Phase I, Single-Dose Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Suramin in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.

Purpose: Suramin is a multifunctional molecule with a wide range of potential applications, including parasitic and viral diseases, as well as cancer. Methods: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled single ascending dose study was conducted to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of suramin in healthy Chinese volunteers. A total of 36 healthy subjects were enrolled. All doses of suramin sodium and placebo were administered as a 30-minute infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected at the designated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis. Safety was assessed by clinical examinations and adverse events. Results: After a single dose, suramin maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUClast) increased in a dose-proportional manner. The plasma half-life (t1/2) was dose-independent, average 48 days (range 28-105 days). The cumulative percentages of the dose excreted in urine over 7 days were less than 4%. Suramin can be detected in urine samples for longer periods (more than 140 days following infusion). Suramin was generally well tolerated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally mild in severity. Conclusion: The PK and safety profiles of suramin in Chinese subjects indicated that 10 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg could be an appropriate dose in a future multiple-dose study.

Phase I evaluation of low-dose suramin as chemosensitizer of doxorubicin in dogs with naturally occurring cancers.

BACKGROUND: Low and nontoxic concentrations (10-50 microM) of suramin, which is a nonspecific inhibitor of multiple growth factors, including fibroblast growth factors, enhances the activities of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, such as doxorubicin and paclitaxel, both in vitro and in vivo. Suramin has not been evaluated as a chemosensitizing agent in dogs with cancer. HYPOTHESIS: Nontoxic suramin can be used safely as a chemosensitizer in dogs. ANIMALS: Sixteen dogs of various breeds with measurable tumors were treated; 1 dog that had undergone amputation for osteosarcoma received adjuvant therapy. METHODS: The dogs received 53 courses of treatment with suramin in combination with doxorubicin. The suramin dosage was 6.75 mg/kg IV 3 h before standard doxorubicin administration every 2 weeks. The pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy were determined. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of low-dose suramin followed a 2-compartment model with half-lives of 2 h and 6 days. The distribution volume was a 0.34 +/- 0.12 L/kg, and clearance was 1.86 +/- 0.76 mL/kg/h. During the time interval that doxorubicin was present at therapeutically active concentrations (ie, from the start of infusion to 24 hours), the plasma concentrations were maintained within 20% of the target range (8-60 microM) in 72% of the treatments. The toxicity of the suramin/doxorubicin combination was mild and comparable to the toxicity expected for doxorubicin monotherapy. Objective partial responses were observed in 2 out of 16 evaluable dogs (13%). All 5 dogs that previously received doxorubicin showed improved responses to the suramin/doxorubicin combination. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: A fixed, low-dose suramin regimen yields the desired target plasma concentrations in most dogs, and appears to enhance the activity of doxorubicin without enhancing toxicity.

Use of adaptive control with feedback to individualize suramin dosing.

Suramin is the first putative growth factor inhibitor in clinical trial that has demonstrated antitumor activity. Administration of suramin is complicated by a narrow therapeutic index and significant interpatient variability of measured pharmacokinetic parameters. Because both antitumor response and dose-limiting toxicities are related to plasma suramin concentration profiles, individualized dose schedules are required for optimal administration of the compound. In this report, the use of optimal sampling theory to derive sparse data monitoring and control strategies for use with suramin is described. A fixed rate continuous infusion schedule was used in seven patients, and the time to peak concentration (280-300 micrograms/ml) ranged from 7.7-21 days (mean, 13.2 days) with a decline to 150 micrograms/ml in 3-22 days (mean, 11 days). An initial population pharmacokinetic model was fit using a maximum likelihood algorithm. The mean volume of the central compartment was 4.5 +/- 6.7 liters/m2, volume of the peripheral compartment 10.6 +/- 1.4 liters/m2, distributional half-life 25 +/- 5.4 h, and elimination half-life 29.7 +/- 6.9 h. The terminal half-life was shorter than previously reported. These parameters were used as the initial population model for an iterative 2-stage analysis. The resulting distributional half-life of 22.3 +/- 2.7 h and elimination half-life of 28.2 +/- 5.0 h were similar, reflecting the intensive sampling. The iterative 2-stage analysis model was then used to determine the optimal sampling times and to simulate 20 data sets for a protocol designed to maintain plasma concentrations in a defined concentration range. This strategy is currently under investigation in phase I clinical trials.

Suramin: rapid loading and weekly maintenance regimens for cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Suramin is an anticancer agent with a narrow therapeutic window and a terminal half-life of 45 to 55 days. These characteristics make it necessary to control accurately the serum concentrations of the drug. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a rapid loading regimen, followed by weekly administration of suramin to maintain serum concentrations of between 150 and 300 micrograms/mL for 8 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were treated with five different loading regimens. Initially, weekly maintenance doses were estimated manually by the treating physician. Subsequently, computer-assisted dosing that used Bayesian pharmacokinetic modeling was used. RESULTS: Thirty-eight courses of suramin that were administered to 35 patients were studied. The optimal loading regimen consisted of a continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 during a 24-hour period, which resulted in a mean serum concentration of 319 micrograms/mL. Potentially toxic concentrations that were observed with shorter infusions were avoided. Maintenance treatment, which used the weekly administration of suramin during a 6-hour period, seemed to be able to maintain mean suramin serum trough concentrations of 150 micrograms/mL, while preventing mean peak concentrations of more than 300 micrograms/mL. The use of Bayesian pharmacokinetics was superior to manual estimation in tailoring the optimal dose to the therapeutic window. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion is the optimal way of delivering suramin during the loading phase. To maintain trough levels and peak levels within a narrower therapeutic window, suramin will have to be administered more frequently than once a week. Bayesian modeling based on individual serum levels and population pharmacokinetics allows accurate dosing to maintain suramin levels within the therapeutic window.

Suramin in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer: a drug with limited efficacy.

PURPOSE: To confirm the previously reported high response rates and prolonged survival in hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated with suramin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six eligible patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer with either measurable disease or bone disease only and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 50 ng/mL were enrolled. Treatment consisted of two 8-week courses of outpatient-based therapy with an interposed rest period. A bayesian adaptive control strategy and a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model that accommodates clearance changes was used to guide individual dosing. A rapid infusion of 1,000 mg/m2 suramin was followed by five daily infusions that targeted 285 micrograms/mL peak plasma levels during the first week. All patients received concomitant hydrocortisone. For the next 7 weeks, patients received one to two doses per week that targeted levels in the 150 to 285 micrograms/mL range and integrated weekly averages of 200 ug/mL. RESULTS: Nine patients (28%) had a partial response to suramin based on a > or = 50% decrease in PSA levels coupled with either relief of bone pain or by a 50% decrease in measurable disease. The median overall survival time for all patients is 31 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 23 to 51). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with fatigue being the most common significant toxicity, but fatal idiosyncratic myelosuppression (grade V) was observed in one patient. CONCLUSION: Using this dosing schedule, suramin has limited activity against hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. Recent data suggest that hydrocortisone administered with suramin may be partly responsible for the benefit attributed to the drug. Although a small cohort of patients appeared to benefit, we were unable to confirm the previously reported high rate of activity and durability of remission using this agent.

Androgen deprivation and four courses of fixed-schedule suramin treatment in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering a combination of suramin and hydrocortisone in addition to androgen deprivation in a cooperative group setting; to assess the feasibility of treatment with multiple courses of suramin; and to assess progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who underwent such treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who had adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic, and coagulation parameters were treated by combined androgen deprivation and suramin plus hydrocortisone. Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles. The statistical design was developed on the basis of the feasibility of administering suramin, as judged by the number of patients who developed neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher or by treatment interruption of 4 weeks or longer due to any persistent suramin-related toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients enrolled onto the study between August 1994 and January 1997, 59 were eligible and assessable for toxicity on the first cycle. Thirty-two (54%) of 59 patients received a second cycle, 13 (22%) of 59 patients received a third cycle, and only five patients (8%) received a fourth cycle. During the first cycle, 27 patients were removed from the study: 17 because of toxicity, five because of disease progression, two who had died, and three because of other reasons. There was one therapy-related death. Grade 4 toxicities were noted in 11 and three patients during first and second courses, respectively. Neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher was observed in nine and seven patients during the first and second cycles, respectively. Fifteen patients had treatment interruptions of 4 weeks or longer. Overall, only 54% (95% confidence interval, 41% to 67%) of the patients demonstrated acceptable limits of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Suramin plus hydrocortisone and androgen deprivation has limited applicability in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Renal clearance, tissue distribution, and CA-125 responses in a phase I trial of suramin.

Suramin was administered to 49 patients in a Phase I cancer trial with real-time pharmacokinetic monitoring and dose individualization to achieve targeted mean plasma concentrations of 210 and 155 mg/liter during the 7-day period between days 15 and 22. Pharmacokinetic sampling after doses on days 1, 3, 5, and 8 was used to modify weekly suramin doses, beginning on day 15, in an attempt to achieve specific averaged plasma concentrations of 210 and 155 mg/liter. A 200-mg test dose was not effective in prospectively determining individual pharmacokinetic parameters and dosage requirements. Patients with peak plasma suramin concentrations in excess of 350 mg/liter may be more likely to experience neurotoxicity (P = 0.06), but there was no statistically significant effect of peak suramin concentration or of cumulative dose. Biopsy and autopsy tissue samples demonstrated low penetration of suramin into brain tissue and muscle but good penetration into prostate and other visceral organs. Prospective use of surrogate substrates for CYP1A2, CYP3A3/4, and CYP2D6 showed no consistent effect of suramin on these enzymes. Although a correlation between creatinine clearance and suramin renal clearance was found (r2 = 0.38; P < 0.00005), there was no correlation between creatinine clearance and total suramin clearance (P = 0.21). No suramin dose modification for renal or hepatic dysfunction can be supported at this time. Three of four ovarian cancer patients demonstrated a drop in CA-125 serum concentrations during suramin treatment.

Phase I study of suramin combined with doxorubicin in the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer.

In this study, we determined the maximum tolerated plasma concentration of suramin (within the predetermined study target range) when combined with doxorubicin in the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Twenty-four patients received suramin dosages based on proportional adjustment of the steady-state plasma suramin concentration to achieve the targeted plasma concentrations of 50-100, 101-150, 151-200, or 201-250 microg/ml. Doxorubicin (20 mg/m2) was administered i.v. over 24 h at weekly intervals. Suramin was given i.v. over 2 h twice weekly. Patients received treatment until dose-limiting toxicity or disease progression. Side effects similar to those reported for suramin and doxorubicin administered as individual agents were observed. Dose-limiting motor neuropathy developed in three patients (13%). Twelve of 24 evaluable patients (50%; 95% confidence interval, 28-71%) and 6 of 10 evaluable patients (60%; 95% confidence interval, 26-88%) had a >50% decrease of prostate-specific antigen and measurable lesions, respectively. The maximum tolerated plasma level of suramin when combined with doxorubicin was 151-200 microg/ml. Future studies on suramin combined with doxorubicin or other agents could be performed using a fixed dosing scheme with a targeted suramin steady-state plasma concentration of 200 microg/ml.

Persistence of human immunodeficiency virus antigenemia in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome treated with a reverse transcriptase inhibitor, suramin. Ten-patient case-control study.

Ten homosexual men with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome were included in a serologic follow-up study (duration, 40 weeks) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigenemia. Five of these men were treated with the reverse transcriptase inhibitor, suramin, for a period of 19 to 37 weeks. In contrast with reported changes in HIV antigen levels after treatment with zidovudine, HIV antigenemia persisted in the suramin-treated group, as well as in the untreated group. No clinical or immunologic improvement was seen in either group within the observation period. These data add evidence to the notion that monitoring HIV antigen levels helps to assess the efficacy of antiviral therapy.

Suramin-induced polyneuropathy.

We report the development of a severe polyneuropathy in 4 of 38 patients who were receiving parenteral suramin therapy for the treatment of various underlying malignancies. In 2 of these patients, the neuropathy progressed to generalized flaccid paralysis with bulbar and respiratory involvement, requiring endotracheal intubation and ICU monitoring. EMG and nerve conduction studies showed evidence of conduction block, suggestive of a demyelinating polyneuropathy. After several weeks, both patients improved clinically. The other 2 patients developed a reversible neuropathy with flaccid paresis of the limbs but without bulbar or respiratory compromise. No immediate response to plasmapheresis was noted. All 4 patients demonstrated an elevated CSF protein in the acute phase of their neuropathy, which declined or returned to normal during recovery. The development of polyneuropathy correlated with the maximum plasma suramin level, with an estimated 40% risk of developing neurotoxicity in those patients whose maximum level was 350 micrograms/ml or greater. No correlation could be made with the total dose of suramin administered or with the duration of therapy. Two of these 4 patients manifested tumor shrinkage while receiving suramin therapy. We conclude that suramin, a promising antineoplastic agent, is capable of inducing a severe sensorimotor polyneuropathy which appears to be related to the plasma concentration of suramin. Serial measurement of the plasma concentration during suramin therapy is recommended.

Suramin-induced neutropenia.

This paper presents a retrospective review of 6 cases of severe neutropenia attributed to suramin, the response to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and the possible mechanism. Plasma suramin concentrations, G-CSF, platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB) and fibroblast growth factor basic (FGF basic) levels were measured and correlated with neutropenic course. The time course of neutropenia was unpredictable and occurred both during and following discontinuation of suramin. Neutropenia rapidly resolved with G-CSF. Neither the measured growth factor levels nor plasma suramin concentrations correlated with neutropenia. We conclude that neutropenia secondary to suramin is unpredictable and responds to G-CSF administration permitting further suramin therapy. The mechanism remains unknown.

Lack of response to suramin in patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex.

Forty-one homosexual men with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or AIDS-related complex were treated with 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 g of suramin weekly for up to six months. In no patient was evidence of symptomatic improvement or regression of Kaposi's sarcoma shown. Opportunistic infections developed in 16 patients during therapy. Only six patients (15 percent) became human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) culture-negative during treatment, despite documentation of adequate serum suramin levels. All but one of these six have had disease progression. Decreases in the numbers of total T4 cells with time were observed in both AIDS and AIDS-related complex subgroups. Toxicity was significant and consisted of fatigue, fever, and hepatic and renal dysfunction, all of which were observed most frequently with the 1.0 or 1.5 g dosages. Fatal hepatic failure developed in two patients, and adrenal insufficiency was documented in eight patients. Suramin is a toxic agent that shows no virologic, immunologic, or clinical benefit in patients with HIV-related disease.

An improved method for the estimation of suramin in plasma and trypanosome samples.

An improved method for the chemical estimation of suramin is described in which the aromatic amines released from the drug by acid hydrolysis are diazotised and then coupled to N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine to form a pink coloured product (EmM545nm267 /+- 5) Provided certain precautions are followed, the assay method is highly reproducible (+/- 2%) and sufficiently sensitive to measure 2.5 nmol; suramin in mixtures with plasma (0.5 ml) or trypanosomes (200 mg wet wt.).

Clinical pharmacokinetics of suramin in patients with HTLV-III/LAV infection.

Suramin has been reported to inhibit the reverse transcriptase activity of a number of retroviruses and to reduce the in vitro infectivity and cytopathic effect of HTLV-III/LAV, the etiologic agent of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). The clinical pharmacokinetics of suramin were investigated as part of a pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this drug for the treatment of patients with diseases caused by HTLV-III/LAV. A dose of suramin 6.2 g was given intravenously over a five-week period to four patients. After the last dose, the plasma half-life of suramin was 44 to 54 days. This is among the longest half-lives reported for any therapeutic substance given to humans. Total plasma levels of suramin were greater than 100 micrograms/mL for several weeks. In vitro activity of suramin was found at concentrations as low as 50 micrograms/mL. Metabolites were not found in plasma, and urinary excretion accounts for elimination of most of the drug. Suramin is approximately 99.7% bound to plasma proteins. The results from these initial clinical pharmacokinetic studies might assist the design of further therapeutic trials of suramin, especially the selection of frequency of dosing and adjustments for renal impairment.

Intravesical suramin in the prevention of transitional cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of intravesical suramin on N-methyl-N-nitrosurea (MNU)-induced bladder tumors in Fischer 344 rats. METHODS: Multiple cohorts of female rats received four biweekly intravesical instillations of MNU. A control group received no other treatment, the experimental group received 25 mg/kg intravesical suramin twice a week beginning at week 6. RESULTS: After 18 weeks from the first instillation of MNU, 60% to 65% of control animals developed papillary transitional cell carcinoma, compared with only 0% to 10% of the suramin-treated animals (P = 0.01 to P = 0.0007). There was no local or systemic toxicity observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical suramin is an effective chemopreventative therapy for transitional cell carcinoma in vivo with minimal toxicity.

Suramin treatment in hormone- and chemotherapy-refractory prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Suramin, a polysulfonated naphtylurea with anti-growth factor activity, was used in the treatment of metastatic, hormone- and chemotherapy-refractory prostate cancer. Recent studies have proved the effect of suramin on prostate cancer. METHODS: Between March 1990 and January 1994, 27 patients with metastatic prostate cancer were enrolled in this study. Treatment regimen consisted of a loading phase, allowing patients to reach suramin serum levels between 180 and 250 microg/mL using a suramin dose of 1.4 g/m2 at 3-day intervals. Constant suramin serum levels were maintained by a 0.5 to 1-g/m2 dose every 7 to 10 days. Because previous studies showed suramin to have serious toxicity, compromised organ status was excluded by repeated examinations. RESULTS: Six patients did not complete the suramin loading phase because of side effects and were removed from the study. With an average cumulative suramin dose of 14.2 g, 33% of the assessable patients (7 of 21) experienced a more than 50% reduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or alkaline phosphatase (AP) serum levels. Mean survival in these suramin-responsive patients was 495 days. Two of these patients experienced a remarkable reduction of metastases in bone scan examinations. Another 48% of the patients (10 of 21) had essentially unchanged AP and PSA serum levels during suramin treatment, indicating stable disease. Mean survival of these patients was 341 days. In 4 patients undergoing suramin treatment, continuous clinical progression of the disease was observed (mean survival 79 days). Toxicity was less or comparable to prior reported studies; the most common side effects were polyneuropathy, allergic skin rash, and vortex keratopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Suramin has limited, but significant, efficacy even in chemotherapy- and hormone-refractory prostate cancer, without serious toxicity.

A phase I/II study of continuous infusion suramin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: toxicity and response.

INTRODUCTION: Suramin is a synthetic polysulfonated naphthylurea which has been used for the treatment of African trypanosomiasis and onchocerciasis, but since the mid-1980s has received attention as a possible antiretroviral and antineoplastic agent. OBJECTIVE: This clinical trial of suramin was undertaken as a phase I/II study in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, with the hypothesis that the intensity of therapy with suramin could be increased significantly if measures were undertaken to maintain the plasma concentrations of the drug under 300 microg/ml. METHODS: We report the clinical results of this trial, wherein patients were treated at three different targeted plasma suramin concentrations (275, 215 and 175 microg/ml) for varying periods of time (2, 4 or 8 weeks), with delivery of the drug by continuous intravenous infusion. RESULTS: The major toxicity observed in this trial was neurologic, consisting of a motor and sensory peripheral neuropathy that resulted in both paresis and paralysis of the limbs. Nearly all of this severe (CTEP grade III, IV) neurologic toxicity was observed in the patients treated at a plasma suramin concentration of 275 microg/ml for 4 or more weeks. A single patient treated at 215 microg/ml for 8 weeks developed moderate (CTEP grade III) proximal lower extremity weakness, and no patient treated at 175 microg/ml developed this toxicity. The second most common toxicity observed was infection of the central venous catheter. The overall response rate for all of the evaluable patients was 17% (13 of 75 patients). In addition, prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-defined responses were observed in six patients receiving therapy at 175 microg/ml, but these responses were confounded by cessation of therapy with flutamide during suramin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, although plasma suramin concentrations were maintained below 300 microg/ml, neurologic toxicity nonetheless occurred with high frequency in patients treated at 275 microg/ml for 4 or more weeks. Therapy at 215 and 175 microg/ml was in general well tolerated, but central venous catheter-related infection, as well as the inconvenience and expense of continuous infusional therapy, make this method of drug delivery impractical. Only moderate antitumor activity was observed during this trial, but it is possible that both continuation of flutamide and flutamide withdrawal during suramin therapy confounded the assessment of suramin's activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Adrenocortical insufficiency in Rhodesian sleeping sickness is not attributable to suramin.

Suramin, a polysulphonated naphthylurea used in the treatment of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), is known to cause adrenocortical insufficiency in doses exceeding the quantity used for treatment of HAT. We have previously reported that Trypanosoma brucei rhodesinese infection causes a combined central and peripheral adrenal insufficiency. To evaluate whether suramin therapy acts as an additional adrenotoxic factor, we assessed adrenocortical function in 72 patients suffering from HAT at different times during treatment with either suramin or melarsoprol by a rapid adrenocorticotropic hormone test. We found a significantly diminished peak cortisol response to stimulation in the acutely ill patients (P = 0.001), indicating impaired adrenocortical function, as well as a high incidence of partial adrenocortical insufficiency (27%). During and after trypanocidal therapy the incidence of partial adrenal insufficiency gradually declined (to 25% and 18% respectively). Stimulated peak cortisol levels did not differ significantly between patients receiving suramin and those given melarsoprol. No correlation was found between serum suramin concentration and the cortisol response to stimulation (r = 0.09, P = 0.47). Thus we conclude that suramin in trypanocidal doses neither causes nor worsens the adrenocortical dysfunction observed in Rhodesian HAT.

Suramin and serum insulin-like growth factor levels in metastatic cancer patients.

Suramin, a polysulphonated naphthylurea, inhibits the activity of several growth factors in in vitro experiments and clinical responses have been reported in human solid tumors. We decided to investigate the relationship between suramin treatment and serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and II (IGF-II) in advanced breast, prostate and lung cancer patients. The serum IGF-I, IGF-II levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. A significant decline of IGF-I and IGF-II serum levels was demonstrated in suramin treated patients. Our results suggest that suramin-induced IGF suppression could be one of the possible mechanisms of suramin action.

Determination of suramin in clinical samples using HPLC.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was applied for the determination of suramin levels in serum samples from cancer patients treated with this drug. Ion-pair chromatography in combination with the deproteination procedure extraction and hydrolysis of complex serum proteins-suramin were recommended. Extraction recoveries and linearity for wide concentration range were evaluated. Detection limit of suramin in serum samples was determined (0.5 micrograms/ml), and concentration curves as the dependences of suramin concentration levels and time have been illustrated. Chromatographic conditions were optimized for minimal analysis time (max. 10 min) and suitable chromatographic resolution (Rij greater than 1.25).