Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care.

Over the past decade, a large body of evidence has accumulated supporting the integration of palliative care into oncology practice for patients with advanced cancer. The question is no longer whether palliative care should be offered, but what is the optimal model of delivery, when is the ideal time to refer, who is in greatest need of a referral, and how much palliative care should oncologists themselves be providing. These questions are particularly relevant given the scarcity of palliative care resources internationally. In this state-of-the-science review directed at the practicing cancer clinician, the authors first discuss the contemporary literature examining the impact of specialist palliative care on various health outcomes. Then, conceptual models are provided to support team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care. Team-based palliative care allows the interdisciplinary members to address comprehensively the multidimensional care needs of patients and their caregivers. Timely palliative care, at its best, is preventive care to minimize crises at the end of life. Targeted palliative care involves identifying the patients most likely to benefit from specialist palliative care interventions, akin to the concept of targeted cancer therapies. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of innovative care models, such as outpatient clinics, embedded clinics, nurse-led palliative care, primary palliative care provided by oncology teams, and automatic referral, are summarized. Moving forward, more research is needed to determine how different health systems can best personalize palliative care to provide the right level of intervention, for the right patient, in the right setting, at the right time. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;680:00-00. 2018 American Cancer Society, Inc.

Abortion.

Induced abortion is safe, is common, and reduces pregnancy-related maternal morbidity and mortality. Internal medicine physicians are uniquely positioned to counsel patients on their pregnancy options, assess medical risks of pregnancy in the context of comorbidities, refer for abortion care when the patient desires it, or provide abortion care themselves. Clinicians can also provide anticipatory guidance about what patients should expect if they seek abortion care.

'Humility, Concern, Respect': A Qualitative Study Exploring Parent Perspectives on a Pediatrician's Role in Addressing Racism.

OBJECTIVE: To explore racially minoritized families' perceptions on how, and if, physicians should address children's racial identity and concepts of racism within clinical settings. STUDY DESIGN: Parents of racially minoritized children, ages 5 through 18, were interviewed to explore experiences with racial identity formation, discrimination, and the extent to which they wanted pediatricians to address these topics. Children were included at the discretion of their parents. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed through a critical race theory lens based in constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS: Parents encouraged their children to embrace their racial identities but also wanted to shield them from negative experiences of racism to preserve identity safety. Parents felt pediatricians should address racial issues in a manner specific to their child's situation. Thoughtful inclusion of race-related questions, whether in discussion or on questionnaires, is essential to prevent tension in a therapeutic relationship. There was no consensus on the use of preclinical screening. Instead, families highlighted the importance of embracing humility, trust, and respect. CONCLUSIONS: Participant families have preferences for approaches to address the effects of racism on their children's health. Pediatricians should understand the importance of identity safety and approach their discussions with cultural humility, which includes self-reflection, empathy, active listening, and flexible negotiation. Above all, pediatricians need to create a safe environment for appropriate discussion of these issues.

Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in PD-associated non-motor symptoms: the roles of neurologists and consultant physicians.

In addition to their motor symptoms, almost all Parkinson's disease patients report non-motor symptoms (NMS) and, in the later course of the disease, non-motor fluctuations as well. These NMS encompass e.g. neuropsychiatric, gastrointestinal, urogenital, cardiovascular symptoms and pain. For a long time, these symptoms received no or at best very little attention, but there is a growing trend towards their recognition and treatment. Despite this progress, significant gaps remain, particularly due to the sometimes-limited expertise among neurologists regarding these symptoms. The clinical need to consequently treat these NMS raises the question of whether Movement Disorder specialists should and can address them sufficiently or if additional consultant physicians have to be enrolled. Therefore, our objective is to establish benchmarking criteria to outline a potential way forward. Ideally, Movement Disorder specialists should take on greater responsibility when treating non-motor PD symptoms, integrating diagnostic and therapeutic pathways from other medical disciplines where feasible.

The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis.

Although they are critical to models of coordinated care, the relationship and communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and cancer specialists throughout the cancer continuum are poorly understood. By using predefined search terms, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature in 3 databases to examine the relationship and communication between PCPs and cancer specialists. Among 301 articles identified, 35 met all inclusion criteria and were reviewed in-depth. Findings from qualitative, quantitative, and disaggregated mixed-methods studies were integrated using meta-synthesis. Six themes were identified and incorporated into a preliminary conceptual model of the PCP-cancer specialist relationship: 1) poor and delayed communication between PCPs and cancer specialists, 2) cancer specialists' endorsement of a specialist-based model of care, 3) PCPs' belief that they play an important role in the cancer continuum, 4) PCPs' willingness to participate in the cancer continuum, 5) cancer specialists' and PCPs' uncertainty regarding the PCP's oncology knowledge/experience, and 6) discrepancies between PCPs and cancer specialists regarding roles. These data indicate a pervasive need for improved communication, delineation, and coordination of responsibilities between PCPs and cancer specialists. Future interventions aimed at these deficiencies may improve patient and physician satisfaction and cancer care coordination. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:156-169. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

The physician's role in reducing health disparities for persons with epilepsy and intellectual disability: "it's not just epilepsy you really have to take a deeper dive."

