Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.
Boal, Matthew W E; Anastasiou, Dimitrios; Tesfai, Freweini; Ghamrawi, Walaa; Mazomenos, Evangelos; Curtis, Nathan; Collins, Justin W; Sridhar, Ashwin; Kelly, John; Stoyanov, Danail; Francis, Nader K.
Affiliation
  • Boal MWE; The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks' Hospital, London, UK.
  • Anastasiou D; Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK.
  • Tesfai F; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK.
  • Ghamrawi W; Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK.
  • Mazomenos E; Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK.
  • Curtis N; The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks' Hospital, London, UK.
  • Collins JW; Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK.
  • Sridhar A; The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks' Hospital, London, UK.
  • Kelly J; Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK.
  • Stoyanov D; Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK.
  • Francis NK; Department of General Surgey, Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, UK.
Br J Surg ; 111(1)2024 Jan 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37951600
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery is increasingly used worldwide to treat many different diseases. The robot is controlled by a surgeon, which may give them greater precision and better outcomes for patients. However, surgeons' robotic skills should be assessed properly, to make sure patients are safe, to improve feedback and for exam assessments for certification to indicate competency. This should be done by experts, using assessment tools that have been agreed upon and proven to work. AIM: This review's aim was to find and explain which training and examination tools are best for assessing surgeons' robotic skills and to find out what gaps remain requiring future research. METHOD: This review searched for all available studies looking at assessment tools in robotic surgery and summarized their findings using several different methods. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION: Two hundred and forty-seven studies were looked at, finding many assessment tools. Further research is needed for operation-specific and automatic assessment tools before they should be used in the clinical setting.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Robotics / Laparoscopy / Robotic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Surg Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Robotics / Laparoscopy / Robotic Surgical Procedures Type of study: Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Br J Surg Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom