Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the renal function of patients undergoing radical cystectomy.
Ho, Matthew D; Black, Anna J; Zargar, Homayoun; Fairey, Adrian S; Mertens, Laura S; Dinney, Colin P; Mir, Maria C; Krabbe, Laura-Maria; Cookson, Michael S; Jacobsen, Niels-Erik; Montgomery, Jeffrey S; Yu, Evan Y; Xylinas, Evanguelos; Kassouf, Wassim; Dall'Era, Marc A; Vasdev, Nikhil; Sridhar, Srikala S; McGrath, John S; Aning, Jonathan; Holzbeierlein, Jeff M; Thorpe, Andrew C; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Wright, Jonathan L; Morgan, Todd M; Bivalacqua, Trinity J; North, Scott; Barocas, Daniel A; Lotan, Yair; Grivas, Petros; Stephenson, Andrew J; Shah, Jay B; van Rhijn, Bas W; Daneshmand, Siamak; Spiess, Philippe E; Black, Peter C.
Affiliation
  • Ho MD; Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Black AJ; Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Zargar H; Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Fairey AS; Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Mertens LS; USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Dinney CP; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Mir MC; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Krabbe LM; Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Cookson MS; Department of Urology, Fundacio Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Jacobsen NE; Department of Urology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Montgomery JS; Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
  • Yu EY; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Xylinas E; Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  • Kassouf W; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Dall'Era MA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States.
  • Vasdev N; Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Sridhar SS; Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States.
  • McGrath JS; Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
  • Aning J; Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
  • Holzbeierlein JM; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Thorpe AC; Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  • Shariat SF; Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
  • Wright JL; Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  • Morgan TM; Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
  • Bivalacqua TJ; Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
  • North S; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States.
  • Barocas DA; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Lotan Y; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Grivas P; Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States.
  • Stephenson AJ; Department of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Shah JB; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • van Rhijn BW; Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
  • Daneshmand S; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
  • Spiess PE; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Black PC; Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 17(10): 301-309, 2023 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37851909
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Cisplatin, however, can induce renal toxicity. Furthermore, RC is an independent risk factor for renal injury, with decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of up to 6 mL/min/1.73 m2 reported at one year postoperatively. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of cisplatin-based NAC and RC on the renal function of patients undergoing both.

METHODS:

We analyzed a multicenter database of patients with MIBC, all of whom received cisplatin-based NAC prior to RC. eGFR values were collected at time points T1 (before NAC), T2 (after NAC but before RC), and T3 (one year post-RC). eGFR and proportion of patients with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage ≥3) were compared between these time points. As all patients in this dataset had received NAC, we identified a retrospective cohort of patients from one institution who had undergone RC during the same time period without NAC for context.

RESULTS:

We identified 234 patients with available renal function data. From T1 to T3, there was a mean decline in eGFR of 17% (13 mL/min/1.73 m2) in the NAC cohort and an increase in proportion of patients with stage ≥3 CKD from 27% to 50%. The parallel cohort of patients who did not receive NAC was comprised of 236 patients. The mean baseline eGFR in this cohort was lower than in the NAC cohort (66 vs. 75 mL/min/1.73 m2). The mean eGFR decline in this non-NAC cohort from T1 to T3 was 6% (4 mL/min/1.73 m2), and the proportion of those with stage ≥3 CKD increased from 37% to 51%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Administration of NAC prior to RC was associated with a 17% decline in eGFR and a nearly doubled incidence of stage ≥3 CKD at one year after RC. Patients who underwent RC without NAC had a higher rate of stage ≥3 CKD at baseline but appeared to have less renal function loss at one year.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada