Coronary Artery Perforation and Tamponade　- Incidence, Risk Factors, Predictors and Outcomes From 12 Years' Data of the SCAAR Registry.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and short- and long-term outcomes of coronary artery perforation (CAP) are not well described.Methods and Results:We analyzed the characteristics and the short- and long-term outcomes of CAP among 243,149 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) from 2005 until 2017 in the national Swedish registry. We identified 1,008 cases of CAP with an incidence of 0.42%. Major adverse event rates were significantly higher in patients with CAP than non-CAP (P<0.001). The 1-year mortality rate was 16% vs. 5.5%, respectively, and the 12-year mortality rate was 52% vs. 34%. The restenosis rate was 5.2% vs. 3.1% and 17% vs. 9%, respectively. The target lesion revascularization rate was 4.2% vs. 2.6% and 10.5% vs. 7%. The stent thrombosis rate was numerically higher, 1.5% vs. 0.8% and 4.5 vs. 2.8%, with no stent thrombosis cases for equine pericardial stent grafts. Among the patients with tamponade a large proportion of cases occurred at the late stage (215/1,008, 21%), and most were not recognized in the cath-lab (167/215, 78%). The mortality rate for late tamponade was similar in patients suffering acute tamponade at 1 year (25.6% vs. 27%) or at 12 years (54% vs. 58%). CONCLUSIONS: CAP is associated with an early high excess in morbidity and mortality but with low risk of additional adverse events in the long term. Late tamponade is as deadly as acute tamponade.

Postoperative Outcomes after Index vs Interval Cholecystectomy for Perforated Cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder perforation is a known morbid sequela of acute cholecystitis, yet evidence for its optimal management remains conflicting. This study compares outcomes in patients with perforated cholecystitis who underwent cholecystectomy at the time of index hospital admission with those in patients who underwent interval cholecystectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 654 patients from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database who underwent cholecystectomy for perforated cholecystitis (2006-2018). Primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative major and minor morbidity, 30-day mortality, and need for prolonged hospitalization. Patient and procedure characteristics and outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney rank sum test for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests for categorical variables. A subset analysis was conducted of patients matched on propensity for undergoing interval cholecystectomy. RESULTS: The 30-day postoperative mortality rate of matched cohort patients undergoing index cholecystectomy was 7% vs 0% of patients undergoing interval cholecystectomy (p = 0.01). The 30-day minor morbidity rates were 2% for index and 8% for interval patients (p = 0.06), and the major morbidity rates were 33% for index and 14% for interval patients (p = 0.003). Of the index patients, 27% required prolonged hospitalization compared with 6% of interval patients (p < 0.001). Results showed similar trends in the unmatched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent index cholecystectomy had significantly longer postoperative hospitalizations and higher 30-day postoperative major morbidity and mortality. There were no differences in 30-day minor morbidity. Selected patients with perforated cholecystitis can benefit from operative management on an interval, rather than urgent, basis.