Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 756
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(9): 2082-2090, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36781580

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is a common disorder that affects both children and adults. However, for adults, little is known about ADHD-attributable medical expenditures. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the medical expenditures associated with ADHD, stratified by age, in the US adult population. DESIGN: Using a two-part model, we analyzed data from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for 2015 to 2019. The first part of the model predicts the probability that individuals incurred any medical costs during the calendar year using a logit model. The second part of the model estimates the medical expenditures for individuals who incurred any medical expenses in the calendar year using a generalized linear model. Covariates included age, sex, race/ethnicity, geographic region, Charlson comorbidity index, insurance, asthma, anxiety, and mood disorders. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18 +) who participated in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from 2015 to 2019 (N = 83,776). MAIN MEASURES: Overall and service specific direct ADHD-attributable medical expenditures. KEY RESULTS: A total of 1206 participants (1.44%) were classified as having ADHD. The estimated incremental costs of ADHD in adults were $2591.06 per person, amounting to $8.29 billion nationally. Significant adjusted incremental costs were prescription medication ($1347.06; 95% CI: $990.69-$1625.93), which accounted for the largest portion of total costs, and office-based visits ($724.86; 95% CI: $177.75-$1528.62). The adjusted incremental costs for outpatient visits, inpatient visits, emergency room visits, and home health visits were not significantly different. Among older adults (31 +), the incremental cost of ADHD was $2623.48, while in young adults (18-30), the incremental cost was $1856.66. CONCLUSIONS: The average medical expenditures for adults with ADHD in the US were substantially higher than those without ADHD and the incremental costs were higher in older adults (31 +) than younger adults (18-30). Future research is needed to understand the increasing trend in ADHD attributable cost.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Gastos em Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Fatores Etários , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/economia , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/terapia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 86(2): 107-112, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34773262

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dyshidrotic eczema (DE) is a common form of eczema affecting the hands, feet, or both areas. To date, there has been little research examining demographics and cost burden associated with this disease. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to characterize the demographics of patients affected and the direct costs of care associated with DE. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis utilizing insurance claim information from IBM MarketScan. Pertinent data including demographic information, healthcare provider type, medications prescribed, and average cost of care were identified using the ICD 10 code L30.1 for DE for the year 2018. RESULTS: In 2018, 34 932 patients filed claims for DE, with 61% female and an average age of 37 years at first diagnosis. DE was mostly seen in employees from the service industry and the manufacturing of durable goods. The total annual direct cost was US $11 738 985. Average annual costs, however, did vary based on type of treating healthcare provider, level of care, and medications prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DE can face an economic burden due to their disease and providers should aim to recognize this disease and its treatments to minimize healthcare costs for patients and improve quality of life.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Eczema Disidrótico/economia , Eczema Disidrótico/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Custos Diretos de Serviços , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Br J Surg ; 108(5): 554-565, 2021 05 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34043776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery can be effective in weight reduction and diabetes remission in some patients, but is expensive. The costs of bariatric surgery in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were explored here. METHODS: Population-based retrospectively gathered data on patients with obesity and T2DM from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (2006-2017) were evaluated. Direct medical costs from baseline up to 60 months were calculated based on the frequency of healthcare service utilization and dispensing of diabetes medication. Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) scores and co-morbidity rates were measured to compare changes in co-morbidities between surgically treated and control groups over 5 years. One-to-five propensity score matching was applied. RESULTS: Overall, 401 eligible surgical patients were matched with 1894 non-surgical patients. Direct medical costs were much higher for surgical than non-surgical patients in the index year (€36 752 and €5788 respectively; P < 0·001) mainly owing to the bariatric procedure. The 5-year cumulative costs incurred by surgical patients were also higher (€54 135 versus €28 603; P < 0·001). Although patients who had bariatric surgery had more visits to outpatient and allied health professionals than those who did not across the 5-year period, surgical patients had shorter length of stay in hospitals than non-surgical patients in year 2-5. Surgical patients had significantly better CCI scores than controls after the baseline measurement (mean 3·82 versus 4·38 at 5 years; P = 0·016). Costs of glucose-lowering medications were similar between two groups, except that surgical patients had significantly lower costs of glucose-lowering medications in year 2 (€973 versus €1395; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery in obese patients with T2DM is expensive, but leads to an improved co-morbidity profile, and reduced length of hospitalization.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/cirurgia , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 41(4): 209-215, 2021 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim was to describe the introduction and operation of a virtual developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) clinic. Our secondary objectives were to provide an overview of DDH referral reasons, treatment outcomes, and adverse events associated with it. METHODS: A prospective observational study involving all patients referred to the virtual DDH clinic was conducted. The clinic consultant delivered with 2 DDH clinical nurse specialists (CNS). The outcomes following virtual review include further virtual review, CNS review, consultant review or discharge. Treatment options include surveillance, brace therapy, or surgery. Efficiency and cost analysis were assessed. RESULTS: Over the 3.5-year study period, 1002 patients were reviewed, of which 743 (74.2%) were female. The median age at time of referral was 7 months, (interquartile range of 5 to 11) with a median time to treatment decision of 9 days. Median waiting times from referral to treatment decision was reduced by over 70%. There were 639 virtual reviews, 186 CNS reviews, and 144 consultant reviews. The direct discharge rate was 24%. One hundred one patients (10%) had dislocated or subluxed hips at initial visit while 26.3% had radiographically normal hips. Over the study period 704 face to face (F2F) visits were avoided. Cost reductions of €170 were achieved per patient, with €588,804 achieved in total. Eighteen parents (1.8%) opted for F2F instead of virtual review. There were no unscheduled rereferrals or recorded adverse events. CONCLUSION: We report the outcomes of the first prospective virtual DDH clinic. This clinic has demonstrated efficiency and cost-effectiveness, without reported adverse outcomes to date. It is an option to provide consultant delivered DDH care, while reducing F2F consults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Luxação Congênita de Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação Congênita de Quadril/terapia , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , Braquetes , Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Enfermeiros Clínicos/organização & administração , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/economia , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Conduta Expectante
5.
Ann Surg ; 271(6): 1056-1064, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30585821

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns of postoperative visits reported for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients. BACKGROUND: Payment for most surgical procedures bundles postoperative visits within a global period of either 10 or 90 days after a procedure. There is concern that payments for some procedures are excessive because the number of postoperative visits provided is less than the number of postoperative visits used to help determine payment. To obtain data to inform this concern, Medicare required select surgeons to report on their postoperative visits starting July 1, 2017. METHODS: We analyzed Medicare FFS claims data from surgeons who billed Medicare for 1 or more of the 293 common procedure codes between July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 in the 9 states where surgeons were required to report postoperative visits. We examined the share of procedures with any reported postoperative visits and the proportion of expected postoperative visits provided. To address concerns about underreporting, we also examined procedures performed by a subset of surgeons actively reporting postoperative visits. RESULTS: We linked 663,681 procedures to 422,432 postoperative visits. The share of procedures with any postoperative visits was higher for procedures with 90-day global periods (70.1%) than for procedures with 10-day global periods (3.7%). The proportions of expected postoperative visits provided for 90-day global and 10-day global periods were 0.37 and 0.04 respectively. Among surgeons actively reporting postoperative visits, the proportions of expected postoperative visits provided were modestly higher (procedures with 90-day global periods=0.46 and 10-day global periods=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of expected postoperative visits that were provided is low. These results support the need for a reassessment of payment for surgical procedures.


Assuntos
Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Humanos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 72(3): 886-895.e1, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31964574

