Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of deep learning with bivariate models for genomic prediction of sow lifetime productivity-related traits.
Hong, Joon-Ki; Kim, Yong-Min; Cho, Eun-Seok; Lee, Jae-Bong; Kim, Young-Sin; Park, Hee-Bok.
Affiliation
  • Hong JK; Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.
  • Kim YM; Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.
  • Cho ES; Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.
  • Lee JB; Korea Zoonosis Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54531, Korea.
  • Kim YS; Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea.
  • Park HB; Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea.
Anim Biosci ; 37(4): 622-630, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38228129
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Pig breeders cannot obtain phenotypic information at the time of selection for sow lifetime productivity (SLP). They would benefit from obtaining genetic information of candidate sows. Genomic data interpreted using deep learning (DL) techniques could contribute to the genetic improvement of SLP to maximize farm profitability because DL models capture nonlinear genetic effects such as dominance and epistasis more efficiently than conventional genomic prediction methods based on linear models. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of DL for the genomic prediction of two SLP-related traits; lifetime number of litters (LNL) and lifetime pig production (LPP).

METHODS:

Two bivariate DL models, convolutional neural network (CNN) and local convolutional neural network (LCNN), were compared with conventional bivariate linear models (i.e., genomic best linear unbiased prediction, Bayesian ridge regression, Bayes A, and Bayes B). Phenotype and pedigree data were collected from 40,011 sows that had husbandry records. Among these, 3,652 pigs were genotyped using the PorcineSNP60K BeadChip.

RESULTS:

The best predictive correlation for LNL was obtained with CNN (0.28), followed by LCNN (0.26) and conventional linear models (approximately 0.21). For LPP, the best predictive correlation was also obtained with CNN (0.29), followed by LCNN (0.27) and conventional linear models (approximately 0.25). A similar trend was observed with the mean squared error of prediction for the SLP traits.

CONCLUSION:

This study provides an example of a CNN that can outperform against the linear model-based genomic prediction approaches when the nonlinear interaction components are important because LNL and LPP exhibited strong epistatic interaction components. Additionally, our results suggest that applying bivariate DL models could also contribute to the prediction accuracy by utilizing the genetic correlation between LNL and LPP.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Anim Biosci Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Anim Biosci Year: 2024 Type: Article