Effects of caffeine intake on pupillary parameters in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Caffeine is a widely used drug that broadly affects human cognition and brain function. Caffeine acts as an antagonist to the adenosine receptors in the brain. Previous anecdotal reports have also linked caffeine intake with changes in pupil diameter. By modifying the retinal irradiance, pupil diameter modulates all ocular light exposure relevant for visual (i.e., perception, detection and discrimination of visual stimuli) and non-visual (i.e., circadian) functions. To date, the extent of the influence of caffeine on pupillary outcomes, including pupil diameter, has not been examined in a systematic review. We implemented a systematic review laid out in a pre-registered protocol following PRISMA-P guidelines. We only included original research articles written in English reporting studies with human participants, in which caffeine was administered, and pupil diameter was measured using objective methods. Using broad search strategies, we consulted various databases (PsycINFO, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv and medRxiv) and used the Covidence platform to screen, review and extract data from studies. After importing studies identified through database search (n = 517 imported, n = 46 duplicates), we screened the title and abstracts (n = 471), finding 14 studies meeting our eligibility criteria. After full-text review, we excluded seven studies, leaving only a very modest number of included studies (n = 7). Extraction of information revealed that the existing literature on the effect of caffeine on pupil parameters is very heterogeneous, differing in pupil assessment methods, time of day of caffeine administration, dose, and protocol timing and design. The evidence available in the literature does not provide consistent results but studies rated as valid by quality assessment suggest a small effect of caffeine on pupil parameters. We summarize the numeric results as both differences in absolute pupil diameter and in terms of effect sizes. More studies are needed using modern pupil assessment methods, robust study design, and caffeine dose-response methodology.

Real-world uptake of an innovative pupil expander device for cataract surgery: Implementation lessons learnt.

Cataract surgery in the eyes, where the pupil does not dilate despite using eye drops, is fraught with vision-threatening complications. About 11 per cent of eyes undergoing cataract surgery have non-dilating, small pupils. The increasing prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), hypertension, diabetes and medications used for the same are the contributing factors. The recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the use of miotic agents in the treatment of presbyopia will lead to a further rise in the number of non-dilating pupils. While pharmacological agents and other methods have been used, mechanical pupil expander devices are the only fail safe option. However, available devices had a steep learning curve and limitations which made them difficult to use, unpredictable and unsafe. With its patented single plane, hexagonal, notches and flanges design, the US FDA registered B-HEX Pupil Expander (Med Invent Devices Pvt. Ltd., India) overcame these limitations and fulfilled an unmet need. The B-HEX is machinable, rapidly produced, consistent, easy to use, safe, and affordable. Despite such advantages, implementation hurdles have restricted its availability to healthcare systems worldwide. Peer acceptance has been steadily growing, with the B-HEX becoming the market leader in India, as evidenced by numerous publications, videos and papers presented at international conferences and comments from opinion leaders endorsing its use. However, impractical regulatory requirements and resource constraints remain a great impediment to the global distribution of this novel invention. This has denied many patients the benefits of a superior and more affordable option. Though value continues to be added to the B-HEX by maintaining a strong intellectual property portfolio with internationally granted Patents and Trademark, increasing its user base, and garnering support from key opinion leaders, only a collaboration with the right partner will help scale up the global reach and make it a leader in the global market.

The effect of cycloplegia in the accuracy of autorefraction, keratometry and axial length using the Myopia Master.