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Trials for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) report lower perioperative mortality and morbidity, but also higher costs compared with open repair. However, few studies have examined the subsequent cost of follow-up evaluations and interventions. Therefore, we present the index and 5-year follow-up costs of EVAR from the Endurant Stent Graft System Post Approval Study. METHODS: From August 2011 to June 2012, 178 patients were enrolled in the Endurant Stent Graft System Post Approval Study de novo cohort and treated with the Medtronic Endurant stent graft system (Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, Calif), of whom 171 (96%) consented for inclusion in the economic analysis and 177 participated in the quality-of-life (QOL) assessment over a 5-year follow-up period. Cost data for the index and follow-up hospitalizations were tabulated directly from hospital bills and categorized by Uniform Billing codes. Surgeon costs were calculated by Current Procedural Terminology codes for each intervention. Current Procedural Terminology codes were also used to calculate imaging and clinic follow-up reimbursement as surrogate to cost based on year-specific Medicare payment rates. Additionally, we compared aneurysm-related versus nonaneurysm-related subsequent hospitalization costs and report EuroQol 5D QOL dimensions. RESULTS: The mean hospital cost per person for the index EVAR was $45,304 (interquartile range [IQR], $25,932-$44,784). The largest contributor to the overall cost was operating room supplies, which accounted for 50% of the total cost at a mean of $22,849 per person. One hundred patients had 233 additional post index admission inpatient admissions; however, only 32 readmissions (14%) were aneurysm related, with a median cost of $13,119 (IQR, $4570-$24,153) compared with a nonaneurysm-related median cost of $6609 (IQR, $1244-$26,466). Additionally, 32 patients were admitted a total of 37 times for additional procedures after index admission, of which 14 (38%) were aneurysm-related. The median cost of hospitalization for aneurysm-related subsequent intervention was $22,023 (IQR, $13,177-$47,752), compared with a median nonaneurysm-related subsequent intervention cost of $19,007 (IQR, $8708-$33,301). After the initial 30-day visit, outpatient follow-up imaging reimbursement averaged $550 per person per year ($475 for computed tomography scans, $75 for the abdomen), whereas annual office visits averaged $107 per person per year, for a total follow-up reimbursement of $657 per person per year. There were no significant differences in the five EuroQol 5D QOL dimensions at each follow-up compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Costs associated with index EVAR are driven primarily by cost of operating room supplies, including graft components. Subsequent admissions are largely not aneurysm related; however, cost of aneurysm-related hospitalizations is higher than for nonaneurysm admissions. These data will serve as a baseline for comparison with open repair and other devices.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/economia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/economia , Prótese Vascular/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Stents/economia , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortografia/economia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Masculino , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
7.
Ann Fam Med ; 18(5): 430-437, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928759

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Total and out-of-pocket visit expenditures for primary care physician visits may affect how primary care is delivered. We determined trends in these expenditures for visits to US primary care physicians. METHODS: Using the 2002-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, we ascertained changes in total and out-of-pocket visit expenditures for primary care visits for Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance. We calculated mean values for each insurer using a generalized linear model and a 2-part model, respectively. RESULTS: Analyses were based on 750,837 primary care visits during 2002-2017. Over time, the proportion of primary care visits associated with private insurance or no insurance decreased, while Medicare- or Medicaid-associated visits increased. The proportion of visits with $0 out-of-pocket expenditure increased, primarily from an increase in $0 private insurance visits. Total expenditure per visit increased for private insurance and Medicare visits, but did not notably change for Medicaid visits. Out-of-pocket expenditures rose primarily from increases in private insurance visits with higher expenditures of this type. Medicare and Medicaid had minimal change in out-of-pocket expenditure per visit. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2002 and 2017, mean total expenditures and out-of-pocket expenditures increased for primary care visits, but at notably lower rates than those previously documented for emergency department visits. A rise in total expenditure per visit was identified for private insurance and Medicare, but not for Medicaid. Out-of-pocket expenditures increased marginally related to changes in out-of-pocket expenditures for private insurance visits. We would expect increasing difficulty with primary care physician access, particularly for Medicaid patients, if the current trends continue.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Seguro Saúde/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos
8.
Vasc Med ; 25(2): 150-156, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31804152

RESUMO

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis in adults. However, comprehensive analyses of the healthcare burden are still scarce. The aim of the study is to report the healthcare burden and cost of illness of GCA in the Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG) region of Italy, based on a data linkage analysis. To this end, a retrospective study was conducted through the integration of many administrative health databases of the FVG region as the source of information. Cases were identified from two verified, partially overlapping sources (the rare disease registry and medical exemption database). From 2001 to 2017, 208 patients with GCA were registered. The prevalence of GCA in the population aged ⩾ 45 years as of December 31, 2017 was 27.2/100,000 inhabitants (95% CI 23.5-31.4). The mean time of observation was 4.5 ± 3.6 years. A total of 3182 visits (338 per 100 patient-years) was recorded. The most frequent specialty visits were rheumatology (n = 610, 19.2%), followed by internal medicine (n = 564, 17.7%). A total of 287 hospitalizations (30 per 100 patient-years) were reported. A total of 13,043 prescriptions (1386 per 100 patient-years) were registered. More than half of the patients were prescribed an immunosuppressive agent. The overall estimated direct healthcare cost was €2,234,070, corresponding to €2374 per patient-year. Overall, GCA is a rare disease which implies a high healthcare cost.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Arterite de Células Gigantes/economia , Arterite de Células Gigantes/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Imunossupressores/economia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Registro Médico Coordenado , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Arterite de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Arterite de Células Gigantes/epidemiologia , Nível de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Medicina Interna/economia , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Prevalência , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reumatologia/economia , Fatores de Tempo
9.
J Asthma ; 57(12): 1354-1364, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31386600

