 treatment charts of subjects with treatment-resistant depression who attended a university mood disorders clinic between 1983 and 2015. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to examine the effectiveness of treatment condition on outcome. Relative adverse event profiles were also examined. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Eighty-four treatment outcome observations were made from 54 subjects who received combination therapy: TCA plus TCA (n = 22), TCA plus MAOI (n = 44), and MAOI plus TCA (n = 18). Treatment condition predicted a poorer (albeit not statistically significant) outcome for TCA plus TCA compared with TCA plus MAOI, or MAOI plus TCA therapy (P = 0.098). Specific adverse events occurred with significantly greater frequency between treatment groups; that is, impotence was more frequent with TCA plus MAOI therapy; headaches and insomnia were more frequent with MAOI plus TCA therapy; and constipation was more frequent with TCA plus TCA therapy. There were no reported or observed hypertensive or serotonergic events. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to conventional wisdom that combined TCA and MAOI therapy should be avoided, the judicious use of this combination may be relatively safe and effective compared with combined TCA plus TCA therapy. However, sample sizes were limited, and the analysis was nonrandomized and retrospective.

A reassessment of the safety profile of monoamine oxidase inhibitors: elucidating tired old tyramine myths.

This review appraises over 150 recent original papers reporting data that demonstrate the greatly reduced tyramine content of modern-day 'foods', about which the medical literature has a paucity of information. It discusses the cardiovascular pharmacology of tyramine and the characteristics, extent, risks, and treatment of the blood pressure increases that sometimes result from tyramine ingestion (the pressor response). In past decades, cheese was the only food associated with documented fatalities resulting from hypertension. Today, few foods contain problematically high tyramine levels, which is a result of changes in international food production techniques (especially the use of starter cultures), and hygiene regulations. Nowadays, even 'matured' cheeses are usually safe in healthy-sized portions. The mechanism by which tyramine may be produced in foods (by certain micro-organisms) is explained and hundreds of recent estimations of cheeses are reviewed. Numerous other previously inadequately documented foods are reviewed, including fish and soy sauces, salami-type sausages, dried meats, beers, wines, and various condiments. Evidence that the risk of harm from the pressor response has previously been overstated is reviewed, and the iatrogenic harms from hasty and aggressive treatment of hypertensive urgency are re-evaluated. Evidence now suggests that MAOIs are of comparable safety to many newer drugs and are straightforward to use. Previously held concerns about MAOIs are misplaced and some are of over-estimated consequence. The variability of pressor sensitivity to tyramine between individuals means that the knowledge and judgement of doctors, and some care, are still required.

Demystifying serotonin syndrome (or serotonin toxicity).

OBJECTIVE: To review the symptoms of serotonin toxicity (commonly referred to as serotonin syndrome) and the causative drugs and their mechanisms of action, and to equip primary care providers with practical strategies to prevent and identify serotonin toxicity. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles on serotonin toxicity, the causes, and the differential diagnosis using search terms related to serotonin toxicity (serotonin syndrome, serotonin toxicity, serotonin overdose), causes (individual names of drug classes, individual drug names), and diagnosis (differential diagnosis, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, anticholinergic toxicity, discontinuation syndrome, malignant hyperthermia, serotonin symptoms). Experts in psychiatric medicine, psychiatric pharmacy, clinical pharmacology, and medical toxicology were consulted. Evidence is level II and III. MAIN MESSAGE: Serotonin toxicity is a drug-induced condition caused by too much serotonin in synapses in the brain. Cases requiring hospitalization are rare, and mild cases caused by serotonin-mediated side effects are unlikely to be fatal. Patients present with a combination of neuromuscular, autonomic, and mental status symptoms. Serotonin-elevating drugs include monoamine oxidase inhibitors, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin releasers. Most cases involve 2 drugs that increase serotonin in different ways; the most concerning combination is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. CONCLUSION: Family physicians play a key role in identifying and preventing serotonin syndrome by teaching patients to recognize symptoms and monitoring patients throughout therapy.

[Effectiveness and safety of safinamide as add-on to levodopa in patients with parkinson's disease: non-interventional study]. / Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Safinamid als Zusatztherapie zu Levodopa bei Parkinson-Patienten: eine nicht-interventionelle Beobachtungsstudie.

AIM: Safinamide (Xadago®) is a newly approved selective MAO-B inhibitor for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD). The X-TRA study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of the substance under clinical practice conditions. METHODS: Prospective, observational study in unselected patients in line with safinamide product specifications. RESULTS: Of the 299 patients included (65.9 % males, age 72.7 ± 9.0 years, duration of disease 7.8 ± 5.9 years), at the beginning of the documentation 229 patients (81.2 %) received L-dopa, 108 (39.3 %) combination drugs containing L-dopa, 172 (59.3 %) a dopamine agonist and 23 (8.3 %) a COMT inhibitor. Of these, 203 patients were followed-up over a period of 6 months. The MDS-UPDRS Part III score for motor symptoms decreased from a baseline value of 48.2 ± 22.1 points by 6.8 ± 14.5 points at the end of the study. The Non-Motor Symptoms Scale score indicating the presence or absence of motor symptoms decreased from a baseline value of 57.6 ± 42.1 by 9.3 ± 2.1 points, the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Score from 4.6 ± 5.8 points by 0.9 ± 2.7 points.The Parkinson's Disease Score (PDQ-8) for assessing quality of life decreased from a baseline value of 39.4 ± 18.2 points by 4.3 ± 13.7 points, reflecting an improvement. In total, 300 adverse events were classified as related to safinamide in 132 patients (44.1 %). Fifty-three events were serious (in 15 patients; 5 %). Seventy-four patients (24.7 %) discontinued safinamide therapy because of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Safinamide therapy improved the motor and non-motor symptoms as well as the quality of life in PD. Most patients tolerated the therapy well. The only side effects that occurred are those described in the patient information leaflet.