Mesenchymal stromal cells plus basiliximab improve the response of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease as a second-line therapy: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). METHODS: The primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981). RESULTS: Most enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-ß and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-ß (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-ß tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: For SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells therapy in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a serious public health issue. In COVID-19 patients, the elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines lead to the manifestation of COVID-19 symptoms, such as lung tissue edema, lung diffusion dysfunction, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), secondary infection, and ultimately mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, thus providing a potential treatment option for COVID-19. The number of clinical trials of MSCs for COVID-19 has been rising. However, the treatment protocols and therapeutic effects of MSCs for COVID-19 patients are inconsistent. This meta-analysis was performed to systematically determine the safety and efficacy of MSC infusion in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search from PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to 22 November 2023 to screen for eligible randomized controlled trials. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for searched literature were formulated according to the PICOS principle, followed by the use of literature quality assessment tools to assess the risk of bias. Finally, outcome measurements including therapeutic efficacy, clinical symptoms, and adverse events of each study were extracted for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials were collected. The results of enrolled studies demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received MSC inoculation showed a decreased mortality compared with counterparts who received conventional treatment (RR: 0.76; 95% CI [0.60, 0.96]; p = 0.02). Reciprocally, MSC inoculation improved the clinical symptoms in patients (RR: 1.28; 95% CI [1.06, 1.55]; p = 0.009). In terms of immune biomarkers, MSC treatment inhibited inflammation responses in COVID-19 patients, as was indicated by the decreased levels of CRP and IL-6. Importantly, our results showed that no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions or serious adverse events were monitored in patients after MSC inoculation. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that MSC inoculation is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Without increasing the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events, MSC treatment decreased patient mortality and inflammatory levels and improved the clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients. However, large-cohort randomized controlled trials with expanded numbers of patients are required to further confirm our results.

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHOD: We conducted a manual search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with a search deadline set for February 1, 2023. Data analysis was performed using Stata version 15.0. RESULT: A total of 9 randomized controlled studies were included, involving a total of 316 people, including 159 mesenchymal stem cells and 147 control groups. Results of meta-analysis: Compared to a placebo group, the administration of mesenchymal stem cells resulted in a significant reduction in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores among patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke [SMD=-0.99,95% CI (-1.93, -0.05)]. Compared to placebo, barthel index [SMD = 0.48,95% CI (-0.55,1.51)], modified rankin score [SMD = 0.45, 95% CI (1.11, 0.21)], adverse events (RR = 0.68, 95% CI (0.40, 1.17)] the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Based on current studies, mesenchymal stem cell transplantation can ameliorate neurological deficits in patients with ischemic stroke to a certain extent without increasing adverse reactions. However, there was no significant effect on Barthel index and Modified Rankin score.

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Management of relapses and refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is complex and difficult. Even after the administration of new biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), only a few patients achieve the complete remission phase. DMARDs help only in modifying the disease activity, which sooner or later fails. They do not manage the disease at the patho-etiological level. There are some serious side effects as well as drug interaction with DMARDs. There are few subsets of RA patients who do not respond to DMARDs, reasons unknown. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) provide a promising alternative, especially in such cases. This review elaborates on the studies pertaining to the application of MSCs in rheumatoid arthritis over the last two decades. A total of 14 studies (one review article) including 447 patients were included in the study. Most of the studies administered MSCs in refractory RA patients through the intravenous route with varied dosages and frequency of administration. MSCs help in RA treatment via various mechanisms including paracrine effects. All the studies depicted a better clinical outcome with minimal adverse events. The functional scores including the VAS scores improved significantly in all studies irrespective of dosage and source of MSCs. The majority of the studies depicted no complications. Although the use of MSCs in RA is still in the early stages requiring further refinement in the source of MSCs, dosage, and frequency. The role of MSCs in the management of RA has a promising prospect. MSCs target the RA at the molecular level and has the potential to manage refractory RA cases not responding to conventional treatment. Multicentric, large sample populations, and long-term studies are required to ascertain efficacy and safety.

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for Crohn's perianal fistula-a real-world experience.

AIM: Remission rates of medically and surgically treated complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease are low. Recently, trials have demonstrated the potential for long-term remission with local injection of allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (darvadstrocel). Our aim was to analyse outcomes from our real-world experience with this new treatment. METHODS: All patients with Crohn's disease suffering complex perianal fistulas who consecutively underwent administration of darvadstrocel at two centres were followed up and evaluated. Patients were assessed for clinical remission, response, failure, and any complications during follow-up. The results of all patients with a minimum of 3 months' follow-up are presented. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with Crohn's disease and complex perianal fistulas were included. Of these, 20 (61%) experienced clinical remission that was maintained for a mean follow-up of 14 (3-32) months. A total of 24 of 33 (73%) experienced at least 3 months of clinical remission, with four later having recurrence (3-12 months). Among the remaining nine patients who did not experience clinical remission, two (6%) had partial remission (such as one of two fistulas closing), two (6%) showed signs of response but not remission, and five (15%) showed no signs of healing. The mean time to maintained clinical remission was 6 weeks (range 2 weeks to 6 months), and there were no severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this real-world experience, treatment of Crohn's disease complex perianal fistulas with darvadstrocel had a 61% success rate for maintained clinical remission.

The nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 agonist tert-butylhydroquinone improves bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell function in prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PT) is a life-threatening comorbidity associated with allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our previous study indicated that dysfunctional bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM MSCs) played a role in PT pathogenesis and that reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation was related to BM MSC senescence and apoptosis. However, the mechanism of the increase in ROS levels in the BM MSCs of PT patients is unknown. In the current case-control study, we investigated whether nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), which is a central regulator of the cellular anti-oxidant response that can clear ROS in human BM MSCs, was associated with PT after allo-HSCT. We evaluated whether an NRF2 agonist (tert-butylhydroquinone, TBHQ) could enhance BM MSCs from PT patients in vitro. We found that BM MSCs from PT patients exhibited increased ROS levels and reduced NRF2 expression. Multivariate analysis showed that low NRF2 expression was an independent risk factor for primary PT [p = 0.032, Odds ratio (OR) 0.868, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.764-0.988]. In-vitro treatment with TBHQ improved the quantity and function of BM MSCs from PT patients by downregulating ROS levels and rescued the impaired BM MSC support of megakaryocytopoiesis. In conclusion, these results suggested that NRF2 downregulation in human BM MSCs might be involved in the pathogenesis of PT after allo-HSCT and that BM MSC impairment could be improved by NRF2 agonist in vitro. Although further validation is needed, our data indicate that NRF2 agonists might be a potential therapeutic approach for PT patients after allo-HSCT.

Real-world data suggest effectiveness of the allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells preparation MSC-FFM in ruxolitinib-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) not tolerating/responding to ruxolitinib (RR-aGvHD) have a dismal prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed real-world outcomes of RR-aGvHD treated with the random-donor allogeneic MSC preparation MSC-FFM, available via Hospital Exemption in Germany. MSC-FFM is provided as frozen cell dispersion for administration as i.v. infusion immediately after thawing, at a recommended dose of 1-2 million MSCs/kg body weight in 4 once-weekly doses. 156 patients, 33 thereof children, received MSC-FFM; 5% had Grade II, 40% had Grade III, and 54% had Grade IV aGvHD. Median (range) number of prior therapies was 4 (1-10) in adults and 7 (2-11) in children. RESULTS: The safety profile of MSC-FFM was consistent with previous reports for MSC therapies in general and MSC-FFM specifically. The overall response rate at Day 28 was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-55%) in adults and 64% (45-80%) in children; most responses were durable. Probability of overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 47% (38-56%), 35% (27-44%) and 30% (22-39%) for adults, and 59% (40-74%), 42% (24-58%) and 35% (19-53%) for children, respectively (whole cohort: median OS 5.8 months). CONCLUSION: A recent real-world analysis of outcomes for 64 adult RR-aGvHD patients not treated with MSCs reports survival of 20%, 16% and 10% beyond 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively (median 28 days). Our data thus suggest effectiveness of MSC-FFM in RR-aGvHD.

Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for multi-drug-resistant acute and late-acute graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) remains a significant risk for mortality and morbidity following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A growing literature supports successful applications of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute GvHD (aGvHD). However, there is limited knowledge about the effects of MSC treatment on late-acute GvHD (late aGvHD). In this article, we present our multicenter study on the safety and efficacy of MSC therapy for patients with steroid-refractory late aGvHD in comparison to those with aGvHD. The outcome measures include non-relapse mortality (NRM) and survival probability over a 2-year follow-up. The study includes a total of 76 patients with grades III-IV aGvHD (n = 46) or late aGvHD (n = 30), who had been treated with at least two lines of steroid-containing immunosuppressive therapy. Patients received weekly adipose or umbilical cord-derived MSC infusions at a dose of median 1.55 (ranging from 0.84 to 2.56) × 106/kg in the aGvHD group, and 1.64 (ranging from 0.85 to 2.58) × 106/kg in the late aGvHD group. This was an add-on treatment to ongoing conventional pharmaceutical management. In the aGvHD group, 23 patients received one or two infusions, 20 patients had 3-4, and three had ≥ 5. Likewise, in the late aGvHD group, 20 patients received one or two infusions, nine patients had 3-4, and one had ≥ 5. MSC was safe without acute or late adverse effects in 76 patients receiving over 190 infusions. In aGvHD group, 10.9% of the patients had a complete response (CR), 23.9% had a partial response (PR), and 65.2% had no response (NR). On the other hand, in the late aGvHD group, 23.3% of the patients had CR, 36.7% had PR, and the remaining 40% had NR. These findings were statistically significant (p = 0.031). Also, at the 2-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of NRM was significantly lower in patients with late aGvHD than in patients with aGvHD at 40% (95% CI, 25-62%) versus 71% (95% CI, 59-86%), respectively (p = 0.032). In addition, the probability of survival at 2 years was significantly higher in patients with late aGvHD than in the aGvHD group at 59% (95% CI, 37-74%) versus 28% (95% CI, 13-40%), respectively (p = 0.002). To our knowledge, our study is the first to compare the safety and efficacy of MSC infusion(s) for the treatment of steroid-resistant late aGVHD and aGVHD. There were no infusion-related adverse effects in either group. The response rate to MSC therapy was significantly higher in the late aGvHD group than in the aGvHD group. In addition, at the 2-year follow-up, the survival and NRM rates were more favorable in patients with late aGVHD than in those with aGVHD. Thus, the results are encouraging and warrant further studies to optimize MSC-based treatment for late aGVHD.

Safety and efficacy of injection of human placenta mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes for treatment of complex perianal fistula in non-Crohn's cases: Clinical trial phase I.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A perianal fistula is an abnormal tract that connects anal canal to skin. Current medical and surgical interventions have a high failure rate particularly in complex and refractory cases. MSC-derived exosomes have demonstrated immunomodulatory effects without the conventional complications; hence, in this study, we evaluated the safety of their application for complex perianal fistula. METHODS: Placenta-derived MSCs were cultured, and exosomes were isolated using ultracentrifugation. Exosome injections were administered in the operating room to 11 patients with complex perianal fistula (presence of fistulas for at least 1 year alongside medical and surgical treatment). The patients were followed for 6 months, and the patients were evaluated using physical examination, face-to-face interviews, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Among 11 patients only one did not show any improvement upon physical examination. Five patients showed complete tract resolve. While the discharge was stopped in eight patients, two patients showed only reduction. None of the patients showed any acute or latent allergic reaction or injection related complications. CONCLUSION: Administration of exosomes isolated from MSCs demonstrates safety and a satisfactory therapeutic effect in treatment complex perianal fistulae; therefore, it can be a candidate for future studies and might play a significant role in treatment.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Recovery from a traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is challenging due to the limited regenerative capacity of the central nervous system to restore cells, myelin, and neural connections. Cell therapy, particularly with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), holds significant promise for TSCI treatment. This systematic review aims to analyze the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic potential of MSC-based cell therapies in TSCI. A comprehensive search of PUBMED and COCHRANE databases until February 2023 was conducted, combining terms such as "spinal cord injury," "stem cells," "stem cell therapy," "mesenchymal stem cells," and "traumatic spinal cord injury". Among the 53 studies initially identified, 22 (21 clinical trials and 1 case series) were included. Findings from these studies consistently demonstrate improvements in AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) grades, sensory scores, and, to a lesser extent, motor scores. Meta-analyses further support these positive outcomes. MSC-based therapies have shown short- and medium-term safety, as indicated by the absence of significant adverse events within the studied timeframe. However, caution is required when drawing generalized recommendations due to the limited scientific evidence available. Further research is needed to elucidate the long-term safety and clinical implications of these advancements. Although significant progress has been made, particularly with MSC-based therapies, additional studies exploring other potential future therapies such as gene therapies, neurostimulation techniques, and tissue engineering approaches are essential for a comprehensive understanding of the evolving TSCI treatment landscape.

Potential Role for Stem Cell Regenerative Therapy as a Treatment for Degenerative Disc Disease and Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Back pain is the single leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite the prevalence and morbidity of lower back pain, we still lack a gold-standard treatment that restores the physiological function of degenerated intervertebral discs. Recently, stem cells have emerged as a promising strategy for regenerative therapy for degenerative disc disease. In this study, we review the etiology, pathogenesis, and developing treatment strategies for disc degeneration in low back pain with a focus on regenerative stem cell therapies. A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE/Embase/Clinical Trials.gov databases was conducted for all human subject abstracts or studies. There was a total of 10 abstracts and 11 clinical studies (1 RCT) that met the inclusion criteria. The molecular mechanism, approach, and progress of the different stem cell strategies in all studies are discussed, including allogenic bone marrow, allogenic discogenic cells, autologous bone marrow, adipose mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), human umbilical cord MSC, adult juvenile chondrocytes, autologous disc derived chondrocytes, and withdrawn studies. Clinical success with animal model studies is promising; however, the clinical outcomes of stem cell regenerative therapy remain poorly understood. In this systematic review, we found no evidence to support its use in humans. Further studies on efficacy, safety, and optimal patient selection will establish whether this becomes a viable, non-invasive therapeutic option for back pain.

Role of stem cells in the treatment of osteoarthritis- a review of literature.

The purpose of this review was to identify and assess the effectiveness of stem cells in the form of injectables in the treatment of joint osteoarthritis as published in the literature. Studies were searched from multiple databases like Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library until June 2022 using multiple keywords. Randomized controlled trials of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) were included which compared the pain and functional outcomes for those getting Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) injectables as compared to those who received no MSCs injection. Twelve randomized controlled trials, assessing a total of 486 participants were identified and studied. Overall, stem cells injection has no significant effect on pain along with physical function. Stem cells injection could be effective in reducing pain and might also help in improving functional outcome in patients with OA. However, the findings are not yet significant and further clinical trials with larger samples are needed to come to a positive conclusion.

Mesenchymal stroma/stem cells: Haematologists' friend or foe?

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are non-haematopoietic cells found in fetal and adult organs, that play important roles in tissue repair, inflammation and immune modulation. MSCs residing in the bone marrow interact closely with haematopoietic cells and comprise an important component of the microenvironment supporting haematopoiesis, in both health and disease states. Since their identification in 1970, basic scientific and preclinical research efforts have shed light on the role of MSCs in the regulation of haematopoiesis and evoked interest in their clinical application in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and malignant haematology. Over the last two decades, these research efforts have led to numerous clinical trials, which have established the safety of MSC therapy; however, the optimal mode of administration and the benefit remain inconclusive. In this paper, we will review the clinical experience with use of MSCs in HSCT for enhancement of engraftment, prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease and haemorrhagic cystitis. Then, we will discuss the contradictory evidence regarding tumour-promoting versus tumour-suppressing effects of MSCs in haematological malignancies, which may have relevance for future clinical applications.

The safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in diabetic lower extremity vascular disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Several studies have shown the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy for lower extremity vascular disease (LEVD) in diabetic patients, but the results are not consistent. Therefore, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the safety and efficacy of MSC therapy in diabetic patients with LEVD. METHODS: Eight available databases were searched in both English and Chinese to identify RCTs comparing MSC therapy-based conventional treatment with conventional treatment alone in diabetic patients with LEVD. Three investigators independently screened the literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk bias. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and Stata 14.0. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies involving 453 patients were included. Compared with conventional treatment only, patients receiving MSC therapy-based conventional treatment had a higher ulcer healing rate, greater number of reduced ulcers and shorter complete healing time. MSC therapy also increased ankle-brachial index and transcutaneous oxygen pressure. In addition, four of the included studies showed that MSC therapy significantly improved the number of new collateral vessels. Moreover, no more adverse events were recorded in the MSC group. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that MSC therapy promotes ulcer healing in diabetic LEVD patients with ulcers, improves blood supply and has a favorable safety profile. More large and well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up are still needed to explore the safety and efficacy of MSC therapy in diabetic patients with LEVD.