RESUMO

Objective: The comparative effectiveness of low-dose budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) versus oral montelukast (MON) in managing asthma control among children with mild asthma was assessed in Korea.Methods: Claims from Korea's national health insurance database for children (2-17 years) with mild asthma (GINA 1 or 2) who initiated BIS or MON during 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Pre- and post-index windows were 1 year each. Adherence, persistency, asthma control, asthma-related health-care resource utilization, and costs were evaluated using unadjusted descriptive statistics and propensity score-matched regression analyses.Results: The number of children identified was 26,052 for unmatched (n = 1,221 BIS; n = 24,831 MON) and 2,290 for matched populations (n = 1,145 per cohort). Medication adherence, measured by proportion of days covered, was low for both cohorts but significantly higher for MON versus BIS (13.8% vs. 4.5%; p < .001). Time to loss of persistency was longer for MON versus BIS (82.3 vs. 78.4 days, respectively; p < .001). Mean number of post-index asthma-related office visits was 6.6 for BIS versus 8.3 for MON (p < .001). However, a greater proportion of patients in the BIS cohort had an asthma exacerbation-related office visit than the MON cohort (78.3% vs. 56.1%; p < .001). Asthma-related total health-care costs were higher with MON versus BIS (₩ 190,185 vs. ₩ 167,432, respectively; p < .001), likely driven by higher pharmaceutical costs associated with MON (₩ 69,113 vs. ₩ 49,225; p < .001).Conclusions: Montelukast patients had better adherence, a longer time to loss of persistency, and were less likely to experience an exacerbation-related office visit in the post-index period than BIS patients.


Assuntos
Acetatos/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Budesonida/administração & dosagem , Ciclopropanos/administração & dosagem , Quinolinas/administração & dosagem , Sulfetos/administração & dosagem , Acetatos/economia , Adolescente , Asma/economia , Budesonida/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ciclopropanos/economia , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Quinolinas/economia , República da Coreia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sulfetos/economia , Suspensões , Exacerbação dos Sintomas , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Prenat Diagn ; 40(10): 1265-1271, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441820

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Advances in prenatal genetics place additional challenges as patients must receive information about a growing array of screening and testing options. This raises concerns about how to achieve a shared decision-making process that prepares patients to make an informed decision about their choices about prenatal genetic screening and testing options, calling for a reconsideration of how healthcare providers approach the first prenatal visit. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 40 pregnant women to identify components of decision-making regarding prenatal genetic screens and tests at this visit. Analysis was approached using grounded theory. RESULTS: Participants brought distinct notions of risk to the visit, including skewed perceptions of baseline risk for a fetal genetic condition and the implications of screening and testing. Participants were very concerned about financial considerations associated with these options, ranking out-of-pocket costs on par with medical considerations. Participants noted diverging priorities at the first visit from those of their healthcare provider, leading to barriers to shared decision-making regarding screening and testing during this visit. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to determine how to restructure the initiation of prenatal care in a way that best positions patients to make informed decisions about prenatal genetic screens and tests.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Testes Genéticos , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/análise , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/sangue , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/economia , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Testes Genéticos/normas , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Programas de Rastreamento/psicologia , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Testes para Triagem do Soro Materno/economia , Testes para Triagem do Soro Materno/psicologia , Testes para Triagem do Soro Materno/normas , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Percepção , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/economia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/organização & administração , Cuidado Pré-Natal/psicologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/normas , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/economia , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/psicologia , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/normas , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
11.
Ann Intern Med ; 170(9_Suppl): S62-S69, 2019 05 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31060059

RESUMO

Background: Studies show that patients want to engage in cost-of-care conversations and factor costs into the formulation of care plans. Low-income patients are particularly likely to defer care because of costs, suggesting that cost-of-care conversations may be an important factor in health equity. Little guidance is available to clinicians and health systems for how to integrate effective cost-of-care conversations into clinical practice or to address specific cost needs of low-income patients. Objective: To develop a framework and tool to assist cost-of-care conversations with low-income patients during prenatal care. Design: A qualitative study using human-centered design methods. Setting: University medical center-based obstetrics-gynecology (ob-gyn) practice. Participants: 20 pregnant or recently postpartum women, 16 clinicians, and 8 support and executive staff. Results: Pregnant women accumulate substantial indirect costs that interfere with treatment adherence and stress patients and their relationships. Frequency and duration of appointments are primary drivers of indirect costs; the burden is exacerbated by not knowing these costs in advance and disproportionately affects low-income patients. Working with ob-gyn clinicians, staff, and patients, a paper-based tool was developed to help patients forecast treatment demands and indirect costs, and to help clinicians introduce and standardize cost conversations. Limitations: Data were collected from a small number of stakeholders in a single clinical setting that may not be generalizable to other settings. The tool has not been tested for effects on adherence or clinical outcomes. Conclusion: A communication tool that helps pregnant patients understand their care plan and anticipate indirect costs can promote cost-of-care conversations between clinicians and low-income patients. Primary Funding Source: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Gastos em Saúde , Relações Médico-Paciente , Pobreza , Cuidado Pré-Natal/economia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Participação dos Interessados , Estados Unidos
12.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(6): 102733, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32971408

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate perioperative costs of canal wall-down (CWD) mastoidectomy as an initial surgery compared to revision surgery following initial canal wall-up (CWU) mastoidectomy. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent CWD mastoidectomy for chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma at a tertiary referral center. Patients were divided into groups that had previous CWU surgery and were undergoing revision CWD and those that were having an initial CWD mastoidectomy. Cost variables including previous surgeries, imaging costs, audiometric testing, and post-operative visits were compared between the two groups using t-test analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference with regards to the cost of post-operative visits, peri-operative imaging, or revision surgeries between the two groups. Hearing outcomes based on mean speech reception threshold (SRT) were not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.087). There was a significant difference in total cost with the revision group having a higher mean cost by $6967.84, most of which was accounted for by the difference in the cost of the previous surgeries of $6488.53. CONCLUSIONS: The revision CWD surgery group had increased total cost that could be attributed to the cost of previous surgery. Increased peri-operative cost was not noted with the initial CWD surgery group for any individual variables examined. Initial CWD mastoidectomy should be considered in the proper patient population to help decrease healthcare costs.


Assuntos
Custos e Análise de Custo , Mastoidectomia/economia , Mastoidectomia/métodos , Otite Média/economia , Otite Média/cirurgia , Período Perioperatório , Reoperação/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Audiometria/economia , Colesteatoma/complicações , Doença Crônica , Redução de Custos/economia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Otite Média/complicações , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 35(1): e156-e166, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31709628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases associated with diabetes threaten the health of Chinese people and contribute to poverty. METHODS: Medical service utilization records of 78 124 visits by outpatients with diabetes to medical institutions in China's eastern region between 2013 and 2015 were randomly selected from the Medical Insurance Department (MID) database. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the average total per-visit, out-of-pocket (OOP), and medical insurance (MI) fund expenses between variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify possible risk factors affecting total per-visit medical expenses. RESULTS: Average total per-visit medical expenses were 244.59, 285.56, and 435.33 yuan in primary, secondary, and tertiary medical institutions, respectively. Significant differences were found for average total per-visit medical expenses by year of visit, age, type of medical insurance, and levels of medical institutions. No significant differences were found for average total per-visit medical expenses by gender. CONCLUSION: The functions of medical networks at all levels should be clarified and the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI) reimbursement ratio improved to ensure equal access to medical services irrespective of medical insurance type. Patients with chronic diseases should be encouraged to visit primary medical institutions to reduce medical expenses.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
14.
Crit Care Med ; 47(6): 749-756, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30889026

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Use of intensive care is increasing in the United States and may be associated with high financial burden on patients and their families near the end of life. Our objective was to estimate out-of-pocket costs in the last year of life for individuals who required intensive care in the months prior to death and examine how these costs vary by insurance coverage. DESIGN: Observational cohort study using seven waves of post-death interview data (2002-2014). PARTICIPANTS: Decedents (n = 2,909) who spent time in the ICU at some point between their last interview and death. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two-part models were used to estimate out-of-pocket costs for direct medical care and health-related services by type of care and insurance coverage. Decedents with only traditional Medicare fee-for-service coverage have the highest out-of-pocket spending in the last year of life, estimated at $12,668 (95% CI, $9,744-15,592), second to only the uninsured. Medicare Advantage and private insurance provide slightly more comprehensive coverage. Individuals who spend-down to Medicaid coverage have 4× the out-of-pocket spending as those continuously on Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Across all categories of insurance coverage, out-of-pocket spending in the last 12 months of life is high and represents a significant portion of assets for many patients requiring intensive care and their families. Medicare fee-for-service alone does not insulate individuals from the financial burden of high-intensity care, due to lack of an out-of-pocket maximum and a relatively high co-payment for hospitalizations. Medicaid plays an important role in the social safety net, providing the most complete hospital coverage of all the insurance groups, as well as significantly financing long-term care.


Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/economia , Hospitais , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Estados Unidos
15.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(10): 2260-2263, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31243711

RESUMO

Primary care is the foundation of the health care system and the basis for new payment and delivery reforms in the USA. Yet since 2008, primary care visit rates dropped by 6-25% across a range of populations in five sources of national survey and administrative data. We hypothesize three likely mechanisms behind the decline: decreases in patients' ability, need, or desire to seek primary care; changes in primary care practice such as greater use of teams and non-face-to-face care; and replacement of in-person primary care visits with alternatives such as specialist, retail clinic, and commercial telemedicine visits. These mechanisms require further investigation. In the meantime, the trend prompts us to optimize the primary care visit and embrace the growth of alternatives while preserving the fundamental benefits of primary care.


Assuntos
Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Estados Unidos
16.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 85(11): 2464-2478, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31486099

RESUMO

AIMS: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesise the evidence relating to medication non-adherence and its association with health outcomes in people aged ≥50 years. METHODS: Seven databases were searched up to February 2019 for observational studies that measured medication (non-)adherence as a predictor of the following health outcomes in adults aged ≥50 years: healthcare utilisation (hospitalisation, emergency department visits, outpatient visits and general practitioner visits), mortality, adverse clinical events and quality of life. Screening and quality assessment using validated criteria were completed by 2 reviewers independently. Random effects models were used to generate pooled estimates of association using adjusted study results. The full methodological approach was published on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42017077264). RESULTS: Sixty-six studies were identified for qualitative synthesis, with 11 of these studies eligible for meta-analyses. A meta-analysis including 3 studies measuring medication non-adherence in adults aged ≥55 years showed a significant association with all-cause hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 1.21). A meta-analysis including 2 studies showed that medication non-adherence was not significantly associated with an emergency department visit (adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.90, 1.22). Good adherence was associated with a 21% reduction in long-term mortality risk in comparison to medication non-adherence (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.63, 0.98). CONCLUSION: Medication non-adherence may be significantly associated with all-cause hospitalisation and mortality in older people. Medication adherence should be monitored and addressed in this cohort to minimise hospitalisation, improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.


Assuntos
Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Multimorbidade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 19(1): 69, 2019 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31064345

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS-C) is a complex disorder with gastrointestinal and nervous system components. The study aim was to assess the economic burden of moderate to severe IBS-C in six European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the UK). METHODS: An observational, one year retrospective-prospective (6 months each) study of patients diagnosed in the last five years with IBS-C (Rome III criteria) and moderate to severe disease at inclusion (IBS Symptom Severity Scale score ≥ 175). The primary objective was to assess the direct cost to European healthcare systems. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-five patients were included, 60% (range: 43.1-78.8%) suffered from severe IBS-C. During follow-up 11.1-24.0% of patients had a hospitalisation/emergency room (ER) visit, median stay range: 1.5-12.0 days and 41.1-90.4% took prescription drugs for IBS-C. 21.4-50.8% of employed patients took sick leave (mean: 11.6-64.1 days). The mean annual direct cost to the healthcare systems was €937.1- €2108.0. The total direct cost (combined costs to healthcare systems and patient) for IBS-C was €1421.7-€2487.1. CONCLUSIONS: IBS-C is not a life-threatening condition; however, it has large impact on healthcare systems and society. Direct and indirect costs for moderate to severe IBS-C were high with the largest direct cost driver being hospitalisations/ER visits.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/complicações , Constipação Intestinal/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/complicações , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Custos de Medicamentos , Europa (Continente) , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Licença Médica/economia
18.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 99(3): 263-267, 2019 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30521060

RESUMO

Atopic eczema (AE) is one of the most common non-communicable inflammatory skin diseases, and has a huge socioeconomic impact. Studies on the everyday economic impact of AE on patients, however, are limited. To estimate the annual extra out-of-pocket spending due to AE among patients in Europe, a cross-sectional study using computer-assisted phone interviewing of patients with AE was performed in 9 European countries. A total of 1,189 patients (56% women) with AE, who were either eligible for, or on, systemic treatment, participated in the study between October 2017 and March 2018. Mean extra spending on everyday necessities was €927 per patient per year for healthcare expenses, and this figure was slightly, but not statistically significantly, influenced by the severity of AE. Emollients and moisturizers accounted for the highest monthly costs, followed by medication that was not reimbursed, doctors' and hospital costs. AE-related out-of-pocket costs pose a substantial burden for affected individuals, are higher than in other chronic diseases, and should always be included in economic assessments of the impact of this disease.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/economia , Dermatite Atópica/terapia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Gastos em Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Fototerapia/economia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Custos de Medicamentos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia
19.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 99(4): 393-399, 2019 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30628631

RESUMO

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disorder that imposes a substantial economic burden. We conducted a cost-utility analysis from a Swedish healthcare payers perspective using a decision-tree model with a 12-week time horizon. Patients with psoriasis vulgaris could have two 4-week cycles of topical treatment with calcipotriol 50 µg/g and betamethasone 0.5 mg/g as dipropionate (Cal/BD) foam or Cal/BD ointment before progressing to phototherapy/methotrexate. In the base-case analysis, Cal/BD foam dominated over Cal/BD ointment. The increased efficacy of Cal/BD foam resulted in fewer consultations and a decreased risk of progressing to phototherapy/methotrexate. Although Cal/BD foam costs more than Cal/BD ointment, this was offset by lower costs for phototherapy/methotrexate or consultation visits. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the base-case net monetary benefit was robust to plausible variations in key parameters. In conclusion, Cal/BD foam was predicted to be more cost-effective than Cal/BD ointment in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris.


Assuntos
Betametasona/análogos & derivados , Calcitriol/análogos & derivados , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/economia , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/economia , Administração Cutânea , Aerossóis , Betametasona/administração & dosagem , Betametasona/efeitos adversos , Betametasona/economia , Calcitriol/administração & dosagem , Calcitriol/efeitos adversos , Calcitriol/economia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Árvores de Decisões , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Progressão da Doença , Composição de Medicamentos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Pomadas , Fototerapia/economia , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Suécia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 58: 83-90, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30684609

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As patient care is being increasingly transitioned out of the hospital and into the outpatient setting, there is a growing interest in developing office-based angiography suites, that is, office-based laboratories. Office-based care has been associated with increased efficiency and greater patient satisfaction, with substantially higher reimbursement directly to the physicians providing care. Prior studies have demonstrated a shift of revascularization procedures to office-based laboratories with a concomitant increase in atherectomy use, a procedure with disproportionately high reimbursement in comparison to other peripheral revascularization techniques. We sought to determine provider trends in endovascular procedure volume, settings, and shifts in practice over time, specific to atherectomy. METHODS: Using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use Files from 2013 to 2015, we identified providers who performed diagnostic angiography (DA), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), stent placement (stent), and atherectomy, and procedures were aggregated at the provider level. Trends in procedures performed in office-based laboratory and facility-based settings were analyzed. Atherectomy was specifically analyzed using the total number and proportion of office-based laboratory procedures, and providers were stratified into quintiles by case volume. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2015, 5,298 providers were identified. Over this time period, the number of providers performing atherectomy increased 25.7%, with the highest quintile of atherectomy providers performing an average of 263 cases (range 109-1,455). The proportion of physicians who performed atherectomy only in the office increased from 39.8% to 50.7% from 2013 to 2015, whereas only 20.8% of physicians who performed DA, PTA, or stent in 2015 did so only in an office-based laboratory. Of the physicians with the highest atherectomy volume, 77.8% operated only in the office in 2015, and these physicians increased their atherectomy volume to 114.1% during the study period. Of those physicians who transitioned to a solely office-based laboratory practice over the study period, atherectomy volume increased 63.4%, which was disproportionate compared with the growth of their DA, PTA, and stent volume. CONCLUSIONS: Over this short study period, a rapid shift into the office setting for peripheral intervention occurred, with a concomitant increase in atherectomy volume that was disproportionate to the increase in other peripheral interventions. This increase in office-based laboratory atherectomy occurred in the setting of increased reimbursement for the procedure and despite a lack of data supporting superiority over PTA/stent.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/tendências , Aterectomia/tendências , Visita a Consultório Médico/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Angiografia/tendências , Angioplastia/instrumentação , Angioplastia/tendências , Aterectomia/economia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./tendências , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Stents/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA