Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prefrontal feature representations drive memory recall.
Yadav, Nakul; Noble, Chelsea; Niemeyer, James E; Terceros, Andrea; Victor, Jonathan; Liston, Conor; Rajasethupathy, Priyamvada.
Affiliation
  • Yadav N; Laboratory of Neural Dynamics and Cognition, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Noble C; Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Niemeyer JE; Laboratory of Neural Dynamics and Cognition, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Terceros A; Laboratory of Neural Dynamics and Cognition, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Victor J; Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Liston C; Laboratory of Neural Dynamics and Cognition, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Rajasethupathy P; Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Nature ; 608(7921): 153-160, 2022 08.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35831504
ABSTRACT
Memory formation involves binding of contextual features into a unitary representation1-4, whereas memory recall can occur using partial combinations of these contextual features. The neural basis underlying the relationship between a contextual memory and its constituent features is not well understood; in particular, where features are represented in the brain and how they drive recall. Here, to gain insight into this question, we developed a behavioural task in which mice use features to recall an associated contextual memory. We performed longitudinal imaging in hippocampus as mice performed this task and identified robust representations of global context but not of individual features. To identify putative brain regions that provide feature inputs to hippocampus, we inhibited cortical afferents while imaging hippocampus during behaviour. We found that whereas inhibition of entorhinal cortex led to broad silencing of hippocampus, inhibition of prefrontal anterior cingulate led to a highly specific silencing of context neurons and deficits in feature-based recall. We next developed a preparation for simultaneous imaging of anterior cingulate and hippocampus during behaviour, which revealed robust population-level representation of features in anterior cingulate, that lag hippocampus context representations during training but dynamically reorganize to lead and target recruitment of context ensembles in hippocampus during recall. Together, we provide the first mechanistic insights into where contextual features are represented in the brain, how they emerge, and how they access long-range episodic representations to drive memory recall.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mental Recall / Gyrus Cinguli / Hippocampus / Models, Neurological Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Nature Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mental Recall / Gyrus Cinguli / Hippocampus / Models, Neurological Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Nature Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States