Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Racial and ethnic disparities in self-reported general and mental health status among colorectal cancer survivors: impact of sociodemographic factors and implications for mortality-a SEER-CAHPS study.
Yoon, Paul S; Navarro, Stephanie; Barzi, Afsaneh; Ochoa-Dominguez, Carol Y; Arizpe, Angel; Farias, Albert J.
Affiliation
  • Yoon PS; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Navarro S; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Barzi A; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Ochoa-Dominguez CY; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Arizpe A; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Farias AJ; Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA. albertfa@usc.edu.
Qual Life Res ; 33(3): 793-804, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153617
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Patient-reported outcomes are recognized as strong predictors of cancer prognosis. This study examines racial and ethnic differences in self-reported general health status (GHS) and mental health status (MHS) among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of Medicare beneficiaries between 1998 and 2011 with non-distant CRC who underwent curative resection and completed a Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey within 6-36 months of CRC diagnosis. Analysis included a stepwise logistic regression to examine the relationship between race and ethnicity and fair or poor health status, and a proportional hazards model to determine the mortality risk associated with fair or poor health status.

RESULTS:

Of 1867 patients, Non-Hispanic Black (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.28) and Hispanic (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.04-2.11) patients had higher unadjusted odds for fair or poor GHS compared to Non-Hispanic White patients, also Hispanic patients had higher unadjusted odds for fair or poor MHS (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.23-3.01). These relationships persisted after adjusting for clinical factors but were attenuated after subsequently adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Compared to those reporting good to excellent health status, patients reporting fair or poor GHS or MHS had an increased mortality risk (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.31-1.76 and OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.34-1.99, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Racial and ethnic differences in GHS and MHS reported after CRC diagnosis are mainly driven by sociodemographic factors and reflect a higher risk of mortality. Identifying unmet biopsychosocial needs is necessary to promote equitable care.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Cancer Survivors Limits: Aged / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Qual Life Res Journal subject: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Colorectal Neoplasms / Cancer Survivors Limits: Aged / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Qual Life Res Journal subject: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States