Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical management patterns of advanced and metastatic gastro-oesophageal carcinoma after fluoropyrimidine/platinum treatment in France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom.
Brown, Jacqueline; Liepa, Astra M; Bapat, Bela; Madhwani, Shweta; Lorenzen, Sylvie; García-Foncillas, Jesús; Candrilli, Sean D; Kaye, James A.
Affiliation
  • Brown J; Eli Lilly and Company, Surrey, UK.
  • Liepa AM; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Bapat B; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Madhwani S; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Lorenzen S; Department of hematology and oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, München, Germany.
  • García-Foncillas J; Cancer Institute, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain.
  • Candrilli SD; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Kaye JA; RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, MA, USA.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) ; 29(2): e13213, 2020 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883156
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To describe treatment patterns and resource utilisation in France, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom (UK) in patients with unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), who failed first-line fluoropyrimidine/platinum treatment.

METHODS:

Treating physicians completed a web-based chart review (2013-2015). Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old; had unresectable locally advanced and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma including the gastro-oesophageal junction; received first-line fluoropyrimidine/platinum-based therapy; and had ≥ 3 months of follow-up after first-line discontinuation. Data were summarised descriptively for each country.

RESULTS:

There were n = 201 patients in France, n = 202 in Germany, n = 208 in Spain and n = 200 in the UK whose charts were reviewed. Percentages of patients receiving second-line therapy were 55% (France), 48% (Germany), 54% (Spain) and 29% (UK). At the start of second-line therapy, most patients had an ECOG performance status of 1 (range 0-3). Second-line therapy was primarily monotherapy, but agents used varied within and across countries. Supportive care use and resource utilisation were frequent whether receiving additional therapy or not; >60% patients had clinic visits unrelated to chemotherapy administration, and > 30% has ≥ 1 hospital admission.

CONCLUSIONS:

For the time of study, established GEA treatment guidelines were generally followed. However, therapies varied widely in the second-line setting.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Stomach Neoplasms / Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Adenocarcinoma / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Guideline Adherence / Esophagogastric Junction Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Stomach Neoplasms / Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Adenocarcinoma / Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Guideline Adherence / Esophagogastric Junction Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM / NEOPLASIAS Year: 2020 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom