Lateral atlanto-axial joint access using the C2 pedicle.

BACKGROUND: Neck pain and headaches can arise from the lateral atlanto-axial (LAA) joint. This pain can be diagnosed with intra-articular injections of local anesthetic. A widely used technique for access to the lateral atlanto-axial joint uses a posterior approach, but this approach can be hazardous because of the proximity of the vertebral artery, the dural sac, and the C2 spinal nerve and dorsal root ganglion. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe and test a new technique for accessing the LAA joint that avoids structures that lie behind the joint. INTERVENTIONS: The new technique was described and tested for tolerance in 10 patients with unilateral suboccipital pain and tenderness over the LAA joint, along with evidence of LAA joint arthropathy on SPECT CT. The technique requires inserting a needle along a trajectory tangential to the dorsal surface of the C2 lamina. It involves obtaining a declined view of the C2 lamina and C2 pedicle. CONCLUSIONS: In all cases, the C2 pedicle was easily identified and allowed the needle to pass asymptomatically underneath the neurovascular structures behind the joint. The tactile response of the lamina of C2 provided important feedback regarding needle depth caudal to the LAA joint.

Ultrasound-Guided PRP and SVF Therapy Shows Sustained Improvement in Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A 12-Month Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease caused by cartilage degeneration in the joint accompanied by joint deformities, pain, and stiffness. This study assessed the changes over time in the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) values of patients after the combined application of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective clinical study was designed. Thirty-four patients (8 males, 26 females, mean age 65.21±10.71, range 30-83 years) with pain due to knee osteoarthritis received SVF and PRP between 2019 and 2020. During and after the procedure, ultrasound-guided intra-articular spread was checked. RESULTS PRP+SVF injection provided significant improvement in the clinical symptoms of the patients measured according to their VAS and WOMAC scores, and this improvement continued until the twelfth month. The change in VAS scores of the patients was 1.76±1.18 (P=0.000) in the first month, 1.50±1.46 (P=0.000) in the sixth month, and 1.53±1.41 (P=0.000) in the twelfth month. VAS scores decreased 6.6 to 1.6 point at the end of the twelfth month. The WOMAC scores of the patients were 23.20±12.12 (P=0.000) in the first month, 19.48±12.0 (P=0.000) in the sixth month, and 20.01±10.48 (P=0.000) in the twelfth month. WOMAC scores decreased 51.99 to 20.48 point at the end of the twelfth month. CONCLUSIONS Applying ultrasound-guided PRP+SVF injection into the knee joint once in OA patients improved VAS and WOMAC scores.

Advanced Interventional Procedures for Knee Osteoarthritis: What Is the Current Evidence?

The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the highest among all joints and likely to increase over the coming decades. Advances in the repertoire of diagnostic capabilities of imaging and an expansion in the availability and range of image-guided interventions has led to development of more advanced interventional procedures targeting pain related to OA pain while improving the function of patients presenting with this debilitating condition. We review the spectrum of established advanced interventional procedures for knee OA, describe the techniques used to perform these procedures safely, and discuss the clinical evidence supporting each of them.

Ultrasound-Guided Vs Non-Guided Prolotherapy for Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This randomized clinical trial study aims to compare ultrasound-guided versus non-guided Dextrose 10% injections in patients suffering from internal derangement in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population included 22 patients and 43 TMJs suffering from unilateral or bilateral TMJ painful clicking, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), refractory to or failed conservative treatment. The patients were divided randomly into two groups (non-guided and ultrasound (US)-guided groups). The procedure involved injection of 2 mL solution of a mixture of 0.75 mL 0.9% normal saline solution, 0.3 mL 2% lidocaine and 0.75 mL dextrose 10% using a 25G needle in the joint and 1 mL intramuscular injection to the masseter muscle at the most tender point. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used to compare joint pain intensity over four different periods, beginning with pre-injection, 1-, 2-, and 6-months postinjection. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients 5 males (n = 5/22, 22.7%) and 17 females (n = 17/22, 77.2%) were included in this study. The mean age was 27.3 ± 7.4 years (30.2 ± 7.0) for the non-guided group and 24.3 ± 6.9 for the US-guided group. The dextrose injection reduced intensity over time in both groups with statistically significant improvement (P value <.05) at 2 and 6 months in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS assessment between both groups. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular injection of dextrose 10% for patients with painful clicking and DDWR resulted in reduced pain intensity in both US-guided and non-guided groups with significant symptomatic improvement over time in both groups. US guidance allowed accurate anatomical localization and safe procedure with a single joint puncture.

Ultrasound-Guided Single Puncture Technique to Simultaneously Reach the Upper and Lower Temporomandibular Joint Compartments for Arthrocentesis or Injections Purposes: A Technical Note.

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis is a widely described and effective technique that promotes lysis and lavage of TMJ compartments, improving pain and mandibular range of motion. Mostly, this technique has been used to reach the upper TMJ compartment, besides effusion may be present also in lower compartment, that, in the absence of disc perforation, may also need to be assessed. Here, we propose an adaptation of arthrocentesis technique aiming to access both upper and lower compartments of the TMJ with a single needle puncture and guided by ultrasound real-time images. The technique was initially established in fresh cadavers and later replicated in 2 patients. Technique modification proved to be efficient and reproducible, reducing the number of perforations and, consequently, possible adverse events. The proposed technique can be applied to arthrocentesis and/or intra-articular injections through the combination of two previously validated techniques, to improve its safety and efficacy.

Ankle, knee, and elbow arthrography: 2022 survey of Society of Skeletal Radiology members.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the preferred ankle, knee, and elbow arthrography injection techniques for Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) members and whether more recently described techniques are gaining acceptance. We also sought to determine whether the concept of knowledge translation might explain differences between the preferred technique, year of fellowship graduation, and year the newer technique was described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 29-question survey was created in Qualtrics and submitted to current SSR members to determine if they perform knee, elbow, and ankle arthrography, and if so, the year of fellowship completion and preferred approaches. Survey respondents indicated the starting and ending needle tip positions for three knee, two elbow, and three ankle arthrography approaches using grids placed over provided frontal and lateral radiographs. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-four SSR members (mean post-fellowship 13 years; range 0-38) completed the survey and performed fluoroscopic-guided knee (93%), elbow (95%), and ankle (75%) arthrography. Preferred approaches included the following: knee lateral subpatellar (43%), anterior (40%); elbow radiocapitellar (74%); ankle anterior/peritendon (70%), lateral mortise (24%). Preference of newer technique was related to fellowship graduation year and publication year for the ankle mortise (26% before, 42% after; p = 0.03) and posterior trans-triceps elbow articles (19% before, 33% after; p < 0.01). The anterior knee approach preference increased from 11% in 2008 to 40% (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nearly twice as many SSR members who graduated after the posterior trans-triceps and ankle mortise techniques were published prefer them for performing arthrography, possibly due to knowledge translation. The preference of the anterior knee arthrography approach has increased nearly fourfold since 2008.

Ultrasound-guided injection and aspiration of small joints: techniques, pearls, and pitfalls.

Ultrasound (US)-guided musculoskeletal intervention of small joints or joints other than the shoulder, elbow, hip, knee, and ankle can be technically challenging. Small joints produce a narrower landing zone for the needle and a smaller target that may be made even more inaccessible by bulky osteophytes. Sonographic (US) guidance offers important advantages including near-field visualization of the joint and soft tissues, ease of access, portability, ability to compare with the contralateral side, and lack of ionization radiation. This review article focuses on the performance of US-guided injections and aspirations involving small joints (joint capacity < 2 mL and/or typically evaluated or injected with a compact linear transducer). For each joint (temporomandibular, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, distal radioulnar, symphysis pubis, and joints of the digits of the hands and feet), a brief overview of the relevant anatomy, indications, procedural description, pearls and pitfalls will be highlighted. This article demonstrates the various approaches to diagnostic or therapeutic injection and aspiration of small joints with the aid of US images, cines and graphic illustrations, emphasizing joint positioning, anatomic landmarks, and needle trajectory for a safe and efficacious procedure. A brief review of available literature for each joint will also be provided.

Injections of the Hip and Knee.

Hip and knee injections are useful diagnostic and therapeutic tools for family physicians. This article reviews anatomic landmark-guided and ultrasound-guided injections and aspiration techniques for greater trochanteric pain syndrome, the hip joint, the knee joint, the pes anserine bursa, and the iliotibial band. Indications for injections include acute and chronic inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis; osteoarthritis; overuse; and traumas. Joint aspirations may be performed to aid in the diagnosis of unexplained effusions and to relieve pain. Technique, injectant, and follow-up timing depend on the physician's comfort, experience, and preference. Infections of the skin or soft tissue are the primary contraindications to injections. The most common complications are local inflammatory reactions to the injectant. These reactions usually cause soreness for 24 to 48 hours, then spontaneously resolve. Follow-up after injections is usually scheduled within two to six weeks.

Intra-articular Knee Injection Is Less Painful Than Expected.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular knee injections (IAKI) are commonly used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes but may induce anxiety and fear. While existing literature has identified the variance between expected and actual pain levels in various medical procedures, this phenomenon remains unexplored in the context of IAKI. OBJECTIVES: To describe the differences between anticipated and experienced pain recorded during IAKI. METHODS: The study cohort included 50 patients who underwent IAKI by an orthopedic specialist in an outpatient clinic. Patients recruited to the study recorded the anticipated and experienced pain, anxiety index, and factors influencing injection related fear. RESULTS: The study population (n=50) demonstrated a significant difference between the pain expected before the injection (mean Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] score 6.19) and the actual experienced (mean VAS score 2.07, P-value < 0.001). Significant differences between anticipated and experienced VAS scores were demonstrated for both females and males. There was a significant difference between males and females in terms of estimated VAS score. There was no significant difference between males and females in term of the experienced VAS score. The difference (delta) between expected and experienced pain differed significantly between sexes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the importance of educating patients about expected pain levels during IAKI. Presenting this quantified information may reassure patients that the procedure is not as painful as expected, which can potentially increase the compliance.

Accuracy of Anterior Shoulder Injections Without Image Guidance: A Prospective Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the accuracy of glenohumeral joint injections through an anterosuperior approach using anatomical landmarks as a guide and arthroscopic visualization as the control method and to evaluate whether there is any association between accuracy, the physicians training, and the patient's pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample size of 124 patients was calculated. A prospective cohort study including 164 consecutive patients was conducted. All patients over 18 years of age who underwent shoulder arthroscopy during the study period were included. A needle was placed using an anterosuperior approach before the beginning of the surgery alternating between a shoulder surgeon and a resident. Direct visualization through a posterior arthroscopic view was used to verify correct needle placement. Each case was classified as success or failure based on the arthroscopic intra-articular visualization of the needle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between injection accuracy, operator experience, and patient pathology. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 164 needles placed, 131 were intra-articular, giving a total correct placement rate of 80% (95% CI, 73-86%). Experts had an accuracy of 88%, compared to a precision rate of 72% for residents (p<0.001). A logistic regression was performed to evaluate which factors are independently associated with injection accuracy failure. Patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis had an OR of 6.15 for injection failure. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that an anterior-superior approach shoulder injection technique performed by a shoulder specialist without image guidance has a high precision rate. However, in physicians with no experience in shoulder surgery, as well as in some pathologies such as adhesive capsulitis, the accuracy of the procedure decreases significantly and thus, in these cases, the use of some type of image guidance during the procedure may be recommended to achieve greater precision.

Impact of arthroscopy on post-procedure intra-articular elbow injections: A cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of arthroscopy and injection volume on post-procedure intra-articular (IA) injection extravasation. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo prospective study. SAMPLE POPULATION: A total of 40 paired canine cadaver forelimbs. METHODS: After radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans with three-dimensional (3D) digital bone model reconstructions, elbows were randomly assigned to the arthroscopy or control group and randomly assigned to receive an IA injection of 2 or 4 mL of contrast. Elbow arthroscopy was performed on assigned specimens, followed by IA injections of contrast in all elbows, and imaging was repeated. 3D digital model volumes were compared. Images were interpreted and scored for extravasation by a radiologist unaware of treatment and volume assignments. RESULTS: Based on CT images and regardless of treatment group, IA injections of 4 mL resulted in a mean extravasation score of 2.25 (SD 0.97) versus 1.55 (SD 1.05) (p = .02) for 2 mL IA injections. The change in 3D model volumes after IA injections was a mean of 13.2 cm3 (SD 5.85) after 4 mL injections, compared to 6.97 cm3 (SD 6.28) (p = .003) after 2 mL injections. On radiographic evaluation, but not CT, the mean extravasation scores were 2.45 (SD 1.15) for the arthroscopy group and 1.25 (SD 0.79) for the control group (p < .001). CONCLUSION: A larger volume of IA injection resulted in higher CT extravasation scores and larger 3D volumes regardless of arthroscopic treatment. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: IA injections performed immediately after arthroscopy resulted in 50% or less extravasation, especially with a smaller IA injection volume.

Intra-articular steroids for the treatment of coxarthrosis; a retrospective cohort study comparing three contrast techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Intra-articular steroid injections (IAS) are a treatment for coxarthrosis. This study examines the efficacy of three fluoroscopy-guided IAS contrast techniques for coxarthrosis: contrast-assisted (Iohexol), air arthrogram-assisted and blind (contrast/air free) and stratifies efficacy based on multiple patient variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 307 hip IAS was retrospectively analysed over a four-year period. The primary outcome was efficacy of IAS between each technique group, defined by duration of symptomatic relief. The secondary outcome was efficacy based on multiple patient variables. Variables included age, BMI, gender, type of osteoarthritis, grade of osteoarthritis, smoking status, co-morbidity index and duration of pre-injection symptoms. Chi-squared, Pearson, One Way ANOVA and F-tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Total failure (< 1 week symptomatic relief) was 20% (contrast 20%, air 14%, blind 26%). >3 months of symptomatic relief was experienced by 35%, with the air arthrogram technique containing the largest proportion of IAS achieving > 3months of relief within its own group (contrast 35%, air 38%, blind 28%). Non-smokers experienced a longer duration of symptomatic relief in the air arthrogram group (p = 0.04). Older patients had a longer duration of symptomatic relief with the blind technique (p = < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the three techniques based on the other patient variables. CONCLUSION: Air arthrogram is an effective method of confirming injection placement in hip IAS for coxarthrosis and the use of a contrast agent (e.g., Iohexol) may not be required. Non-contrast techniques may produce longer duration of symptomatic relief in non-smokers and in older patients.

Ultrasound-guided injection of the ankle joint: cadaveric investigation of the anterolateral approach.

OBJECTIVE: Injection of the tibiotalar (TT) joint is commonly performed in clinical practice under ultrasound (US) guidance using an anteromedial approach. However, in some patients, this approach may be technically challenging due to post-traumatic and/or degenerative bony changes. Therefore, the aim of this cadaveric investigation was to demonstrate the feasibility of the ultrasound-guided (USG) injection of the ankle joint via the anterolateral sulcus (ALS) by confirming the dye placement/distribution inside the articular space. Likewise, the safety of the procedure has also been evaluated by measuring the distance between the needle and the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve of the foot. DESIGN: A descriptive laboratory study with eight embalmed cadaveric ankles using the Fix for Life (F4L) method was performed at the setting of an academic institution. The interventional technique and the related anatomical findings were illustrated. During the injection, the needle was advanced into the TT joint through the ALS under US guidance, i.e., in-plane anterior-to-posterior approach. With the objective to confirm its correct placement, the needle was kept in situ and-to demonstrate the location of the dye inside the articular space-all eight ankles were injected with 3 mL of green color dye. Thereafter, a layer-by-layer anatomical dissection was performed on all four cadavers. RESULTS: The position of the needle's tip within the ALS was confirmed in all specimens. Accurate placement of the dye inside the articular space of the ankle was confirmed in seven of the eight cadaveric ankles, with 87.5% of accuracy. Herewith, unintentional spilling of the dye within the superficial soft tissues was reported in two of the eight ankles (25.0%). The mean distance between the needle and the intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve of the foot, measured in all eight procedures, was 3 cm. CONCLUSION: USG injection of the ALS using the in-plane, anterior-to-posterior approach can accurately place the injectate inside the articular space. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This cadaveric investigation described the accuracy and potential pitfalls of USG injection of the ankle via the anterolateral approach which represents an alternative technique in patients with reduced accessibility of the anteromedial recess due to degenerative and/or post-traumatic bony changes.

[Therapy of degenerative changes in the ankle joint with US-guided linear hyaluronic acid injections. A review].

The article discusses the issue and our own experience of local therapy for osteoarthritis of the ankle joint with injections of linear hyaluronic acid under ultrasound navigation. Since the ankle joint is difficult in terms of surgical treatment in general and endoprosthetics in particular, a course of intra-articular injection of 1% Flexotron® Forte hyaluronate, especially in the early stages of dystrophic changes in cartilage, is a promising method for relieving pain, chondroprotection and preserving the biomechanics of the joint, and ultrasound navigation when performing manipulation, it ensures the most accurate introduction of the drug into the joint cavity.

Relationship of Imaging-guided Corticosteroid Injections to COVID-19 Incidence in the Pandemic Recovery Period.

Background Corticosteroids injected for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain are systemically absorbed and can affect the immune response to viral infections. Purpose To determine the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 disease in individuals receiving image-guided corticosteroid injections for musculoskeletal pain compared with the general population during the pandemic recovery period. Materials and Methods In this prospective cohort multicenter study, adults with a history of musculoskeletal pain who underwent imaging-guided intra-articular and spine corticosteroid injections from April 2020 to February 2021 were consecutively enrolled. Participants were followed for a minimum of 28 days through their electronic medical record (EMR) or by direct phone communication to screen for COVID-19 test results or symptoms. Clinical data, including body mass index (BMI), were also obtained from the EMR. The incidence of COVID-19 in the state was obtained using the Massachusetts COVID-19 Response Reporting website. The Student t test was used for continuous variable comparisons. Univariable analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test. Results A total of 2714 corticosteroid injections were performed in 2190 adult participants (mean age, 59 years ± 15 [SD]; 1031 women). Follow-up was available for 1960 participants (89%) who received 2484 injections. Follow-up occurred a mean of 97 days ± 33 (range, 28-141 days) after the injection. Of the 1960 participants, 10 had COVID-19 within 28 days from the injection (0.5% [95% CI: 0.24, 0.94]) and 43 had COVID-19 up to 4 months after the injection (2.2% [95% CI: 1.6, 2.9]). These incidence rates were lower than that of the population of Massachusetts during the same period (519 195 of 6 892 503 [7.5%], P < .001 for both 28 days and 4 months). Participants diagnosed with COVID-19 (n = 10) within 28 days from the injection had a higher BMI than the entire cohort (n = 1960) (mean, 32 kg/m2 ± 10 vs 28 kg/m2 ± 6; P = .04). Conclusion Adults who received image-guided corticosteroid injections for pain management during the pandemic recovery period had a lower incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 compared with the general population. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Comparative Effectiveness of Corticosteroid Dosages for Ultrasound-Guided Glenohumeral Joint Hydrodilatation in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of hydrodilatation with 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide (TA) compared with the same procedure with 10 mg TA in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulders. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with 12 weeks of follow-up. SETTING: Tertiary care rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-four patients diagnosed with AC (N=84). INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound guidance using (A) hydrodilatation with 4 mL of TA (40 mg)+4 mL 2% lidocaine hydrochloride+12 mL normal saline or (B) hydrodilatation with 1 mL of TA (10 mg)+4 mL 2% lidocaine hydrochloride+15 mL normal saline through the posterior glenohumeral recess. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM) at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks after injection. RESULTS: Both groups experienced improvements in the SPADI score, VAS scores for pain, and ROM throughout the study period. However, group-by-time interactions were not significant for any outcome measurement at any follow-up time point. No adverse events were reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation with 40 and 10 mg TA yielded similar improvements in SPADI, VAS score, and ROM at the 12-week follow-up. Considering the potential detrimental effects of corticosteroids on the adjacent cartilage and tendons, a low dose of TA would be preferable for ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation for AC.

A Straightforward 3-Step Method for Identifying the Sacroiliac Joint Using Ultrasonography.

Blind injections of the proximal sacroiliac joint have a low success rate. Blind injections of the distal, on the other hand, are risky due to the proximity of the sacral foramen. Therefore, ultrasound guidance is required in sacroiliac joint injections.

Ultrasound-guided interventions of the upper extremity joints.

Ultrasound guidance is valuable for performing precise joint interventions. Joint interventions may be requested for therapeutic and diagnostic pain injections, joint aspiration in the setting of suspected infection, or contrast injection for arthrography. In practice, interventions of the shoulder girdle, elbow, and hand/wrist joints may be performed without any imaging guidance. However, imaging guidance results in more accurate interventions and better patient outcomes than those performed by palpation alone. When compared to other modalities used for imaging guidance, ultrasound has many potential advantages. Radiologists should be prepared to perform ultrasound-guided upper extremity joint interventions utilizing recommended techniques to optimize clinical practice and patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: 1. Ultrasound-guided injections of the glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, elbow, and hand/wrist joints have higher accuracy than injections performed without imaging guidance. 2. Ultrasound-guided aspirations of upper extremity joints have advantages to fluoroscopic-guided aspirations because of the potential to identify effusions, soft tissue abscess, or bursitis. 3. Ultrasound-guided contrast injection prior to MR arthrography is as accurate as fluoroscopic-guided injection for upper extremity joints.

Fluoroscopic-guided procedures of the lower extremity.

This article reviews the literature and the authors' experiences regarding the performance of lower extremity fluoroscopically guided procedures from the hip to the toes. An overview of injections and aspirations, their indications, risks, and complications are provided, focusing on anesthetics, corticosteroids, and contrast agents. A variety of approaches to each joint and the associated pearls and pitfalls of each approach will be discussed.

Fluoroscopy-guided injections of the upper extremity: pearls and pitfalls.

Fluoroscopy guidance is commonly utilized for injections in the upper extremity, with increased accuracy for injection placement compared to blind injection. Injection of the glenohumeral joint is the most commonly performed upper extremity procedure. However, there are a number of other sites which can be easily injected under fluoroscopy including the acromioclavicular joint, subacromial subdeltoid bursa, biceps tendon sheath, scapulothoracic bursa, elbow, wrist, first CMC joint, and pisotriquetral joint. Fluoroscopy can be used to guide injections into the glenohumeral, elbow, or wrist joints preceding MR arthrography. While there are technique similarities when injecting any of these sites, some particular approaches and pitfalls are unique to each anatomic site.