Epilepsy affects approximately 25 % of people with intellectual disability (ID). Despite this high prevalence, evidence of health disparity exists in healthcare access and health outcomes for this population. Patients with ID experience additional challenges in accessing appropriate epilepsy care, and are at greater risk of experiencing inappropriate prescribing, polypharmacy and misdiagnosis compared with the general population. The expectations, attitudes and actions of physicians are key in addressing health inequalities, particularly those which disproportionately impact a specific group of patients, such as patients with ID and epilepsy. This qualitative study aimed to explore the views of specialist physicians as to why they believe this patient group are at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing appropriate epilepsy care, and how physicians can intervene to ensure that patients with ID are given equal access to suitable epilepsy care, and equal opportunity to achieve the best possible treatment outcomes. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with six physicians, located in six countries, who specialise in the care of persons with ID who have epilepsy. Interviews sought views on prognostic expectations, experiences of disparities in epilepsy care, and suggestions for advocacy interventions. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three core themes and nine subthemes were identified. Core themes included (1) 'Nervousness in care and treatment,' which reflected participants' descriptions of a nervousness by colleagues when treating epilepsy in patients with ID. (2) 'Taking a deeper dive' captured the harmful effects of accepting "common dogma," as well as the issue of a lack of clarity around treatment pathways for patients with epilepsy and ID. (3) 'Teach me' illustrated the importance of shared expertise, reflective practice and continued research and advocacy. Findings reflected participants' recommendations to address disparities in epilepsy care for patients with ID. These recommendations highlighted education and training, taking time to learn how to communicate in different ways, and regular reflection on personal assumptions and biases as important contributors to addressing inequalities in epilepsy care for patients with ID. It is hoped that findings will prompt those providing epilepsy care to reflect on their own practice and identify ways in which they might intervene to minimise inadvertent harm and reduce health disparities in epilepsy care for patients with ID.

The role of oculoplastic surgeons in minimally invasive cosmetic injectables.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, the field of aesthetic medicine has witnessed a paradigm shift with an increasing demand for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures, including cosmetic injectables. This review aims to delineate the distinctive role played by oculoplastic surgeons in the administration of cosmetic injectables, comparing their expertise to that of nonphysician practitioners. RECENT FINDINGS: Complications arising from cosmetic injections are discussed, including skin discoloration, inflammation, necrosis, vision loss, retinal pathology, and central nervous system adverse effects. Injector expertise, patient factors, type of filler, location of injection, and management strategies are reviewed. Findings highlight diverse practitioner involvement, common adverse effects like skin necrosis and vision loss, with hyaluronic acid fillers being prominent. Areas at the highest risk for ocular complication include the glabella and nose with potential management involving dissolving fillers and reducing pressure. Emphasis is placed on expert injector selection and patient awareness. SUMMARY: The administration of cosmetic injectables requires a profound understanding of facial anatomy, vasculature, and potential complications. In contrast to nonphysician practitioners, oculoplastic and aesthetic surgeons bring a level of anatomical precision and clinical acumen that is essential for navigating the complexities of cosmetic injectables. Emphasis on training and collaboration among practitioners will be essential in advancing the field while prioritizing patient safety and satisfaction.

Climate change and human health: a primer on what women's health physicians can do on behalf of their patients and communities.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the current state of knowledge on the impact on climate change on women's health and to highlight opportunities for healthcare providers to serve as advocates and subject matter experts. RECENT FINDINGS: Healthcare providers are a uniquely respected voice in society but have not used this advantage to advocate for their communities and participate in mitigation, adaptation, and resiliency efforts on behalf of their patients and communities. SUMMARY: Healthcare providers feel that climate change is real, is human caused, and is currently or will shortly negatively impact their patients. They feel unprepared to serve as leaders and advocates due to time limitations and a knowledge gap. Resources in the current climate movement can help close this gap.

Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence-driven Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are being increasingly introduced into various domains of health care for diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic and other purposes. A significant part of the discourse on ethically appropriate conditions relate to the levels of understanding and explicability needed for ensuring responsible clinical decision-making when using AI-CDSS. Empirical evidence on stakeholders' viewpoints on these issues is scarce so far. The present study complements the empirical-ethical body of research by, on the one hand, investigating the requirements for understanding and explicability in depth with regard to the rationale behind them. On the other hand, it surveys medical students at the end of their studies as stakeholders, of whom little data is available so far, but for whom AI-CDSS will be an important part of their medical practice. METHODS: Fifteen semi-structured qualitative interviews (each lasting an average of 56 min) were conducted with German medical students to investigate their perspectives and attitudes on the use of AI-CDSS. The problem-centred interviews draw on two hypothetical case vignettes of AI-CDSS employed in nephrology and surgery. Interviewees' perceptions and convictions of their own clinical role and responsibilities in dealing with AI-CDSS were elicited as well as viewpoints on explicability as well as the necessary level of understanding and competencies needed on the clinicians' side. The qualitative data were analysed according to key principles of qualitative content analysis (Kuckartz). RESULTS: In response to the central question about the necessary understanding of AI-CDSS tools and the emergence of their outputs as well as the reasons for the requirements placed on them, two types of argumentation could be differentiated inductively from the interviewees' statements: the first type, the clinician as a systemic trustee (or "the one relying"), highlights that there needs to be empirical evidence and adequate approval processes that guarantee minimised harm and a clinical benefit from the employment of an AI-CDSS. Based on proof of these requirements, the use of an AI-CDSS would be appropriate, as according to "the one relying", clinicians should choose those measures that statistically cause the least harm. The second type, the clinician as an individual expert (or "the one controlling"), sets higher prerequisites that go beyond ensuring empirical evidence and adequate approval processes. These higher prerequisites relate to the clinician's necessary level of competence and understanding of how a specific AI-CDSS works and how to use it properly in order to evaluate its outputs and to mitigate potential risks for the individual patient. Both types are unified in their high esteem of evidence-based clinical practice and the need to communicate with the patient on the use of medical AI. However, the interviewees' different conceptions of the clinician's role and responsibilities cause them to have different requirements regarding the clinician's understanding and explicability of an AI-CDSS beyond the proof of benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The study results highlight two different types among (future) clinicians regarding their view of the necessary levels of understanding and competence. These findings should inform the debate on appropriate training programmes and professional standards (e.g. clinical practice guidelines) that enable the safe and effective clinical employment of AI-CDSS in various clinical fields. While current approaches search for appropriate minimum requirements of the necessary understanding and competence, the differences between (future) clinicians in terms of their information and understanding needs described here can lead to more differentiated approaches to solutions.

UHMS Position Statement: Physician's Duties in Hyperbaric Medicine - 99183.

Introduction: The Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS) is at the forefront of advancing medical knowledge and promoting patient safety in the field of hyperbaric medicine. In the dynamic landscape of healthcare, physicians' critical role in overseeing hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBO2) cannot be overstated. This position statement aims to underscore the significance of physician involvement in delivering HBO2 and articulate UHMS's commitment to maintaining the highest standards of care and safety for patients undergoing hyperbaric treatments. Abstract: Hyperbaric oxygen treatment demands a meticulous approach to patient management. As the complexity of hyperbaric patients continues to evolve, the direct oversight of qualified physicians becomes paramount to ensuring optimal patient outcomes and safeguarding against potential risks. In this statement, we outline the key reasons physician involvement is essential in every facet of HBO2, addressing the technical intricacies of the treatment and the broader spectrum of patient care. Rationale: Physician oversight for hyperbaric oxygen treatment is rooted in the technical complexities of the treatment and the broader responsibilities associated with clinical patient care. The responsibilities outlined below delineate services intrinsic to the physician's duties for treating patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen treatments.

Polypharmacy and Deprescription: Role of Internists.

Polypharmacy is the concurrent use of five or more drugs per day. It is common in old age because of multimorbidity. The prevalence of polypharmacy is increasing as the number of old people is increasing worldwide. The proliferation of clinical guidelines and wider availability of preventive and curative medicines are important causes of polypharmacy. Appropriate polypharmacy is beneficial to the patients. However, polypharmacy may be inappropriate, causing adverse effects, drug interactions (DI), poor treatment efficacy, hospitalizations, and high healthcare costs. Prescribing cascade and legacy prescribing add to the burden of inappropriate polypharmacy. Inappropriate polypharmacy can be prevented or managed by medication optimization through medication review, deprescription, ensuring adherence, and patient education. Deprescription includes the removal of risky, unnecessary, and duplicate drugs, replacement with efficacious drugs, and relaxation of tight control as per life expectancy. Several deprescription tools (both explicit and implicit) exist for helping physicians to decide when to deprescribe or to add medicines, especially in old age. Care should be taken during deprescription to prevent unjustified omission, reduction to subtherapeutic dose, and onset of withdrawal features. Age and disease-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs should be considered during the optimization of pharmacotherapy.

[The otolaryngologist's role in evaluating diving fitness]. / Beurteilung einer Tauchtauglichkeit als HNO-Arzt.

Scuba diving and other modes of device-supported diving are popular activities that can be especially demanding and hazardous for people with preexisting physical conditions. Due to the high ambient pressure, the temperature differences, and potential unpredictable events, which have manifold effects on the organism, diving carries a high risk of life-threatening disease. A special risk is present if the body does not readily equalize air pressure changes. Therefore, prior to diving, all divers should undergo detailed education regarding the physical principles of the sport as well as specific physical examination. Consultation of an otolaryngologist is of exceptional relevance because many otorhinolaryngologic diseases can lead to (usually temporary) unfitness to dive. The role of the modern otorhinolaryngologist trained in diving medicine is to correctly advise the patient and restore fitness for diving via conservative or invasive methods.

Role of neurosurgeons In strengthening paediatric neuro-oncology In low- and middle-income countries: a narrative review with case examples.

Paediatric neuro-oncology in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) accounts for a significant proportion of cancer-related mortalities in this age group. The current dearth of structured paediatric neurosurgery training programmes in LMICs requires multidisciplinary coordination; neurosurgeons play certain key roles, as discussed in this article, in ensuring safe and effective care for paediatric neuro-oncology patients. This document intends to elaborate through illustrative cases of the technical and structural nuances required by neurosurgeons in LMICs to provide appropriate surgical care.

[The Role of the Anaesthesiologist in Liver Transplantation - Preoperative Evaluation]. / Die Rolle des Anästhesisten bei Lebertransplantationen ­ präoperative Evaluation.

Preoperative evaluation prior to listing for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) requires a careful multidisciplinary approach with specialized teams including surgeons, hepatologists and anesthesiologists in order to improve short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Due to inadequate supply of donor organs and changing demographics, patients listed for LT have become older, sicker and share more comorbidities. As cardiovascular events are the leading cause for early mortality precise evaluation of risk factors is mandatory. This review focuses on the detection and management of coronary artery disease, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, portopulmonary hypertension and hepatopulmonary syndrome in patients awaiting LT. Further insights are being given into scoring systems, patients with Acute-on-chronic-liver-failure (ACLF), frailty, NASH cirrhosis and into psychologic evaluation of patients with substance abuse.

Intensive Intervention on Smoking Cessation in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: The Role of Family Physicians.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the role of physicians in the intensive intervention and education regarding the smoking cessation of patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: A randomised prospective study was conducted in family physicians' clinics in which smokers of both sexes, aged 21-65 years, without cognitive impairments, and who were not addicted to psychoactive substances voluntarily participated. Four weeks preoperatively, 120 smokers were randomised into two equal groups; the intervention group (IG) underwent an intervention for the purpose of smoking cessation and the control group (CG) underwent no intervention. Biochemical tests were performed in order to determine the smoking status of the participants in the phase of randomisation, one week preoperatively, as well as 40, 120, and 180 days and 12 months postoperatively. The examinees of the IG talked to the physician five times and received 140 telephone messages, leaflets, and motivational letters along with the pharmacotherapy, while the participants in the CG received little or no advice on smoking cessation. Results: The results of this study confirmed a significant influence of the intervention and education on the smoking abstinence in the IG compared to the CG (p < 0.001). The smokers in the IG had 7.31 (95% CI: 2.32-23.04) times greater odds of abstinence upon the 12-month follow-up than the smokers in the CG. The smokers in the IG who did not stop smoking had a lower degree of dependence and smoked fewer cigarettes (p < 0.0001) compared to those in the CG, as well as a multiple times higher prevalence of short- and long-term abstinence. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the intensive intervention and education can motivate patients preparing for elective surgery to stop smoking in the short- and long term.

The Role and Importance of Physician and Health Care Professional Programs.

Physician Health Programs (PHPs) have been support-ing and advocating for health professionals for nearly four decades. Initially developed by state medical societies in the 1980s, PHPs recognized the need for therapeutic alterna-tives to disciplinary measures for physicians facing health issues that could impair their ability to practice safely. Originally focused on substance use disorders, PHPs have since expanded their services to encompass mental health and other co-occurring conditions.

[Transidentites : the relevance of involving psychiatrists]. / Transidentités : pertinence de l'implication des psychiatres.

Psychiatrists play a crucial role in evaluating requests and treatment indications for individuals experiencing gender incongruence, while also providing support throughout the transition process. Their work involves addressing both the psychological and somatic aspects of this journey, facilitating the profound identity changes it entails.

Les psychiatres psychothérapeutes jouent un rôle essentiel pour évaluer les demandes et les indications au traitement des personnes souffrant d'incongruence de genre, et les accompagner dans leur parcours de transition. Leur travail permet d'intégrer les enjeux psychologiques et somatiques de ce cheminement et de soutenir les remaniements identitaires profonds qu'il implique.

[Tobacco use : guidelines for primary care physicians]. / Aide au sevrage tabagique : recommandations pour les médecins de premier recours.

Tobacco use affects about 25% of the population and is the most important modifiable risk factor for many diseases, namely cancers, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. The role of the primary care physician is essential in providing screening and brief intervention to all patients, particularly to those at higher risk. This will help them to quit smoking, or adopt risk reduction strategies, according to their own wish. The main interventions include motivational support, nicotine replacement therapy and other medications. Vaping has been proved to be efficient for tobacco withdrawal and is still studied as a risk reduction tool. At the moment, it is considered by some as twenty times less harmful than smoked tobacco.

La consommation de tabac concerne environ 25 % de la population et est le facteur de risque modifiable le plus important pour de nombreuses pathologies, dont les cancers et les atteintes cardiovasculaires et pulmonaires. Le rôle du médecin de premier recours est primordial dans le dépistage et l'intervention brève chez tous les patients, notamment ceux à plus haut risque, afin d'aider à l'arrêt de la consommation ou à la mise en place de mesures de réduction des risques, selon leur souhait. Les principales stratégies comprennent, en plus de l'accompagnement, les substituts nicotiniques et les approches médicamenteuses. Le vapotage a aujourd'hui démontré son efficacité pour l'arrêt du tabac et, tout en étant encore à l'étude comme moyen de réduction des risques du tabac, il est estimé comme étant jusqu'à vingt fois moins nocif que ce dernier.

[Non-suicidal self-injurious behaviors in adolescence Role of frontline practitioners]. / Comportements autodommageables sans intention suicidaire à l'adolescence. Rôle des intervenant-e-s en première ligne.

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is an increasing mental health issue among adolescents. General practitioners and pediatricians play a crucial role in detecting, evaluating, and managing these behaviors. This article aims to provide recommendations for the first line surrounding the young person, such as the appropriate stance to adopt and the use of a safety plan, for effectively managing NSSI patients. It takes into account the often-present interpersonal hypersensitivity in these patients and includes strategies for working with families and within a multidisciplinary network.

Les comportements autodommageables sans intention suicidaire (NSSI, non-suicidal self-injury) sont un problème de santé mentale en augmentation chez les adolescents. Les généralistes et pédiatres jouent un rôle crucial dans la détection, l'évaluation et la prise en charge de ces comportements. Cet article donne des recommandations, surtout pour les services non spécialisés, telles la posture à tenir et l'utilisation d'un plan de sécurité, pour une prise en charge appropriée des patients NSSI, en tenant compte de l'hypersensibilité interpersonnelle souvent présente chez ces patients, et en incluant des stratégies pour le travail avec les familles et en réseau.

E-Cigarettes and Cardiopulmonary Health: Review for Clinicians.

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are battery powered electronic nicotine delivery systems that use a propylene glycol/vegetable glycerin base to deliver vaporized nicotine and flavorings to the body. E-cigarettes became commercially available without evidence regarding their risks, long-term safety, or utility in smoking cessation. Recent clinical trials suggest that e-cigarette use with counseling may be effective in reducing cigarette use but not nicotine dependence. However, meta-analyses of observational studies demonstrate that e-cigarette use is not associated with smoking cessation. Cardiovascular studies reported sympathetic activation, vascular stiffening, and endothelial dysfunction, which are associated with adverse cardiovascular events. The majority of pulmonary clinical trials in e-cigarette users included standard spirometry as the primary outcome measure, reporting no change in lung function. However, studies reported increased biomarkers of pulmonary disease in e-cigarette users. These studies were conducted in adults, but >30% of high school-age adolescents reported e-cigarette use. The effects of e-cigarette use on cardiopulmonary endpoints in adolescents and young adults remain unstudied. Because of adverse clinical findings and associations between e-cigarette use and increased incidence of respiratory diseases in people who have never smoked, large longitudinal studies are needed to understand the risk profile of e-cigarettes. Consistent with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, clinicians should monitor the health risks of e-cigarette use, discourage nonsmokers and adolescents from using e-cigarettes, and discourage smokers from engaging in dual use without cigarette reduction or cessation.