Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The neonatal adverse event severity scale: current status, a stakeholders' assessment, and future perspectives.
Allegaert, Karel; Salaets, Thomas; Wade, Kelly; Short, Mary A; Ward, Robert; Singh, Kanwaljit; Turner, Mark A; Davis, Jonathan M; Lewis, Tamorah.
Affiliation
  • Allegaert K; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Salaets T; Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Wade K; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Short MA; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Ward R; Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Singh K; Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Turner MA; International Neonatal Consortium, Communications Workgroup, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Davis JM; Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
  • Lewis T; International Neonatal Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Front Pediatr ; 11: 1340607, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38259600
ABSTRACT
To support informed decisions on drug registration and prescription, clinical trials need tools to assess the efficacy and safety signals related to a given therapeutic intervention. Standardized assessment facilitates reproducibility of results. Furthermore, it enables weighted comparison between different interventions, instrumental to facilitate shared decisions. When focused on adverse events in clinical trials, tools are needed to assess seriousness, causality and severity. As part of such a toolbox, the international Neonatal Consortium (INC) developed a first version of the neonatal adverse event severity scale (NAESS). This version underwent subsequent validation in retro-and prospective trials to assess its applicability and impact on the inter-observer variability. Regulators, sponsors and academic researchers also reported on the use of the NAESS in regulatory documents, trial protocols and study reports. In this paper, we aim to report on the trajectory, current status and impact of the NAESS score, on how stakeholders within INC assess its relevance, and on perspectives to further develop this tool.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Front Pediatr Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Front Pediatr Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Belgium