Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-dose pulse methylprednisolone vs. dexamethasone standard therapy for severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia: Efficacy assessment in a retrospective single-centre experience from Malaysia.
Soo, C I; Poon, K V; Ayub, A; You, H W; Tan, C X; Loh, K J J; Eng, C C H; Sia, L C; Wong, C K.
Affiliation
  • Soo CI; University Malaya Medical Center, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. scianray@gmail.com.
  • Poon KV; University Malaya Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Ayub A; University Malaya Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • You HW; University Malaya Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Tan CX; University Malaya Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Loh KJJ; University Malaya Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Eng CCH; University Malaya Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Sia LC; University Malaya Medical Center, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Wong CK; University Malaya Medical Center, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Med J Malaysia ; 79(1): 15-20, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38287752
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The use of dexamethasone (DXM) has been associated with decreased mortality in the patients with hypoxemia during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, while the outcomes with methylprednisolone (MTP) have been mixed. This real-life study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 who were treated with high doses of MTP. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study enrolled hospitalised patients between May 2021 and August 2021, aged 18 years and above, with severe respiratory failure defined by a ratio of oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SF ratio) of less than 235. The treatment protocol involved administering high-dose MTP for 3 days, followed by DXM, and the outcomes were compared with those of patients who received DXM alone (total treatment duration of 10 days for both groups).

RESULTS:

A total of 99 patients were enrolled, with 79 (79.8%) receiving pulse MTP therapy and 20 (20.2%) being treated with DXM only. The SF ratio significantly improved from a mean of 144.49 (±45.16) at baseline to 208 (±85.19) at 72 hours (p < 0.05), with a mean difference of 63.51 (p < 0.001) in patients who received ≤750 mg of MTP. Additionally, in patients who received >750 mg of MTP, the SF ratio improved from a baseline mean of 130.39 (±34.53) to 208.44 (±86.61) at 72 hours (p < 0.05), with a mean difference of 78.05 (p = 0.001). In contrast, patients who received DXM only demonstrated an SF ratio of 132.85 (±44.1) at baseline, which changed minimally to 133.35 (±44.4) at 72 hours (p = 0.33), with a mean difference of 0.50 (p = 0.972). The incidence of nosocomial infection was higher in the MTP group compared with the DXM group (40.5% vs. 35%, p = 0.653), with a relative risk of 1.16 (95% CI 0.60-2.23).

CONCLUSION:

MTP did not demonstrate a significant reduction in intubation or intensive care unit admissions. Although a high dose of MTP improved gas exchange in patients with severe and critical COVID-19, it did not provide an overall mortality benefit compared to standard treatment.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia / Respiratory Insufficiency / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Med J Malaysia Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Malaysia
Search on Google
Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia / Respiratory Insufficiency / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Med J Malaysia Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Malaysia