Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of pretransplant minimal residual disease in patients with multiple myeloma and a very good partial response or better receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Pasvolsky, Oren; Pasyar, Sarah; Bassett, Roland L; Khan, Hina N; Tanner, Mark R; Bashir, Qaiser; Srour, Samer; Saini, Neeraj; Lin, Paul; Ramdial, Jeremy; Nieto, Yago; Lee, Hans C; Patel, Krina K; Kebriaei, Partow; Thomas, Sheeba K; Weber, Donna M; Orlowski, Robert Z; Shpall, Elizabeth J; Champlin, Richard E; Qazilbash, Muzaffar H.
Affiliation
  • Pasvolsky O; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Pasyar S; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Bassett RL; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Khan HN; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Tanner MR; Department of Hematology/Oncology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Bashir Q; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Srour S; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Saini N; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Lin P; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Ramdial J; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Nieto Y; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Lee HC; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Patel KK; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Kebriaei P; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Thomas SK; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Weber DM; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Orlowski RZ; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Shpall EJ; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Champlin RE; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Qazilbash MH; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cancer ; 130(9): 1663-1672, 2024 May 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127583
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The prognostic significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) status before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has not been clearly elucidated.

METHODS:

Retrospective single-center study of adult MM patients who achieved ≥very good partial response (VGPR) after induction therapy from 2015 to 2021 received upfront autoHCT and had available pretransplant MRD status by next-generation flow cytometry. The cohort was divided into pretransplant MRD-negative (MRDneg) and MRD-positive (MRDpos) groups.

RESULTS:

A total of 733 patients were included in our analysis; 425 were MRDneg and 308 MRDpos at autoHCT. In the MRDpos group, more patients had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (48% vs. 38%, respectively; p = .025), whereas fewer patients achieved ≥CR before autoHCT (14% vs. 40%; p < .001). At day 100 after autoHCT, 37% of the MRDpos versus 71% of the MRDneg achieved ≥CR, and at best posttransplant response 65% versus 88% achieved ≥CR, respectively. After a median follow-up of 27.6 months (range, 0.7-82.3), the median PFS was significantly shorter for patients in the MRDpos group compared to the MRDneg group 48.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-80.5) versus 80.1 months (95% CI, 0.5-80.1), respectively (p < .001). There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (p = .41). Pretransplant MRDpos status was predictive of shorter PFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.31-2.46; p < .001). The impact of pretransplant MRD status was retained in most of the examined subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients achieving ≥VGPR to induction, pretransplant MRDpos status was associated with a lower CR rate after autoHCT and a shorter PFS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Multiple Myeloma Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Cancer Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Multiple Myeloma Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Cancer Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States