Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
All human social groups are human, but some are more human than others: A comprehensive investigation of the implicit association of "Human" to US racial/ethnic groups.
Morehouse, Kirsten N; Maddox, Keith; Banaji, Mahzarin R.
Affiliation
  • Morehouse KN; Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
  • Maddox K; Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
  • Banaji MR; Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 120(22): e2300995120, 2023 05 30.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37216551
ABSTRACT
All human groups are equally human, but are they automatically represented as such? Harnessing data from 61,377 participants across 13 experiments (six primary and seven supplemental), a sharp dissociation between implicit and explicit measures emerged. Despite explicitly affirming the equal humanity of all racial/ethnic groups, White participants consistently associated Human (relative to Animal) more with White than Black, Hispanic, and Asian groups on Implicit Association Tests (IATs; experiments 1-4). This effect emerged across diverse representations of Animal that varied in valence (pets, farm animals, wild animals, and vermin; experiments 1-2). Non-White participants showed no such Human=Own Group bias (e.g., Black participants on a White-Black/Human-Animal IAT). However, when the test included two outgroups (e.g., Asian participants on a White-Black/Human-Animal IAT), non-White participants displayed Human=White associations. The overall effect was largely invariant across demographic variations in age, religion, and education but did vary by political ideology and gender, with self-identified conservatives and men displaying stronger Human=White associations (experiment 3). Using a variance decomposition method, experiment 4 showed that the Human=White effect cannot be attributed to valence alone; the semantic meaning of Human and Animal accounted for a unique proportion of variance. Similarly, the effect persisted even when Human was contrasted with positive attributes (e.g., God, Gods, and Dessert; experiment 5a). Experiments 5a-b clarified the primacy of Human=White rather than Animal=Black associations. Together, these experiments document a factually erroneous but robust Human=Own Group implicit stereotype among US White participants (and globally), with suggestive evidence of its presence in other socially dominant groups.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethnicity / Racial Groups / Racism / Social Group Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ethnicity / Racial Groups / Racism / Social Group Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Year: 2023 Type: Article