Waitlist Outcomes for Pediatric Heart Transplantation in the Current Era: An Analysis of the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society Database.

BACKGROUND: Waitlist mortality (WM) remains elevated in pediatric heart transplantation. Allocation policy is a potential tool to help improve WM. This study aims to identify patients at highest risk for WM to potentially inform future allocation policy changes. METHODS: The Pediatric Heart Transplant Society database was queried for patients <18 years of age indicated for heart transplantation between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2021. Waitlist mortality was defined as death while awaiting transplant or removal from the waitlist due to clinical deterioration. Because WM is low after the first year, analysis was limited to the first 12 months on the heart transplant list. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing was conducted to compare unadjusted survival between groups. Cox proportional hazard models were created to determine risk factors for WM. Subgroup analysis was performed for status 1A patients based on body surface area (BSA) at time of listing, cardiac diagnosis, and presence of mechanical circulatory support. RESULTS: In total 5974 children met study criteria of which 3928 were status 1A, 1012 were status 1B, 963 were listed status 2, and 65 were listed status 7. Because of the significant burden of WM experienced by 1A patients, further analysis was performed in only patients indicated as 1A. Within that group of patients, those with smaller size and lower eGFR had higher WM, whereas those patients without congenital heart disease or support from a ventricular assist device (VAD) at time of listing had decreased WM. In the smallest size cohort, cardiac diagnoses other than dilated cardiomyopathy were risk factors for WM. Previous cardiac surgery was a risk factor in the 0.3 to 0.7 m2 and >0.7 m2 BSA groups. VAD support was associated with lower WM other than in the single ventricle cohort, where VAD was associated with higher WM. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mechanical ventilation were associated with increased risk of WM in all cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in WM among status-1A patients. Potential refinements to current allocation system should factor in the increased WM risk we identified in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or mechanical ventilation, single ventricle congenital heart disease on VAD support and small children with congenital heart disease, restrictive cardiomyopathy, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Mortality risk for kidney transplant candidates with diabetes: a population cohort study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: It is unclear whether kidney transplant candidates with diabetes have equitable transplantation opportunities or have divergent survival probabilities stratified by kidney replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate these two issues using national transplant registry data in the UK. METHODS: A cohort study was undertaken of prospectively collected registry data of all wait-listed people with kidney failure receiving dialysis in the UK. All people listed for their first kidney-alone transplant between 2000 and 2019 were included. Stratification was done for cause of kidney failure. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Time-to-death from listing was analysed using adjusted non-proportional hazard Cox regression models, with transplantation handled as a time-dependent covariate. RESULTS: A total of 47,917 wait-listed people with kidney failure formed the total study cohort, of whom 6594 (13.8%) had diabetes classified as cause of kidney failure. People with kidney failure with diabetes comprised 27.6% of the cohort (n=3681/13,359) that did not proceed to transplantation vs only 8.4% (n=2913/34,558) of the cohort that received a transplant (p<0.001). Kidney transplant candidates with diabetes were more likely to be older, of male sex and of ethnic minority background compared with those without diabetes. In an adjusted analysis, compared with remaining on dialysis, any kidney transplant provided survival benefit for wait-listed kidney transplant candidates regardless of diabetes as cause of kidney failure (RR 0.26 [95% CI 0.25, 0.27], p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Kidney transplant candidates with diabetes have a lower chance of transplantation despite better survival after kidney transplantation vs remaining on dialysis. The reasons for this require further investigation to ensure equal transplantation opportunities.

Status 2 upgrade indication impacts posttransplant mortality in patients bridged with intraaortic balloon pump in the new heart allocation system.

To evaluate outcomes of patients undergoing heart transplants (HTs) using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) under exception status. Adult patients supported by an IABP who underwent HT between November 18, 2018, and December 31, 2020, as documented in the United Network for Organ Sharing, were included. Patients were stratified according to requests for exception status. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to look for differences in survival between groups. A total of 1284 patients were included; 492 (38.3%) were transplanted with an IABP under exception status. Exception status patients had higher body mass index, were more likely to be Black, and had longer waitlist times. Exception status patients received organs from younger donors, had a shorter ischemic time, and had a higher frequency of sex mismatch. The 1-year posttransplant survival was 93% for the nonexception and 88% for the exception IABP patients (hazard ratio: 1.85 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.86, P = .006]). The most common reason for requesting an exception status was inability to meet blood pressure criteria for extension (37% of patients). The most common reason for an extension request for an exception status was right ventricular dysfunction (24%). IABP patients transplanted under exception status have an increased 1-year mortality rate posttransplant compared with those without exception status.

Excess waitlist mortality among candidates for multivisceral liver-intestine transplant in acuity circle allocation.

Candidates for multivisceral transplant (MVT) have experienced decreased access to transplant in recent years. Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, transplant and waiting list outcomes for MVT (ie, liver-intestine, liver-intestine-pancreas, and liver-intestine-kidney-pancreas) candidates listed between February 4, 2018, and February 3, 2022, were analyzed, including model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease and exception scores by era (before and after acuity circle [AC] implementation on February 4, 2020) and age group (pediatric and adult). Of 284 MVT waitlist registrations (45.6% pediatric), fewer had exception points at listing post-AC compared to pre-AC (10.0% vs 19.1%), and they were less likely to receive transplant (19.1% vs 35.9% at 90 days; 35.7% vs 57.2% at 1 year). Of 177 MVT recipients, exception points at transplant were more common post-AC compared to pre-AC (30.8% vs 20.2%). Postpolicy, adult MVT candidates were more likely to be removed due to death/too sick compared with liver-alone candidates (13.5% vs 5.6% at 90 days; 24.2% vs 9.8% at 1 year), whereas no excess waitlist mortality was observed among pediatric MVT candidates. Under current allocation policy, multivisceral candidates experience inferior waitlist outcomes compared with liver-alone candidates. Clarification of guidance around submission and approval of multivisceral exception requests may help improve their access to transplantation and achieve equity between multivisceral and liver-alone candidates on the liver transplant waiting list.

Where you live matters: Area deprivation predicts poor survival and liver transplant waitlisting.

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are important predictors of poor clinical outcomes in chronic diseases, but their associations among the general cirrhosis population and liver transplantation (LT) are limited. We conducted a retrospective, multiinstitutional analysis of adult (≥18-years-old) patients with cirrhosis in metropolitan Chicago to determine the associations of poor neighborhood-level SDOH on decompensation complications, mortality, and LT waitlisting. Area deprivation index and covariates extracted from the American Census Survey were aspects of SDOH that were investigated. Among 15 101 patients with cirrhosis, the mean age was 57.2 years; 6414 (42.5%) were women, 6589 (43.6%) were non-Hispanic White, 3652 (24.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 2662 (17.6%) were Hispanic. Each quintile increase in area deprivation was associated with poor outcomes in decompensation (sHR [subdistribution hazard ratio] 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.10; P < .001), waitlisting (sHR 0.72; 95% CI 0.67-0.76; P < .001), and all-cause mortality (sHR 1.09; 95% CI 1.06-1.12; P < .001). Domains of SDOH associated with a lower likelihood of waitlisting and survival included low income, low education, poor household conditions, and social support (P < .001). Overall, patients with cirrhosis residing in poor neighborhood-level SDOH had higher decompensation, and mortality, and were less likely to be waitlisted for LT. Further exploration of structural barriers toward LT or optimizing health outcomes is warranted.

