Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Cooling of Lidocaine with Epinephrine on the Anesthetic Success of Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Primary Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Aggarwal, Vivek; Singla, Mamta; Saatchi, Masoud; Gupta, Alpa; Hasija, Mukesh; Meena, Babita.
Affiliation
  • Aggarwal V; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jamia Millia Islamia, Faculty of Dentistry, New Delhi, India.
  • Singla M; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SGT Dental College, Gurgaon, India.
  • Saatchi M; Department of Endodontics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Gupta A; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabaad, India.
  • Hasija M; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jamia Millia Islamia, Faculty of Dentistry, New Delhi, India.
  • Meena B; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jamia Millia Islamia, Faculty of Dentistry, New Delhi, India.
Eur Endod J ; 8(4): 239-245, 2023 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38219038
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of cooling a 2% lidocaine solution with 1 200,000 epinephrine, administered as a supplementary intraligamentary injection to overcome a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).

METHODS:

The study was preceded by a pilot study to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of plain lidocaine solutions given as intraligamentary injections. In the subsequent randomized clinical trial, one hundred and thirty-eight patients received IANB with 2% lidocaine with 1 80,000 epinephrine for endodontic man- agement of a mandibular molar with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Eighty-eight patients reported pain greater than 54 mm on a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS) were categorized as unsuccessful anesthesia. These patients received either of the following intraligamentary injections 2% lidocaine with 1 200,000 epinephrine at room temperature; or 2% lidocaine with 1 200,000 epinephrine at 4°C. Anes- thetic success was again evaluated after re-initiation of the endodontic treatment. The heart rates of the patients were measured using a finger pulse oximeter. The categorical success rates were statistically analyzed with the Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate measurements were analyzed using a t-test.

RESULTS:

The intraligamentary injections with anesthetic solutions at room temperature presented a suc- cess rate of 59.1%, while the injections with a solution at 4°C gave a success rate of 52.27%. There were no significant differences between the success rates of the groups (χ2=0.41, p=0.52). Regarding the heart rates, there were no differences between the two solutions at baseline (T=1.2, p=0.2) or after injections (T=0.64, p=0.52).

CONCLUSION:

Reducing the temperature of 2% lidocaine with 1 200,000 epinephrine to 4°C does not affect the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injections, given after a failed primary IANB. (EEJ-2023-03-044).
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Lidocaine / Nerve Block Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Endod J Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: India

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Lidocaine / Nerve Block Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Endod J Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: India