BACKGROUND: Assessing refractive errors under cycloplegia is recommended for paediatric patients; however, this may not always be feasible. In these situations, refraction has to rely on measurements made under active accommodation which may increase measurements variability and error. Therefore, evaluating the accuracy and precision of non-cycloplegic refraction and biometric measurements is clinically relevant. The Myopia Master, a novel instrument combining autorefraction and biometry, is designed for monitoring refractive error and ocular biometry in myopia management. This study assessed its repeatability and agreement for autorefraction and biometric measurements pre- and post-cycloplegia. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study evaluated a cohort of 96 paediatric patients that underwent ophthalmologic examination. An optometrist performed two repeated measurements of autorefraction and biometry pre- and post-cycloplegia. Test-retest repeatability (TRT) was assessed as differences between consecutive measurements and agreement as differences between post- and pre-cycloplegia measurements, for spherical equivalent (SE), refractive and keratometric J0/J45 astigmatic components, mean keratometry (Km) and axial length (AL). RESULTS: Cycloplegia significantly improved the SE repeatability (TRT, pre-cyclo: 0.65 D, post-cyclo: 0.31 D). SE measurements were more repeatable in myopes and emmetropes compared to hyperopes. Keratometry (Km) repeatability did not change with cycloplegia (TRT, pre-cyclo: 0.25 D, post-cyclo:0.27 D) and AL repeatability improved marginally (TRT, pre-cyclo: 0.14 mm, post-cyclo: 0.09 mm). Regarding pre- and post-cycloplegia agreement, SE became more positive by + 0.79 D, varying with refractive error. Myopic eyes showed a mean difference of + 0.31 D, while hyperopes differed by + 1.57 D. Mean keratometry, refractive and keratometric J0/J45 and AL showed no clinically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive error measurements, using the Myopia Master were 2.5x less precise pre-cycloplegia than post-cycloplegia. Accuracy of pre-cycloplegic refractive error measurements was often larger than the clinically significant threshold (0.25 D) and was refractive error dependent. The higher precision compared to autorefraction measurements, pre- and post-cycloplegia agreement and refractive error independence of AL measurements emphasize the superiority of AL in refractive error monitoring.

Alpha-adrenergic antagonists and iris dynamics: Challenges and solutions in cataract surgery.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists (α1-ARAs) are frequently used in treatment of Hypertension and symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). Numerous studies have demonstrated the association between α1-ARAs like Tamsulosin and increased surgical risks for patients undergoing cataract surgery. This study aims to identify and study the effects of α1-ARAs on iris parameters and the subsequent operative challenges encountered during cataract surgery. METHODS: A cross-sectional, prospective study involving 30 patients on α1-ARAs planned for cataract surgery and equal number of age and sex matched controls were subjected to evaluation of changes on iris parameters and subsequent challenges in cataract surgery. RESULTS: The study group had statistically significant lesser pupil diameter. Iris thickness at sphincter muscle region (SMR) was similar between groups (P = 0.53). Significantly lower values of iris thickness at dilator muscle region (DMR) found in treated subjects (P = < 0.001). There was statistically significant difference between DMR/SMR ratio of two groups (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed longer duration of α1-ARAs treatment correlated with reduced DMR/SMR ratio (P = 0.001; r = 0.47). CONCLUSION: α1-ARAs have implications for pupil size regulation and surgical procedures involving the eye. Tamsulosin is more potent than alfuzosin in inducing IFIS. Systemic α1-ARAs lower values of DMR thickness, DMR/SMR ratio and reduces pupillary diameter. Therefore, ophthalmologists, primary care physicians, urologists, and patients should be aware of the potential difficulties that these drugs pose for cataract surgery.

Case report: Topical pilocarpine ameliorated the accommodation loss and pupillary dilation after micropulse transscleral laser treatment.

BACKGROUND: The present study elucidates a common significant postoperative complication of micropulse transscleral laser treatment (mTLT) and explores its potential management strategies for younger patients with good central vision. CASE PRESENTATION: Three younger Chinese glaucoma patients with good central vision maintained high intraocular pressures (IOPs) (36, 25, and 30 mmHg) on maximally tolerated topical anti-glaucoma medications. All patients were treated with mTLT because of a higher risk of complications with filtering surgery. After the procedure, their best-corrected visual acuities were not significantly changed, IOPs were significantly decreased, and the number of topical anti-glaucoma medicines was gradually decreased. However, all patients complained about reduced near visual acuity (NVA) for 1-5 months. Slit-lamp examination revealed pupillary dilation, and binocular accommodative function examination indicated accommodation loss. After treatment with 2% topical pilocarpine, all patients reported an improvement in NVA. Among them, we could observe pupillary constriction, recovery of accommodation function, and improved NVA, even discontinuation of pilocarpine in Patient 2. CONCLUSION: In younger patients with good central vision, topical pilocarpine might ameliorate accommodation loss and pupillary dilation after mTLT.

Effect of Tiotropium on eye findings in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a persistent, chronic inflammatory disease of the lungs. Tiotropium, used in the treatment of COPD, is a muscarinic receptor antagonist that provides long-acting bronchodilation. Our study aimed to investigate the effects of Tiotropium on anterior chamber parameters. METHODS: The study was conducted as an observational cross-sectional and prospectively between October 2023 and April 2024. Patients were examined in three groups: Group 1 consisted of untreated COPD patients; Group 2 consisted of healthy volunteers similar age and gender, and Group 3 included COPD patients receiving Tiotropium 18 mcg via HandiHaler. Anterior chamber parameters, intraocular pressure values, and photopic-mesopic pupil diameters were measured at the initial visit for Group 1 and Group 2 patients, and at the third month of treatment for Group 3 patients. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in each group in the study. No significant differences were observed in ocular findings between the patient and control groups. In COPD patients receiving Tiotropium, narrowing of angle parameters, an increase in photopic-mesopic pupil diameters, and intraocular pressure were observed at the third month of treatment. CONCLUSION: This study is the first research that investigate the effects of Tiotropium on anterior chamber parameters, pupil diameters, and intraocular pressure in COPD treatment. In conclusion, patients with COPD receiving Tiotropium therapy for three months showed narrowing in angle parameters, an increase in intraocular pressure, and photopic-mesopic pupil diameter; however, no patients developed drug-induced acute angle closure glaucoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: An independent ethics committee approved the study (Giresun EAH KEAK 2023/180 and 9.10.2023/02) which was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. The study was conducted as prospectively, observational case-control. The Clinical Trial Number obtained for the study is NCT06525051 and was taken on 2024-07-29.

Comparison between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refraction in young adult myopes.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study explores the difference between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refraction in young adult myopes. PURPOSE: From the available literature, it is unclear whether cycloplegia is necessary when refracting young adults. This study investigates the agreement between noncycloplegic autorefraction and cycloplegic autorefraction and investigates factors affecting the agreement between the two methods. METHODS: In total, 125 myopes with ages ranging between 18 and 26 years were included from Australia and Vietnam. Each participant underwent noncycloplegic autorefraction and cycloplegic autorefraction. Cycloplegia was induced with 1% ophthalmic tropicamide. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent difference (95% confidence interval) between noncycloplegic autorefraction and cycloplegic autorefraction was -0.20 D (-0.25 to -0.14 D; t124 = -7.18, p<0.0001 ) . A mean difference of >0.25 D was seen in 46.8% of eyes. The lower and upper limits of agreement were -0.80 and 0.41 D, respectively. With univariate analysis, factors including age, degree of refractive error, accommodation amplitude, and distance phorias showed no impact on the average difference between cycloplegic autorefraction and noncycloplegic autorefraction. Yet, eyes with near exophoria ( F2,120 = 6.63, p=0.0019) and Caucasian eyes ( F3,121 = 2.85, p=0.040) exhibited the smallest paired differences. However, in the multivariate analysis, only near exophoria was associated with a lower mean difference. A significantly smaller proportion (34.9%) of eyes with near exophoria had a paired difference of -0.25 D or more compared with esophoria (50%) and orthophoria (65%; χ2 = 6.6, p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Noncycloplegic autorefraction results in more myopic refractive error than cycloplegic autorefraction in young adults.

Zonular fibre Insertion-to-Limbus Distance (ZLD): normative data to assess lens position and diagnose ectopia lentis.

PURPOSE: Subluxation of the crystalline lens (Ectopia Lentis, EL) can lead to significant visual impairment and serves as a diagnostic criterion for genetic disorders such as the Marfan syndrome. There is no established criterion to diagnose and quantify EL. We prospectively investigated the distance between the zonular fibre insertion and the limbus (ZLD) in healthy subjects as a parameter to assess the position of the lens, quantify EL and provide normative data. METHODS: This prospective, observational, cross-sectional study includes one-hundred-fifty eyes of 150 healthy participants (mean age 28 years, range 4-68). Pupils were dilated with tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 2.5% eyedrops. ZLD was measured in mydriasis at the slit lamp as the distance between the most central visible insertions of the zonular fibres on the lens surface and the corneoscleral limbus. Vertical pupil diameter (PD) and refractive error were recorded. If zonular fibre insertions were not visible, the distance between limbus and the pupillary margin was recorded as ZLD. RESULTS: 145 right and 5 left eyes were examined. 93% of study subjects were Caucasian, 7% were Asian. In eyes with visible zonular fibre insertions (n = 76 eyes), ZLD was 1.30 ± 0.28 mm (mean ± SD, range 0.7-2.1) and PD was 8.79 ± 0.57 mm (7.5-9.8). In the remaining 74 eyes, ZLD was 1.38 ± 0.28 mm (0.7-2.1), and PD was 8.13 ± 0.58 mm (6.7-9.4). For all eyes, ZLD was 1.34 ± 0.29 mm (0.7-2.1), and PD was 8.47 ± 0.66 mm (6.7-9.8). Refractive error and sex did not significantly affect ZLD. Smaller PD and older age were associated with larger ZLD (P < 0.001 and P = 0.036, respectively). CONCLUSION: Average ZLD was 1.34 mm in eyes of healthy subjects. Older age correlated with larger ZLD. These normative data will aid in diagnosing and quantifying EL.

Orexin-A Intensifies Mouse Pupillary Light Response by Modulating Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells.

We show for the first time that the neuropeptide orexin modulates pupillary light response, a non-image-forming visual function, in mice of either sex. Intravitreal injection of the orexin receptor (OXR) antagonist TCS1102 and orexin-A reduced and enhanced pupillary constriction in response to light, respectively. Orexin-A activated OX1Rs on M2-type intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (M2 cells), and caused membrane depolarization of these cells by modulating inward rectifier potassium channels and nonselective cation channels, thus resulting in an increase in intrinsic excitability. The increased intrinsic excitability could account for the orexin-A-evoked increase in spontaneous discharges and light-induced spiking rates of M2 cells, leading to an intensification of pupillary constriction. Orexin-A did not alter the light response of M1 cells, which could be because of no or weak expression of OX1Rs on them, as revealed by RNAscope in situ hybridization. In sum, orexin-A is likely to decrease the pupil size of mice by influencing M2 cells, thereby improving visual performance in awake mice via enhancing the focal depth of the eye's refractive system.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study reveals the role of the neuropeptide orexin in mouse pupillary light response, a non-image-forming visual function. Intravitreal orexin-A administration intensifies light-induced pupillary constriction via increasing the excitability of M2 intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells by activating the orexin receptor subtype OX1R. Modulation of inward rectifier potassium channels and nonselective cation channels were both involved in the ionic mechanisms underlying such intensification. Orexin could improve visual performance in awake mice by reducing the pupil size and thereby enhancing the focal depth of the eye's refractive system.

Early phase of pupil dilation is mediated by the peripheral parasympathetic pathway.

Pupil diameter fluctuates in association with changes in brain states induced by the neuromodulator systems. However, it remains unclear how the neuromodulator systems control the activity of the iris sphincter (constrictor) and dilator muscles to change the pupil size. The present study compared temporal patterns of pupil dilation during movement when each muscle was pharmacologically manipulated in the human eye. When the iris sphincter muscle was blocked with tropicamide, the latency of pupil dilation was delayed and the magnitude of pupil dilation was reduced during movement. In contrast, when the iris dilator muscle was continuously stimulated with phenylephrine, the latency and magnitude of rapid pupil dilation did not differ from the untreated control eye, but sustained pupil dilation was reduced until the end of movement. These results suggest that the iris sphincter muscle, which is under the control of the parasympathetic pathway, is quickly modulated by the neuromodulator system and plays a major role in rapid pupil dilation. However, the iris dilator muscle receives signals from the neuromodulator system with a slow latency and is involved in maintaining sustained pupil dilation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY By pharmacologically manipulating the pupil dilator and constrictor muscles of human eye separately, we found that the pupil constrictor muscle is a primary controller of rapid pupil dilation upon brain arousal. However, the pupil dilator muscle, which is innervated by the sympathetic nervous system and is generally considered as a major regulator of pupil dilation, is not involved in rapid pupil dilation, but was involved in long-lasting pupil dilation.