Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[UROLOGICAL CONSULT FOR PATIENT WITH RENAL COLIC BEFORE DISCHARGE FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT (ED): THE OUTCOME EFFECT ON SPONTANEOUS STONE EXPULSION AND RE-VISIT TO ED].
Shemesh, Amit; Shalom, Ben; Hen, Eyal; Barkai, Eyal; Atamna, Fahed; Abu Nijmeh, Haitham; Cooper, Amir; Raz, Orit.
Affiliation
  • Shemesh A; Department of Urology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
  • Shalom B; Department of Urology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
  • Hen E; Department of Urology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
  • Barkai E; Department of Urology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
  • Atamna F; Department of Urology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
  • Abu Nijmeh H; Department of Urology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
  • Cooper A; Department of Urology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
  • Raz O; Department of Urology, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel.
Harefuah ; 161(12): 751-756, 2022 Dec.
Article in He | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36916114
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Renal colic due to ureterolithiasis is a frequent reason for visiting the emergency departments (ED). The majority of those patients are managed non-surgically and will experience a spontaneous stone expulsion. The ED at our hospital works as a unified department, which is a well-established practice in Europe and North America.

AIMS:

Assess the outcome of urological consultation in the ED for patients with urolithiasis.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort examined 402 ureterolithiasis patients proven by abdominal CT-scan at the ED. Patients were divided into 3 groups Group1 patients were discharged after evaluation by ED physician alone. In Group 2 patients were discharged after being evaluated by an ED physician and urologist. In Group 3 patients who were admitted to the Urology Department. Clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters were examined as well as patients'

outcomes:

spontaneous stone expulsion, re-visit to ED and surgical intervention.

RESULTS:

There were not significant differences between group 1 and 2 regarding age, stone size, stone location, WBC levels, stone expulsion rate or surgical intervention. Group 1 had a significant higher rate of ED re-visits compared with group 2 (79 (43.3%) vs. 12 (17.9%). p=0.0002). Group 3 had significantly higher stone size, creatinine levels, inflammatory markers, proximal stone location and surgical interventions.

CONCLUSIONS:

ED working as a unified department provides excellent management to patients with renal colic due to ureterolithiasis, with a high rate of spontaneous stone expulsion and urologist referral to admissions and surgical interventions. Nevertheless, urological consultation significantly decreases re-visits to ED.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ureterolithiasis / Renal Colic Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: He Journal: Harefuah Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Israel
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ureterolithiasis / Renal Colic Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: He Journal: Harefuah Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: Israel