Prevention of chronic diabetic complications in type 1 diabetes by co-transplantation of umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells and autologous bone marrow: a pilot randomized controlled open-label clinical study with 8-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND AIMS: To explore the long-term safety and benefit of umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cell (MSCs) plus autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell (aBM-MNC) stem cell transplantation (SCT) without immunotherapy in established type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: In the primary completion of this trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01374854), the authors randomized patients (n = 21 per group) to either SCT or standard care (control) and previously reported effects on insulin secretion. The authors report about the incidence of chronic diabetes complications (primary endpoint) after 8 years of follow-up. The authors also report on secondary endpoints, safety, islet function and metabolic control. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 14 of 21 patients in the SCT group and 15 of 21 patients in the control group who completed follow-up. At 8 years, the incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 7.1% (one of 14) in the SCT group versus 46.7% (seven of 15) in the control group (P = 0.017). The incidence of diabetic nephropathy was 7.1% (one of 14) in the SCT group versus 40.0% (six of 15) in the control group (P = 0.039). The incidence of retinopathy was 7.1% (one of 14) in the SCT group versus 33.3% (five of 15) in the control group (P = 0.081). Two patients (two of 14, 14.3%) in the SCT group and 11 patients (11 of 15, 73.3%) in the control group developed at least one complication (P = 0.001). One and six patients in the SCT group and control group, respectively, had at least two complications (P = 0.039). No malignancies were reported in the treated group. CONCLUSIONS: Co-transplantation of umbilical cord MSCs and aBM-MNCs in patients with established T1D was associated with reduced incidence of chronic diabetes complications.

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for focal epilepsy: A systematic review of preclinical models and clinical studies.

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is characterized by recurrent seizures despite appropriate treatment with antiseizure medication (ASM). Due to their regenerative and immunomodulatory potential, therapies with biologics such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) offer a potential therapeutic benefit for structural causes of epilepsy, such as hippocampal sclerosis. In this article, we report a systematic review of the literature evaluating the preclinical and clinical studies of MSCs for DRE. Medline, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Databases were searched electronically from their dates of inception to November 2021 using the following keywords: (("mesenchymal") AND ("stem cell")) AND (("epilepsy") OR ("convulsion") OR ("seizures")). This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The initial query identified 488 studies representing 323 unique manuscripts. After application of selection criteria, 15 studies were included in this systematic review; 11 were preclinical studies and 4 were clinical studies. All preclinical studies were performed in rodents and all clinical studies were phase 1 trials. Thus far, therapy with MSCs appears to be safe for use in humans, as no severe adverse events related directly to the therapy were reported. Furthermore, MSC therapy appears to provide a statistically significant clinical benefit by reducing the seizure burden of patients, reducing the electrophysiological biomarkers of epilepsy, and improving their comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety. In addition, animal studies reveal that the therapy exerts its effect by reducing aberrant mossy fiber sprouting (reduce excitatory pathways) and increasing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic interneurons (increase inhibitory pathways). Both preclinical and clinical studies have shown MSC therapy to be safe and preliminary effective, thus warranting further studies to investigate its therapeutic potential.

Safety and tolerability of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in lupus animal models and a phase I clinical trial in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Several clinical trials aimed at treating various autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), by introducing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been conducted. However, with refractory lupus nephritis (LN), the outcomes of MSC transplantation are not well known, and further validation is required. In particular, data concerning the safety and efficacy of LN treatment using bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) are still lacking. METHODS: We identified characteristics of BM-MSCs in terms of cell morphology, chromosomal stability, differentiation capacity, and phenotype through cell passages. The in vivo stability of BM-MSCs was evaluated by single-dose and repeated-dose toxicity tests, tumorigenicity tests, and biodistribution tests using lupus mouse models. Based on the encouraging nonclinical results, we conducted a nonrandomized, open-label, single-arm phase I clinical trial to evaluate the tolerability and safety of a single administration of haploidentical allogeneic BM-MSCs (CS20AT04) in seven LN patients (NCT03174587). We used a classical three + three design to find the optimal dosage. The starting dose was 2.0×106 cells/kg and escalated to 3.0×106 cells/kg if there was no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Evaluation of the safety and tolerability was assessed 28 days after the infusion, and the maximum tolerated dose was determined. RESULTS: Properly cultured BM-MSCs showed high proliferation and multipotency, but chromosomal changes were not found. There were two deaths by a rapid administration rate in the high-dose group (2.0×106 cells/head) in a single administration test. BM-MSCs were distributed in the kidneys until Day 7. In the phase I clinical trial, seven LN patients were enrolled. Participants received BM-MSCs through intravenous infusion. There was no DLT at both initial dose (2.0×106 cells/kg) and escalated dose (3.0×106 cells/kg). One patient was not administered the full 2.0×106 cells/kg dose because of a technical error during infusion. This patient did not show DLT. Three adverse events were reported, namely, one diarrhea, one toothache, and one arthralgia, and all were considered NCI-CTC grade I events. CONCLUSION: We defined the characteristics of BM-MSCs and identified their safety and tolerability in both animal models and a phase I clinical trial. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 3.0×106 cells/kg in patients with LN.

Tissue repair strategies: What we have learned from COVID-19 in the application of MSCs therapy.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection evokes severe proinflammatory storm and pulmonary infection with the number of confirmed cases (more than 200 million) and mortality (5 million) continue to surge globally. A number of vaccines (e.g., Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson/Janssen and AstraZeneca vaccines) have been developed over the past two years to restrain the rapid spread of COVID-19. However, without much of effective drug therapies, COVID-19 continues to cause multiple irreversible organ injuries and is drawing intensive attention for cell therapy in the management of organ damage in this devastating COVID-19 pandemic. For example, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have exhibited promising results in COVID-19 patients. Preclinical and clinical findings have favored the utility of stem cells in the management of COVID-19-induced adverse outcomes via inhibition of cytokine storm and hyperinflammatory syndrome with coinstantaneous tissue regeneration capacity. In this review, we will discuss the existing data with regards to application of stem cells for COVID-19.

Clinical and laboratory findings following transplantation of allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in knee osteoarthritis, a brief report.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) injection has been proposed as an innovative treatment for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Since, allogeneic MSCs can be available as off-the-shelf products, they are preferable in regenerative medicine. Among different sources for MSCs, adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) appear to be more available. METHODS: Three patients with KOA were enrolled in this study. A total number of 100 × 106 AD-MSCs was injected intra-articularly, per affected knee. They were followed up for 6 months by the assessment of clinical outcomes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and serum inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS: The primary outcome of this study was safety and feasibility of allogeneic AD-MSCs injection during the 6 months follow-up. Fortunately, no serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported. Assessment of secondary outcomes of visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) indicated improvement in all patients. Comparison between baseline and endpoint findings of MRI demonstrated a slight improvement in two patients. In addition, decrease in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) indicated the possibility of reduced cartilage degeneration. Moreover, quantification of serum interleukin-10 (IL-10) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels indicated that the host immune system immunomodulated after infusion of AD-MSCs. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular injection of AD-MSCs is safe and could be effective in cartilage regeneration in KOA. Preliminary assessment after six-month follow-up suggests the potential efficacy of this intervention which would need to be confirmed in randomized controlled trials on a larger population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials (https://en.irct.ir/trial/46) in 24 April 2018 with identifier IRCT20080728001031N23.

Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Ocular GVHD (oGVHD), manifested by severe injury of corneal epithelial cells, meibomian and lacrimal glands' dysfunction, is a serious complication of systemic GVHD which develops as a consequence of donor T and natural killer cell-driven inflammation in the eyes of patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are, due to their enormous differentiation potential and immunosuppressive characteristics, considered as a potentially new remedy in ophthalmology. MSC differentiate in corneal epithelial cells, suppress eye inflammation, and restore meibomian and lacrimal glands' function in oGVHD patients. MSC-sourced exosomes (MSC-Exos) are extracellular vesicles that contain MSC-derived growth factors and immunoregulatory proteins. Due to the lipid membrane and nano-sized dimension, MSC-Exos easily by-pass all biological barriers in the eyes and deliver their cargo directly in injured corneal epithelial cells and eye-infiltrated leukocytes, modulating their viability and function. As cell-free agents, MSC-Exos address all safety issues related to the transplantation of their parental cells, including the risk of unwanted differentiation and aggravation of intraocular inflammation. In this review article, we summarized current knowledge about molecular mechanisms which are responsible for beneficial effects of MSC and MSC-Exos in the therapy of inflammatory eye diseases, emphasizing their therapeutic potential in the treatment of oGVHD.