Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies.
Lim, Mi Young; Park, Yong-Soo; Kim, Jung-Ha; Nam, Young-Do.
Affiliation
  • Lim MY; Research Group of Healthcare, Korea Food Research Institute, Jeollabuk-do, 55365, Republic of Korea.
  • Park YS; Food Processing Support Team, Korea Food Research Institute, Jeollabuk-do, 55365, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JH; Department of Family Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, 06973, Republic of Korea.
  • Nam YD; Research Group of Healthcare, Korea Food Research Institute, Jeollabuk-do, 55365, Republic of Korea. youngdo98@kfri.re.kr.
BMC Microbiol ; 20(1): 212, 2020 07 17.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32680572
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

DNA extraction is an important factor influencing the microbiome profile in fecal samples. Considering that the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit, one of the most commonly used DNA extraction kits, is no longer manufactured, this study aimed to investigate whether a new commercially available kit, the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, yields comparable microbiome profiles with those previously obtained using the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit.

RESULTS:

We extracted DNA from fecal samples of 10 individuals using three protocols (protocol P of the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit, and protocols SB and S of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit with and without an additional bead-beating step, respectively) in triplicate. Ninety extracted DNA samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. DNA quality measured by 260/280 absorbance ratios was found to be optimal in protocol P. Additionally, the DNA quantity and microbiome diversity obtained using protocol P were significantly higher than those of protocol S, however, did not differ significantly from those of protocol SB. Based on the overall microbiome profiles, variations between protocol P and protocol SB or S were significantly less than between-individual variations. Furthermore, most genera were not differentially abundant in protocol P compared to the other protocols, and the number of differentially abundant genera, as well as the degree of fold-changes were smaller between protocols P and SB than between protocols P and S.

CONCLUSIONS:

The QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit exhibited microbiome analysis results that were comparable with those of the QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit with a bead-beating step. These results will prove useful for researchers investigating the gut microbiome in selecting an alternative protocol to the widely used but discontinued kit.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bacteria / RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Sequence Analysis, DNA Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Microbiol Journal subject: MICROBIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bacteria / RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Sequence Analysis, DNA Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Microbiol Journal subject: MICROBIOLOGIA Year: 2020 Type: Article