Interpretation of Lung Cancer Plasma EGFR Mutation Tests in the Clinical Setting.
Am J Clin Pathol
; 159(2): 181-191, 2023 02 01.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-36573768
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
Comprehensive data synthesis of the clinical parameters that affect plasma EGFR mutation test results in non-small cell lung carcinoma is lacking. Although individual studies have suggested a variety of patient characteristics that can affect diagnostic accuracy, no unified conclusion has been reached.METHODS:
We analyzed 170 plasma EGFR mutation tests performed between 2015 and 2021 at our institution and carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify clinical and imaging features that correlate with plasma EGFR mutation test sensitivity.RESULTS:
Data synthesis from 14 studies of 2,576 patients revealed that patients with stage IV disease had a significantly lower false-negative rate than those with stage I through III disease. For our institutional cohort, which consisted of 75 paired plasma and tissue tests that were assessable for diagnostic accuracy, the overall sensitivity was 70.59% (95% confidence interval, 56.17%-82.51%). Patients who had distant metastases and more suspicious lymph nodes on imaging findings correlated with a low false-negative rate.CONCLUSIONS:
While interpreting plasma EGFR mutation results, extra caution should be exercised for patients with early-stage, localized disease to accommodate the possibility of false-negative results. These meta-analyses and clinical data may enable clinicians to make evidence-based judgments for individual patients.Key words
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/
Lung Neoplasms
Type of study:
Prognostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Limits:
Humans
Language:
En
Journal:
Am J Clin Pathol
Year:
2023
Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Hong Kong