Evaluation of a delayed liver transplantation strategy for patients with HCC receiving bridging therapy: the DELTA-HCC study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To maximize utility and prevent premature liver transplantation (LT), a delayed LT strategy (DS) was adopted in France in 2015 in patients listed for any single HCC treated with resection or thermal ablation during the waiting phase. The DS involves postponing LT until recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the DS to make sure that it did not hamper pre- and post-LT outcomes. METHODS: Patients listed for HCC in France between 2015 and 2018 were studied. After data extraction from the national LT database, 2,025 patients were identified and classified according to six groups: single tumor entering DS, single tumor not entering DS, multiple tumors, no curative treatment, untreatable HCC or T1 tumors. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 18-month risk of dropout for death, too sick to be transplanted or tumor progression before LT, 5-year post-LT HCC recurrence and post-LT survival rates were compared. RESULTS: Median waiting-time in the DS group was 910 days. Pre-LT dropout probability was significantly lower in the DS group compared to other groups (13% vs. 19%, p = 0.0043) and significantly higher in the T1 group (25.4%, p = 0.05). Post-LT HCC recurrence rate in the multiple nodules group was significantly higher (19.6%, p = 0.019), while 5-year post-LT survival did not differ among groups and was 74% in the DS group (p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: The DELTA-HCC study shows that DS does not negatively impact either pre- nor post-LT patient outcomes, and has the potential to allow for redistribution of organs to patients in more urgent need of LT. It can reasonably be proposed and pursued. The unexpectedly high risk of dropout in T1 patients seems related to the MELD-based offering rules underserving this subgroup. IMPACTS AND IMPLICATIONS: To maximize utility and prevent premature liver transplantation (LT), a delayed LT strategy was adopted in France in 2015. It involves postponing LT until recurrence in patients listed for any single HCC curatively treated by surgical resection or thermal ablation. The DELTA-HCC study was conducted to evaluate this nationwide strategy. It shows in a European LT program that delayed strategy does not negatively impact pre- nor post-LT patient outcomes and is relevant to up to 20% of LT candidates; thus, it could potentially enable the redistribution of organs to patients in more urgent need of LT. Such a delayed strategy can reasonably be pursued and extended to other LT programs. Of note, an unexpectedly high risk of dropout in T1 patients, seemingly related to MELD-based offering rules which underserve these patients, calls for further scrutinization and revision of allocation rules in this subgroup.

Wait times and breast cancer survival: a population-based retrospective cohort study using CanIMPACT data.

PURPOSE: The time from breast cancer surgery to chemotherapy has been shown to affect survival outcomes; however, the effect of time from first breast cancer-related healthcare contact to first cancer specialist consultation, or the time from first breast cancer-related healthcare contact to adjuvant chemotherapy on survival has not been well explored. We aimed to determine whether various wait times along the breast cancer treatment pathway (contact-to-consultation, contact-to-chemotherapy, surgery-to-chemotherapy) were associated with overall survival in women within the Canadian province of Ontario. METHODS: We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer in Ontario between 2007 and 2011 who received surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. This was the Ontario cohort of a larger, nationwide study (the Canadian Team to improve Community-Based Cancer Care along the Continuum - CanIMPACT). We used Cox-proportional hazards regression to determine the association between the contact-to-consultation, contact-to-chemotherapy, and surgery-to-chemotherapy intervals and overall survival while adjusting for cancer stage, age, comorbidity, neighborhood income, immigration status, surgery type, and method of cancer detection. RESULTS: Among 12,782 breast cancer patients, longer surgery-to-chemotherapy intervals (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.18 per 30-day increase), but not the contact-to-consultation (HR 0.979, 95% CI 0.95-1.01 per 30-day increase), nor the more comprehensive contact-to-chemotherapy intervals (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02 per 30-day increase) were associated with decreased survival in our adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the prognostic importance of a shorter surgery-to-chemotherapy interval, whereas the contact-to-consultation and contact-to-chemotherapy intervals have less impact on survival outcomes.

Liver paired exchange: A US single-center experience-Pairs, chains, and use of compatible pairs.

In the United States, the discrepancy between organ availability and need has persisted despite changes in allocation, innovations in preservation, and policy initiatives. Living donor liver transplant remains an underutilized means of improving access to timely liver transplantation and decreasing waitlist mortality. Liver paired exchange (LPE) represents an opportunity to overcome living donor liver transplant pair incompatibility due to size, anatomy, or blood type. LPE was adopted as a strategy to augment access to liver transplantation at our institution. Specific educational materials, consent forms, and selection processes were developed to facilitate LPE. From 2019 through October 2023, our center performed 11 LPEs, resulting in 23 living donor liver transplant pairs. The series included several types of LPE: those combining complementary incompatible pairs, the inclusion of compatible pairs to overcome incompatibility, and the use of altruistic nondirected donors to initiate chains. These exchanges facilitated transplantation for 23 recipients, including 1 pediatric patient. LPE improved access to liver transplantation at our institution. The ethical application of LPE includes tailored patient education, assessment and disclosure of exchange balance, mitigation of risk, and maximization of benefit for donors and recipients.

Clinically relevant cut-points for changes in the Liver Frailty Index are associated with waitlist mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Physical frailty is a critical determinant of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and can be objectively measured using the Liver Frailty Index (LFI), which is potentially modifiable. We aimed to identify LFI cut-points associated with waitlist mortality. Ambulatory adults with cirrhosis without HCC awaiting liver transplantation from 9 centers from 2012 to 2021 for ≥3 months with ≥2 pre-liver transplantation LFI assessments were included. The primary explanatory variable was the change in LFI from first to second assessments per 3 months (∆LFI); we evaluated clinically relevant ∆LFI cut-points at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5. The primary outcome was waitlist mortality (death or delisting for being too sick), with transplant considered as a competing event. Among 1029 patients, the median (IQR) age was 58 (51-63) years; 42% were female; and the median lab Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium at first assessment was 18 (15-22). For each 0.1 improvement in ∆LFI, the risk of overall mortality decreased by 6% (cause-specific hazard ratio: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, p < 0.001). ∆LFI was associated with waitlist mortality at cut-points as low as 0.1 (cause-specific hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46-0.87) and 0.2 (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87). An improvement in LFI per 3 months as small as 0.1 in the pre-liver transplantation period is associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in waitlist mortality. These data provide estimates of the reduction in mortality risk associated with improvements in LFI that can be used to assess the effectiveness of interventions targeting physical frailty in patients with cirrhosis.

Waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of pregnancy-related acute liver failure in the United States.

Data on the liver transplant (LT) outcomes of women with acute liver failure (ALF) due to liver diseases unique to pregnancy (P-ALF) are limited. Using United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) data (1987-2021), we analyzed waitlist and post-LT outcomes of ALF in women of childbearing age comparing P-ALF versus ALF due to liver diseases not unique to pregnancy. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups at the time of listing for LT. Of 3542 females aged 16-43 years and listed for LT for ALF, 84 (2%) listed for P-ALF were less likely to be Black (11 vs. 21%, p =0.033), have lower international normalized ratio (2.74 vs. 4.53 p <0.002), but more likely to have respiratory failure (56% vs. 41%, p <0.005), be on pressors (58% vs. 43%, p <0.005), and require dialysis (23% vs. 10%, p <0.001). The cumulative 90-day waitlist mortality (WLM) was lower in P-ALF vs. ALF due to liver diseases not unique to pregnancy (7.4 vs. 16.6%, p <0.001). Posttransplant survival rates at 5 years were similar (82% vs. 79%, p =0.89). In a Fine and Gray regression model controlled for listing year and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, 90-day WLM was lower in P-ALF with a sub-HR of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.19-0.94, p =0.035). Of 84 women with P-ALF and listed for LT, 45 listed for hemolysis-elevated liver enzymes-low platelets (HELLP) versus 39 for acute fatty liver of pregnancy had higher 90-day WLM (19.3% vs. 5.7% p <0.005). The 90-day WLM was about 10-fold higher in HELLP versus acute fatty liver of pregnancy with a sub-HR of 9.97 (95% CI: 1.64-60.55, p =0.013). In this UNOS database analysis of ALF among women of childbearing age, the waitlist outcome is better in women with P-ALF compared to women with ALF due to liver diseases not unique to pregnancy. Among women with P-ALF, the 90-day WLM is worse for HELLP versus acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Further studies are needed to improve the management of HELLP and prevent the development of ALF in this subgroup population.

Association between bridging therapy and posttransplant outcomes in patients with HCC within Milan criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liver transplantation is the curative therapy of choice for patients with early-stage HCC. Locoregional therapies are often employed as a bridge to reduce the risk of waitlist dropout; however, their association with posttransplant outcomes is unclear. We conducted a systematic review using Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies published between database inception and August 2, 2023, which reported posttransplant recurrence-free survival and overall survival among patients transplanted for HCC within Milan criteria, stratified by receipt of bridging therapy. Pooled HRs were calculated for each outcome using the DerSimonian and Laird method for a random-effects model. We identified 38 studies, including 19,671 patients who received and 20,148 patients who did not receive bridging therapy. Bridging therapy was not associated with significant differences in recurrence-free survival (pooled HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.08; I2 =39%) or overall survival (pooled HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95-1.24; I2 =47%). Results were relatively consistent across subgroups, including geographic location and study period. Studies were discordant regarding the differential strength of association by pretreatment tumor burden and pathologic response, but potential benefits of locoregional therapy were mitigated in those who received 3 or more treatments. Adverse events were reported in a minority of studies, but when reported occurred in 6%-15% of the patients. Few studies reported loss to follow-up and most had a risk of residual confounding. Bridging therapy is not associated with improvements in posttransplant recurrence-free or overall survival among patients with HCC within Milan criteria. The risk-benefit ratio of bridging therapy likely differs based on the risk of waitlist dropout.

Controversies in terlipressin and transplantation in the United States: How do we MELD the two?

Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is a severe complication of cirrhosis that carries a poor prognosis. The recent Food and Drug Administration approval of terlipressin has substantial implications for managing HRS-AKI and liver allocation in the United States. Terlipressin has been available in Europe for over a decade, and several countries have adapted policy changes such as Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score "lock" for HRS-AKI. In this article, we outline the European experience with terlipressin use and explore the question of whether terlipressin treatment for HRS-AKI should qualify for the MELD score "lock" in the United States in those who respond to therapy. Arguments for the MELD lock include protecting waitlist priority for terlipressin responders or partial responders who may miss offers due to MELD reduction in the terlipressin treatment window. Arguments against MELD lock include the fact that terlipressin may produce a durable response and improve overall survival and that equitable access to terlipressin is not guaranteed due to cost and availability. We subsequently discuss the proposed next steps for studying terlipressin implementation in the United States. A successful approach will require the involvement of all major stakeholders and the mobilization of our transplant community to spearhead research in this area.

An updated analysis of retransplantation following living donor liver transplantation in the United States: Insights from the latest UNOS database.

There is no recent update on the clinical course of retransplantation (re-LT) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the US using recent national data. The UNOS database (2002-2023) was used to explore patient characteristics in initial LT, comparing deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and LDLT for graft survival (GS), reasons for graft failure, and GS after re-LT. It assesses waitlist dropout and re-LT likelihood, categorizing re-LT cohort based on time to re-listing as acute or chronic (≤ or > 1 mo). Of 132,323 DDLT and 5955 LDLT initial transplants, 3848 DDLT and 302 LDLT recipients underwent re-LT. Of the 302 re-LT following LDLT, 156 were acute and 146 chronic. Primary nonfunction (PNF) was more common in DDLT, although the difference was not statistically significant (17.4% vs. 14.8% for LDLT; p = 0.52). Vascular complications were significantly higher in LDLT (12.5% vs. 8.3% for DDLT; p < 0.01). Acute re-LT showed a larger difference in primary nonfunction between DDLT and LDLT (49.7% vs. 32.0%; p < 0.01). Status 1 patients were more common in DDLT (51.3% vs. 34.0% in LDLT; p < 0.01). In the acute cohort, Kaplan-Meier curves indicated superior GS after re-LT for initial LDLT recipients in both short-term and long-term ( p = 0.02 and < 0.01, respectively), with no significant difference in the chronic cohort. No significant differences in waitlist dropout were observed, but the initial LDLT group had a higher re-LT likelihood in the acute cohort (sHR 1.40, p < 0.01). A sensitivity analysis focusing on the most recent 10-year cohort revealed trends consistent with the overall study findings. LDLT recipients had better GS in re-LT than DDLT. Despite a higher severity of illness, the DDLT cohort was less likely to undergo re-LT.

Outpatient mean arterial pressure: A potentially modifiable risk for acute kidney injury and death among patients with cirrhosis.

Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), which decreases as portal hypertension progresses, may be a modifiable risk factor among patients with cirrhosis. We included adults enrolled in the Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation study. We completed latent class trajectory analyses to define MAP trajectories. We completed time-dependent Cox-regression analyses to test the association between outpatient MAP and 3 cirrhosis-related outcomes: (1) stage 2 acute kidney injury (AKI), defined as a ≥200% increase in serum creatinine from baseline; (2) a 5-point increase in the MELD-Na score, defined as the incidence of increase from initial MELD-Na; (3) waitlist mortality, defined as death on the waitlist. For each outcome, we defined MAP cut points by determining the maximally selected Log-rank statistic after univariable Cox-regression analyses. Among the 1786 patients included in this analysis, our latent class trajectory analyses identified 3 specific outpatient MAP trajectories: "stable-low," "stable-high," and "increasing-to-decreasing." However, >80% of patients were in a "stable-low" trajectory. We found in adjusted analyses that outpatient MAP was associated with each of our outcomes: Stage 2 AKI (adjusted hazard ratio 0.88 per 10 mm Hg increase in MAP [95% CI: 0.79-0.99]); 5-point increase in MELD-Na (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.86-0.96]; waitlist mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.81-0.96]). For each outcome, we found that an outpatient MAP of 82 mm Hg was most associated with outcomes ( p <0.05 for all). Our study informs the association between outpatient MAP and cirrhosis-related outcomes. These findings, coupled with the identification of specific thresholds, lay the foundation for the trial of targeted outpatient MAP modulation in patients with cirrhosis.

Pursuing living donor liver transplantation improves outcomes of patients with autoimmune liver diseases: An intention-to-treat analysis.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers the opportunity to decrease waitlist time and mortality for patients with autoimmune liver disease (AILD), autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. We compared the survival of patients with a potential living donor (pLDLT) on the waitlist versus no potential living donor (pDDLT) on an intention-to-treat basis. Our retrospective cohort study investigated adults with AILD listed for a liver transplant in our program between 2000 and 2021. The pLDLT group comprised recipients with a potential living donor. Otherwise, they were included in the pDDLT group. Intention-to-treat survival was assessed from the time of listing. Of the 533 patients included, 244 (43.8%) had a potential living donor. Waitlist dropout was higher for the pDDLT groups among all AILDs (pDDLT 85 [29.4%] vs. pLDLT 9 [3.7%], p < 0.001). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year intention-to-treat survival rates were higher for pLDLT versus pDDLT among all AILDs (95.7% vs. 78.1%, 89.0% vs. 70.1%, and 87.1% vs. 65.5%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, pLDLT was associated with a 38% reduction in the risk of death among the AILD cohort (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42-0.93 [ p <0.05]), and 60% among the primary sclerosing cholangitis cohort (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74 [ p <0.05]). There were no differences in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year post-transplant survival between LDLT and DDLT (AILD: 95.6% vs. 92.1%, 89.9% vs. 89.4%, and 89.1% vs. 87.1%, p =0.41). This was consistent after adjusting for covariates (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.56-1.68 [ p >0.9]). Our study suggests that having a potential living donor could decrease the risk of death in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis on the waitlist. Importantly, the post-transplant outcomes in this population are similar between the LDLT and DDLT groups.

The Impact of Local Programmatic Decisions on Outcomes in Transplant-Listed Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: We investigated variables impacting waitlist times and negative waitlist outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) who were waiting for orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) after the 2018 allocation change. METHODS: Adult candidates for OHT who were listed between 10/18/2018 and 12/31/2022 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized as ACHD vs non-ACHD. Waitlist time and time to upgrade for those upgraded into status 1-3 were compared by using rank-sum tests. Death/delisting for deterioration was assessed by using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs). RESULTS: Of 15,424 OHT candidates, 589 (3.8%) were ACHD. ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates had less urgent status at initial listing (4.2% vs 4.7% listed at status 1; 17.2% vs 23.7% listed at status 2; P < 0.001), but not final listing (5.9% vs 7.6% final status 1; 35.6% vs 36.8% final status 2; P < 0.001). ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates upgraded into status 1 (65.0 vs 30.0 days; P = 0.09) and status 2 (113.0 vs 64.0 days; P = 0.003) spent longer times on the waitlist. ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates spent longer times waiting for an upgrade into status 1 (51.4 vs 17.6 days; P = 0.027) and status 2 (76.7 vs 34.7 days; P = 0.003). Once upgraded, there was no difference between groups in waitlist time to status 1 (9.7 vs 5.5 days = 0.66). ACHD vs non-ACHD candidates with a final status of 1 (20.0% vs 8.6%; SHR 2.47 [95%CI = 1.19-5.16]; P = 0.02) and 2 (8.9% vs 2.3%; SHR 3.59 [95%CI = 2.18-5.91]; P < 0.001) experienced higher rates of death and deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: ACHD candidates have longer waitlist times, have lower priority status at initial listing, wait longer for upgrades, and have higher mortality rates at the same final status as non-ACHD candidates, suggesting that they are being upgraded too late.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: 5-year outcomes and bridge to decision in a large, older cohort.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT) has expanded considerably, though evidence-based selection criteria and long-term outcome data are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether risk factors often used to exclude patients from ECMO BTT-specifically older age and not yet being listed for transplant-are validated by long-term outcomes. METHODS: To ensure minimum 5-year follow-up, a retrospective cohort study was performed of adult patients actively listed for lung transplantation at a high-volume center and bridged on ECMO between January 2012 and December 2017. Data was collected through January 1, 2023. RESULTS: Among 50 patients bridged on ECMO, 25 survived to transplant. Median age at listing was 58 (interquartile range [IQR], 42-65) in the transplanted group and 65 (IQR, 56.5-69) in the deceased group (P = 0.051). One-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival were 88% (22/25), 60% (15/25), and 44% (11/25), respectively, with eight patients still living at the time of review. Median time spent at home during the year post-transplant was 340 days (IQR, 314-355). Older age at listing was a negative predictor of survival on ECMO to transplant (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.99], P = 0.01). Thirteen patients were placed on ECMO prior to being listed and three were listed the same day as ECMO cannulation, with 10/16 transplanted. No significant difference in post-transplant survival was found between patients placed on ECMO prior to listing (n = 10) and those already listed (n = 15) (P = 0.93, log-rank). Serial post-transplant spirometry up to 5 years and surveillance transbronchial biopsy demonstrated good allograft function and low rates of cellular rejection. CONCLUSIONS: In one of the oldest cohorts of ECMO BTT patients described, favorable survival outcomes and allograft function were observed up to 5 years irrespective of whether patients were previously listed or bridged to decision. Despite inherent limitations to this retrospective, single-center study, the data presented support the feasibility of ECMO BTT in older and not previously listed advanced lung disease patients.

Waitlist and transplant outcomes in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), in the context of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) among liver transplantation (LT) candidates or recipients remains poorly understood. This study compares waitlist and post-LT outcomes in patients with MASLD/AIH to MASLD and AIH alone. METHODS: Using the united network organ sharing database (2002-2022), we compared waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival among patients with MASLD/AIH (n = 282), AIH (n = 5812), and MASLD (n = 33 331). Competing risk, Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed. RESULTS: MASLD/AIH group had the highest rates of encephalopathy and ascites, and highest MELD scores. MASLD/AIH patients had higher transplantation incidence (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.64, 95% CI 1.44-1.85; p < .001) and lower waitlist removal risk (aSHR .30, 95% CI .20-.44; p < .001) compared to MASLD alone. One-year post-LT survival favoured MASLD compared to AIH (patient: 92% vs. 91%, p < .001; graft: 89% vs. 88%, p < .001) and MASLD/AIH (patient: 92% vs. 90%, p = .008; graft: 89% vs. 88%, p = .023). Recipients with MASLD/AIH showed no significant difference in survival at 10-year post-LT compared to MASLD (patient: 63% vs. 61%, p = .68; graft 60% vs. 59%, p = .83) and AIH (patient: 63% vs. 70%, p = .07; graft: 60% vs. 64%, p = .42). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that MASLD/AIH patients demonstrate higher LT incidence and lower dropout rates. Long-term post-LT outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings.

Evolving trends and outcomes on the US liver transplant waitlist of alcohol-associated hepatitis patients with very high MELD scores.

Liver transplantation (LT) in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) has rapidly increased following the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the implementation of the Acuity Circle policy, raising questions of equity and utility. Waitlist mortality among high (≥37) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease LT candidates with AH and post-transplant survival were assessed with a semiparametric survival regression and a generalized linear mixed-effect model with LT centre- and listing date-level random intercepts. These models demonstrate a lower mortality for the candidates listed with AH (adjusted sub-hazard ratio .58_.72_.90 and odds ratio .44_.66_.99) when compared to other diagnoses (autoimmune hepatitis, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and primary biliary cholangitis). Post-LT survival was comparable. This study highlights the limitations of current tools in characterizing the risk of mortality, and thus need for the modifications in prioritizing LT candidates with AH. Policy revision may be needed to ensure equivalent access to LT regardless of diagnosis.

Dietary Restriction, Socioeconomic Factors, Access to Kidney Transplantation, and Waitlist Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: Dietary restrictions for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are burdensome. Kidney transplantation (KT) candidates who lack neighborhood resources and are burdened by dietary restrictions may have decreased access to KT. METHODS: In our two-center prospective cohort study (2014-2023), 2471 ESKD patients who were evaluated for KT (candidates) reported their perceived burden of dietary restrictions (not at all, somewhat/moderately, or extremely bothered). Neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors were derived from residential ZIP codes. We quantified the association of perceived burden of the dietary restrictions with a chance of listing using Cox models and risk of waitlist mortality using competing risks models. Then we tested whether these associations differed by neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: At evaluation, 18% of KT candidates felt extremely bothered by dietary restrictions. Those who felt extremely bothered were less likely to be listed for KT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.87); this association did not differ by neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors. Overall, the burden of dietary restrictions was not associated with waitlist mortality (p = 0.62). However, among candidates living in high food insecurity neighborhoods, those who felt extremely bothered had higher waitlist mortality (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR] = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.14-3.75, p[interaction] = 0.02). The association between dietary burden and waitlist mortality did not differ by neighborhood-level healthy food access. CONCLUSION: The perceived burden of dietary restrictions is associated with a lower chance of listing for KT, and higher waitlist mortality only among candidates residing in neighborhoods with high food insecurity. Transplant centers should identify vulnerable patients and support them with nutrition education and access to food assistance programs.