Clinical outcomes with utilization of high-potency topical steroids in patients with lichen sclerosus-associated vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of high-potency topical steroid use on risk of recurrence of lichen sclerosus-associated vulvar cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients with lichen sclerosus (LS)- associated vulvar squamous cell cancer (VSCC). Demographic and clinical outcome data were compared between two comparison groups: patients who received steroids, mainly clobetasol, and patients who did not receive steroids following treatment of LS-related vulvar cancer. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test or chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using a two-sided student's t-test. Time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival plot and compared using Mantel-Cox log rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression models were conducted to generate hazard ratios for both TTR and OS. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included, with 36 patients receiving steroid treatment and 13 patients in the expectant management group. The median age of diagnosis was 68. The average BMI was 31.7 +/- 7.0. The median length of follow up was 41 months. The majority of patients were diagnosed with stage I VSCC. There was no difference in demographics or oncologic management of vulvar cancer between the two cohorts. Overall recurrence was decreased among patients who received steroid treatment when compared to patients who did not, 12 patients (33.3%) versus 9 patients (69.2%) respectively (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: High-potency topical steroid use following treatment of lichen sclerosus-associated vulvar squamous cell carcinoma is associated with decreased risk of recurrence and prolonged median time to recurrence.

Treatment of vulvar cancer recurrence with electrochemotherapy: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a combined treatment method based on electroporation and simultaneous chemotherapy. In cases where radiotherapy has previously been used, surgery is often the only treatment option for vulvar cancer recurrence with potential resection of clitoris, vagina, urethra or anal sphincter. The unique advantage of ECT is its selectivity for cancer cells while sparing the surrounding healthy tissue. The aim of the study was to compare the ECT treatment of vulvar cancer recurrence for non-palliative purposes with surgical treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients with single vulvar cancer recurrence were treated with ECT and followed up for 12 months. As a control group, 15 patients with single vulvar cancer recurrence were treated with wide local excision. The following data were collected, analyzed and compared: Age, body mass index, comorbidities, histological type, location and size of vulvar cancer recurrence, treatment history, details of procedures and hospital stay. RESULTS: The probability curves for local tumor control did not differ between the ECT group and the surgical group (p = 0.694). The mean hospital stay and the mean duration of procedure were statistically significantly shorter in the ECT group (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the ECT and surgical groups in terms of mean body mass index, associated diseases, previous treatments, presence of lichen sclerosus, p16 status, gradus, anatomical site of the tumor, and type of anesthesia. CONCLUSION: In this case-control study, treatment of vulvar cancer recurrence with ECT for non-palliative purposes was comparable to surgical treatment in terms of effectiveness. The results need to be confirmed in larger randomized trials.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab for locally advanced vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVES: External beam radiation with sensitizing platinum is the recommended therapy for locally advanced vulvar cancers not amenable to curative surgery and is associated with considerable acute and chronic side effects. Radical vulvectomy post-radiation for persistent disease is often compromised with poor wound healing. We describe clinical outcomes for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus bevacizumab followed by radical vulvectomy for locally advanced vulvar cancer. METHODS: We performed retrospective analyses of all patients at our institution who underwent radical vulvectomy from January 2015 to November 2023. Of 113 patients, 13 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Demographics and clinicopathologic data were extracted, and descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Cases with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were further evaluated for response, adverse effects, and survival. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 13 patients with stage II-IV disease that involved the urethra, vagina, or anus. Lesion sizes ranged from 4 to 20 cm (median 7 cm). Patients received 2-6 cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. Nine (69.2%) patients had partial pathologic responses, and four patients had complete responses. All patients had negative surgical margins. Ten (76.9%) patients had radiographic evidence of inguinal lymph node metastasis prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and four had residual nodal disease. Only one patient developed a superficial groin seroma. Three patients developed recurrence, two locally and one distant, and there was one death. The median follow-up was 23 months (range 6-84 months). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using combination platinum/paclitaxel/bevacizumab was efficacious for locally advanced vulvar cancer, resulting in complete resections, negative margins, and excellent wound healing. A multi-institutional phase II trial is warranted to validate these findings.

