Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Noninvasive Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Circulating Tumor Cells.
Xu, Lei; Mao, Xueying; Grey, Alistair; Scandura, Glenda; Guo, Tianyu; Burke, Edwina; Marzec, Jacek; Abdu, Semah; Stankiewicz, Elzbieta; Davies, Caitlin R; Rajan, Prabhakar; Tipples, Karen; Hines, John; Chan, Pui Ying; Campbell, Diane; Wilkinson, Karen; Kudahetti, Sakunthala; Shamash, Jonathan; Oliver, Tim; Berney, Daniel; Shaw, Greg; Lu, Yong-Jie.
Affiliation
  • Xu L; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Mao X; Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Grey A; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Scandura G; Department of Urology, Barts Health National Health Service, United Kingdom.
  • Guo T; Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.
  • Burke E; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
  • Marzec J; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Abdu S; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Stankiewicz E; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Davies CR; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Rajan P; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Tipples K; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Hines J; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Chan PY; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
  • Campbell D; Department of Urology, Barts Health National Health Service, United Kingdom.
  • Wilkinson K; Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.
  • Kudahetti S; Department of Urology, University College London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Shamash J; Department of Urology, Barts Health National Health Service, United Kingdom.
  • Oliver T; Department of Urology, Barts Health National Health Service, United Kingdom.
  • Berney D; Department of Urology, University College London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Shaw G; Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health National Health Service, United Kingdom.
  • Lu YJ; Department of Urology, Barts Health National Health Service, United Kingdom.
J Urol ; 203(1): 73-82, 2020 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31389764
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Prostate specific antigen testing results in unnecessary biopsy and over diagnosis with consequent overtreatment. Tissue biopsy is an invasive procedure associated with significant morbidity. More accurate noninvasive or minimally invasive diagnostic approaches should be developed to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsy and over diagnosis. We investigated the potential of using circulating tumor cell analysis in cancer diagnosis, particularly to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in prebiopsy cases. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We enrolled 155 treatment naïve patients with prostate cancer and 98 before biopsy for circulating tumor cell enumeration. RNA was extracted from circulating tumor cells of 184 patients for gene expression analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman rank tests, multivariate logistic regression and the random forest method were applied to assess the association of circulating tumor cells with aggressive prostate cancer.

RESULTS:

Of patients with localized prostate cancer 54% were scored as having positive circulating tumor cells, which was associated with a higher Gleason score (p=0.0003), risk group (p <0.0001) and clinically significant prostate cancer (p <0.0001). In the prebiopsy group a positive circulating tumor cell score combined with prostate specific antigen predicted clinically significant prostate cancer (AUC 0.869). A 12-gene panel prognostic for clinically significant prostate cancer was also identified. When combining the prostate specific antigen level, the circulating tumor cell score and the 12-gene panel, the AUC of clinically significant prostate cancer prediction was 0.927. Adding those data to cases with available multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging data significantly increased prediction accuracy (AUC 0.936 vs 0.629).

CONCLUSIONS:

Circulating tumor cell analysis has the potential to significantly improve patient stratification by prostate specific antigen and/or multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for biopsy and treatment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Neoplastic Cells, Circulating Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Urol Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Prostatic Neoplasms / Neoplastic Cells, Circulating Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Urol Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom