MED15::ATF1-Rearranged Tumor: A Novel Cutaneous Tumor With Melanocytic Differentiation.

We recently described novel dermal tumors with melanocytic differentiation and morphologic and biological similarities to cutaneous clear cell sarcoma, including CRTC1::TRIM11 cutaneous tumor, and clear cell tumors with melanocytic differentiation and either ACTIN::MITF or MITF::CREM. Here, we describe a series of 3 patients presenting with tumors reminiscent of CRTC1::TRIM11 cutaneous tumor, found to demonstrate a novel MED15::ATF1 fusion. All 3 patients were children (5-16 years old). Primary excision of case 1 showed a circumscribed wedge-shaped silhouette with peripheral intercalation into collagen fibers and scattered lymphoid aggregates. All 3 tumors abutted the epidermis; one showed a junctional component. Tumors were highly cellular and comprised of monomorphic, oval-to-round epithelioid cells arranged in vague nests and short fascicles in variably fibrotic stroma. Mitotic rate was high (hotspot 6-12/mm2), without atypical mitoses. Necrosis was focally present in case 3. All cases showed strong, diffuse nuclear staining for SOX10 and MITF (2/2) but showed variable expression for S100 protein (1/3) and other melanocytic markers-Melan-A (focal in 2/3), HMB45 (focal in 1/3), and Pan-Melanoma (patchy in 1/1). Whole-exome RNA sequencing demonstrated a MED15::ATF1 fusion without any other notable alterations. Cases 1 and 2 were completely excised without recurrence (12 months). Case 3 developed a grossly apparent regional lymph node spread shortly after primary biopsy. The patient was treated with wide excision, radiation, cervical lymph node dissection (4/46 with >75% lymph node replacement), and neoadjuvant and adjuvant nivolumab (alive without disease at cycle 11). This series is presented to aid in future diagnosis of this novel dermal tumor with melanocytic differentiation and emphasize the potential for aggressive biologic behavior, which should be considered in patient management planning.

A solitary scalp mass as the presenting feature of clear cell sarcoma of the kidney in a pediatric patient.

Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney is a rare renal malignancy, accounting for 2%-4% of all pediatric renal tumors. In this case report, we describe a 9-year-old boy with an asymptomatic, solitary mass on the scalp, ultimately found to be metastatic clear cell sarcoma of the kidney. This report reviews indications for imaging scalp masses to facilitate making an accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.

Intestinal Clear Cell Sarcoma-A Case Presentation of an Extremely Rare Tumor and Literature Review.

Background: Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is an extremely rare form of sarcoma representing less than 1% of all soft-tissue sarcomas. It has morphological, structural, and immunohistochemical similarities to malignant melanoma, affecting young adults and equally affecting both sexes, and is usually located in the tendinous sheaths and aponeuroses of the limbs. Gastrointestinal localization is exceptional, with less than 100 cases reported thus far. The gene fusion of activating transcription factor 1 (ATF1) and the Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 (EWSR1) are pathognomonic for clear cell sarcoma, representing the key to the diagnosis. CCS is an extremely aggressive tumor, with >30% having distant or lymphatic metastasis at the time of diagnostic, and it has a high recurrence rate of over 80% in the first year after diagnosis and a high tendency for metastatic dissemination. Given the rarity of this tumor, there is no standardized treatment. Early diagnosis and radical surgery are essential in the treatment of CCS both for the primary tumor and for recurrence or metastasis. Chemo-radiotherapy has very little effect and is rarely indicated, and the role of targeted therapies is still under investigation. Case presentation: We present an extremely rare case of intestinal CSS in a 44-year-old Caucasian female. The patient, asymptomatic, first presented for a routine checkup and was diagnosed with mild iron-deficiency anemia. Given her family history of multiple digestive cancers, additional investigations were requested (gastroscopy, colonoscopy, tumoral markers and imaging) and the results were all within normal limits. In the subsequent period, the patient experienced mild diffuse recurrent abdominal pain, which occurred every 2-3 months. Two years later, the patient presented with symptoms of intestinal obstruction and underwent an emergency laparotomy followed by segmental enterectomy and regional lymphadenectomy for stenotic tumor of the jejunum. Histology, immunohistochemistry, and genetic testing established the diagnosis of CCS. No adjuvant therapy was indicated. Initially, no signs of recurrence or metastasis were detected, but after 30 and 46 months, respectively, from the primary treatment, the patient developed liver metastasis and pericolic peritoneal implants treated by atypical hepatic resections and right hemicolectomy. The patient remains under observation.

Unusual Clinical Presentation of Clear Cell Sarcoma in a Young Woman.

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare but aggressive malignancy that typically occurs in young adults and is characterized by soft tissue tumors of the extremities. CCS can be difficult to distinguish from metastatic melanoma based solely on histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) because of the significant overlap between them. However, it is imperative to get an accurate clinical diagnosis, as it informs disease staging and treatment options for patient care. Present in approximately 75% of CCS cases, the EWSR1 gene rearrangement detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can help with establishing a diagnosis; the underlying reciprocal translocation has never been reported in cutaneous melanoma. We reviewed a case of a young woman who presented with a confusing picture of widespread lymphadenopathy, cutaneous metastases, and electrolyte derangements and was subsequently diagnosed with metastatic CCS.This case suggests possible value in performing molecular testing when a clinical picture does not correspond with what is expected for melanoma. It also raises the question of whether CCS cases may be underreported. This case highlights an uncommon presentation that may not be recognized as a manifestation of CCS by an oncologist who is not a sarcoma specialist. It is unclear how COVID-19 vaccination contributed to her clinical presentation, and it is also unclear whether an early diagnosis would have changed her clinical outcome.

Compound clear cell sarcoma with EWSR1::CREM fusion.

Cutaneous clear cell sarcomas may be confused with melanomas as a result of overlapping histopathology and immunohistochemical staining. We report a case of a 41-year-old woman with a purported history of acral melanoma of the great toe. Twenty-one months after excision of the primary tumor, the patient developed a groin mass, diagnosed as metastatic melanoma on excision. Five months later, a biopsy of a lung mass was reported as metastatic melanoma. The patient was referred to our institution for treatment, which prompted molecular testing on the groin metastasis by targeted next-generation sequencing. Molecular testing results revealed TP53 and TERT promoter mutations and the absence of BRAF, KRAS, and KIT mutations; it also revealed an EWSR1::CREM fusion that was confirmed by Archer FusionPlex. The alleged acral melanoma was re-reviewed, showing an invasive amelanotic spindle cell neoplasm in the dermis with neoplastic nests at the dermal-epidermal junction; the tumor cells expressed markers of melanocytic differentiation but were negative for PRAME and BRAF immunohistochemical staining. Molecular testing of the toe and lung metastasis revealed the same EWSR1::CREM fusion. In light of the molecular findings, the diagnosis was revised to a primary acral compound clear cell sarcoma with EWSR1::CREM fusion.

One step at a time: Melanocytic differentiation in fusion-driven cutaneous neoplasms.

As dermatopathologists, we routinely diagnose melanocytic nevi, melanomas, and occasionally melanocytomas in our daily clinical practice. However, it is now clearly established that the presence of melanocytic differentiation in a tumor does not necessarily indicate any of the aforementioned diagnoses. Tumors such as clear cell sarcoma, malignant melanotic nerve sheath tumor, PEComa, melanotic neuroectodermic tumor of infancy, and even certain translocation-associated renal cell carcinomas all share the common characteristic of melanin synthesis. Over the past two decades, with the advent of molecular diagnostics, there has been an explosion of new data and discoveries in this field. Examples such as CRTC1::TRIM11 cutaneous tumors and MITF pathway-activated melanocytic tumors (ACTIN::MITF and MITF::CREM) have been incorporated into the latest edition of the WHO classification of skin tumors (5th ed). In a recent issue, Alexandrescu et al. reported another case of a dermal/subcutaneous melanocytic tumor harboring a MITF::CREM1 translocation. In a separate paper within the current issue, Li et al. present a case of clear cell sarcoma with the rare EWSR1::CREM fusion, which had initially been misdiagnosed as melanoma with regional and distant metastases. We warmly welcome these two very interesting and high-quality articles to our journal, and we eagerly anticipate what the future holds for this fascinating category of tumors.

Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Kidney (CCSK) With BCOR-CCNB3 Fusion: A Rare Case Report With a Brief Review of the Literature.

Pediatric renal tumors are a rare entity and majority of these tumors are accounted for by Wilms tumor. The second most common renal tumor is clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CSSK). Most of the CSSK have either BCOR-internal tandem duplication (ITD) or YWHAE-NUTM2B/E fusion. The sarcomas with BCOR-CCNB3 fusion are well documented in soft tissue and bone tumors, but are extremely rare in the pediatric renal setting. We are reporting an extremely rare case of pediatric clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CSSK) with BCOR-CCNB3 fusion, which was a diagnostic challenge on morphological grounds. A final diagnosis could only be reached after multiple reviews and NGS based RNA fusion testing. We have also performed a brief review of literature which revealed eight (8) other cases of this rare entity.

Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue with eccrine differentiation: A case report and review of the literature.

Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue (CCSST) is a deep soft tissue tumor presenting in the extremities of young adults. Histopathologically, nests and sheets of polygonal cells with clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm separated by fibrous septa as well as occasional "wreath-like" giant cells are visualized. However, CCSST has been noted to have atypical histopathological features, such as epidermotropism or myxoid differentiation, or occurrence at unusual sites. Here, we present a case of eccrine ductal differentiation in CCSST. The patient, a 21-year-old woman, presented with a lump of 10-year duration sized 3 × 5 cm on the plantar surface of the fourth and fifth interdigital spaces. There had been an increase in size as well as pain and redness over 6 years. Besides the characteristic findings, there were ductal structures in continuity with the upper dermis indicative of ductal differentiation. The tumor stained positively for S100, HMB45, and succinic dehydrogenase; ducts stained positively for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). CCSST was confirmed with cytogenetic analysis showing the translocation associated with EWSR1-ATF1 fusion gene. Therefore, ductal differentiation is a unique finding that should be considered when evaluating for CCSST.

Role of Cyclin D1 and BCOR Immunohistochemistry in Differentiating Clear Cell Sarcoma of Kidney From its Mimics.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clear cell sarcoma of kidney (CCSK) is the second most common pediatric renal malignancy, constituting ∼3% of renal tumors. Due to its morphologic diversity, the diagnosis of CCSK is often challenging. Recent studies have identified internal tandem duplication of BCL6 corepressor (BCOR) gene in CCSKs which coupled with cyclin D1 immunoreactivity, is helpful in differentiating it from its mimics, particularly blastema-rich Wilms tumor (WT), malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT), and congenital mesoblastic nephroma (CMN). We aimed to evaluate the utility of cyclin D1 and BCOR immunohistochemistry in differentiating CCSK from its morphologic mimics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cohort comprised of 38 pediatric renal tumors which included CCSK (n=18), WT (n=10), MRT (n=5), and CMN (n=5) cases. A detailed clinicopathologic analysis was performed, and tissue microarray were constructed for CCSK and WT, while MRT and CMN tumors were individually stained. RESULTS: The age ranged from 2 months to 16 years with male:female ratio of 3:1. Strong, diffuse nuclear immunoreactivity for cyclin D1 and BCOR was noted in 61% (n=11/18) and 83% (n=15/18) of CCSK, respectively, while it was significantly less in WT (n=3/10 for cyclin D1) (n=2/10 for BCOR). None of the MRT and CMN examples demonstrated any immunoreactivity. Interestingly, only the blastemal component of WTs showed distinct, rare nuclear immunoreactivity for cyclin D1 or BCOR and the combination of these was never positive in a given case. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that concurrent immunopositivity with cyclin D1 and BCOR is helpful in distinguishing CCSK from its morphologic mimics.

Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor: Cytologic, histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular pitfalls.

Malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor (GNET) is a rare malignant primary gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor which can be diagnosed via fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. In the context of FNA, the diagnosis requires a cell block and the use of significant resources including immunohistochemical stains and molecular testing. The differential diagnosis of GNET includes clear cell sarcoma (CCS), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), gastric schwannoma, metastatic melanoma, malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) and granular cell tumor, among others. Here we describe a case which was initially diagnosed as malignant granular cell tumor by FNA which was later revised to GNET following the finding of an EWSR1-ATF1 fusion gene rearrangement.

[Soft tissue clear cell sarcoma. A report of three cases]. / Svetlokletochnaya sarkoma myagkikh tkanei. Opisanie trekh nablyudenii.

The paper describes three cases of soft tissue clear cell sarcoma, a rare melanin-producing malignant tumor, which is diagnosed in 52-to-87-year-old women. It provides a clinical and morphological description of the tumor and the results of immunohistochemical tests.

A rare case of primary dermal clear cell sarcoma with focal epidermotropism: An entity difficult to distinguish from melanoma.

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is an uncommon soft-tissue sarcoma that only rarely arises within the dermis. It is challenging to distinguish dermal CCS from nodular, primary dermal, or metastatic melanoma, as they share morphologic features and immunoprofiles. We describe a dermal CCS in a 25-year-old man with a cutaneous groin mass. The lesion was initially diagnosed as melanoma, likely metastatic. On consultation, in addition to a melanoma-like tumor in the dermis, we identified focal infiltration of tumor cells into the overlying epidermis (epidermotropism), resembling primary nodular or metastatic melanoma. Given the patient's age and absence of a history of primary melanoma, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed, which revealed separation of the 5' and 3' EWSR1 probe signals on chromosome 22q12, prompting a diagnosis of CCS. Our case highlights the histopathological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural similarities between CCS and melanoma, and the consequent potential for major diagnostic confusion. In such cases, FISH analysis remains the key to diagnosis. CCS should be considered in patients with a melanoma-like tumor in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue without epidermal (or with minimal) involvement, or prior to diagnosing metastatic melanoma in the absence of a known history of primary melanoma, especially in young individuals.

Immunophenotype-Genotype Correlations in Clear Cell Sarcoma of Kidney-An Evaluation of Diagnostic Ancillary Studies.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to establish a reliable panel of antibodies for immunohistochemical corroboration of a diagnosis of clear cell sarcoma of kidney (CCSK), taking into consideration the various genotypic subsets of CCSK. METHODS: We conducted full genotypic analysis for evidence of YWHAE-NUTM2, BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD), and BCOR-CCNB3 in 68 archival cases of CCSK and then immunostained all cases for CCND1, TLE1, and BCOR along with 63 control samples representing tumor types that may enter into the differential diagnosis of CCSK, including 7 congenital mesoblastic nephromas, 2 desmoplastic small round cell tumors, 13 malignant rhabdoid tumors, 9 Ewing sarcomas/primitive neuroectodermal tumor, 5 synovial sarcomas, and 27 Wilms' tumors. RESULTS: Molecular assays showed that 54 CCSKs harbored a BCOR-ITD, 1 case expressed a YWHAE-NUTM2 fusion transcript while none expressed the BCOR-CCNB3 fusion. The remaining 13 CCSKs were designated "triple-negative" based on the molecular findings. CCND1 showed positive immunoreactivity across all subgroups. TLE1 was positive in 94% of cases, including 1 YWHAE-NUTM2 fusion-positive case. Three BCOR-ITD-positive tumors were TLE1-negative. BCOR immunostaining was most variable among subgroups, with triple-negative tumors showing the weakest staining. In all, 10/68 (15%) tumors did not stain for BCOR, of which 4 were triple-negative (4/13 = 31%) and 6 were BCOR-ITD-positive (6/54 = 11%). The single YWHAE-NUTM2-positive tumor showed strong staining for all 3 markers. No single case was negative for all 3 stains; however, 3 cases showed no reactivity for either BCOR or TLE1 of which 1 was triple-negative and 2 BCOR-ITD-positive. CONCLUSION: Having completed the first comprehensive evaluation of immunostaining of 68 fully genotyped CCSK tumors, we show herein that there is a rationale for the use of a small panel of antibodies to assist in the diagnosis of CCSK regardless of genotype, and we demonstrate that in combination CCND1, TLE1, and BCOR are compelling markers in aiding CCSK diagnosis.

Cytomorphological spectrum, including immunohistochemical results of 16 cases of clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue, along with positive EWSR1 gene rearrangement result in two cases.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the cytopathological features of clear cell sarcomas (CCSs), including immunohistochemical and molecular results, the latter in selected cases. METHODS: Sixteen consecutively diagnosed cases of CCS of soft tissue, over 6-year duration were included. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed for primary diagnosis in three and for recurrent/metastatic lesions in 12 cases. Cytopathological features in 16 cases (conventional Papanicolaou- and May-Grünwald Giemsa-stained smears) were critically analysed. Corresponding histopathological and immunostained sections were available in 15 cases. Two cases were tested for EWSR1 gene rearrangement by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation. RESULTS: Sixteen tumours occurred in patients with age ranging from 18 to 56 years (median = 33.5); M: F ratio = 1:1; in deep soft tissues, mostly in extremities. Primary cytopathological diagnosis (3 cases) was CCS with a differential diagnosis of melanoma (1 case) and poorly differentiated malignant tumour (2 cases). On review, smears were predominantly hypercellular (n = 14), invariably composed of monomorphic appearing epithelioid/polygonal cells (n = 16), including spindle cells (n = 6); mostly singly scattered (n = 16), in loose clusters (n = 12); with prominent nucleolisation (n = 16); granular to vacuolated, well-defined cytoplasm (n = 12), binucleation/multinucleation (n = 9); mitoses (n = 6); sudden anisonucleosis; racquet-shaped cells (n = 3), against a tigroid background (n = 2), along with focal intracytoplasmic pigment deposition (n = 2). Immunohistochemically, tumour cells were positive for S-100P (15/15), HMB-45 (15/15) and melan-A(6/12). Two cases tested for EWSR1 rearrangement displayed red-green split signals. CONCLUSIONS: This constitutes one of the largest series describing the cytomorphological spectrum of CCS of soft tissue. Certain features, such as singly scattered monomorphic, epithelioid cells with prominent nucleolisation are useful diagnostic clues. Immunohistochemical stains are necessary and molecular testing is further helpful in reinforcing a diagnosis in certain cases. A correct diagnosis has crucial treatment implications.

Primary extragonadal vaginal yolk sac tumour: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Yolk sac tumour (YST) or endodermal sinus tumour is rare and typically seen in gonads. CASE REPORT: We described a case of extragonadal vaginal YST in a one year and seven months old girl who presented with vaginal discharge and bleeding, and discuss its differential diagnosis and potential pitfalls in immunohistochemistry. She was found to have a suprapubic mass on examination. The serum alpha fetoprotein was 11919.4 ng/mL. Computed tomography of the pelvis revealed a large 6.4 cm heterogenous pelvic mass. Colposcopic examination of the pelvis showed a fungating vaginal mass that was subsequently confirmed as a yolk sac tumour. Immunohistochemically, the malignant cells were positive toward CKAE1/AE3, AFP and glypican-3, as well as CD117. DISCUSSION: Solid pattern extragonadal vaginal YST may morphologically resemble dysgerminoma that is also CD117 positive, while the glandular pattern YST may have clear cytoplasm and is positive for cytokeratin; hence, may resemble clear cell carcinoma. Being mindful of these potential diagnostic caveats is necessary to prevent misdiagnosis.

Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney in a 62-year-old patient presenting with generalized pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK) is the second most common renal tumor in children following Wilms' tumor. CCSK is extremely rare in adults, with only 25 adult cases reported in the medical literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a 62-year-old man with a right renal mass presenting only with generalized pruritus who underwent radical right nephrectomy. With immunostaining, tumor cells were positive for expressed vimentin, neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM, CD56), and Ki-67 and focally positive for p53, CD10 and Bcl-2. The histopathological diagnosis was CCSK. Two weeks after the operation, the generalized pruritus ended. One month after the operation, the patient started treatment with a regimen combining doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide. At the 20-month follow-up visit, there was no evidence of local recurrence or metastases. CONCLUSIONS: In a patient presenting with generalized pruritus, further evaluation for an underlying malignancy should be considered. It is difficult to distinguish CCSK from undifferentiated renal neoplasms. Immunohistochemistry could help to make exact histopathological diagnoses. The BCL-6 corepressor (BCOR) gene could play a significant role in CCSK tumorigenesis and be a good marker for CCSK diagnosis. Surgery with combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy could be used to treat CCSK in older patients.

A case report of cutaneous melanocytoma with CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion: Is CMCT distinct from clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue?

Pathological diagnosis of dermal melanocytic tumors is often problematic owing to histological resemblance. Recently, cutaneous melanocytoma with CRTC1-TRIM11 (CMCT) was added to this category. However, only six cases have been reported so far. We herein present a case of a 77-year-old Japanese man with CMCT. The patient presented a nodule in the right thigh and underwent surgical resection. Histological examination indicated a well-demarcated 6 × 5 mm-sized tumor nodule in the dermis and subcutis. The tumor was amelanotic, consisting of uniform nests and fascicles of spindled, or epithelioid cells. The melanocytic nature was evident by immunohistochemistry. The CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion was detected by TRIM11 immunostaining, chromogenic in situ hybridization, and RT-PCR/direct sequencing. He has been free from the tumor for 1 year after additional resection. The main differential diagnosis of CMCT includes primary and metastatic dermal malignant melanomas (MM) and dermal/subcutaneous clear cell sarcoma (CCS). Additionally, histological overlap with paraganglioma-like dermal melanocytic tumor was considered. Although some investigators argue that CMCT is a variant of CCS, we think it should be separated from CCS, and subcutaneous/dermal CCS should be confined to tumors with EWSR1-ATF1/ CREB1 fusion. However, longer follow-up and more case studies are needed for revealing the true prognosis of CMCT.

Review of the medical literature and assessment of current utilization patterns regarding the use of two common fluorescence in situ hybridization assays in the diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and clear cell sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a tumor of intermediate malignancy, which in selected circumstances can pose difficulty in diagnosis. Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a very rare aggressive soft tissue sarcoma that can be difficult to distinguish histologically from melanoma. METHODS: The current literature on t(17;22) COL1A1-PDGFB fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay in DFSP was reviewed. Also reviewed was the current literature on dual color break-apart EWSR1 FISH assay in CCS. Finally, the current utilization patterns of these tests was assessed in attendees of the American Society of Dermatopathology annual meeting (Chicago, 2016). RESULTS: The literature indicates that (17;22) COL1A1-PDGFB FISH assay has limited value for classic DFSP, where the diagnosis can be established by routine morphology and immunohistochemistry. Given the high specificity of the EWSR1 FISH assay and significant complexity in the diagnosis of CCS, this ancillary study is helpful in distinguishing CCS from melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: In attendees, t(17;22) COL1A1-PDGFB FISH testing for classic cases of DFSP is appropriately not being used by respondents. However, the literature sustains that it is useful in selected circumstances in which a definitive diagnosis is challenging. The majority of respondents are utilizing the EWSR1 FISH assay to distinguish CSS from melanoma as is supported by the literature.