Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phenolic compounds in water: Review of occurrence, risk, and retention by membrane technology.
Ladeia Ramos, Ramatisa; Rezende Moreira, Victor; Santos Amaral, Miriam Cristina.
Affiliation
  • Ladeia Ramos R; Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, P.O. Box 1294, ZIP 30.270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: lramos.eng@gmail.com.
  • Rezende Moreira V; Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, P.O. Box 1294, ZIP 30.270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
  • Santos Amaral MC; Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais, P.O. Box 1294, ZIP 30.270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: miriam@desa.ufmg.br.
J Environ Manage ; 351: 119772, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38147771
ABSTRACT
Phenolic compounds are one of the main contributors to water source contamination worldwide. In this review, the data collected on Elsevier, Scopus, and Pubmed, considering papers published between 2000 and 2023, showed more than 60 different phenols have been identified in water matrix (<0.065-179,000,000 ng L-1). The highest concentration reported was in surface water canals in India. The most recurrent and studied compound was bisphenol A (n = 93) in concentrations ranging from 0.45 to 2,970,000 ng L-1. The solid phase extraction (HBL Oasis cartridge) and methanol as solvent was the method of pre-concentration most used followed by gas chromatography for the determination of phenols in water samples. The importance of drinking water guidelines incorporating more phenolic compounds was emphasized given the variety of these compounds quantified in water matrix. The human health risk assessment (HRA) was performed for the min-max concentrations of the pollutants reported in the literature. High HRA even at the lowest concentrations for 2-nitrophenol, 2,6-dichlorophenol, 3,4,5-trichlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol, and 2,4-dinitrophenol was recognized. The cancer risk estimated was considered possible for 3-methylphenol, 2,4-dimethylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, pentachlorophenol, and 2,4-dinitrophenol in the highest concentrations. The in-depth discussion of mechanisms, advantages, challenges, and carbon footprint of membrane technologies in water treatment and phenols retention demonstrated the great potential and trends for the production of safe drinking water, highlighting reverse osmosis, as a mature technology, and membrane distillation, as an emergent technology.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Pollutants, Chemical / Drinking Water Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Environ Manage Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water Pollutants, Chemical / Drinking Water Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Environ Manage Year: 2024 Type: Article