Primary chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery as treatment strategy for locally advanced vulvar carcinoma (VULCANize2).

BACKGROUND: Current treatment options for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer are limited and associated with high morbidity. Therefore, it is important to develop new and safe treatment strategies for this vulnerable patient group. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is oncologically safe, potentially more effective than primary chemoradiation in establishing long lasting locoregional control, and associated with an improved quality of life. TRIAL DESIGN: This study is a multicenter, prospective, phase II randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the standard treatment arm (primary chemoradiation, consisting of a tumor dose of 64.5 Gy in 30 fractions of external beam radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin for 6 weeks) or the experimental treatment arm (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel in a 3 weekly scheme, followed by surgery). MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Eligible patients must have a histologically confirmed primary or recurrent locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages Ib-Iva; Lesions larger than 2 cm in size or stromal invasion larger than 1 mm (T1b or higher), any status of lymph node involvement (any N), no distant metastasis including pelvic lymph nodes (M0)) with the size or localization of the tumor requiring treatment through primary chemoradiation or extensive surgery. Patients with documented metastases of the pelvic lymph nodes will be excluded from participation in this study. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Locoregional control at 24 months. SAMPLE SIZE: 98 patients will be included in the study. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Expected complete accrual in 2028 with presentation of results by 2030. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05905315.

A Mimicker of Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia: Reactive Atypia From Noncompliance With Lichen Sclerosus Therapy.

ABSTRACT: Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (d-VIN) is an HPV-independent precursor to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. The histology of d-VIN lesions is difficult to differentiate from that of non-neoplastic epithelial disorders, especially lichen sclerosus (LS). The authors present a case of LS, where relying on histopathology alone could have led to misdiagnosis. The patient was a 17-year-old female patient with clinical features of vulvar dermatitis and LS for 2 years. She was counseled to apply clobetasol 0.05% to the affected area daily but reported no improvement after 6 months. A biopsy of the right labia majora revealed histologic findings typical of d-VIN and near-contiguous p53 expression. These features are characteristic of d-VIN. However, d-VIN is exceedingly rare in young patients. The case was reviewed by 6 dermatopathologists and gynecologic pathologists, who observed that the degree of inflammation would be unusual postclobetasol therapy and could be due to noncompliance. A review of the patient's chart revealed that she "does not always remember to apply" clobetasol. The patient's clinician confirmed that there were compliance issues, and the follow-up biopsy was negative for d-VIN. The case was signed out as LS, with a note describing the above, and to rebiopsy if concern persisted. The authors conjecture that inflammatory infiltrates in the biopsied area caused reactive atypia due to lack of adherence to treatment. Although the patient's age helped rule out d-VIN, similar cases in elderly patients may be occurring. Pathologists must be aware that reactive forms of untreated LS can mimic d-VIN, to avoid misdiagnosis.

Definitive chemoradiation in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: outcome and toxicity from an observational multicenter Italian study on vulvar cancer (OLDLADY 1.1).

BACKGROUND: Vulvar carcinoma is a rather uncommon gynecological malignancy affecting elderly women and the treatment of loco-regional advanced carcinoma of the vulva (LAVC) is a challenge for both gynecologic and radiation oncologists. Definitive chemoradiation (CRT) is the treatment of choice, but with disappointing results. In this multicenter study (OLDLADY-1.1), several institutions have combined their retrospective data on LAVC patients to produce a real-world dataset aimed at collecting data on efficacy and safety of CRT. METHODS: The primary study end-point was 2-year-local control (LC), secondary end-points were 2-year-metastasis free-survival (MFS), 2-year-overall survival (OS) and the rate and severity of acute and late toxicities. Participating centers were required to fill data sets including age, stage, histology, grading as well as technical/dosimetric details of CRT. Data about response, local and regional recurrence, acute and late toxicities, follow-up and outcome measures were also collected. The toxicity was a posteriori documented through the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 scale. RESULTS: Retrospective analysis was performed on 65 patients with primary or recurrent LAVC treated at five different radiation oncology institutions covering 11-year time interval (February 2010-November 2021). Median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range 32-89). With a median follow-up of 19 months (range 1-114 months), 2-year actuarial LC, MFS and OS rate were 43.2%, 84.9% and 59.7%, respectively. In 29 patients (44%), CRT was temporarily stopped (median 5 days, range 1-53 days) due to toxicity. The treatment interruption was statistically significant at univariate analysis of factors predicting LC (p: 0.05) and OS rate (p: 0.011), and it was confirmed at the multivariate analysis for LC rate (p: 0.032). In terms of toxicity profile, no G4 event was recorded. Most adverse events were reported as grade 1 or 2. Only 14 acute G3 toxicities, all cutaneous, and 7 late G3 events (3 genitourinary, 3 cutaneous, and 1 vaginal stenosis) were recorded. CONCLUSION: In the context of CRT for LAVC, the present study reports encouraging results even if there is clearly room for further improvements, in terms of both treatment outcomes, toxicity and treatment interruption management.

Prevalence of prescribing topical corticosteroids to patients with lichen sclerosus following surgery for vulvar cancer: a survey among gynaecologic oncologists in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis which can progress to precursor lesion differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) and vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). The risk of developing recurrent vulvar cancer following LS-associated VSCC is high. Evidence suggests that treatment of LS with topical corticosteroids (TCS) can prevent progression to dVIN, VSCC and recurrences. However, current guidelines do not give any recommendation on the management of LS following surgery for VSCC. The aim of this study was to conduct a survey among all registered gynaecologic oncologists (GOs) in the Netherlands to evaluate the current management of LS patients without a history of VSCC (LSnoVSCC) and patients with LS following surgery for VSCC (LSVSCC). METHODS: An online survey was distributed to all registered GOs in the Netherlands. Primary outcome measures were the frequency, type and duration of TCS treatment prescribed for LSnoVSCC and LSVSCC patients, separately. As a secondary outcome measure, reasons for treating or not treating patients with LSnoVSCC and LSVSCC with TCS were analysed. RESULTS: Forty-four GOs completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 75%. TCS were prescribed more often to patients with LSnoVSCC as compared to patients with LSVSCC (86% versus 52%, respectively, p < 0.001). If treatment was initiated, ultra-potent (class IV) TCS were most commonly prescribed for an indefinite period of time for both patient groups. The most reported reason for treating patients in both groups with TCS was symptoms, followed by clinical aspects of the lesion and prevention of progression to dVIN and VSCC. CONCLUSION: The majority of GOs who participated in our study endorse the utilisation of long-term ultra-potent TCS therapy in both patients with LSnoVSCC and LSVSCC. Nevertheless, Dutch GOs are currently prescribing TCS more frequently to patients with LSnoVSCC than to patients with LSVSCC.

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic skin condition which may progress to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) through differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN). LS symptoms are treated with topical corticosteroids (TCS), which can also prevent progression to dVIN and VSCC. However, current international guidelines do not give any recommendation on the treatment of LS following surgery for VSCC. To evaluate the current management of LS patients without a history of VSCC (LS^noVSCC) and patients with LS following surgery for VSCC (LS^VSCC), a survey study was conducted among all gynaecologic oncologists (GOs) in The Netherlands. The findings of this study demonstrate that Dutch GOs prescribed TCS more often to patients with LS^noVSCC as compared to patients with LS^VSCC. However, when deciding to prescribe TCS, the majority of Dutch GOs prescribed ultra-potent TCS for an indefinite period of time for both LS^noVSCC and LS^VSCC patients.

Transmissible venereal tumor of the uterine stump following successful chemotherapy in a 5-year-old mixed-breed dog.

A 5-year-old spayed female mixed-breed dog was referred to the Atlantic Veterinary College (Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island) because of a 7-month history of intermittent pink, mucoid, vulvar discharge. The dog was imported from the Bahamas at 3.5 y of age and had a history of transmissible venereal tumor (TVT) of the vulva that was successfully treated with a course of vincristine chemotherapy. Complete remission was achieved with a disease-free interval of 6 mo before clinical signs recurred. Abdominal ultrasound and CT scan identified a large caudal abdominal mass thought to arise from the uterine stump. An exploratory laparotomy was performed and the mass grossly excised. Histopathology was consistent with a poorly differentiated round cell tumor, and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed TVT as the most likely diagnosis. No further treatment was carried out. Repeat abdominal ultrasound at 4 mo after surgery showed no evidence of mass recurrence. At 8 mo after surgery, the dog was reported to be doing well clinically. Key clinical message: Transmissible venereal tumor should be considered as a differential diagnosis for masses arising from the deep genital tissues of dogs in cases where there is a history of previous TVT. Transmissible venereal tumor should be considered even in dogs that have had complete resolution of a primary mass after chemotherapy.

Tumeur vénérienne transmissible du moignon utérin à la suite d'une chimiothérapie réussie chez un chien croisé de 5 ans.Une chienne de race mixte de 5 ans, stérilisée, a été référée au Atlantic Veterinary College (Charlottetown, Île-du-Prince-Édouard) en raison d'antécédents de pertes vulvaires roses, mucoïdes et intermittentes depuis 7 mois. Le chien a été importé des Bahamas à l'âge de 3,5 ans et avait des antécédents de tumeur vénérienne transmissible (TVT) de la vulve qui a été traitée avec succès par une chimiothérapie à la vincristine. Une rémission complète a été obtenue avec un intervalle sans maladie de 6 mois avant la réapparition des signes cliniques. L'échographie abdominale et la tomodensitométrie ont identifié une grosse masse abdominale caudale qui proviendrait du moignon utérin. Une laparotomie exploratoire a été réalisée et la masse excisée. L'histopathologie était compatible avec une tumeur à cellules rondes peu différenciée et l'analyse immunohistochimique a confirmé la TVT comme le diagnostic le plus probable. Aucun autre traitement n'a été effectué. Une échographie abdominale répétée 4 mois après la chirurgie n'a montré aucun signe de récidive massive. Huit mois après l'opération, la chienne se portait bien cliniquement.Message clinique clé:Les tumeurs vénériennes transmissibles doivent être considérées comme un diagnostic différentiel pour les masses provenant des tissus génitaux profonds des chiens dans les cas où il existe des antécédents de TVT. Une tumeur vénérienne transmissible doit être envisagée même chez les chiens dont la masse primaire a complètement disparu après chimiothérapie.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Topical imiquimod versus surgery for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (vHSILs) is challenging. Surgery is the standard treatment, but recurrences are observed in half of patients. Medical treatment with imiquimod is an effective alternative, but the two modalities have not been compared in a randomised trial. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness, histological response, human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance, acceptance, and psychosexual morbidity of primary imiquimod treatment versus surgical treatment in women with vHSIL. METHODS: This study was a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial done by the Austrian Gynaecological Oncology group at six hospitals in Austria. We recruited female patients aged 18-90 years with histologically confirmed vHSIL with visible unifocal or multifocal lesions. Main exclusion criteria were clinical suspicion of invasion, a history of vulvar cancer or severe inflammatory dermatosis of the vulva, and any active treatment for vHSIL within the previous 3 months. Women with known immunodeficiency, who were pregnant, or who were lactating were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by block randomisation to imiquimod or surgery, and stratified by unifocal or multifocal disease. Treatment with imiquimod was self-administered in a slowly escalating dosage scheme up to three times per week for a period of 4-6 months. Surgery consisted of excision or ablation. Patients were assessed with vulvoscopy, vulvar biopsy, HPV tests, and patient-reported outcomes at baseline and after 6 months and 12 months. The primary endpoint was complete clinical response (CCR) at 6 months after local imiquimod treatment or one surgical intervention. Primary analysis was per protocol with a non-inferiority margin of 20%. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01861535. FINDINGS: 110 patients with vHSIL (78% with unifocal vHSIL and 22% with multifocal vHSIL) were randomly assigned between June 7, 2013, and Jan 8, 2020. Clinical response to treatment could be assessed in 107 patients (54 in the imiquimod group and 53 in the surgery group), and 98 patients (46 in the imiquimod group and 52 in the surgery group) completed the study per protocol. 37 (80%) of 46 patients using imiquimod had CCR, compared with 41 (79%) of 52 patients after one surgical intervention, showing non-inferiority of the new treatment (difference in proportion -0·016, 95% CI -0·15 to -0·18; p=0·0056). Invasive disease was found in five patients at primary or secondary surgery, but not in patients with per-protocol imiquimod treatment. There was no significant difference in HPV clearance, adverse events, and treatment satisfaction between study groups. INTERPRETATION: Imiquimod is a safe, effective, and well accepted alternative to surgery for women with vHSIL and can be considered as first-line treatment. FUNDING: Austrian Science Fund and Austrian Gynaecological Oncology group.

Recent advances in treating female genital human papillomavirus related neoplasms with topical imiquimod.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) encompasses a group of viruses that infect the skin and mucous membranes. In the presence of certain factors, persistent infection with high-risk HPVs can trigger a process of neoplastic transformation. Imiquimod is a topical agent that acts as a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist, stimulating the innate and adaptive immune system to exert antitumor and antiviral effects. It has been approved for the treatment of various skin conditions, however, its efficacy and safety in the management of HPV-related-neoplasms of the lower genital tract, such as vulvar, vaginal, and cervical neoplasia, are still under investigation. This review summarizes the current evidence on the use of imiquimod for the treatment of HPV-induced lesions of the female lower genital tract, focusing on its indications, mechanisms of action, outcomes, and predictors of response.

Safety and efficacy of topical artesunate for the treatment of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of topical artesunate ointment for treatment of biopsy-confirmed Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) 2/3. METHODS: Participants were enrolled on a prospective, IRB-approved, dose-escalation phase I trial testing either 1, 2 or 3 treatment cycles (5 days), every other week, as applicable. Clinical assessments were completed prior to each dose cycle and included exam and review of adverse event (AE) diary cards. HPV testing and colposcopy was completed at 15 and 28 weeks. AEs were assessed according to CTCAE 4.0 criteria. Complete responders (CR) underwent biopsy of the treated site at the 28-weeks while partial (PR) and non (NR)-responders underwent surgical resection or biopsy and ablation. RESULTS: Fifteen patients consented to and began treatment. Per-protocol assessments were completed in 100% at 15- and 80% at 28-weeks. All patients completed prescribed cycles with no grade 3 or 4 AEs. Vulvovaginal burning/ was the most common AE occurring in 93.3%. AEs were grade 2 in 23.7% and included vulvovaginal pruritus (n = 3), swelling (n = 3) and candidiasis (n = 2). The highest ORR was in the 3-cycle group (88.9% with 55.6% CR). HPV-16 was detected either alone (46.7%) or with other subtypes (33.3%) in 80% of lesions and 5 of 8 (62.5%) with CR had complete viral clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Topical artesunate for treatment of high-grade VIN shows high tolerability, low toxicity and evidence for clinical response in this initial small series. The safety and observed responses support further study in a Phase II trial.

Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with locally advanced vulvar or vaginal cancer in British Columbia.

OBJECTIVE: As vulvar and vaginal cancers are rare malignancies, treatment is extrapolated from the cervical cancer field. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or combined chemoRT is most beneficial. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with vulvar or vaginal cancer in 2000-2017. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize demographic factors. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, multivariate analysis with hazard ratios (HR) were conducted to compare survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival, between surgery, RT, and chemoRT. RESULTS: This study included 688 patients with either vulvar (n = 560, 81%) or vaginal cancer (n = 128, 19%). Median age of diagnosis was 68 (27-98) years. In multivariate survival analysis, vulvar cancer was associated with more likelihood of death (HR: 1.50, p = 0.042) compared to vaginal cancer. For patients who received definitive RT, median OS was 63.8 months with concurrent chemotherapy vs. 46.3 months without for vulvar cancer (p = 0.75); for vaginal, median OS 100.4 with chemotherapy vs. 66.6 months without (p = 0.31). For vulvar cancer patients who received RT (n = 224), adding chemotherapy (n = 100) was not associated with statistically significant OS improvement (HR: 0.989, p = 0.957). Similarly, vaginal cancer patients who received chemoRT (n = 51) did not have significant OS benefit (HR: 0.720, p = 0.331) over patients who received RT (n = 49). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, chemoRT was not associated with significant improvements in survival compared to RT in vulvar or vaginal cancer. Future studies investigating novel therapies to treat these cancers are needed to improve patient outcomes.

Electrochemotherapy with intravenous bleomycin for heavily pre-treated vulvar cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: The management of vulvar cancer recurrences is complicated by patients' advanced age and comorbidities. Bleomycin-based electrochemotherapy is a potential treatment option in this setting. However, no data on long-term outcomes are available. Therefore, a multicenter observational study was designed to evaluate the 5-year results in these patients. METHODS: Data about patients and tumor characteristics, electrochemotherapy cycles, clinical response, and follow-up were recorded. Treatment procedures were performed according to the European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy (ESOPE) guidelines. Response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (mean age 82.31±7.28 years) with squamous cell vulvar cancer underwent electrochemotherapy (median number of sessions 1; range 1-4). 20 patients had complete response and 32% of these were disease-free after 2 years (median progression-free survival 16.8 months). In 13 patients with partial response the median progression-free survival was 15.36 months, while patients with stable or progressive disease showed tumor relapse after 6.95 and 3.26 months, respectively (p<0.001). Median overall survival was 18.77, 13.07, 6.73, and 11.13 months in patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up of vulvar cancer patients showed reasonable tumor control after electrochemotherapy and improved progression-free survival and overall survival in responder subjects compared with non-responders. Further studies aimed at improving local response after electrochemotherapy are warranted. Thus, this approach represents a potential alternative for these patients.

Steroid Phobia in Patients With Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus.

OBJECTIVE: Steroid phobia in people with dermatologic conditions is associated with noncompliance with topical corticosteroids (TCS). Although it has not been studied in those with vulvar lichen sclerosus (vLS), first-line therapy is lifelong maintenance TCS, and noncompliance is associated with impaired quality of life, progression of architecture changes, and vulvar skin cancer. The authors aimed to measure steroid phobia in patients with vLS and determine their most valued sources of information to direct future interventions to address this phenomenon. METHODS: The authors adapted a preexisting, validated scale for steroid phobia (TOPICOP), which is a 12-item questionnaire that produces a score of 0 = no phobia and 100 = maximum phobia. The anonymous survey was distributed across social media platforms with an in-person component at the authors' institution. Eligible participants included those with clinical or biopsy-proven LS. Participants were excluded if they did not consent or did not communicate in English. RESULTS: The authors obtained 865 online responses over a 1-week period. The in-person pilot obtained 31 responses, with a response rate of 79.5%. Mean global steroid phobia score was 43.02 (21.9)% and in-person responses were not significantly different (40.94 [16.03]%, p = .59). Approximately 40% endorsed waiting as long as they can before using TCS and stop as soon as possible. The most influential sources to improve patient comfort with TCS were physician and pharmacist reassurance over online resources. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid phobia is common in patients with vLS. Focused efforts to address steroid phobia among health care providers is the next best step toward improving patient comfort with TCS.

Activation of G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor 1 (GPER1) Reduces Progression of Vulvar Carcinoma Cells.

Whether G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) is tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressive depends in part on tumor entity. Little is known about the function of GPER1 in vulvar carcinoma. In this work, we aim to clarify what role GPER1 plays in vulvar cancer, tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressive. Localization of GPER1 in A431 and CAL-39 vulvar carcinoma cells was examined by immunofluorescence. Using a tissue microarray of vulvar neoplasias, the correlation between GPER1 expression and grade of malignancy was investigated. A431 and CAL-39 cells were treated either with GPER1 agonist G1 or antagonist G36. Proliferation was quantified by BrdU assay and viability examined using Resazurin assay. Morphological changes were analyzed by microscopy and measured using ImageJ. Cell migration was analyzed by gap closure assay. Clonogenic potential was tested by colony and sphere formation. Expression of estrogen receptors was examined by Western blot. GPER1 was found consistently expressed in vulvar neoplasia tissues. The immune-reactive score was found to be significantly higher in tissue samples of lymph node metastases and neoplasias with grade 3. In A431 and CAL-39 vulvar carcinoma cells, GPER1 expression was mainly found in the cytoplasm and nuclei. Treatment of A431 and CAL-39 cells with GPER1 agonist G1 resulted in a decrease in proliferation and migration. In addition, colony formation and tumor sphere formation were reduced. Furthermore, morphological signs of necrosis and reduction in cell viability after G1 treatment were observed. The GPER1 antagonist G36 did not have significant effects on vulvar carcinoma cells. Neither agonist G1 nor antagonist G36 treatment resulted in altered expression of estrogen receptors. Activation of GPER1 with GPER1 agonist G1 reduces the tumorigenic potential of the vulvar carcinoma cells. It can be deduced from this that GPER1 appears to have a tumor-suppressive effect in vulvar carcinoma.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Studies on treatment options for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer (LAVC) are scarce, and high-level evidence for a primary treatment choice is lacking. Furthermore, current treatment options are associated with extensive morbidity and high complication rates. More effective treatment options are urgently needed. This review describes current treatment possibilities, focusing on literature regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Although data are heterogeneous and limited, NACT followed by surgery might be an effective and well tolerated treatment alternative associated with lower morbidity compared with current treatment options, such as excenterative surgery or definitive chemoradiation. SUMMARY: Up until now, several studies describe an overall response rate of 40-86%. Surgery turned out to be possible in 40-90% of the LAVC patients who received NACT. Prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of NACT followed by surgery with a homogeneous chemotherapy regimen are urgently awaited. NACT should, at this point, still be considered investigational.

Time to completion of radiation treatment in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and the impact on survival.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether radiation completion within a planned timeframe in locally advanced squamous cell vulvar cancer impacts overall survival (OS). METHODS: The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2017 was used to identify women ≥18 years old with stage II-IVA squamous cell vulvar cancer. We included women who received radiation alone (RT) or concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) for initial vulvar cancer treatment. Primary outcome was overall survival associated with time of delay in radiation completion. RESULTS: There were 2378 women identified (n = 856 RT and n = 1522 CRT). Median age was 67 (IQR 56-78), majority (88.35%) were white with advanced stage III or IVA (72.29%) disease. Median radiation dose was 5720 c-Gray (IQR 5040-6300). Radiation completion with delay ≥7 days resulted in reduction in survival compared to delay of <7 days (unadjusted HR 1.183 [95%CI: 1.066-1.313], p = 0.0016). When delays extended to ≥14 days compared to <14 days there was increased hazard of death (unadjusted HR: 1.263 [95%CI:1.126-1.416], p < 0.0001). Survival improved for patients with <7 versus ≥7 days delay whether treatment was with RT (median OS: 34.9 months versus 21.6 months, p < 0.01) or CRT (Median OS:58 months versus 41.3 months, p < 0.01). Stage IVA disease was associated with the greatest increase in hazard of death (HR 1.759 [95%CI 1.517-2.039], p < 0.0001) compared to stage II. CONCLUSION: Radiation completion with <7 days delay is associated with improved overall survival, independent of concurrent chemotherapy. This suggest that strategies to minimize delays in radiation are crucial in locally advanced vulvar cancer.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for patients with previously treated advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: Results from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for advanced vulvar cancer are limited. We evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) enrolled in the phase 2 multicohort, open-label KEYNOTE-158 study (NCT02628067). METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically documented advanced vulvar SCC with prior treatment failure, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG performance status 0-1, and a tumor sample available for biomarker analysis. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously Q3W for up to 35 cycles (approximately 2 years). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent central radiologic review in all patients and subgroups based on PD-L1 combined positive score (≥1 [PD-L1-positive] versus <1 [PD-L1-negative]). RESULTS: 101 patients were enrolled. Median time from first dose to data cutoff was 36.0 months. The ORR (95% CI) was 10.9% (5.6%-18.7%) among all patients, 9.5% (4.2%-17.9%) among the 84 patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, and 28.6% (3.7%-71.0%) among the 7 patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. Among patients with a response, median DOR was 20.4 (range, 2.1+ to 28.0) months. Median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 2.1 (2.0-2.1) and 6.2 (4.9-9.4) months, respectively. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 50.5% of patients (grade 3-5, 11.9%) and led to discontinuation of treatment in 5.0% of patients. Two deaths were considered treatment-related (hepatitis, n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab monotherapy was associated with durable responses in a subset of patients with vulvar SCC. Responses occurred regardless of tumor PD-L1 status. No new safety signals emerged; overall, pembrolizumab was well tolerated.

Definitive chemoradiation or radiation therapy alone for the management of vulvar cancer.

Vulvar cancer is rare, and unresectable disease provides a therapeutic conundrum. Although definitive surgery remains the mainstay for curative treatment of vulvar cancer, a minority of patients present with advanced disease for which surgical resection would be extraordinarily morbid. Pre-operative and definitive radiation with radiosensitizing systemic therapy allows such patients an opportunity for cure. In this review, we explore the origins of pre-operative radiation, current treatment standards for pre-operative and definitive chemoradiation, and future directions.

A Scoping Review of Treatment Outcome Measures for Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to identify a list of clinician-reported outcome measures (CROMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) through a review of published studies reporting on any therapeutic interventions for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of published studies reporting on any therapeutic interventions for VIN was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database, PsychInfo, and CINAHL from inception to September 20, 2021, based on predetermined study selection criteria. Data were extracted and analyzed by 2 authors independently using Covidence software. RESULTS: Thirty two of 2386 studies identified met study selection criteria. None of the 32 studies provided an explicit definition of VIN treatment "success." The most common CROM was "clinical response to treatment." The most common scale used to measure this outcome was "complete response/partial response/no response"; however, 17 of 23 studies (73.9%) did not define these values. Laboratory CROMs were reported in 12/32 (37.5%) studies. Patient-reported outcome measures were reported in only 10 of 32 studies(31.3%) -the most common PROM was "symptoms." Only 2 of 32 studies measured PROMs related to "quality of life" domains. Adverse events/treatment-related adverse effects were reported in 24 of 32 studies (75%), although 71% of studies provided no details on how these data were collected. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large variation in outcome measures, instruments, and scales used for any clinician-reported treatment outcome such as "clinical response." Most studies do not include patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of life domains. A Core Outcome Set for the treatment of VIN is needed to improve the quality of VIN research.